[Wicket-user] Re: Remove a Behavior?
That would work except that I still have the problem of removing the
behavior from the list while the list is being iterated. Also, this uses
the api in a way that doesn't match up with the wicket documentation,
and I know that will cause some grief down the road.
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On second thought... can't you use the detach method of behaviours?
This has the same effect as onEndRequest.
Eelco
On 1/26/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That would be great. I would prefer my custom components know as little
as possible about what the behavior needs to do.
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
If you work with custom components, you could override onEndRequest
and do the work there. I thought that this issue might come up some
time, and kind of expected we might want to implement life cycle call
backs (onBeginRequest, onEndRequest) on behaviours some day. I didn't
implement it right away, as I first wanted us to get across a use case
where this would actually be wanted. This might be such a use case.
Eelco
On 1/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May be we could implement a class Behaviors which provdes an interface
similar to List which provides "secure" implementations of e.g.
remove().
Juergen
On 1/26/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I would like to do have the behavior remove itself by calling
component.getBehaviors ().remove (this); in its rendered() method (this
is the last method called on the Behavior during the request cycle,
right?). I don't believe this is safe since the behavior list is being
iterated at that point. Any ideas how and where this can be done?
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It should be possible. Component.getBehaviors().remove(myBehavior)
Juergen
On 1/26/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran into the same question yesterday.
Usecase:
singleton attributemodifier.
in css:
.hidden {
display : none;
}
in html:
in Java:
class MyModifiers {
private static AttributeModifier hider = new ClassAttributeModifier();
public static void hide(Component comp) {
comp.add(hider);
}
public static void show(Component comp) {
comp.remove(hider);
}
}
class MyPage {
MyPage() {
MarkupContainer foo = new MarkupContainer("foo");
MarkupContainer bar = new MarkupContainer("bar");
if(somecondition) {
MyModifiers.hide(foo);
MyModifiers.show(bar);
} else {
MyModifiers.show(foo);
MyModifiers.hide(bar);
}
}
}
On 1/26/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really understand how/ where/ when you would do the add/
remove operation. However, I can't think of anything against the
option of removing behaviors either.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes my behavior is smart enough not to do its transform if the
RequestTarget isn't of the right type, but what I really want to do is
add the behavior only if the RequestTarget is a ComponentRequestTarget,
and then remove it once that request cycle is done. That way it is only
there if it is needed, and not by default, and not when the user does a
full page refresh for the next request. Like you said, it can be coded
around. But there is a use for removing behaviors, and it would be
pleasant to have it supported :). Should I open an rfe?
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think the best you can do is make your behavior smart enough so that
it doesn't do anything after it did it's transform.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to remove a behavior from a component? I have created a
MarkupEscapeTransformer and would like to remove it after the transform
has occurred. If it is possible, where in the request cycle should it
happen?
thanks,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for
[Wicket-user] Re: Remove a Behavior?
That would be great. I would prefer my custom components know as little
as possible about what the behavior needs to do.
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
If you work with custom components, you could override onEndRequest
and do the work there. I thought that this issue might come up some
time, and kind of expected we might want to implement life cycle call
backs (onBeginRequest, onEndRequest) on behaviours some day. I didn't
implement it right away, as I first wanted us to get across a use case
where this would actually be wanted. This might be such a use case.
Eelco
On 1/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May be we could implement a class Behaviors which provdes an interface
similar to List which provides "secure" implementations of e.g.
remove().
Juergen
On 1/26/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I would like to do have the behavior remove itself by calling
component.getBehaviors ().remove (this); in its rendered() method (this
is the last method called on the Behavior during the request cycle,
right?). I don't believe this is safe since the behavior list is being
iterated at that point. Any ideas how and where this can be done?
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It should be possible. Component.getBehaviors().remove(myBehavior)
Juergen
On 1/26/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran into the same question yesterday.
Usecase:
singleton attributemodifier.
in css:
.hidden {
display : none;
}
in html:
in Java:
class MyModifiers {
private static AttributeModifier hider = new ClassAttributeModifier();
public static void hide(Component comp) {
comp.add(hider);
}
public static void show(Component comp) {
comp.remove(hider);
}
}
class MyPage {
MyPage() {
MarkupContainer foo = new MarkupContainer("foo");
MarkupContainer bar = new MarkupContainer("bar");
if(somecondition) {
MyModifiers.hide(foo);
MyModifiers.show(bar);
} else {
MyModifiers.show(foo);
MyModifiers.hide(bar);
}
}
}
On 1/26/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really understand how/ where/ when you would do the add/
remove operation. However, I can't think of anything against the
option of removing behaviors either.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes my behavior is smart enough not to do its transform if the
RequestTarget isn't of the right type, but what I really want to do is
add the behavior only if the RequestTarget is a ComponentRequestTarget,
and then remove it once that request cycle is done. That way it is only
there if it is needed, and not by default, and not when the user does a
full page refresh for the next request. Like you said, it can be coded
around. But there is a use for removing behaviors, and it would be
pleasant to have it supported :). Should I open an rfe?
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think the best you can do is make your behavior smart enough so that
it doesn't do anything after it did it's transform.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to remove a behavior from a component? I have created a
MarkupEscapeTransformer and would like to remove it after the transform
has occurred. If it is possible, where in the request cycle should it
happen?
thanks,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk
[Wicket-user] Re: Remove a Behavior?
What I would like to do have the behavior remove itself by calling
component.getBehaviors ().remove (this); in its rendered() method (this
is the last method called on the Behavior during the request cycle,
right?). I don't believe this is safe since the behavior list is being
iterated at that point. Any ideas how and where this can be done?
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It should be possible. Component.getBehaviors().remove(myBehavior)
Juergen
On 1/26/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran into the same question yesterday.
Usecase:
singleton attributemodifier.
in css:
.hidden {
display : none;
}
in html:
in Java:
class MyModifiers {
private static AttributeModifier hider = new ClassAttributeModifier();
public static void hide(Component comp) {
comp.add(hider);
}
public static void show(Component comp) {
comp.remove(hider);
}
}
class MyPage {
MyPage() {
MarkupContainer foo = new MarkupContainer("foo");
MarkupContainer bar = new MarkupContainer("bar");
if(somecondition) {
MyModifiers.hide(foo);
MyModifiers.show(bar);
} else {
MyModifiers.show(foo);
MyModifiers.hide(bar);
}
}
}
On 1/26/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really understand how/ where/ when you would do the add/
remove operation. However, I can't think of anything against the
option of removing behaviors either.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes my behavior is smart enough not to do its transform if the
RequestTarget isn't of the right type, but what I really want to do is
add the behavior only if the RequestTarget is a ComponentRequestTarget,
and then remove it once that request cycle is done. That way it is only
there if it is needed, and not by default, and not when the user does a
full page refresh for the next request. Like you said, it can be coded
around. But there is a use for removing behaviors, and it would be
pleasant to have it supported :). Should I open an rfe?
thx,
jim
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think the best you can do is make your behavior smart enough so that
it doesn't do anything after it did it's transform.
Eelco
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to remove a behavior from a component? I have created a
MarkupEscapeTransformer and would like to remove it after the transform
has occurred. If it is possible, where in the request cycle should it
happen?
thanks,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Living a wicket life...
Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst
Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us
[Wicket-user] Re: Remove a Behavior?
Yes my behavior is smart enough not to do its transform if the RequestTarget isn't of the right type, but what I really want to do is add the behavior only if the RequestTarget is a ComponentRequestTarget, and then remove it once that request cycle is done. That way it is only there if it is needed, and not by default, and not when the user does a full page refresh for the next request. Like you said, it can be coded around. But there is a use for removing behaviors, and it would be pleasant to have it supported :). Should I open an rfe? thx, jim Eelco Hillenius wrote: I think the best you can do is make your behavior smart enough so that it doesn't do anything after it did it's transform. Eelco On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible to remove a behavior from a component? I have created a MarkupEscapeTransformer and would like to remove it after the transform has occurred. If it is possible, where in the request cycle should it happen? thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Remove a Behavior?
Is it possible to remove a behavior from a component? I have created a MarkupEscapeTransformer and would like to remove it after the transform has occurred. If it is possible, where in the request cycle should it happen? thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: custom ComponentRequestTarget: where to escape markup
It seems you need to set that for the whole application and I would like it only for one request using a ComponentRequestTarget. I guess I could just create a transformer behavior and attach it to the component. I was just looking for an easy way to intercept the response and escape the &'s in the wicket Link hrefs. thx, jim Eelco Hillenius wrote: wicket.IResponseFilter ? Eelco On 1/25/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Isn't that postprocessor thing Johan coded not something that can be used? I forgot what it is called... Eelco On 1/25/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the requestcycleprocessor has a requestcodingstrategy. But be aware it will cover on wicket generated hrefs and src. Juergen On 1/26/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately no. Rico's xml envelop wraps the html returned by wicket and then looks up the appropriate dom element and does a replace with innerHTML. If I could just call Strings.escapeMarkup on the rendered response, that would be sufficient. Where would be the best place to do that? thx, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: CDATA is no option? Juergen On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a custom ComponentRequestTarget for wrapping response in the envelope rico expects. I need to escape the markup generated by wicket, especially the hrefs, or the browser's (ff 1.5) xml parser barfs. Where would I do this? thx, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: custom ComponentRequestTarget: where to escape markup
Unfortunately no. Rico's xml envelop wraps the html returned by wicket and then looks up the appropriate dom element and does a replace with innerHTML. If I could just call Strings.escapeMarkup on the rendered response, that would be sufficient. Where would be the best place to do that? thx, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: CDATA is no option? Juergen On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a custom ComponentRequestTarget for wrapping response in the envelope rico expects. I need to escape the markup generated by wicket, especially the hrefs, or the browser's (ff 1.5) xml parser barfs. Where would I do this? thx, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] custom ComponentRequestTarget: where to escape markup
Hi, I have a custom ComponentRequestTarget for wrapping response in the envelope rico expects. I need to escape the markup generated by wicket, especially the hrefs, or the browser's (ff 1.5) xml parser barfs. Where would I do this? thx, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Problem with panel in of another panel
Hi Juergen,
I meant adding a panel to itself, which i now see is prevented as a
degenerate case in MarkupContainer. I can see a couple of use cases for
doing this, though. Obviously, building views that are by their nature
recursive, such as trees, or views that are repeating. In my case, I
would like to pick href and event attributes out of a Panel's body and
use them to initialize script objects in that panel's head, and replace
the attribute values in the body with method calls on those script
objects. One way to do this would be to add that panel to its own
, transform the markup from the panel's first rendering
into javascript, then transform attribute values in the body to call the
script objects. This actually simplifies my current setup where I need a
separate xml MarkupContainer which wicket renders and then transforms
into script.
Does get rendered after the part and before
the behavior gets to do its work? If so, I could probably just do this
all in one pass of the transformer.
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I've implemented on my latop a version which applies the "scope"
approach. I called it "skipDuplicates" though which is a boolean. It
gets evaluated before the headers body gets rendered. The advantage is
that we save some performance compared to an approach which first
renders the header part and only than evaluates it if the output
should be contributed or not. The latter approach I think is the more
flexible one though. The tags attribute could pre-set the components
variable. And the performance penalty isn't probably that bad, if we
can do "if no scope attribute present, than skip duplicates".
Jim: what exactly do you mean by "it would be good if we could add a
panel to a panel"? You can add any component to a
MarkupContainer/Panel which of course includes panels as well. Am I
missing something?
Juergen
On 1/25/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That might be better -- keep it in the same namespace.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
or support multipe .
originally i was thinking of setting this key in java somewhere which
would make it much more flexible. but if only class/instance is required
then ading an attr to wicket:head is probably easier.
-Igor
On 1/24/06, *Jim McLaughlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Maybe the components inside wicket:head can have a wicket:scope
attribute which can be assigned either class or instance, with the
default being class.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> can we make it so there is some sort of a string key we provide
for each
> contribution. it can default to the component.class.getName()
which is
> the default currently right?
>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 1/24/06, *Jim McLaughlin* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > Are you saying your Panel inside is the same
but the
> > XSLT produces different output?
>
> It is a different panel. I am adding a panel that gets XSLT
transformed
> to the NodePanel of the Tree. I hadn't thought about adding a
Panel to
> itself. Is this possible? I can see some interesting uses for
that.
>
> Right now my needs are simpler. I just need the wicket:head
for every
> /instance/ of a Panel to be contributed, instead of once per
class. I
> will open an RFE.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If that is the case than I don't have
> > an immediate answer. We are using the Component (Panel)
class to
> make
> > sure that the panels head is contributed only once. Could
you please
> > open an RFE for it. Thanks
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> > On 1/24/06, Jim McLaughlin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>I am building a Tree derived from
wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. I
> have
> >>my own custom NodePanel. Each NodePanel in the Tree needs to
> contribute
> >>some unique
[Wicket-user] Re: Problem with panel in of another panel
That might be better -- keep it in the same namespace. Igor Vaynberg wrote: or support multipe . originally i was thinking of setting this key in java somewhere which would make it much more flexible. but if only class/instance is required then ading an attr to wicket:head is probably easier. -Igor On 1/24/06, *Jim McLaughlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Maybe the components inside wicket:head can have a wicket:scope attribute which can be assigned either class or instance, with the default being class. Igor Vaynberg wrote: > can we make it so there is some sort of a string key we provide for each > contribution. it can default to the component.class.getName() which is > the default currently right? > > -Igor > > > On 1/24/06, *Jim McLaughlin* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > Are you saying your Panel inside is the same but the > > XSLT produces different output? > > It is a different panel. I am adding a panel that gets XSLT transformed > to the NodePanel of the Tree. I hadn't thought about adding a Panel to > itself. Is this possible? I can see some interesting uses for that. > > Right now my needs are simpler. I just need the wicket:head for every > /instance/ of a Panel to be contributed, instead of once per class. I > will open an RFE. > > Thanks, > > jim > > > > > > > If that is the case than I don't have > > an immediate answer. We are using the Component (Panel) class to > make > > sure that the panels head is contributed only once. Could you please > > open an RFE for it. Thanks > > > > Juergen > > > > On 1/24/06, Jim McLaughlin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >>I am building a Tree derived from wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. I > have > >>my own custom NodePanel. Each NodePanel in the Tree needs to > contribute > >>some unique
[Wicket-user] Re: Problem with panel in of another panel
Maybe the components inside wicket:head can have a wicket:scope
attribute which can be assigned either class or instance, with the
default being class.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
can we make it so there is some sort of a string key we provide for each
contribution. it can default to the component.class.getName() which is
the default currently right?
-Igor
On 1/24/06, *Jim McLaughlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> Are you saying your Panel inside is the same but the
> XSLT produces different output?
It is a different panel. I am adding a panel that gets XSLT transformed
to the NodePanel of the Tree. I hadn't thought about adding a Panel to
itself. Is this possible? I can see some interesting uses for that.
Right now my needs are simpler. I just need the wicket:head for every
/instance/ of a Panel to be contributed, instead of once per class. I
will open an RFE.
Thanks,
jim
If that is the case than I don't have
> an immediate answer. We are using the Component (Panel) class to
make
> sure that the panels head is contributed only once. Could you please
> open an RFE for it. Thanks
>
> Juergen
>
> On 1/24/06, Jim McLaughlin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>I am building a Tree derived from wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. I
have
>>my own custom NodePanel. Each NodePanel in the Tree needs to
contribute
>>some unique
[Wicket-user] Re: Problem with panel in of another panel
Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Are you saying your Panel inside is the same but the XSLT produces different output? It is a different panel. I am adding a panel that gets XSLT transformed to the NodePanel of the Tree. I hadn't thought about adding a Panel to itself. Is this possible? I can see some interesting uses for that. Right now my needs are simpler. I just need the wicket:head for every /instance/ of a Panel to be contributed, instead of once per class. I will open an RFE. Thanks, jim If that is the case than I don't have an immediate answer. We are using the Component (Panel) class to make sure that the panels head is contributed only once. Could you please open an RFE for it. Thanks Juergen On 1/24/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am building a Tree derived from wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. I have my own custom NodePanel. Each NodePanel in the Tree needs to contribute some unique
[Wicket-user] Problem with panel in of another panel
Hi, I am building a Tree derived from wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. I have my own custom NodePanel. Each NodePanel in the Tree needs to contribute some unique
[Wicket-user] Re: rico xml response envelope
I am using the ComponentRequestTarget to render my component, using the
ajax prototype example as a guide. Implementing an IRequestTarget just
to set the content type seems like too much work. On the other hand,
having the RequestTarget create the xml envelope rico expects would get
rid of my ugly hack of detecting what kind of target is performing the
rendering inside the RicoEnvelopeBehavior. (as a side question, how
would I have a behavior remove itself from a component after rendering?)
Maybe this could also permit multiple, non-nested components to be
rendered in the same request.
Would the implementation of respond look something like this:
/**
* @see wicket.IRequestTarget#respond(wicket.RequestCycle)
*/
public void respond(final RequestCycle requestCycle)
{
// set content-type
final Response res = requestCycle.getResponse ();
res.setContentType ("text/xml");
// Initialize temporary variables
Page page = component.getPage();
if (page != null)
{
page.startComponentRender(component);
}
// Let component render itself
if (component instanceof Page)
{
// Use the default Page request target, if component is
a Page
new
PageRequestTarget((Page)component).respond(requestCycle);
}
else
{
// Start outer Rico Envelope
res.write ("");
// start component rico envelope
// Assumes wicket:id and dom id are the same
res.write (""
// Render the component
component.doRender();
// close component rico env
res.write ("");
//close outer rico env
res.write ("");
}
if (page != null)
{
page.endComponentRender(component);
}
}
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I'm currently trying to (performance) improve the header
implementation and AjaxHandler and IBehaviourListener are getting into
my way all the time. The more I think about them the less I like them.
I like the ajax prototype implemention in the examples much better.
And I agree with you (Johan) that a RicoComponentRequestTarget would
be my choice as well.
Juergen
On 1/21/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What call are you using to render that component?
because now the ComponentRequestTarget doesn't set any headers i think .
You could implement youre own request target that does this.
and in the response method:
public void respond(final RequestCycle requestCycle)
{
<<<<<<<<<<<<<< set the headers here.. should work.
// Initialize temporary variables
Page page = component.getPage();
if (page != null)
{
page.startComponentRender(component);
}
// Let component render itself
if (component instanceof Page)
{
// Use the default Page request target, if component is a Page
new
PageRequestTarget((Page)component).respond(requestCycle);
}
else
{
// Render the component
component.doRender();
}
if (page != null)
{
page.endComponentRender(component);
}
}
We have to see if we must have build in support for this. Or that it has to
be done by something else like the AjaxHandler or something?
johan
On 1/21/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm experimenting with Ajax component rendering using the openrico
library. rico expects the response to be wrapped in xml, ie
I created a transformer to do this, which works fine, but I also need
to set the mime type to "text/xml". I saw this discussed on the list a
few months back and the consensus was to override the getMarkupType
method, but the object I am ajax rendering is a Panel, and that method
is final. Also, I only want the mime type to be text/xml when ajax
rendering is being performed, and text/html otherwise.
I tried setting it with RequestCycle.get ().getResponse
().setContentType ("text/xml"); but this didn't work. Viewing the
response with LiveHTTPHeaders didn't even show a Content-Type in the
header. I set the content type in the transform method of my
transformer, so maybe this is the problem. Where is the right place to
set the content type?
thx,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsor
[Wicket-user] rico xml response envelope
Hi,
I'm experimenting with Ajax component rendering using the openrico
library. rico expects the response to be wrapped in xml, ie
I created a transformer to do this, which works fine, but I also need
to set the mime type to "text/xml". I saw this discussed on the list a
few months back and the consensus was to override the getMarkupType
method, but the object I am ajax rendering is a Panel, and that method
is final. Also, I only want the mime type to be text/xml when ajax
rendering is being performed, and text/html otherwise.
I tried setting it with RequestCycle.get ().getResponse
().setContentType ("text/xml"); but this didn't work. Viewing the
response with LiveHTTPHeaders didn't even show a Content-Type in the
header. I set the content type in the transform method of my
transformer, so maybe this is the problem. Where is the right place to
set the content type?
thx,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: need advice extending wicket-contrib-gmap
This looks great -- very well thought out! unfortunately I'm pretty far into my xslt version and I have a tight end of the month deadline for my current demo project. The xslt is nice in that you get all the js out of your java code, enabling more flexible generation and independent testing of rendering. But xslt is pretty unkind on the eyes. I will be stealing some of your ideas though :) jim Iulian-Corneliu Costan wrote: I did it finally, it was my issue, thanks and sorry for troubling you. Jim, let me know if it is good enough for you. iulian On 1/15/06, *Eelco Hillenius * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: I haven't seen any commits comming by. We have a special mailing list for that, that should trigger any commits. Eelco On 1/15/06, Iulian-Corneliu Costan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > Hi again, > > I've finished gmap component refactoring and basically now you can add any > wicket component (even panel and border, but not a wicket page) to a gmarker > with one condition: the name of your component has to be "gmarkerInfo". > When user clicks on gmarker icon a new ajax request is sent in order to > render and display the content of info window. I updated the examples and > everything works pretty nice in Firefox, i have to test it in IE as well. > > But I have some issues committing the code, sometimes I cannot update from > cvs, now it keeps telling me that i dont have write permission. Eelco or > someone else, would you like to double check what happened. > > iulian > > > On 1/4/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi Iulian, > > Do you have some ideas for making the component aware of the wicket > > lifecycle? I want map events such as clicking on a marker to call events > > on other wicket components, such as Links, Forms, or Behaviors. Right > > now I am working on creating an xml container for gmap, which thanks to > > Juergen we can transform into javascript using xslt. I would be happy to > > hear what your thoughts are. > > > > jim > > > > Iulian-Corneliu COSTAN wrote: > > > GMap component is not aware of any wicket lifecycle, it uses only plain > > > JavaScript. I needed only this basic functionality long time ago, but > > > now if people are interested in this component I can make it better. > > > > > > keep in touch ... > > > > > > iulian > > > > > > On 12/29/05, *Jim McLaughlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > > > We want to include a google map in our webapp and use it as a > navigation > > > tool. Can someone advise us how to add a Link or AjaxHandler to a > > > GMarker? The problem is that the gmap components are rendered as a > > > javascript blob outside of the wicket rendering process. I guess the > > > bigger question is howto make wicket render components as > javascript. > > > I've been puzzling over how to have a ListView of GMarkers render to > the > > > proper javascript, with Links or AjaxHandlers passed to > > > GEvent.addListener (...). > > > > > > thanks, > > > jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through > > > log files > > > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > > > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD > SPLUNK! > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click <http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click> > > > < > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click <http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click>> > > > ___ > > > Wicket-user mailing list > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Wicket-user@list
[Wicket-user] Re: Add panel in wicket:head of another panel fails
I have created issue 1401812 "Add nested components to wicket:head fails" for this. The exception occurs without the transformer. The transformer is working great, btw. thx, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: On 1/10/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm using the XsltTransformerBehavior created by Juergen last week to transform xml to javascript in panelA. The excepton occurs without the transformer? If I add panelA to panelB in panelB's wicket:head, I get an exception "The markup stream of the component should be known by now, but isn't:" for the first component nested inside panelA. This does not happen if I add panelA inside the wicket:panel tags of panelB (I am not adding panelA inside of
[Wicket-user] Add panel in wicket:head of another panel fails
Hi, I'm using the XsltTransformerBehavior created by Juergen last week to transform xml to javascript in panelA. If I add panelA to panelB in panelB's wicket:head, I get an exception "The markup stream of the component should be known by now, but isn't:" for the first component nested inside panelA. This does not happen if I add panelA inside the wicket:panel tags of panelB (I am not adding panelA inside of
[Wicket-user] Re: need advice extending wicket-contrib-gmap
Hi Iulian, Do you have some ideas for making the component aware of the wicket lifecycle? I want map events such as clicking on a marker to call events on other wicket components, such as Links, Forms, or Behaviors. Right now I am working on creating an xml container for gmap, which thanks to Juergen we can transform into javascript using xslt. I would be happy to hear what your thoughts are. jim Iulian-Corneliu COSTAN wrote: GMap component is not aware of any wicket lifecycle, it uses only plain JavaScript. I needed only this basic functionality long time ago, but now if people are interested in this component I can make it better. keep in touch ... iulian On 12/29/05, *Jim McLaughlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: We want to include a google map in our webapp and use it as a navigation tool. Can someone advise us how to add a Link or AjaxHandler to a GMarker? The problem is that the gmap components are rendered as a javascript blob outside of the wicket rendering process. I guess the bigger question is howto make wicket render components as javascript. I've been puzzling over how to have a ListView of GMarkers render to the proper javascript, with Links or AjaxHandlers passed to GEvent.addListener (...). thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click <http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click> ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
This is great Juergen, thanks. I am going to start working with this today, sourceforge willing :) Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Good idea. The xsl transformer no longer adds http://...";> .. to the input of the xsl processor (and removes it later on). Instead it adds the attr xmlns:wicket to the tag associated with the XsltTransformerContainer resp XslTransformerBehaviour. This allow to develop and test the xsl and apply it to wicket without modifications and the input to the xsl processor is still well-formed xml. Thanks Jim Juergen On 1/3/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see what you mean. If panels and borders don't have their own markup file, then you would have to put the namespace declaration in each one of their wicket markup tags. Not so nice. in bind(), is it possible to have the XslBehavior add an AttributeModifier to the Component for xmlns:wicket? If not, maybe we can use a regex to check the stream for the declaration, add it if it is not there, and then check if it is still there on return? This will add a bit too much overhead, probably. Restrict the attaching of XsltBehaviors to Components that implement an interface that guarantees the namespace declaration. But I don't think you guys want this to have such a visible impact on the framework. jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I tried to change it but actually it does not work for Behaviours at all except if attached to WebMarkupContainer. Where to put the for a Panel or a Border and remember it must be the first and the last tag of the generated output. Would you accept this limitation to the XslBehaviour? Actually the XslContainer would even than be the more convinient choice. Any idea how to solve the problem? Juergen On 1/2/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem why I added xmlns:wicket=\"http://wicket.sourceforge.net\";> is a) xsl requires a single root element b) xsl requires the namespace definition otherwise it will fail to "compile" the xsl file c) no wicket component will generate them. They are not needed for Label, Panel or whatever. We only need them for xsl. Hence, we can not leave it to the user. Hmm, but because the user knows it will be xsl transformed ... May be you are right. Juergen On 1/2/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Excellent. This fits into the framework beautifully. I am also not an xsl expert. The only problem I see is enclosing the markup stream in the http://wicket.sourceforge.net\";> tags and then popping them off after transforming the stream. There is no guarantee those tags will be there after xsl returns the new stream. My suggestion is leave it to the user to make sure there is a wicket namespace declaration in the document. It is likely that they will want to unit test the xsl outside of wicket, and will need to put the declaration in their document anyway. And if they don't, whatever tranformer they decide to use should deliver a nice stack trace informing them of the omission. It would be kind to note in the javadoc that documents including wicket markup must declare the wicket namespace in the tag incorporating the markup or one of its ancestors. jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I've added a XsltTransfomerBehaviour which similar to XsltOutputTransformerContainer allows to post-process a components output. The Behaviour however does not require an additional container. It is a first draft (and I'm not a xsl expert). Please don't hesitate in case something should be improved. Juergen On 1/1/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ? Not sure I understand your question. I didn't intend to re-implement the Border component. I choose the MarkupContainer because I wasn't quite sure how to make it with Border or Panel. Which part of the Border/Panel markup should be the external xsl file? The MarkupContainer seemed to me the easiest approach. The disadvantage of the current approach of course is, you need an additional tag and an additional container. Juergen On 12/31/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so when this is completed border will extend from the abstract output transformer container and perform an empty transform as opposed to extending the markup container? -Igor On 12/31/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I committed a first attempt. I called them OutputTransformer. They are extended from WebMarkupContainer and override onComponentTagBody. The method transformer() must replaced to implement the transformation. Juergen On 12/31/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wouldn't this make for a nice component? Something that works like a border in that you can wrap any component in a transform component, and that the xsl is attached as markup to that transform component? public class MyTransform extends XslTransformBor
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
I see what you mean. If panels and borders don't have their own markup
file, then you would have to put the namespace declaration in each one
of their wicket markup tags. Not so nice.
in bind(), is it possible to have the XslBehavior add an
AttributeModifier to the Component for xmlns:wicket?
If not, maybe we can use a regex to check the stream for the
declaration, add it if it is not there, and then check if it is still
there on return? This will add a bit too much overhead, probably.
Restrict the attaching of XsltBehaviors to Components that implement an
interface that guarantees the namespace declaration. But I don't think
you guys want this to have such a visible impact on the framework.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I tried to change it but actually it does not work for Behaviours at
all except if attached to WebMarkupContainer. Where to put the for a Panel or a Border and remember it
must be the first and the last tag of the generated output.
Would you accept this limitation to the XslBehaviour? Actually the
XslContainer would even than be the more convinient choice. Any idea
how to solve the problem?
Juergen
On 1/2/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem why I added
xmlns:wicket=\"http://wicket.sourceforge.net\";> is
a) xsl requires a single root element
b) xsl requires the namespace definition otherwise it will fail to
"compile" the xsl file
c) no wicket component will generate them. They are not needed for
Label, Panel or whatever. We only need them for xsl. Hence, we can not
leave it to the user. Hmm, but because the user knows it will be xsl
transformed ... May be you are right.
Juergen
On 1/2/06, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent. This fits into the framework beautifully.
I am also not an xsl expert. The only problem I see is enclosing the
markup stream in the http://wicket.sourceforge.net\";> tags and then
popping them off after transforming the stream. There is no guarantee
those tags will be there after xsl returns the new stream. My suggestion
is leave it to the user to make sure there is a wicket namespace
declaration in the document. It is likely that they will want to unit
test the xsl outside of wicket, and will need to put the declaration in
their document anyway. And if they don't, whatever tranformer they
decide to use should deliver a nice stack trace informing them of the
omission. It would be kind to note in the javadoc that documents
including wicket markup must declare the wicket namespace in the tag
incorporating the markup or one of its ancestors.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I've added a XsltTransfomerBehaviour which similar to
XsltOutputTransformerContainer allows to post-process a components
output. The Behaviour however does not require an additional
container.
It is a first draft (and I'm not a xsl expert). Please don't hesitate
in case something should be improved.
Juergen
On 1/1/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
? Not sure I understand your question. I didn't intend to re-implement
the Border component. I choose the MarkupContainer because I wasn't
quite sure how to make it with Border or Panel. Which part of the
Border/Panel markup should be the external xsl file? The
MarkupContainer seemed to me the easiest approach. The disadvantage of
the current approach of course is, you need an additional tag
and an additional container.
Juergen
On 12/31/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so when this is completed border will extend from the abstract output
transformer container and perform an empty transform as opposed to extending
the markup container?
-Igor
On 12/31/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I committed a first attempt. I called them OutputTransformer. They are
extended from WebMarkupContainer and override onComponentTagBody. The
method transformer() must replaced to implement the transformation.
Juergen
On 12/31/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't this make for a nice component? Something that works like a
border in that you can wrap any component in a transform component,
and that the xsl is attached as markup to that transform component?
public class MyTransform extends XslTransformBorder {
...
}
MyTransform.xsl
wrote:
s/Ivan/Igor/g
So many apologies...
Jim McLaughlin wrote:
Thanks Ivan and Juergen! I will implement this and let you know my
results.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Yes, I was not being clear with my question (my grasp of wicket is
very
weak). I want to transform the markup being loaded from the markup
file,
but *after* wicket has run it through the rendering process. What
I want
to do is have wicket take the xml markup associated with the panel
and
run it through its r
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
Excellent. This fits into the framework beautifully.
I am also not an xsl expert. The only problem I see is enclosing the
markup stream in the xmlns:wicket=\"http://wicket.sourceforge.net\";> tags and then
popping them off after transforming the stream. There is no guarantee
those tags will be there after xsl returns the new stream. My suggestion
is leave it to the user to make sure there is a wicket namespace
declaration in the document. It is likely that they will want to unit
test the xsl outside of wicket, and will need to put the declaration in
their document anyway. And if they don't, whatever tranformer they
decide to use should deliver a nice stack trace informing them of the
omission. It would be kind to note in the javadoc that documents
including wicket markup must declare the wicket namespace in the tag
incorporating the markup or one of its ancestors.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I've added a XsltTransfomerBehaviour which similar to
XsltOutputTransformerContainer allows to post-process a components
output. The Behaviour however does not require an additional
container.
It is a first draft (and I'm not a xsl expert). Please don't hesitate
in case something should be improved.
Juergen
On 1/1/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
? Not sure I understand your question. I didn't intend to re-implement
the Border component. I choose the MarkupContainer because I wasn't
quite sure how to make it with Border or Panel. Which part of the
Border/Panel markup should be the external xsl file? The
MarkupContainer seemed to me the easiest approach. The disadvantage of
the current approach of course is, you need an additional tag
and an additional container.
Juergen
On 12/31/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so when this is completed border will extend from the abstract output
transformer container and perform an empty transform as opposed to extending
the markup container?
-Igor
On 12/31/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I committed a first attempt. I called them OutputTransformer. They are
extended from WebMarkupContainer and override onComponentTagBody. The
method transformer() must replaced to implement the transformation.
Juergen
On 12/31/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't this make for a nice component? Something that works like a
border in that you can wrap any component in a transform component,
and that the xsl is attached as markup to that transform component?
public class MyTransform extends XslTransformBorder {
...
}
MyTransform.xsl
wrote:
s/Ivan/Igor/g
So many apologies...
Jim McLaughlin wrote:
Thanks Ivan and Juergen! I will implement this and let you know my
results.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Yes, I was not being clear with my question (my grasp of wicket is
very
weak). I want to transform the markup being loaded from the markup
file,
but *after* wicket has run it through the rendering process. What
I want
to do is have wicket take the xml markup associated with the panel
and
run it through its rendering process, and then capture that output
before it gets merged with the panel's parent, transform it with
xslt
(into javascript -- see my post from yesterday on
wicket-contrib-gmap),
and then merge it with the panel's parent.
protected final void onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream
markupStream,
ComponentTag openTag)
{
// Temporarily replace the web response with a String
response
final Response webResponse = this.getResponse();
try
{
final StringResponse response = new StringResponse();
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(response);
super.onComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag);
.
if ( output.length() > 0)
{
webResponse.write(output);
}
}
finally
{
// Restore the original response
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(webResponse);
}
}
This way I am hoping to have javascript rendered into the page
that will
know about urls for wicket components. To me, it seems like a
natural
way to have javascript objects call wicket Link objects and
AjaxHandlers.
Apologies if this sounds like babbling -- I'm still trying to find
my
wicket legs.
That's ok.
Juergen
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to create a component that will transform its xml markup
with
xslt?
Looking at wicket-contrib-velocity, the VelocityPanel calls
replaceComponentTagBody inside of onComponentTagBody. It looks
like
replaceComponentTagBody will skip all the RawMarkup. How can I
get
it to
be replaced by the xs
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
s/Ivan/Igor/g
So many apologies...
Jim McLaughlin wrote:
Thanks Ivan and Juergen! I will implement this and let you know my results.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I was not being clear with my question (my grasp of wicket is very
weak). I want to transform the markup being loaded from the markup file,
but *after* wicket has run it through the rendering process. What I want
to do is have wicket take the xml markup associated with the panel and
run it through its rendering process, and then capture that output
before it gets merged with the panel's parent, transform it with xslt
(into javascript -- see my post from yesterday on wicket-contrib-gmap),
and then merge it with the panel's parent.
protected final void onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream markupStream,
ComponentTag openTag)
{
// Temporarily replace the web response with a String response
final Response webResponse = this.getResponse();
try
{
final StringResponse response = new StringResponse();
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(response);
super.onComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag);
.
if (output.length() > 0)
{
webResponse.write(output);
}
}
finally
{
// Restore the original response
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(webResponse);
}
}
This way I am hoping to have javascript rendered into the page that will
know about urls for wicket components. To me, it seems like a natural
way to have javascript objects call wicket Link objects and
AjaxHandlers.
Apologies if this sounds like babbling -- I'm still trying to find my
wicket legs.
That's ok.
Juergen
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to create a component that will transform its xml markup with
xslt?
Looking at wicket-contrib-velocity, the VelocityPanel calls
replaceComponentTagBody inside of onComponentTagBody. It looks like
replaceComponentTagBody will skip all the RawMarkup. How can I get
it to
be replaced by the xslt transformation?
The same way FreeMarkerPanel.onComponentTagBody works except that you
don't call FreeMarker but you xslt processor.
replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag, newBody) removes the
body (as you already discovered) and gets replaced by "newBody" (third
parameter).
Could it be this is not your question? Are you asking to xslt
transform the markup being loaded from the markup file. That would be
similar to loading the markup from a database (or any other source you
can think of). Add a IResourceStreamLocator to the
DefaultResourceStreamLocator which is default an accessible through
Application.getResourceStreamLocator(). Or replace
Application.newMarkupResourceStream but than you loose all the default
functionality.
Juergen
thx,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD
SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log fi
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
Thanks Ivan and Juergen! I will implement this and let you know my results.
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I was not being clear with my question (my grasp of wicket is very
weak). I want to transform the markup being loaded from the markup file,
but *after* wicket has run it through the rendering process. What I want
to do is have wicket take the xml markup associated with the panel and
run it through its rendering process, and then capture that output
before it gets merged with the panel's parent, transform it with xslt
(into javascript -- see my post from yesterday on wicket-contrib-gmap),
and then merge it with the panel's parent.
protected final void onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream markupStream,
ComponentTag openTag)
{
// Temporarily replace the web response with a String response
final Response webResponse = this.getResponse();
try
{
final StringResponse response = new StringResponse();
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(response);
super.onComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag);
.
if (output.length() > 0)
{
webResponse.write(output);
}
}
finally
{
// Restore the original response
this.getRequestCycle().setResponse(webResponse);
}
}
This way I am hoping to have javascript rendered into the page that will
know about urls for wicket components. To me, it seems like a natural
way to have javascript objects call wicket Link objects and AjaxHandlers.
Apologies if this sounds like babbling -- I'm still trying to find my
wicket legs.
That's ok.
Juergen
thx,
jim
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to create a component that will transform its xml markup with xslt?
Looking at wicket-contrib-velocity, the VelocityPanel calls
replaceComponentTagBody inside of onComponentTagBody. It looks like
replaceComponentTagBody will skip all the RawMarkup. How can I get it to
be replaced by the xslt transformation?
The same way FreeMarkerPanel.onComponentTagBody works except that you
don't call FreeMarker but you xslt processor.
replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag, newBody) removes the
body (as you already discovered) and gets replaced by "newBody" (third
parameter).
Could it be this is not your question? Are you asking to xslt
transform the markup being loaded from the markup file. That would be
similar to loading the markup from a database (or any other source you
can think of). Add a IResourceStreamLocator to the
DefaultResourceStreamLocator which is default an accessible through
Application.getResourceStreamLocator(). Or replace
Application.newMarkupResourceStream but than you loose all the default
functionality.
Juergen
thx,
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep thro
[Wicket-user] Re: XsltPanel?
Yes, I was not being clear with my question (my grasp of wicket is very weak). I want to transform the markup being loaded from the markup file, but *after* wicket has run it through the rendering process. What I want to do is have wicket take the xml markup associated with the panel and run it through its rendering process, and then capture that output before it gets merged with the panel's parent, transform it with xslt (into javascript -- see my post from yesterday on wicket-contrib-gmap), and then merge it with the panel's parent. This way I am hoping to have javascript rendered into the page that will know about urls for wicket components. To me, it seems like a natural way to have javascript objects call wicket Link objects and AjaxHandlers. Apologies if this sounds like babbling -- I'm still trying to find my wicket legs. thx, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: On 12/30/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How to create a component that will transform its xml markup with xslt? Looking at wicket-contrib-velocity, the VelocityPanel calls replaceComponentTagBody inside of onComponentTagBody. It looks like replaceComponentTagBody will skip all the RawMarkup. How can I get it to be replaced by the xslt transformation? The same way FreeMarkerPanel.onComponentTagBody works except that you don't call FreeMarker but you xslt processor. replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag, newBody) removes the body (as you already discovered) and gets replaced by "newBody" (third parameter). Could it be this is not your question? Are you asking to xslt transform the markup being loaded from the markup file. That would be similar to loading the markup from a database (or any other source you can think of). Add a IResourceStreamLocator to the DefaultResourceStreamLocator which is default an accessible through Application.getResourceStreamLocator(). Or replace Application.newMarkupResourceStream but than you loose all the default functionality. Juergen thx, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] XsltPanel?
How to create a component that will transform its xml markup with xslt? Looking at wicket-contrib-velocity, the VelocityPanel calls replaceComponentTagBody inside of onComponentTagBody. It looks like replaceComponentTagBody will skip all the RawMarkup. How can I get it to be replaced by the xslt transformation? thx, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: need advice extending wicket-contrib-gmap
I chatted with Igor on ##wicket, and he suggested the following solutions: * use freemarker or velocity to render the parts of the javascript that need to know urls of wicket components * create a custom panel that can perform substitutions at render time I will post my results when I get it working. thanks, jim Jim McLaughlin wrote: Yes. The problem with wicket-contrib-gmap is that all the gmap components are not wicket components. They get injected into the page as pure javascript. I want to get them rendered by wicket so I can attach Links and hopefully AjaxHandlers to them. thanks, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Did you check project wicket-stuff module wicket-contrib-gmap and wicket-contrib-gmap-examples already. Juergen On 12/29/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We want to include a google map in our webapp and use it as a navigation tool. Can someone advise us how to add a Link or AjaxHandler to a GMarker? The problem is that the gmap components are rendered as a javascript blob outside of the wicket rendering process. I guess the bigger question is howto make wicket render components as javascript. I've been puzzling over how to have a ListView of GMarkers render to the proper javascript, with Links or AjaxHandlers passed to GEvent.addListener(...). thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: need advice extending wicket-contrib-gmap
Yes. The problem with wicket-contrib-gmap is that all the gmap components are not wicket components. They get injected into the page as pure javascript. I want to get them rendered by wicket so I can attach Links and hopefully AjaxHandlers to them. thanks, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Did you check project wicket-stuff module wicket-contrib-gmap and wicket-contrib-gmap-examples already. Juergen On 12/29/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We want to include a google map in our webapp and use it as a navigation tool. Can someone advise us how to add a Link or AjaxHandler to a GMarker? The problem is that the gmap components are rendered as a javascript blob outside of the wicket rendering process. I guess the bigger question is howto make wicket render components as javascript. I've been puzzling over how to have a ListView of GMarkers render to the proper javascript, with Links or AjaxHandlers passed to GEvent.addListener(...). thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] need advice extending wicket-contrib-gmap
We want to include a google map in our webapp and use it as a navigation tool. Can someone advise us how to add a Link or AjaxHandler to a GMarker? The problem is that the gmap components are rendered as a javascript blob outside of the wicket rendering process. I guess the bigger question is howto make wicket render components as javascript. I've been puzzling over how to have a ListView of GMarkers render to the proper javascript, with Links or AjaxHandlers passed to GEvent.addListener(...). thanks, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: i10n and branding questions
Please edit and correct: http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Newuserguide#Locale_and_Style thx, jim Juergen Donnerstag wrote: On 12/19/05, Jim McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since I am a new user, I will add the answers to these questions to the new user guide wiki. When to use StringResourceModel and when to call getLocalizer() directly? StringResourceModel is an IModel and thus the right choice whereever an IModel parameter is requested (usually container.add(id, model)). StringResourceModel uses the Localizer internally. Localizer provides a general purpose interface to access properties files. What is the difference between setVariant and setStyle? A style applies to the application, a variation to a component only. How do you set the application up to use the WicketMessageTagHandler? override Application.getAdditionalMarkupHandler() Also, it looks like it traverses the stack upward from the component to look for properties. Is this true? Please see AbstractStringResouceLoader for details. Is this traversal opposite of Localizer? No, it is using the Localizer Juergen --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] i10n and branding questions
Since I am a new user, I will add the answers to these questions to the new user guide wiki. When to use StringResourceModel and when to call getLocalizer() directly? What is the difference between setVariant and setStyle? How do you set the application up to use the WicketMessageTagHandler? Also, it looks like it traverses the stack upward from the component to look for properties. Is this true? Is this traversal opposite of Localizer? thanks in advance, jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket and Maven 2
Nick Heudecker wrote: I'm getting the following error when trying to compile the Wicket sources with Maven 2: [INFO] Cannot execute mojo: resources. It requires a project with an existing pom.xml, but the build is not using one. Copying the existing project.xml to pom.xml doesn't help either. Any advice? You can convert maven1 projects to maven2 with the following command: mvn maven1:convert We are managing all our wicket dependencies this way, and have had no major issues. The only problem was with the manifest in the generated jar for wicket-contrib-spring-jdk5 (one of the header fields spanned more than 1 line). jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket, Spring and Hibernate
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i was just falling asleep and thought of something (still sleepy so dont
know if this will make sense in the morning). with all this talk of
testing why not borrow a page from spring's book. have a
IInitializingPage { void afterPropertiesSet(); } and have the injector
check for this and call it after its done populating the page. I know
this isnt as clean as spring because the order is a bit out of wack -
afterPropertiesSet is called before the constructor of the page is
finished but if you leave your constructor blank and move everything
into that method i think it should work. and you can have total control
over dependencies in unit tests w/out anything special just set the
injector to a noop injector and call afterPropertiesSet() yourself.
how does that sound? will this make things easier or dirtier?
-Igor
I've thought about it and it doesn't provide us any real advantage over
your InjectorLocator pattern right now. Using composition keeps
everything loosely coupled and pretty much transparent to the developer.
But we are just starting out on this project and haven't hit any
complications yet.
jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket, Spring and Hibernate
John Moore wrote: Jim McLaughlin wrote: I just started up a project using wicket, spring, and hibernate following the instructions in http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Spring. While it is not full step-by-step boiler plate, a half hour to an hour of noodling around this page and the wicket-phonebook example should have you up and running. Which approach did you go with? Application Object or Proxy Based? I'm all for an easy life and thus the Application Object approach is rather more appealing. I'd like to know a bit more about the downsides, though. The wiki says: "Application class might get cluttered if the application has a lot of dependencies" I can't see that being a particular problem for this project unless I've misunderstood something, so I'm interested in anyone else's thoughts on this. John We are using the proxy based approach. This is what is given to you if you use the SpringInjector provided by wicket.contrib.spring. Just set this in your InjectorLocator when your webapp starts up. I think the point of both appraches is to let you operate in a clustered environment, but the proxy approach is way more elegant. If you use the Application Object approach, you need to manually fetch your dependencies from it, which diminishes some of the advantages of spring d-i. The only disadvantage to the proxy approach is the way it interferes with unit testing, but there are a bunch of clever ways around that as shown in the previous thread. hth, Jim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket, Spring and Hibernate
John Moore wrote: Hmm, now I'm really confused! Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question. Is there an example which shows Wicket working with database access, handling all the stuff like automatic (declarative) transactions which Spring does with Hibernate? I like Spring but I'm not sold on it but for features like that. John Hi John, I just started up a project using wicket, spring, and hibernate following the instructions in http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Spring. While it is not full step-by-step boiler plate, a half hour to an hour of noodling around this page and the wicket-phonebook example should have you up and running. Essentially, any page or panel you want to have spring manage the dependencies for you should have inherit from SpringWebPage or SpringPanel from wicket-contrib-spring. (hmm, I don't think there is a SpringPanel but you can simply adapt SpringWebPage). There was some discussion a week or two ago about how to manage unit testing with this set up, and a couple of excellent solutions were offered. Read this thread -- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9098321&forum_id=42411 We chose the InjectorLocator route suggested by Igor. Just change SpringWebPage to use InjectorLocator.getInjector ().inject(this) in the constructor and you should be good to go. Hope this helps, Jim BTW we love wicket! Thanks to everyone who built this project --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
