[Wien] volume optimization

2010-02-11 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Wien2k users,

 I am running volume optimization for a
spin polarized system. After getting charge convergence for the first
structure (say for 10% more volume than the initial volume) when it was
running for second structure after 9 cycles it was stopped showing lapw1
error. Then I remove the error file and click the vol. optimize option in
w2web. It shows 3 options save_lapw, delete broyden files: and run
anyway. I chose the option run anyway and it shows the option for x
optimize and run optimize.job. I choose run optimize.job and after
completing dstart it continues with SCF cycle. My question is:

1) whether it starts its SCF cycle by taking into account the first
structure (10% more than initial volume) or it starts its SCF from the
second structure *keeping intact the calculation for the 1st structure (I
have not gone for the option save_lapw )?*


Thank you in advance

regards,

Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Scholar
IIT Kharagpur
Kharagpur 721302
INDIA
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/42ee6572/attachment.htm


[Wien] volume optimization

2010-02-11 Thread Peter Blaha
No, it will start with first structure again.


 shows the option for x optimize and run optimize.job. I choose run 
 optimize.job and after completing dstart it continues with SCF cycle. 

What you should have done after the crash (and we hope it was due to some
computer/network error, otherwise it will show up again ?) is choosing
another option, namely:

edit optimize.job
 comment (put a #) the line with the volume you already have (+10)



 My question is:
 
 1) whether it starts its SCF cycle by taking into account the first 
 structure (10% more than initial volume) or it starts its SCF from the 
 second structure *keeping intact the calculation for the 1st structure 
 (I have not gone for the option save_lapw )?*



-- 
-
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-


[Wien] volume optimization

2010-02-11 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Peter Blaha Sir,

 Thank you very much for your reply and
suggestion.

with best regards,

Shamik Chakrabarti

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atwrote:

 No, it will start with first structure again.



  shows the option for x optimize and run optimize.job. I choose run
 optimize.job and after completing dstart it continues with SCF cycle.


 What you should have done after the crash (and we hope it was due to some
 computer/network error, otherwise it will show up again ?) is choosing
 another option, namely:

 edit optimize.job
comment (put a #) the line with the volume you already have (+10)



  My question is:

 1) whether it starts its SCF cycle by taking into account the first
 structure (10% more than initial volume) or it starts its SCF from the
 second structure *keeping intact the calculation for the 1st structure (I
 have not gone for the option save_lapw )?*




 --
 -
 Peter Blaha
 Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
 Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
 Tel: +43-1-5880115671
 Fax: +43-1-5880115698
 email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 -
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/9e8d8fb4/attachment.htm


[Wien] w2web

2010-02-11 Thread susanta mohanta
Dear Prof Blaha and wien2k users,

I am running wien2k 9.1 vesion in core2duo PC with MKL 10.1.1.018 and FC
10.1.018
(Fedora core 10). I am facing a strange kind of problem, while beginning any
computation
lots of w2web programs are running simultaneously and it makes my PC
extreamly slow.
The w2web programs even sometimes consume 75% of the processor (commands
show
10-15, w2web are running). I don't know how to get rid of this problem ?

However with the version of MKL and FC in fedora 8 that problem is not there
but it is only
using only one processor (50%). At the beginning it was utilising 100% of
processor and after
few month it is utilising only half of the processor.

Any suggestion in this regard ?

with regards
susanta
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/633b79d3/attachment.htm


[Wien] rutile DOS

2010-02-11 Thread Liberti, Emanuela
Dear Wien2k users and developers,
I  am running Wien2k_08 using a Windows XP terminal and connecting to a Linux 
server using Putty and Cygwin.
I am calculating the DOS of TiO2 rutile using the w2web interface.
The calculated DOS is provided in the energy range -10 - 15 eV, whereas the 
lowest valence bands ( -17 eV) are not displayed. I increased the energy range 
in case.in1 (as suggested in the FAQ's), rerun the SCF and tetra via interface 
and nothing changed.
Can you please help me?
With kind regards,
Emanuela Liberti
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/0833f076/attachment.htm


[Wien] rutile DOS

2010-02-11 Thread Rocquefelte
Did you change the emin value in the case.int file ?
By default Emin = -0.5 Ry, so you must change this value to -1.5 Ry for 
instance.

Title
 -1.50 0.002 1.500 0.003   EMIN, DE, EMAX, Gauss-broadening(;de)
1  NUMBER OF DOS-CASES specified below
01   total atom, case=column in qtl-header, label

Regards

Xavier




Liberti, Emanuela a ?crit :

 Dear Wien2k users and developers,

 I  am running Wien2k_08 using a Windows XP terminal and connecting to 
 a Linux server using Putty and Cygwin.

 I am calculating the DOS of TiO_2 rutile using the /w2web/ interface.

 The calculated DOS is provided in the energy range -10 -- 15 eV, 
 whereas the lowest valence bands ( -17 eV) are not displayed. I 
 increased the energy range in case.in1 (as suggested in the FAQ's), 
 rerun the SCF and tetra via interface and nothing changed.  

 Can you please help me?   

 With kind regards,

 Emanuela Liberti

 

 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
   

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/a1567692/attachment.htm


[Wien] rutile DOS

2010-02-11 Thread Rocquefelte
One more comment.You do not need to rerun lapw1 (and particularly you 
should not change Emax to better see semi-core or core levels).
You just need to rerun TETRA after changing Emin in the input file of 
TETRA (case.int).

Hope that this explanation will help you to better figure out how DOS 
calculations are realized.

Regards

Xavier

Liberti, Emanuela a ?crit :

 Dear Wien2k users and developers,

 I  am running Wien2k_08 using a Windows XP terminal and connecting to 
 a Linux server using Putty and Cygwin.

 I am calculating the DOS of TiO_2 rutile using the /w2web/ interface.

 The calculated DOS is provided in the energy range -10 -- 15 eV, 
 whereas the lowest valence bands ( -17 eV) are not displayed. I 
 increased the energy range in case.in1 (as suggested in the FAQ's), 
 rerun the SCF and tetra via interface and nothing changed.  

 Can you please help me?   

 With kind regards,

 Emanuela Liberti

 

 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
   

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/43d78f0e/attachment.htm
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4159 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100211/43d78f0e/attachment.bin