[Wien] orbital charge density

2018-07-06 Thread BUSHRA SABIR
Dear P.Blaha and wien2k users,
I am interested to plot orbital charge density for Ru d states .so i need to 
enter Emin and emax of d state from scf1 and scf2 files.

I am attaching both files, can anyone help me to understand these files.
    Ru(scf1up)
      ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Ru
:e__0012: OVERALL ENERGY PARAMETER IS    0.6223
  OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS LAPW
:E0_0012: E( 0)=    0.6223
 APW+lo
:E0_0012: E( 0)=   -4.6450   E(BOTTOM)=   -4.965   E(TOP)=   -4.324  3  4   161
 LOCAL ORBITAL
:E1_0012: E( 1)=    0.6223
 APW+lo
:E1_0012: E( 1)=   -2.4520   E(BOTTOM)=   -3.004   E(TOP)=   -1.900  2  3   159
 LOCAL ORBITAL
:E2_0012: E( 2)=    0.6223   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.212   E(TOP)= -200.000  1 -1   151
 APW+lo    Ru(scf1dn)
 ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Ru
:e__0012: OVERALL ENERGY PARAMETER IS    0.6223
  OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS LAPW
:E0_0012: E( 0)=    0.6223
 APW+lo
:E0_0012: E( 0)=   -4.6033   E(BOTTOM)=   -4.922   E(TOP)=   -4.284  3  4   171
 LOCAL ORBITAL
:E1_0012: E( 1)=    0.6223
 APW+lo
:E1_0012: E( 1)=   -2.4077   E(BOTTOM)=   -2.958   E(TOP)=   -1.857  2  3   163
 LOCAL ORBITAL
:E2_0012: E( 2)=    0.6223   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.163   E(TOP)= -200.000  1 -1   153
 APW+lo

    Ru(scf2up)
:POS012: ATOM  -12 X,Y,Z = 0.66405 0.33836 0.32763  MULT= 1  ZZ= 44.000  Ru

   LMMAX 49


:CHA012: TOTAL VALENCE CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE  12 =   8.0236    (RMT=  1.9600 )
:PCS012: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 12 S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL012: 1.0641 2.9740 3.9476 0.0318 0.9915 0.9908 0.9918 0.7677 0.7892 0.7884 
0.8081 0.7942
    Q-s-low E-s-low   Q-p-low E-p-low   Q-d-low E-d-low   Q-f-low E-f-low
:EPL012:  0.9953 -4.5031    2.8883 -2.3282    0.0352 -0.5270    0.0029 -0.5311
    Q-s-hi  E-s-hi    Q-p-hi  E-p-hi    Q-d-hi  E-d-hi    Q-f-hi  E-f-hi
:EPH012:  0.0688  0.7008    0.0857  0.6110    3.9124  0.8200    0.0290  0.7812

    Ru(scf2dn)
:POS012: ATOM  -12 X,Y,Z = 0.66405 0.33836 0.32763  MULT= 1  ZZ= 44.000  Ru

   LMMAX 49


:CHA012: TOTAL VALENCE CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE  12 =   8.0236    (RMT=  1.9600 )
:PCS012: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 12 S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL012: 1.0641 2.9740 3.9476 0.0318 0.9915 0.9908 0.9918 0.7677 0.7892 0.7884 
0.8081 0.7942
    Q-s-low E-s-low   Q-p-low E-p-low   Q-d-low E-d-low   Q-f-low E-f-low
:EPL012:  0.9953 -4.5031    2.8883 -2.3282    0.0352 -0.5270    0.0029 -0.5311
    Q-s-hi  E-s-hi    Q-p-hi  E-p-hi    Q-d-hi  E-d-hi    Q-f-hi  E-f-hi
:EPH012:  0.0688  0.7008    0.0857  0.6110    3.9124  0.8200    0.0290  0.7812


Bushra



___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Volunteers for constrained fixed-point

2018-07-06 Thread Laurence Marks
Dear All,

I have a working (I believe) version of the mixer that includes constraints
on atomic positions. It can therefore be used to find transition states,
and for other things (perhaps Berry phase and phonons). I suspect that it
may reduce the time to find a transition state by a factor of 10-100. I am
looking for experienced Wien2k users to test it. Please contact me off the
list -- and not the word "experienced".

-- 
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu ; Corrosion in 4D: MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, www.cfw.org/100-percent
Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] LOPW-exhausted for atom 4 PASS 1 had to reduce check 0.010000

2018-07-06 Thread Rui Costa
Thank you very much, it worked.

It is a B lattice and the Oxygen has a multiplicity of 48.

I ended up doing echo 0.4 > .pratt and set tolf=0.01 with -fc 0.001 but
since it was taking a large amount of time I stopped with forces below 0.1.

Best regards,
Rui Costa.

On 20 June 2018 at 06:11, Peter Blaha  wrote:

> Usually this warning comes for B lattices and a position of high
> multiplicity (24 ??). In general I do not consider this as a problem and I
> doubt that it has anything to do with the force minimization.
>
> This problem is most likely connected with a "mixer" problem in such a
> way, that mixer keeps the non-converged forces in a MSR1a optimizitation
> below the convergence criterium and thus stops the optimization, while
> after switching back to MSR1 the converged forces are again larger than
> expected. This can even go on a couple of times.
>
> The solutions can be:
> echo 0.4 > .pratt
> run -min ...
>
> or/and  set a very tight convergence criterium (eg. tolf= 0.1 in
> case.inM). With the latter it does not stop at the "false convergence", but
> it may also not stop automatically. Once the positions have moved and E-tot
> settles at a better value, you can manually change to MSR1 and check the
> final converged forces.
>
>
>
> Am 19.06.2018 um 18:36 schrieb Rui Costa:
>
>> Dear wien2k users,
>>
>> I am trying to minimize the positions of the compound YIG to get forces
>> below 1 mRy/bohr but instead I am always getting forces around 3 mRy/bohr,
>> and in every iteration I am getting the warning message: "LOPW-exhausted
>> for atom4 PASS 1  had to reduce check 0.01", where atom 4 is the
>> Oxygen and it is the only with free structural parameters.
>>
>> I have searched the mailing list ([https://www.mail-archive.com
>> /wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg13899.html] and [
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.a
>> t/msg14393.html]) and it seems that the problem is a low RKmax but I
>> have done the calculations from RKmax=6 to 10 and the warning persists.
>>
>> Also, if I do a 1x1x1 P supercell (160 atoms) this warning disappears.
>>
>> Should I increase the RKmax until I no longer get the warning or is there
>> an alternative?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rui Costa.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wien mailing list
>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/wi
>> e...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>>
>>
> --
> --
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
> Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
> WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha
> -
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/wi
> e...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Fw: Re: How to calculate work function

2018-07-06 Thread prasad jayasena
 Dear developers and users
I tried to create a supercell of U3O8 (sace group : Amm2, 38, orthorhombic). 
However I ended up with an error. Can someone suggest me a way to do it please.

 Fatal Error occured:
 Unknown lattice type: CYZ


Thank you
Prasad



   - Forwarded Message - From: prasad jayasena 
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users 
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018, 2:14:24 p.m. 
CSTSubject: Re: [Wien] How to calculate work function
  
Dear Professor Laurence Marks

Thank you so much for your answer. This discussion was very valuable

Prasad
On Thursday, June 28, 2018, 1:55:22 p.m. CST, Laurence Marks 
 wrote:  
 
 v5,v5c,v5x are at z=0.5. v5 (1st number) is the total potential, v5c is the 
Coulomb and v5x is the exchange. (For a good calculation v5x should be small, 
it will never be zero.)

Whether one should use v5 or v5c is something I have debated with myself. I 
suspect that there are enough uncertainties in the XC used that they are 
equally bad.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:21 PM, prasad jayasena  wrote:

Dear Prof. Gavin Abo
Thank you very much. Yes it worked and I could finish one scf calculation with 
spin polarization.
I have one more question.

I know that, WF= VZERO -FERMI. Since I have given the vacuum along z-direction 
I believe I need z-component of Vzero . I found the values below from scf0 file 
and I am not quite sure which one is the relevant value.
:VZERO:v0,v0c,v0x  -1.73141  -0.86375  -0.86766 v5,v5c,v5x   0.38171   0.39653  
-0.01482
:VZERY:v0,v0c,v0x  -0.49951   0.0  -0.49951 v5,v5c,v5x  -0.49951   0.0  
-0.49951
:VZERX:v0,v0c,v0x  -0.86692  -0.32162  -0.54530 v5,v5c,v5x  -0.91974  -0.41621  
-0.50353

I checked the userguide::VZERO   Gives the total, Coulomb and xc-potential at 
z=0 and z=0.5 (meaningfull only for slabcalculations)a


I think  VZERY and VZERX are not relevant and not meaningful in my case since I 
have the slab in the z direction. But I am  not sure which value is at z=0.5?
I am sorry that I tried userguide and the mailing list to find any description 
on this. But I couldn't.
Thank you for your understanding and for your valuable comments

Prasad





On Wednesday, June 27, 2018, 6:32:22 p.m. CST, Gavin Abo  
wrote:


Regarding the "head: cannot open 'super.inm' for reading: No such file or 
directory", yes, that is most likely because you missing a necessary step.

There should be different methods that you could use to solve that:

1) Since super.inm is automatically created by init_lapw, use the terminal 
command: init_lapw

2) If you use w2web, after clicking "initialize calc." in the menu, create the 
super.inm file by clicking on the button: Prepare input files

Note: Make sure you clicked the "x lstart" button first to create super.inm_st 
before clicking the "Prepare input files" button.

3) Create the case.inm yourself by using the two commands:
 x lstart
 cp super.inm_st super.inm

Regarding the "no super.clmsum(_old) file found", did you run "x dstart" during 
your "x symmetry, copy struct_st, instgen_lapw,etc" steps to create the 
super.clmsum file?

On 6/27/2018 1:36 PM, prasad jayasena wrote:

Dear Prof Gavin Abo
Thank you for your valuable instruction and for your time.
I couldn't get this corrected yet. I am giving all the steps I followed  and 
the recieved error below.
I am doing the calculation in "super" folder only
1. mkdir super2. cd super3. makestruct 
4. cp init.struct super.struct ( MgO structure correctly viewed through 
XCRYSDEN - so  n doubt about up to this step)5. x supercell (1x1x5 supercell 
with 30 bohr vacuum in z direction created)
6 cp super_super.struct super.struct ( structure is correct, viewed through 
xcrysden)7. x nn8. (warning appeared) cp super.struct_nn super.struct9. x nn10. 
x sgroup11. cp super.struct_sgroup super.struct
After this I did the other initilize steps as it is through w2web interface 
x symmetry, copy struct_st, instgen_lapw, etc
When I run SCF calculation now I am getting the following error in STDOUT
head: cannot open 'super.inm' for reading: No such file or directory
head: cannot open 'super.inm' for reading: No such file or directory
no super.clmsum(_old) file found, which is necessary for lapw0 !

>   stop error

I am not sure whether I am following the correct path or if I am missing some 
necessary steps.

Truly I am not sure the correct way to do this. I believe after correct 
supercell I should do initilize the structure and then run the required 
run_lapw or  runsp_lapw with -orb -dm -so options as required.

I appreciate very much if someone can correct me on this. I am really lost
Thank you in advance
Prasad

__ _
Wien mailing list
w...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac. at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien. ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
w...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac. at/index.html




-- 
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think wha

[Wien] tutorial 2 berrypi

2018-07-06 Thread kadda AMARA
*Dear WIEN2k users,I'm attempting an berrypi Version 1.3.4 calculation with
the tutorial 2 *
*it is mentioned :*


1.5 Once the calculation is completed the result will be printed like this

---PHASES/2*PI IN [0 to 2]RANGE---

TOTAL PHASE/(2*PI):  [0.991459032, 1.91132539,
0.97814709926563959]

   ---PHASES/2*PI IN [-1 to +1]RANGE---

TOTAL PHASE/(2*PI):  [0.991459032, -0.088674607,
0.97814709926563959]


*Where this result will be printed?*




*Best regards*
*Kadda Amara*
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Error in supercell creation

2018-07-06 Thread prasad jayasena
Dear developers and users
I tried to create a supercell of U3O8 (sace group : Amm2, 38, orthorhombic) for 
predicting the work function. However I ended up with an error. Can someone 
suggest me a way to do it please.

 Fatal Error occured:
 Unknown lattice type: CYZ


Thank you
Prasad___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Optic program error for XMCD calculation of Fe3O4

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha
I could finally make the XMCD option working again. Several small errors 
were fixed in a preliminary way, because of a partial (incomplete) HELO 
implementation. HELOs are still not supported for XMCD. Cells with more 
than one atom should work now (I guess they never worked ??).


However, I have not verified the results against previous versions (for 
bcc Fe), nor made other cross checks (eg. run bcc Fe in simple cubic 
structure with 2 atoms, ...). So please check.


The modifications are too big to send them here.

However, I'm ready now with WIEN2k_18, where these fixes will be 
included. The new release should come today/tomorrow, unless I find some 
more problems.


Peter Blaha

On 06/27/2018 02:40 PM, Jose Maria Castillo wrote:

Yes, I tried with bcc-Fe and I didn't have any problem.

Best regards,

José María Castillo Robles
El mié., 27 de jun. de 2018 a la(s) 03:34, Peter Blaha
(pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at) escribió:


Did you try bccFe ?? This runs for me (and I would like to get a hint if
the problem comes from more atoms/cell or if your optics is not updated
properly)

On 06/27/2018 08:07 AM, Jose Maria Castillo wrote:

Dear Prof. Blaha,

Thank you for your answer.  Yes, I used the patch that is in the following post:

https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg17555.html

but I got the error that I mentioned.

Best regards,

José María Castillo Robles

El mié., 27 de jun. de 2018 a la(s) 00:26, Peter Blaha
(pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at) escribió:


Did you search the mailinglist for recent threads about xmcd ?

There was a patch for a severe bug mentioned just a few weeks ago.

Regards

Am 27.06.2018 um 07:11 schrieb Jose Maria Castillo:

Dear Prof. Blaha and Wien2k users,

I am using WIEN2k version WIEN2k_17.1 for calculating XMCD spectra of
Fe3O4 at the L23 edge for Fe.  First, I did a spin polarized
calculation using:

init_lapw (using default settings)
runsp_lapw -ec 0.0001

and then a calculation including spin orbit coupling. I ran the
following commands:

initso_lapw (using default settings)
rm *.broyd*
runsp_lapw -so -ec 0.0001

and I don't get any errors in the calculations. In both cases, the
Brillouin zone was sampled with 1000 k-points.

After this, I ran the commands that are mentioned in the usersguide
(section 8.17 "OPTIC calculating optical properties") :

1. cp Fe3O4.struct Fe3O4.ksym
2. x kgen -so -fbz
3. change TOT to FERMI in Fe3O4.in2c and Fe3O4.in2
4. put TETRA with value 101 in Fe3O4.in2c and Fe3O4.in2
5. set IPRINT=1 in Fe3O4.inc
6. rm *broyd*
7. x lapw1 -up
8. x lapw1 -dn
9. x lapwso -up
10. x lapw2 -fermi -up
11. x lapw2 -fermi -dn
12. x lcore -up
13. x lcore -dn
14. x optic -so -up

Before optic program, it ran without errors, but after running optic
program it crashes with the following error:


user@machine:~/Fe3O4$ x optic -so -up
emin,emax,nbvalmax  -5.003.00 

XMCD selected for atom   2 L23
LSO=  T
forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 18, file
/home/user/Fe3O4/Fe3O4.vspup
Image  PCRoutineLine
Source
opticc 00436D53  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
opticc 0045C00A  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
opticc 00403709  atpar_ 62  atpar_op.f
opticc 00429D22  cor_mat_  345
sph-UPcor_tmp.f
opticc 004112F1  MAIN__460  opmain.f
opticc 00402BEE  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc-2.23.so   2AE5A5E03830  __libc_start_main Unknown  Unknown
opticc 00402AE9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.01 100.0% 0+0k 0+72io 0pf+0w
error: command   /home/user/WIEN2k_ifort/opticc upoptic.def   failed

In order to discard a problem with the structure, I tried to do the
XMCD calculation for two different solids (Fe3O4 and CeFe2)
and I got the same error. It looks like the format of Fe3O4.vspup is
not compatible with optic program.

I would like to ask for your help. I send you the input files for the
optic program, the output, as well as the error files.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards!
José María Castillo Robles
-Inputs
Fe3O4.inop
9 1   number of k-points, first k-point
-5.0 3.0  Emin, Emax for matrix elements, NBvalMAX
XMCD 1 L23xmcd  atom_num edge
2 number of choices (columns in *outmat): 2: hex or tetrag. case
1 Re xx
3 Re zz
OFF   ON/OFF   writes MME to unit 4
---
Fe3O4.inc
1 0.00  1  NUMBER OF ORBITALS (EXCLUDING SPIN)
1,-1,2   ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
5 0.00  1  NUMBER OF ORBITALS (EXCLUDING SPIN)
1,-1,2   ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
2,-1,2  

[Wien] Fw: Error in supercell creation

2018-07-06 Thread prasad jayasena
 

   - Forwarded Message - From: prasad jayasena 
To: A. Mailing List for WIEN2k Users 
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018, 11:27:27 a.m. 
CSTSubject: Error in supercell creation
 Dear developers and users
I tried to create a supercell of U3O8 (sace group : Amm2, 38, orthorhombic) for 
predicting the work function. However I ended up with an error. Can someone 
suggest me a way to do it please.

 Fatal Error occured:
 Unknown lattice type: CYZ


Thank you
Prasad  ___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Memory in the k-parallel method exceeds NMATMAX ?

2018-07-06 Thread Luc Fruchter
[ ... I apolodgize for having not responded yet to a pending discussion 
that I already have for another subject - and probably to this one also 
for a while, but the mail archive webmaster agrees than one cannot 
answer with 'reply button' until this is fixed ...]


Here is my problem,

I am running cases of supercells of different sizes, using the 
k-parallel method. To make it simple, I only consider a 10 cores machine 
running these cores locally.


The machine has 32 Gb memory, and NTMATMAX was set according to the 
installation suggestion:


NTMATMAX = 19000 (2 Gb)
NUME = 6000

The cases I have run presently are from group 26 (no inversion), with 
number of atoms ranging from 10 to 22, depending on the supercell size.


I find the following memory requirements, using k-parallel method, fixed 
k grid and default RKMAX:


Number of atoms / memory per CPU used
10 / 1.7 Gb
12 / 2
15 / 2.7
17 / 3.1
22 / 4.3

So, this exceeds what I expected to be the maximum limit (from manual p. 
255 ~ 2 Go / CPU) and precludes the computation of larger cells, using 
reasonable memory (3-6 Gb / CPU). Increasing the number of CPU will not 
solve the problem, as the memory per CPU needed appears proportional to 
the number of these CPUs.


Could someone recall the general principles for memory usage estimate in 
the k-parallel method, and how I could be able to run larger cells 
within these principles ?



Thanks
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Orbital character: along which axes?

2018-07-06 Thread Lukasz Plucinski

Dear All,

I did two calculations for bulk Fe with SOC for magnetization along 110 
and 100. Then I plotted band characters (using lapw2 -band -qtl -up/dn). 
I noticed that now different bands have different character, as if now 
e.g. d(x2-y2) orbital is defined either along 110 and 100 (basically now 
different bands are called with different names as if the reference 
frame has rotated by 45 deg).


I think it would be good to set the reference frame of the bcc crystal 
lattice, that is independent on the magnetization direction.


I also tried with QTL program (x qtl -dn -so) with different QSPLIT 
parameter but this does not seem to solve the problem.


I looked at the manual and could not find a quick answer. It seems it 
has to do with symmetries of the calculation (M is changing mirror 
planes). But is there a way to set x-y directions to be always with 
respect to the crystal axes?


Best,
Lukasz

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] wien2k_18

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha

Dear wien2k users,

A new version, WIEN2k_18 is ready and can be downloaded by all 
registered users.


It contains numerous updates, new features, bug fixes. The most 
important changes are:


The list of Authors of WIEN2k has changed. In order to acknowledge their 
support over many years, we have included Robert Laskowski, Fabien Tran 
and Laurence Marks as official co-authors. The official citation of 
WIEN2k should be changed to:


P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, 
F. Tran and L. Marks, WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals 
Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. 
Universität Wien, Austria), 2018. ISBN 3-9501031-1-2


Please use this reference in your further papers.
--
There are new packages:

afmsim: (Atomic force microscopy simulations)

3ddens: (fast program to calculate 3D-densities/potentials,... producing 
an xsf file). Don't use the 3D option of xcrysden anymore. It can also 
simulate constant current STM images.


nlvdw: large speed iprovement (no network overload anymore)

mixer: New version 9.4 by L.D.arks

pes: new module for valence PES simulations

Improvements in several *_lapw scripts:
   new switches for lapw5 (potentials, )
   automatic recovery from Cholesky or "band range errors" when using 
iterative diagonalization


GLLB-SC potential as alternative to TB-mBJ. However, usually mBJ gives 
superior results 

-
Many bug fixes, which where discussed in the mailing list over the last 
year (and more ...)



A complete list of changes is given at
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/updates


Regards
Peter Blaha
--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha- 


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Error

2018-07-06 Thread Subhasis Panda
 Dear All,

I have installed Wien2k 17.1 version on a desktop PC having core i7 with
ubuntu
16.04 operating system, fortran compiler ifort, math libraries MKL. When I
was generating the structure of any material, RMT is not calculated
automatically. Again if I am giving RMT manually and during initializing
the calculation the following error is found from the STDOUT file. Kindly
suggest me what to do.

 next is setrmt
 next is nn
/home/anupriya/WIEN2k_17.1/nn: Command not found.
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
error: command   /home/anupriya/WIEN2k_17.1/nn nn.def   failed
 n stop error n




Thanks & regards
Subhasis

-- 



Best regards from,

Dr. Subhasis Panda
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
National Institute of Technology Silchar
Assam, India  - 788010.

-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Memory in the k-parallel method exceeds NMATMAX ?

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha
You did not specify the corresponding :RKM values, which lists the 
actual matrix size in your calculations.


Two remarks:   the quoted numbers are typical averages with "sensible 
RMTs and close-packed structures.


I do not understand / believe the supercell sizes. What is a supercell 
with 17 atoms ? How do you create from 10 atoms --> 17 atoms ??


What are your RMT values ???


PS: k-parallel means you are usingn   lapw1  runs, and each of them 
requires the same memory. So of course, when running on a single cpu n 
k-parallel jobs, you need n times the memory of a single calculation.


Am 05.07.2018 um 16:32 schrieb Luc Fruchter:
[ ... I apolodgize for having not responded yet to a pending discussion 
that I already have for another subject - and probably to this one also 
for a while, but the mail archive webmaster agrees than one cannot 
answer with 'reply button' until this is fixed ...]


Here is my problem,

I am running cases of supercells of different sizes, using the 
k-parallel method. To make it simple, I only consider a 10 cores machine 
running these cores locally.


The machine has 32 Gb memory, and NTMATMAX was set according to the 
installation suggestion:


NTMATMAX = 19000 (2 Gb)
NUME = 6000

The cases I have run presently are from group 26 (no inversion), with 
number of atoms ranging from 10 to 22, depending on the supercell size.


I find the following memory requirements, using k-parallel method, fixed 
k grid and default RKMAX:


Number of atoms / memory per CPU used
10 / 1.7 Gb
12 / 2
15 / 2.7
17 / 3.1
22 / 4.3

So, this exceeds what I expected to be the maximum limit (from manual p. 
255 ~ 2 Go / CPU) and precludes the computation of larger cells, using 
reasonable memory (3-6 Gb / CPU). Increasing the number of CPU will not 
solve the problem, as the memory per CPU needed appears proportional to 
the number of these CPUs.


Could someone recall the general principles for memory usage estimate in 
the k-parallel method, and how I could be able to run larger cells 
within these principles ?



Thanks
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha- 


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] orbital charge density

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha
You can use scf1/2 only for the determination of "localized" (semicore 
states).


For valence states, you have to plot the partial DOS (in Ry, not in eV) 
and take the energy range from these plots.


Am 01.07.2018 um 06:01 schrieb BUSHRA SABIR:

Dear P.Blaha and wien2k users,

I am interested to plot orbital charge density for Ru d states .
so i need to enter Emin and emax of d state from scf1 and scf2 files.


I am attaching both files, can anyone help me to understand these files.
*    Ru(scf1up)
*
**ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Ru
:e__0012: OVERALL ENERGY PARAMETER IS    0.6223
   OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS LAPW
:E0_0012: E( 0)=    0.6223
  APW+lo
:E0_0012: E( 0)=   -4.6450   E(BOTTOM)=   -4.965   E(TOP)=   -4.324  3  
4   161

  LOCAL ORBITAL
:E1_0012: E( 1)=    0.6223
  APW+lo
:E1_0012: E( 1)=   -2.4520   E(BOTTOM)=   -3.004   E(TOP)=   -1.900  2  
3   159

  LOCAL ORBITAL
:E2_0012: E( 2)=    0.6223   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.212   E(TOP)= -200.000  1 
-1   151

  APW+lo
*  Ru(scf1dn)*
  ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Ru
:e__0012: OVERALL ENERGY PARAMETER IS    0.6223
   OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS LAPW
:E0_0012: E( 0)=    0.6223
  APW+lo
:E0_0012: E( 0)=   -4.6033   E(BOTTOM)=   -4.922   E(TOP)=   -4.284  3  
4   171

  LOCAL ORBITAL
:E1_0012: E( 1)=    0.6223
  APW+lo
:E1_0012: E( 1)=   -2.4077   E(BOTTOM)=   -2.958   E(TOP)=   -1.857  2  
3   163

  LOCAL ORBITAL
:E2_0012: E( 2)=    0.6223   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.163   E(TOP)= -200.000  1 
-1   153

  APW+lo

*Ru(scf2up)*

:POS012: ATOM  -12 X,Y,Z = 0.66405 0.33836 0.32763  MULT= 1  ZZ= 44.000  Ru

    LMMAX 49


:CHA012: TOTAL VALENCE CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE  12 =   8.0236    (RMT=  
1.9600 )
:PCS012: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 12 
S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL012: 1.0641 2.9740 3.9476 0.0318 0.9915 0.9908 0.9918 0.7677 0.7892 
0.7884 0.8081 0.7942
     Q-s-low E-s-low   Q-p-low E-p-low   Q-d-low E-d-low   Q-f-low 
E-f-low
:EPL012:  0.9953 -4.5031    2.8883 -2.3282    0.0352 -0.5270    0.0029 
-0.5311
     Q-s-hi  E-s-hi    Q-p-hi  E-p-hi    Q-d-hi  E-d-hi    Q-f-hi  
E-f-hi
:EPH012:  0.0688  0.7008    0.0857  0.6110    3.9124  0.8200    0.0290  
0.7812


*
*
*    Ru(scf2dn)*

:POS012: ATOM  -12 X,Y,Z = 0.66405 0.33836 0.32763  MULT= 1  ZZ= 44.000  Ru

    LMMAX 49


:CHA012: TOTAL VALENCE CHARGE INSIDE SPHERE  12 =   8.0236    (RMT=  
1.9600 )
:PCS012: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 12 
S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL012: 1.0641 2.9740 3.9476 0.0318 0.9915 0.9908 0.9918 0.7677 0.7892 
0.7884 0.8081 0.7942
     Q-s-low E-s-low   Q-p-low E-p-low   Q-d-low E-d-low   Q-f-low 
E-f-low
:EPL012:  0.9953 -4.5031    2.8883 -2.3282    0.0352 -0.5270    0.0029 
-0.5311
     Q-s-hi  E-s-hi    Q-p-hi  E-p-hi    Q-d-hi  E-d-hi    Q-f-hi  
E-f-hi
:EPH012:  0.0688  0.7008    0.0857  0.6110    3.9124  0.8200    0.0290  
0.7812



Bushra






___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha- 


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Orbital character: along which axes?

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha
This is due to the local rotation matrices, which rotates the frame 
according to the directions of the highest symmetry operation.

You should see this in your struct file.

PS: with  qtl   can can change the the coordinate fram back to what you 
had previously. But you have to put the correct inq file.


Am 05.07.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Lukasz Plucinski:

Dear All,

I did two calculations for bulk Fe with SOC for magnetization along 110 
and 100. Then I plotted band characters (using lapw2 -band -qtl -up/dn). 
I noticed that now different bands have different character, as if now 
e.g. d(x2-y2) orbital is defined either along 110 and 100 (basically now 
different bands are called with different names as if the reference 
frame has rotated by 45 deg).


I think it would be good to set the reference frame of the bcc crystal 
lattice, that is independent on the magnetization direction.


I also tried with QTL program (x qtl -dn -so) with different QSPLIT 
parameter but this does not seem to solve the problem.


I looked at the manual and could not find a quick answer. It seems it 
has to do with symmetries of the calculation (M is changing mirror 
planes). But is there a way to set x-y directions to be always with 
respect to the crystal axes?


Best,
Lukasz

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha- 


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Error

2018-07-06 Thread Peter Blaha

The problem clearly says:   nn not found.

Most likely, the installation (compilation) did NOT work properly.

Check for the presence of/home/anupriya/WIEN2k_17.1/nn

if it does not exist,
cd SRC_nn; cat compile.msgand check for errors.




Am 05.07.2018 um 08:36 schrieb Subhasis Panda:

Dear All,

I have installed Wien2k 17.1 version on a desktop PC having core i7 with 
ubuntu
16.04 operating system, fortran compiler ifort, math libraries MKL. When 
I was generating the structure of any material, RMT is not calculated 
automatically. Again if I am giving RMT manually and during initializing 
the calculation the following error is found from the STDOUT file. 
Kindly suggest me what to do.


  next is setrmt
  next is nn
/home/anupriya/WIEN2k_17.1/nn: Command not found.
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
error: command   /home/anupriya/WIEN2k_17.1/nn nn.def   failed
  n stop error n




Thanks & regards
Subhasis

--



Best regards from,

Dr. Subhasis Panda
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
National Institute of Technology Silchar
Assam, India  - 788010.

-


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: 
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha- 


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] wien2k_18

2018-07-06 Thread Dr. K. C. Bhamu
Dear Prof. Peter,

Thanks for the updated version.


initialization and scf for TiC went perfectly on ubuntu16.04 Desktop with
ifort (2015 version) and cc.

However, I observed below things:

At the download page, the size of the tar file  is mentioned 80MB while I
see 124M

another thing is:


sed: can't read /home/bhamu/Wien2k18/WIEN2k_COMPILER: No such file or
directory

Anyway, I do not see problematic all these.



Kind regards
Bhamu




On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Peter Blaha 
wrote:

> Dear wien2k users,
>
> A new version, WIEN2k_18 is ready and can be downloaded by all registered
> users.
>
> It contains numerous updates, new features, bug fixes. The most important
> changes are:
>
> The list of Authors of WIEN2k has changed. In order to acknowledge their
> support over many years, we have included Robert Laskowski, Fabien Tran and
> Laurence Marks as official co-authors. The official citation of WIEN2k
> should be changed to:
>
> P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, F.
> Tran and L. Marks, WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program
> for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universität
> Wien, Austria), 2018. ISBN 3-9501031-1-2
>
> Please use this reference in your further papers.
> --
> There are new packages:
>
> afmsim: (Atomic force microscopy simulations)
>
> 3ddens: (fast program to calculate 3D-densities/potentials,... producing
> an xsf file). Don't use the 3D option of xcrysden anymore. It can also
> simulate constant current STM images.
>
> nlvdw: large speed iprovement (no network overload anymore)
>
> mixer: New version 9.4 by L.D.arks
>
> pes: new module for valence PES simulations
>
> Improvements in several *_lapw scripts:
>new switches for lapw5 (potentials, )
>automatic recovery from Cholesky or "band range errors" when using
> iterative diagonalization
>
> GLLB-SC potential as alternative to TB-mBJ. However, usually mBJ gives
> superior results 
> -
> Many bug fixes, which where discussed in the mailing list over the last
> year (and more ...)
>
>
> A complete list of changes is given at
> http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/updates
>
>
> Regards
> Peter Blaha
> --
> --
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
> Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
> WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha
> -
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  http://www.mail-archive.com/wi
> e...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html