[Wien] SCF doesn't run after initso_lap

2014-06-23 Thread hüsnü kara
Dear Wien Users,

I did structure optimization and I got regular initialization. I runned the
SCF calculation for spin poarized case.(runsp_lapw -ec 0.1 -cc 0.1
-Nl -i 50)  I saved the results. Then I used initso_lapw command in
terminal:



*For large spin orbit effects it might be necessary to include many more
eigenstates from lapw1 by increasing EMAX in case.in1(c). *





















































*Please enter EMAX(default 5.0 Ryd):  The radial basis set for heavy
atoms with p-semicore states is verylimited. One can improve this by adding
RLOs. Note: you MUST NOT addRLOs for atoms like oxygen, therefore the
default is set to NONEAdd RLO for NONE, ALL, CHOOSE elements? (N/a/c)
: cp-Energy parameters for Sr atom is : 1   -1.35  0.002 CONT 1 1
0.30  0.000 CONT 1 Would you like to add RLO? (Y/n)Yp-Energy parameters
for Ti atom is : 1   -2.58  0.002 CONT 1 10.30  0.000 CONT
1 Would you like to add RLO? (Y/n)Y Check the generated a3.inso file
(RLOs,...) Check the generated a3.in1 file (Emax at the bottom of the
file)In spinpolarized case SO may reduce symmetry. The program symmetso
dedects the proper symmetry and creates new struct andinput files. (Note,
equivalent atoms could become inequivalent in some cases). Do you have a
spinpolarized case (and want to run symmetso) ? (y/N)y
90.090.01.57079632679490  T
1.00   0.000E+000  0.000E+000
6.123233995736766E-017   1.00   0.000E+000
6.123233995736766E-017  6.123233995736766E-017   1.00 0.0u
0.0s 0:00.11 81.8% 0+0k 2224+4208io 8pf+0w A new structure for SO
calculations has been created (_so). If you commit it will create new
a3.struct, in1(c), in2c, inc, clmsum/up/dn, vspup/dn and vnsup/dn files.
(Please SAVE any previous calculations)NOTE: Files for -orb
(a3.indm(c),inorb,dmatup/dn) must be adapted manuallyDo you want to use the
new structure for SO calculations ? (y/N)y We run KGEN to generate a new
kmesh for the SO calculation: Number of Kpoint in a3.klist is :
1000Please enter Number of k-points in full BZ (default: 1000):
NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of
G) length of reciprocal lattice vectors:   0.843   0.843   0.843  10.000
10.000  10.000  Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no,
1=shift)  75  k-points generated, ndiv=  10
10  10KGEN ENDSDo you want to rerun kgen ? (y/N)NSpinorbit is now
ready to run.*
And then I runned the SCF calculation(*runsp_lapw -so -ec 0.1 -cc
0.1 -NI* ), but it doesn't run.

Please can you help me?

With regards,







-- 

Hüsnü Kara

Doktora Öğrencisi/ PhD Candidate
Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi/ Yildiz Technical University
İstanbul / Turkey
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Electronic polarization with mBJ

2014-06-23 Thread Peter Blaha

Difficult to answer, it may even depend on the specific case.

We know that LDA/GGA overestimates covalency and does not localize 
an ionic compound sufficiently.


mBJ opens band gaps and localizes the states much more, but as it is 
exchange-only (+LDA correlation) with an emphasis on band-gaps, it may 
overshoot easily.


So I guess it is a nice topic to check whether mBJ would improve or 
overestimate polarization in semiconductors/insulators.


On 06/22/2014 07:28 PM, Oleg Rubel wrote:

Dear Wien2k Community:

I wonder if mBJ can be useful in calculation of polarization-related
properties. There are narrow gap semiconductors (like InN), which turn
into semi-metals with a pure LDA. For polarization calculations we need
a finite band gap, so LDA+mBJ could be an option.

However, it was mentioned on the list
(http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg07108.html)
that mBJ results in a more ionic electron density. I performed a test
for GaN: LDA polarization is 0.030 C/m2 vs 0.035 C/m2 for LDA+mBJ. So,
it is indeed more ionic.

Do you think we can trust the polarization value obtained with mBJ?


Thank you in advance
Oleg


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--

  P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: 
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/

--
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Optic - brunching ratio

2014-06-23 Thread prasenjit roy
Dear Prof. Blaha and WIEN2K users,

I am calculating XMCD spectra for 3d transition metal
elements Using Wien2k ver 13.0. While calculating the xmcd signal for Fe
and Mn, I used the Lorentzian broadening parameters to match the
experimental L23 brunching ratios.
So in case.injoint I used a lorentzian broadening of 1.8 eV and 0.4 eV for
Fe  edge and 2.0 eV and 0.6 eV for Mn edge {in 6th line of case.injoint }.
This matches with the experimental xmcd spectra. But my question is that,
are we free to choose the lorentzian broadeing parameters in order to match
the experiment? or there is some fixed values (viz. 0.8 eV and 0.4 eV) that
we always need to use. To cheack this, I use, 0.8 and 0.4 in the 6th line
of case.injoint, but then the spectra does not matches with the brunching
ratios of the experiment at all. Kindly let me know which is the correct
way to do the calculation.

With kind regards,

Prasenjit Roy
Electronic Structures of Materials
Radboud University
Nijmegen
+31 (0) 24 36 52805
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Formula to calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3

2014-06-23 Thread delamora
Yes, in the WIEN2k you find a, b and c optimization all set for you, but ti 
include the angles the number of structures would increase exponentially;

1 dimensionn

2 dimensionsn**2

3 dimensionsn**3

4 dimensionsn**4

5 dimensionsn**5

6 dimensionsn**6


4**6=4096


So you must do each optimization separately

First you optimize a, b, c

then you vary alpha and optimize, then beta and finally gamma


then you return to the beginning;

optimize a, b and c

until the changes in the cell parameters change little.



De: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at en nombre de Mian Fayyaz Ahmad 
fayyaz...@gmail.com
Enviado: domingo, 22 de junio de 2014 09:41 p.m.
Para: Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Asunto: [Wien] Formula to calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3


Respected, Wien2K Community
   I want to calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3 in space group P1( 
Triclinic ). I have done volume optimization. I found a formula [V = abc( 
1?cos**2alpha ?cos**2beta? cos**2gamma+2*cos alpha*cos beta*cos gamma)**1/2]. I 
found only volume in volume optimization. How can i found lattice parameters a, 
b , c and angles???
please help me in this regard.
thanks in advance
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Parallel compilation installation

2014-06-23 Thread Brahim ABRAIME
The memory RAM in use of the machines does not decrease when we kill the
processes of Wien2k on the CPU
Ans suggestions please ?
Le 17 juin 2014 22:10, Gavin Abo gs...@crimson.ua.edu a écrit :


   what about the environment in which we must mention the list of
 machines that will run parallel computing?


 If you are using a single PC, you should be able to use edit .machines
 in the menu of w2web.  See section 5.5.4 The .machines file in the Wien2k
 13.1 usersguide [http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/usersguide.pdf],
 which describes the content of the .machines file.

 I also find the University of Texas slides at the following link useful:

 https://www.xsede.org/documents/10157/305826/ecss_hliu_051012.pdf

 If you are using a cluster, you should talk to your system administer(s),
 because they should know everything about your cluster system and should be
 able to help you create the best configuration for your system (something
 we know nothing about it).  There is a webpage in FAQ on the Wien2k website
 that can help with that:

 http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/faq/pbs.html

  I also want to know the parameters for multi threading


 I think there was some previous discussion on threading.  Search the mail
 archive at:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/

 For example, try searching with the keyword: OMP_NUM_THREADS



 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] SCF doesn't run after initso_lap

2014-06-23 Thread tran

Hi,

what do you mean by but it doesn't run? Did the calculation crash?
You have to give more details.

F. Tran

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, hüsnü kara wrote:


Dear Wien Users,

I did structure optimization and I got regular initialization. I runned the SCF 
calculation for spin poarized case.(runsp_lapw -ec 0.1 -cc 0.1 -Nl -i
50)  I saved the results. Then I used initso_lapw command in terminal:

For large spin orbit effects it might be necessary to include many more
eigenstates from lapw1 by increasing EMAX in case.in1(c).
 
Please enter EMAX(default 5.0 Ryd):
 
The radial basis set for heavy atoms with p-semicore states is very
limited. One can improve this by adding RLOs. Note: you MUST NOT add
RLOs for atoms like oxygen, therefore the default is set to NONE
Add RLO for NONE, ALL, CHOOSE elements? (N/a/c) : c
p-Energy parameters for Sr atom is :
 1   -1.35  0.002 CONT 1
 1    0.30  0.000 CONT 1
 
Would you like to add RLO? (Y/n)Y
p-Energy parameters for Ti atom is :
 1   -2.58  0.002 CONT 1
 1    0.30  0.000 CONT 1
 
Would you like to add RLO? (Y/n)Y
 Check the generated a3.inso file (RLOs,...)
 Check the generated a3.in1 file (Emax at the bottom of the file)

In spinpolarized case SO may reduce symmetry.

The program symmetso dedects the proper symmetry and creates new struct and
input files. (Note, equivalent atoms could become inequivalent in some cases).

Do you have a spinpolarized case (and want to run symmetso) ? (y/N)y
   90.0    90.0    1.57079632679490  T
   1.00   0.000E+000  0.000E+000
  6.123233995736766E-017   1.00   0.000E+000
  6.123233995736766E-017  6.123233995736766E-017   1.00
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.11 81.8% 0+0k 2224+4208io 8pf+0w
 A new structure for SO calculations has been created (_so).
 If you commit it will create new  a3.struct, in1(c), in2c, inc,
 clmsum/up/dn, vspup/dn and vnsup/dn files. (Please SAVE any previous
 calculations)

NOTE: Files for -orb (a3.indm(c),inorb,dmatup/dn) must be adapted manually
Do you want to use the new structure for SO calculations ? (y/N)y

 We run KGEN to generate a new kmesh for the SO calculation:
 
Number of Kpoint in a3.klist is : 1000

Please enter Number of k-points in full BZ (default: 1000):

  NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G)
 length of reciprocal lattice vectors:   0.843   0.843   0.843  10.000  10.000  
10.000
  Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift)
  75  k-points generated, ndiv=  10  10  10
KGEN ENDS
Do you want to rerun kgen ? (y/N)N

Spinorbit is now ready to run.

And then I runned the SCF calculation(runsp_lapw -so -ec 0.1 -cc 0.1 
-NI ), but it doesn't run.

Please can you help me?

With regards,

 





--

Hüsnü Kara

Doktora Öğrencisi/ PhD Candidate
Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi/ Yildiz Technical University
İstanbul / Turkey


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Formula to calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3

2014-06-23 Thread Mian Fayyaz Ahmad
Respected,  delam...@unam.mx
Still i am confusing how to calculate . As you mentioned but still
confusion about concrete steps as you mentioned
( First you optimize a, b, c
then you vary alpha and optimize, then beta and finally gamma

then you return to the beginning;

optimize a, b and c

until the changes in the cell parameters change little.).

 According to user guide at page #66 (listed from 1-6 ) in volume
optimization case.

Please guide me according to list in user guide step wise.

I would be very thankful to you.


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:30 AM, delamora delam...@unam.mx wrote:

  Yes, in the WIEN2k you find a, b and c optimization all set for you, but
 ti include the angles the number of structures would increase exponentially;

 1 dimensionn

 2 dimensionsn**2

 3 dimensionsn**3

 4 dimensionsn**4

 5 dimensionsn**5

 6 dimensionsn**6


  4**6=4096


  So you must do each optimization separately

 First you optimize a, b, c

 then you vary alpha and optimize, then beta and finally gamma


  then you return to the beginning;

 optimize a, b and c

 until the changes in the cell parameters change little.


  --
 *De:* wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
 wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at en nombre de Mian Fayyaz Ahmad 
 fayyaz...@gmail.com
 *Enviado:* domingo, 22 de junio de 2014 09:41 p.m.
 *Para:* Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 *Asunto:* [Wien] Formula to calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3


  *Respected, Wien2K Community*
  *   I want to **calculate Lattice Constant and angle of BiFeO3 in space
 group P1( Triclinic ). I have done volume optimization. I found a formula
 [V = abc( 1-cos**2alpha -**cos**2beta**- **cos**2gamma**+2***cos alpha***cos
 beta***cos gamma)**1/2]. I found only volume in volume optimization. How
 can i found lattice parameters a, b , c and angles??? *
 *please help me in this regard.*
  *thanks in advance*

 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html