Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
An example:
MapString, CharSequence variables = new HashMapString,
CharSequence(7);
variables.put(javaScriptId, javaScriptId);
variables.put(backGroundElementId, backgroundElementId);
variables.put(imageElementId, imageElementId);
variables.put(leftUp, settings.getLeftUp());
variables.put(rightDown, settings.getRightDown());
variables.put(tick, settings.getTick());
variables.put(formElementId, element.getId());
add(TextTemplateHeaderContributor.forJavaScript(Slider.class,
init.js, Model.valueOf(variables)));
Where init.js is:
var ${javaScriptId};
function init${javaScriptId}() {
${javaScriptId} =
YAHOO.widget.Slider.getHorizSlider(${backGroundElementId},
${imageElementId}, ${leftUp}, ${rightDown}, ${tick});
${javaScriptId}.onChange = function(offsetFromStart) {
document.getElementById(${formElementId}).value =
offsetFromStart;
}
}
Eelco
On 1/19/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very kind, thank you. So JavaScriptTemplate defines foo as a
document-level object? Nice. Much appreciated.
Scott
On 1/19/07, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered
your question? Unacceptable!
JavaScriptTemplate is good for passing variables into Javascript. You
can use a cache buster to make sure it gets loaded each time. So, with
that approach you would have a plain onclick=oldJavaScript(foo); in
your page template because foo has already been set in the external js
template.
A quicker and dirtier approach is to use an AttributeModifier for
onclick to patch together the full script call during page generation.
Using an anonymous subclass model: new AbstractReadOnlyModel() { ...
getObject(...) { return oldJavaScript( + foo + );; }} And so on.
Nathan
What sort of options are there for embedding simple scalar values into
an html page, particularly into the parameters of an existing
javascript method? I'm looking for something along the lines of:
onclick=oldJavaScript(wicket:scalar wicket:id=foo/);
Which is then rendered as
onclick=oldJavaScript(1234);
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
Mighty slick, and much appreciated.
On 1/20/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An example:
MapString, CharSequence variables = new HashMapString,
CharSequence(7);
variables.put(javaScriptId, javaScriptId);
variables.put(backGroundElementId, backgroundElementId);
variables.put(imageElementId, imageElementId);
variables.put(leftUp, settings.getLeftUp());
variables.put(rightDown, settings.getRightDown());
variables.put(tick, settings.getTick());
variables.put(formElementId, element.getId());
add(TextTemplateHeaderContributor.forJavaScript(Slider.class,
init.js, Model.valueOf(variables)));
Where init.js is:
var ${javaScriptId};
function init${javaScriptId}() {
${javaScriptId} =
YAHOO.widget.Slider.getHorizSlider(${backGroundElementId},
${imageElementId}, ${leftUp}, ${rightDown}, ${tick});
${javaScriptId}.onChange = function(offsetFromStart) {
document.getElementById(${formElementId}).value =
offsetFromStart;
}
}
Eelco
On 1/19/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very kind, thank you. So JavaScriptTemplate defines foo as a
document-level object? Nice. Much appreciated.
Scott
On 1/19/07, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered
your question? Unacceptable!
JavaScriptTemplate is good for passing variables into Javascript. You
can use a cache buster to make sure it gets loaded each time. So, with
that approach you would have a plain onclick=oldJavaScript(foo); in
your page template because foo has already been set in the external js
template.
A quicker and dirtier approach is to use an AttributeModifier for
onclick to patch together the full script call during page generation.
Using an anonymous subclass model: new AbstractReadOnlyModel() { ...
getObject(...) { return oldJavaScript( + foo + );; }} And so on.
Nathan
What sort of options are there for embedding simple scalar values into
an html page, particularly into the parameters of an existing
javascript method? I'm looking for something along the lines of:
onclick=oldJavaScript(wicket:scalar wicket:id=foo/);
Which is then rendered as
onclick=oldJavaScript(1234);
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
Scott, you still interested in hiring some wicket expertise? regards Nino winmail.dat- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
I'll know in two weeks. Starting Monday we spend two weeks building proof-of-concept apps in Wicket JSF/Facelets. If Wicket comes out on top then I'm pretty confident that the answer is a yes. Cheers, Scott On 1/19/07, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott, you still interested in hiring some wicket expertise? regards Nino - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered
your question? Unacceptable!
JavaScriptTemplate is good for passing variables into Javascript. You
can use a cache buster to make sure it gets loaded each time. So, with
that approach you would have a plain onclick=oldJavaScript(foo); in
your page template because foo has already been set in the external js
template.
A quicker and dirtier approach is to use an AttributeModifier for
onclick to patch together the full script call during page generation.
Using an anonymous subclass model: new AbstractReadOnlyModel() { ...
getObject(...) { return oldJavaScript( + foo + );; }} And so on.
Nathan
What sort of options are there for embedding simple scalar values into
an html page, particularly into the parameters of an existing
javascript method? I'm looking for something along the lines of:
onclick=oldJavaScript(wicket:scalar wicket:id=foo/);
Which is then rendered as
onclick=oldJavaScript(1234);
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
Very kind, thank you. So JavaScriptTemplate defines foo as a
document-level object? Nice. Much appreciated.
Scott
On 1/19/07, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered
your question? Unacceptable!
JavaScriptTemplate is good for passing variables into Javascript. You
can use a cache buster to make sure it gets loaded each time. So, with
that approach you would have a plain onclick=oldJavaScript(foo); in
your page template because foo has already been set in the external js
template.
A quicker and dirtier approach is to use an AttributeModifier for
onclick to patch together the full script call during page generation.
Using an anonymous subclass model: new AbstractReadOnlyModel() { ...
getObject(...) { return oldJavaScript( + foo + );; }} And so on.
Nathan
What sort of options are there for embedding simple scalar values into
an html page, particularly into the parameters of an existing
javascript method? I'm looking for something along the lines of:
onclick=oldJavaScript(wicket:scalar wicket:id=foo/);
Which is then rendered as
onclick=oldJavaScript(1234);
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
Thank you both. On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good luck! Keep us informed, and of course I hope Wicket will be good for you :) Eelco On 1/17/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets Wicket. This will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website. My apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions to which I will undoubtedly subject you all. As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in using Wicket with JBoss? Cheers, Scott - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
not that we know of. its just a servlet/filter. -igor On 1/17/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets Wicket. This will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website. My apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions to which I will undoubtedly subject you all. As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in using Wicket with JBoss? Cheers, Scott __ From: Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:46 PM To: Cc: Subject:UI Framework selection C, I would like you to lead up the UI Framework prototyping project, which is a prerequisite for BSC. I would like you to work with Scott Swank and J, who have also put in a lot of effort in research and prototyping. We have a couple weeks to dedicate to this, and a number of developers to work on prototypes. Our goal is to select the framework for BSC and establish initial guidelines and directions for use. Our candidates are JSF Facelets and Wicket. Wicket is the underdog, but I want us to give it due consideration, as I like the approach. I would like to divide the group into two teams. Primary criteria will be ease (speed/complexity) of use, reuse and maintenance. Consider mainly the sorts of UI tasks necessary for BSC, but also consider concierge style AJAX. It would be best to come up with a single obstacle course to run each framework through. Primarily the team will be those that worked on hotels, with the addition of K, and others optional, depending on need. Please schedule a meeting tomorrow with me, Swank, R, J, B for us to finalize our plan. Thanks, SM - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection
Good luck! Keep us informed, and of course I hope Wicket will be good for you :) Eelco On 1/17/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets Wicket. This will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website. My apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions to which I will undoubtedly subject you all. As a first question in that direction, are there any known gotchas in using Wicket with JBoss? Cheers, Scott - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
