Re: [Wien] my membership to the mailing list gets disabled every 3 weeks
30.01.2017 20:24, Laurence Marks wrote: Do any of the people who are experiencing this use .forward, or is there a .forward within the WIEN2k subscription checking structure? My understanding is that .forward is problematic In my mail account I do not have any automatic forwarding. The letters simply lay somewhere at the mail.ru server, and program Mozilla Thunderbird every 15 minutes makes connection, checks letters, and loads new. So bouncing is done at the level of mail.ru or closer to Wien. I have looked through deleted letters: during last month I had 2 notifications 11 and 19 Jan 2017. And what is strange: I had looked, after re-enabling the subscription, through the archive in order to see the letters that I missed (that were bounced), and I did not find any "excessive bounces". Though I must admit that I was not very attentive in this, but I remember I was surprised. I should have had 5 missed letters, yes? Best regards Lyudmila Dobysheva -- Phys.-Techn. Institute of Ural Br. of Russian Ac. of Sci. 426001 Izhevsk, ul.Kirova 132 RUSSIA -- Tel.:7(3412) 432045(office), 722529(Fax) E-mail: l...@ftiudm.ru, lyuk...@mail.ru (office) lyuk...@gmail.com (home) Skype: lyuka17 (home), lyuka18 (office) http://ftiudm.ru/content/view/25/103/lang,english/ -- ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] my membership to the mailing list gets disabled every 3 weeks
31.01.2017 13:16, Lyudmila Dobysheva wrote: So bouncing is done at the level of mail.ru or closer to Wien. And what is strange: ... I did not find any "excessive bounces". Though I must admit that I was not very attentive in this Well, now, in the archive, I've found one recent bounced letter which I did not receive: [Wien] A probable bug in TELNES program Hajar Nejati hajar.nejatipoor at yahoo.com Sun Jan 29 10:31:24 CET 2017 Best regards Lyudmila Dobysheva -- Phys.-Techn. Institute of Ural Br. of Russian Ac. of Sci. 426001 Izhevsk, ul.Kirova 132 RUSSIA -- Tel.:7(3412) 432045(office), 722529(Fax) E-mail: l...@ftiudm.ru, lyuk...@mail.ru (office) lyuk...@gmail.com (home) Skype: lyuka17 (home), lyuka18 (office) http://ftiudm.ru/content/view/25/103/lang,english/ -- ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] my membership to the mailing list gets disabled every 3 weeks
As Prof. Marks mentioned, I also suspect that it is due to gmail [1] and mail.ru [2] recently changing to a stricter DMARC Policy (i.e., from p=none to p=reject). The DMARC reject policy (p=reject) is known to be a problem that is not easy for mailing list administrators to address [3], because it currently seems that a choice has to be made among a list of imperfect solutions that come with their own pros and cons [4]. For an administrator of a mailing list (Mailman), the possible solutions listed on the webpage that should be accessible as follows might be of interest: 1. Go to: https://wiki.list.org/ 2. Click "List administrator tasks" (under FAQs in the left menu) 3. Find and click on "What can I do about members being unsubscribed by bounces of Yahoo user's posts for DMARC policy reasons?" [1] https://dmarc.org/2015/10/global-mailbox-providers-deploying-dmarc-to-protect-users/ [2] https://team.mail.ru/why-mail-ru-implements-a-strict-dmarc-policy/ [3] https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC [4] https://dmarc.org/wiki/FAQ#I_operate_a_mailing_list_and_I_want_to_interoperate_with_DMARC.2C_what_should_I_do.3F ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom
Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic properties of TiO2 anatase phase so in this order, i used the structural parameters a=b=3.7A and c=9.7A after doing the process of rmt reduction i found the rmt vales are Ti=1.38 O=1.24 sum of NN distance is 2.63647 which is close to sum of rmt value. i also searched in your mailing but same problem found by some other users but i could not find the proper solution. I have seen the .struct file in VESTA which is looking fine as per my knowledge. So please suggest me where i did wrong in calculation. - Thanks & Regards Rajneesh Chaurasiya Research Scholar IIT Jodhpur, India Mob. No. +91-9584499697 +91-7610950803 ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom
It seems that you did a mistake in the generation of the case.struct file. If you have the structure in VESTA you can export in CIF format and then use cif2struct. Best Regards Xavier Le 01/02/2017 à 08:21, Rajneesh Chaurasiya a écrit : Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic properties of TiO2 anatase phase so in this order, i used the structural parameters a=b=3.7A and c=9.7A after doing the process of rmt reduction i found the rmt vales are Ti=1.38 O=1.24 sum of NN distance is 2.63647 which is close to sum of rmt value. i also searched in your mailing but same problem found by some other users but i could not find the proper solution. I have seen the .struct file in VESTA which is looking fine as per my knowledge. So please suggest me where i did wrong in calculation. - Thanks & Regards Rajneesh Chaurasiya Research Scholar IIT Jodhpur, India Mob. No. +91-9584499697 +91-7610950803 ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom
The experimental structure of anatase that I used is a=3.785 Ang and c=9.51 Ang. This led to RMT=1.91 for Ti and 1.73 for O. Your parameters seem too small, check them. F. Tran On Wednesday 2017-02-01 08:21, Rajneesh Chaurasiya wrote: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 08:21:16 From: Rajneesh Chaurasiya Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users To: Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic properties of TiO2 anatase phase so in this order, i used the structural parameters a=b=3.7A and c=9.7A after doing the process of rmt reduction i found the rmt vales are Ti=1.38 O=1.24 sum of NN distance is 2.63647 which is close to sum of rmt value. i also searched in your mailing but same problem found by some other users but i could not find the proper solution. I have seen the .struct file in VESTA which is looking fine as per my knowledge. So please suggest me where i did wrong in calculation. - Thanks & RegardsRajneesh Chaurasiya Research Scholar IIT Jodhpur, India Mob. No. +91-9584499697 +91-7610950803 ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
