[Wien] Charge Convergence is not achieved

2011-07-06 Thread Shamik Chakrabarti
Dear wien2k users,

We have done volume optimization of a structure having space group no. 225
(Fm3m) and 3 inequivalent atoms per unit cell. We have taken the least
energy lattice parameters for spin polarized SCF calculations. However, the
last calculation (spin polarized SCF) has not been converging at all. We
have set the convergence criteria of  charge to 0.0001and it reached up to
0.006. After that its is fluctuating sinusoidally at this value (even at
around 400th iteration). We have also tried using the fallowing steps, such
as

1. increasing the RmaxKmax value from 7 to 9

2. changing mixer values ranging from 0.01 to 0.3 (using MSEC mixing
scheme...wien2k 10)

3. increasing the K-points from 1000 to 5000

but unfortunately we haven't got the desired convergence yet. Therefore, it
is very helpful for us to have a suggestion for this problem.

-- 
Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Scholar
Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
IIT Kharagpur
Kharagpur 721302
INDIA
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20110706/17935ec3/attachment.htm


[Wien] Charge Convergence is not achieved

2011-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha
For just 3 atoms/cell (and metallid ??) 1000 or 5000 k are still not much.
Better k-mesh should improve convergence.

And sometimes you cannot reach (easily) arbitrary convergence. What about 
E-tot, ... ?


Am 06.07.2011 07:48, schrieb Shamik Chakrabarti:
 Dear wien2k users,

 We have done volume optimization of a structure having space group no. 225 
 (Fm3m) and 3 inequivalent atoms per unit cell. We have taken the least energy 
 lattice parameters for
 spin polarized SCF calculations. However, the last calculation (spin 
 polarized SCF) has not been converging at all. We have set the convergence 
 criteria of  charge to 0.0001and it
 reached up to 0.006. After that its is fluctuating sinusoidally at this value 
 (even at around 400th iteration). We have also tried using the fallowing 
 steps, such as

 1. increasing the RmaxKmax value from 7 to 9

 2. changing mixer values ranging from 0.01 to 0.3 (using MSEC mixing 
 scheme...wien2k 10)

 3. increasing the K-points from 1000 to 5000

 but unfortunately we haven't got the desired convergence yet. Therefore, it 
 is very helpful for us to have a suggestion for this problem.

 --
 Shamik Chakrabarti
 Research Scholar
 Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
 Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
 IIT Kharagpur
 Kharagpur 721302
 INDIA



 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--


[Wien] how to find Stoner parameter using wien2k

2011-07-06 Thread Seyed Javad Hashemifar
I have no experience on calculation of stoner parameter and interesting to
learn it. However, by doing a simple spin polarized calculations with
nonzero and parallel initial moments on your system, you may easily find
whether your system prefers ferromagnetism or not. The initial magnetic
moments are controlled in case.inst file.
SJ Hashemifar
==
Seyed Javad  Hashemifar
Physics Department, Isfahan University of Technology
84156-83111 Isfahan, Iran
Tel: +98 311 391 2375 Fax:+98 311 3912376
Email:  hashemifar at cc.iut.ac.ir
Homepage:  http://hashemifar.iut.ac.ir
---


2011/7/6 Shamik Chakrabarti shamikiitkgp at gmail.com


 Dear wien2k users,

 According to the Stoner band theory of magnetism, one can able to predict
 the magnetic ground state of the material as it is paramagnetic or
 ferromagnetic using product of the non magnetic density of states around the
 Fermi level (N(E)) and the Stoner parameter (I). As given in some of the
 literature, the Stoner parameter  can be described as the exchange integral
 and it could be found using LSDA and LMTO methods. see the fallowing
 literature...

 1. http://prb.aps.org/pdf/PRB/v16/i1/p255_1

 2. http://jap.aip.org/resource/1/japiau/v89/i11/p6889_s1

 We are doing our calculations in Wein2K package using the GGA approximation
 and we want to know how the stoner parameter could be found according to the
 my calculations. As non magnetic calculations gives the total density of
 states at around the Fermi level, it is very helpful for us to predict the
 material is magnetic or not using the Stoner parameter. therefore, please
 suggest us how to find the Stoner parameter using wein2k package.
  --
 Shamik Chakrabarti
 Research Scholar
 Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
 Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
 IIT Kharagpur
 Kharagpur 721302
 INDIA

 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20110706/12771865/attachment.htm