Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Flavius


There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.

Here is the Ajax output from the console:

INFO:
INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on
/;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=0.8983050159419032
INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
INFO:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[

]]/component/ajax-response
INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
INFO: Response processed successfully.
INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...

Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form component)
it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several controls,
a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.

I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:
http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508

So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.




Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
 
 On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
 I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
 It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and that's
 not
 working either.
 
 How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
 What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
 
 Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set 
 outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
 it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
 console.
 
 - Timo
 
 -- 
 Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
 Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
 
 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Johan Compagner
so whats in the fragment doesnt disappear? looking at the ajax code we
see an empty component comming up. I guess the ajax console is saying
exatly the same stuff when you do it for the textfield?

On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
 true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
 with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
 Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.

 Here is the Ajax output from the console:

 INFO:
 INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on
 /;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=0.8983050159419032
 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
 INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
 INFO:
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
 id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[

 ]]/component/ajax-response
 INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
 INFO: Response processed successfully.
 INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...

 Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form component)
 it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
 and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several controls,
 a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.

 I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:
 http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508

 So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.




 Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
 
  On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
  I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
  It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and that's
  not
  working either.
 
  How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
  What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
 
  Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set
  outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
  it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
  console.
 
  - Timo
 
  --
  Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
  Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
 
  -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
  control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
  http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Flavius

The fragment contents appear fine.
When I change the value on the dropdown, I expect the
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onUpdate() to set
the visibility to false.


My dropdown has this added:

dropDown.add(new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange)
{
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget 
target)
{   
target.addComponent(container); 

text2Fragment.setVisible(false);
}
});

Now if I substitute a TextField instead of a fragment (or panel), it
correctly
sets the visibility to false.  But with the fragment, it stays visible when
the 
onchange event fires.   

I put up a couple of test pages, if you want to see:
http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test (this is just the component, which works)
http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test2 (this is with the fragment, which does not)

I included the java source on each page.


Johan Compagner wrote:
 
 so whats in the fragment doesnt disappear? looking at the ajax code we
 see an empty component comming up. I guess the ajax console is saying
 exatly the same stuff when you do it for the textfield?
 
 On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
 true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
 with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
 Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.

 Here is the Ajax output from the console:

 INFO:
 INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on
 /;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=0.8983050159419032
 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
 INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
 INFO:
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
 id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[

 ]]/component/ajax-response
 INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
 INFO: Response processed successfully.
 INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...

 Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form component)
 it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
 and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several controls,
 a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.

 I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:
 http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508

 So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.




 Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
 
  On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
  I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
  It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and that's
  not
  working either.
 
  How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
  What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
 
  Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set
  outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
  it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
  console.
 
  - Timo
 
  --
  Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
  Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
 
 
 -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
  control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
  http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 
 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 

Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Johan Compagner

can a span have other block elements?
try to make the span a div

johan


On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



The fragment contents appear fine.
When I change the value on the dropdown, I expect the
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onUpdate() to set
the visibility to false.


My dropdown has this added:

dropDown.add(new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange)
{
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
target)
{
target.addComponent(container);
text2Fragment.setVisible(false);
}
});

Now if I substitute a TextField instead of a fragment (or panel), it
correctly
sets the visibility to false.  But with the fragment, it stays visible
when
the
onchange event fires.

I put up a couple of test pages, if you want to see:
http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test (this is just the component, which works)
http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test2 (this is with the fragment, which does
not)

I included the java source on each page.


Johan Compagner wrote:

 so whats in the fragment doesnt disappear? looking at the ajax code we
 see an empty component comming up. I guess the ajax console is saying
 exatly the same stuff when you do it for the textfield?

 On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
 true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
 with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
 Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.

 Here is the Ajax output from the console:

 INFO:
 INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on

/;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=
0.8983050159419032
 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
 INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
 INFO:
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
 id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[

 ]]/component/ajax-response
 INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
 INFO: Response processed successfully.
 INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...

 Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form
component)
 it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
 and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several controls,
 a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.

 I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:

http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508

 So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.




 Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
 
  On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
  I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
  It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and
that's
  not
  working either.
 
  How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
  What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
 
  Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set
  outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
  it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
  console.
 
  - Timo
 
  --
  Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
  Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
 
 

-
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
  control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
  http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
 This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
 Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
 control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
 http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 

Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Flavius

I didn't think about that.
However, I changed the spans to divs and
still the same result.  :-(  

I put a new build out at the same urls.




Johan Compagner wrote:
 
 can a span have other block elements?
 try to make the span a div
 
 johan
 
 
 On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 The fragment contents appear fine.
 When I change the value on the dropdown, I expect the
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onUpdate() to set
 the visibility to false.


 My dropdown has this added:

 dropDown.add(new
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange)
 {
 protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
 target)
 {
 target.addComponent(container);
 text2Fragment.setVisible(false);
 }
 });

 Now if I substitute a TextField instead of a fragment (or panel), it
 correctly
 sets the visibility to false.  But with the fragment, it stays visible
 when
 the
 onchange event fires.

 I put up a couple of test pages, if you want to see:
 http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test (this is just the component, which works)
 http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test2 (this is with the fragment, which does
 not)

 I included the java source on each page.


 Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  so whats in the fragment doesnt disappear? looking at the ajax code we
  see an empty component comming up. I guess the ajax console is saying
  exatly the same stuff when you do it for the textfield?
 
  On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
  true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
  with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
  Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.
 
  Here is the Ajax output from the console:
 
  INFO:
  INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on
 
 /;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=
 0.8983050159419032
  INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
  INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
  INFO:
  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
  id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[
 
  ]]/component/ajax-response
  INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
  INFO: Response processed successfully.
  INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
 
  Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form
 component)
  it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
  and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several
 controls,
  a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.
 
  I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508
 
  So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.
 
 
 
 
  Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
  
   On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
   I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
   AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
   It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and
 that's
   not
   working either.
  
   How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
   What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
  
   Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set
   outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
   it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
   console.
  
   - Timo
  
   --
   Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
   Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
  
  
 
 -
   This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
   Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
   control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
   http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
  control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
  http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  

Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-23 Thread Flavius


Btw, I am running wicket 1.2.6 on Tomcat 6.


Johan Compagner wrote:
 
 can a span have other block elements?
 try to make the span a div
 
 johan
 
 
 On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 The fragment contents appear fine.
 When I change the value on the dropdown, I expect the
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onUpdate() to set
 the visibility to false.


 My dropdown has this added:

 dropDown.add(new
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange)
 {
 protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
 target)
 {
 target.addComponent(container);
 text2Fragment.setVisible(false);
 }
 });

 Now if I substitute a TextField instead of a fragment (or panel), it
 correctly
 sets the visibility to false.  But with the fragment, it stays visible
 when
 the
 onchange event fires.

 I put up a couple of test pages, if you want to see:
 http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test (this is just the component, which works)
 http://24.248.103.44/pages/Test2 (this is with the fragment, which does
 not)

 I included the java source on each page.


 Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  so whats in the fragment doesnt disappear? looking at the ajax code we
  see an empty component comming up. I guess the ajax console is saying
  exatly the same stuff when you do it for the textfield?
 
  On 5/23/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  There are no errors.  I did try setting the outputMarkupId to
  true for the fragment.  In the examples (and in my own code
  with just the TextField), setting the container was sufficient.
  Adding this to the Fragment had no effect.
 
  Here is the Ajax output from the console:
 
  INFO:
  INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on
 
 /;jsessionid=32444A7415B3D15E1792F255AFB8C5BE?wicket:interface=:0:inputForm:dropDown:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=
 0.8983050159419032
  INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
  INFO: Received ajax response (181 characters)
  INFO:
  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
  id=inputForm_container ![CDATA[
 
  ]]/component/ajax-response
  INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
  INFO: Response processed successfully.
  INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
 
  Like I mentioned, if I just add a TextField (or any other form
 component)
  it works great.  But my pages need to remove the control
  and label.  In a couple of places, it needs to remove several
 controls,
  a prime candidate for a fragment or panel, imho.
 
  I've read other threads discussing setting the visibility like this:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Changing-visibility-via-ajax-tf1974532.html#a5418508
 
  So I must conclude I'm doing something wrong.
 
 
 
 
  Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
  
   On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
   I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
   AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
   It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and
 that's
   not
   working either.
  
   How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
   What is the error message / stack trace, if any?
  
   Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set
   outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
   it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
   console.
  
   - Timo
  
   --
   Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
   Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 
  
  
 
 -
   This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
   Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
   control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
   http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/setVisible-on-Fragment-with-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tf3800038.html#a10764129
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
  control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
  http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
  Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 

Re: [Wicket-user] setVisible on Fragment with AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior

2007-05-22 Thread Timo Rantalaiho
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Flavius wrote:
 I am trying to setVisible on a Fragment using the
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior object.
 It doesn't seem to work.  I've also tried this with a Panel and that's not
 working either.

How does it not work? What does the Ajax debug console say?
What is the error message / stack trace, if any?

Looking quickly it occurs to me that maybe you should set 
outputMarkupId(true) to the Fragment. If this is the case,
it should be obvious from the error message on Ajax debug
console.

- Timo

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho   +358-45-6709709
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user