Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
wicket:container is in trunk only it is just a pseudo tag - a container that has setrenderbodyonly(true) called on it. imagine you have a listview that builds tds like this trspan wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/span/tr validating editors in an ide will complain because span is not allowed inside tr, so instead you do trwicket:container wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/wicket:container/tr now they should not complain cause the namespace is different -igor On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
Ah, pretty sweet actually. Good one for the WIKI and Wicket In Action as well. Eelco On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket:container is in trunk only it is just a pseudo tag - a container that has setrenderbodyonly(true) called on it. imagine you have a listview that builds tds like this trspan wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/span/tr validating editors in an ide will complain because span is not allowed inside tr, so instead you do trwicket:container wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/wicket:container/tr now they should not complain cause the namespace is different -igor On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
Nice. So use wicket:container where you'd like to use div or span but the result is invalid html. Then does the list of standard wicket tags looks like the following? wicket:border wicket:child wicket:container wicket:extend wicket:link wicket:message wicket:panel On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, pretty sweet actually. Good one for the WIKI and Wicket In Action as well. Eelco On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket:container is in trunk only it is just a pseudo tag - a container that has setrenderbodyonly(true) called on it. imagine you have a listview that builds tds like this trspan wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/span/tr validating editors in an ide will complain because span is not allowed inside tr, so instead you do trwicket:container wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/wicket:container/tr now they should not complain cause the namespace is different -igor On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
there is a wiki page that lists all these with the exception of :container -igor On 2/22/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice. So use wicket:container where you'd like to use div or span but the result is invalid html. Then does the list of standard wicket tags looks like the following? wicket:border wicket:child wicket:container wicket:extend wicket:link wicket:message wicket:panel On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, pretty sweet actually. Good one for the WIKI and Wicket In Action as well. Eelco On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket:container is in trunk only it is just a pseudo tag - a container that has setrenderbodyonly(true) called on it. imagine you have a listview that builds tds like this trspan wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/span/tr validating editors in an ide will complain because span is not allowed inside tr, so instead you do trwicket:container wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/wicket:container/tr now they should not complain cause the namespace is different -igor On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:component, container, pseudo, et al
There is. Thank you. http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is a wiki page that lists all these with the exception of :container -igor On 2/22/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice. So use wicket:container where you'd like to use div or span but the result is invalid html. Then does the list of standard wicket tags looks like the following? wicket:border wicket:child wicket:container wicket:extend wicket:link wicket:message wicket:panel On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, pretty sweet actually. Good one for the WIKI and Wicket In Action as well. Eelco On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wicket:container is in trunk only it is just a pseudo tag - a container that has setrenderbodyonly(true) called on it. imagine you have a listview that builds tds like this trspan wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/span/tr validating editors in an ide will complain because span is not allowed inside tr, so instead you do trwicket:container wicket:id=listviewtd.../tdtd.../td/wicket:container/tr now they should not complain cause the namespace is different -igor On 2/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/21/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of the above tags were disparaged in the wicket:component vote. Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly standard tags. wicket:border wicket:child wicket:extend wicket:message wicket:panel What about wicket:link That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, wicket:link can be quite convenient. In particular, which tags (apart from component, container pseudo) would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn
