[Wien] restricting magnetic moment of individual atom‏

2015-03-03 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان
Dear Wien2k Developers and user,
hi,

I'm studying charge transfer mechanisms within LaCaMnO3 which has a mixture
of Mn+3 and Mn+4 oxidation state.

it is AFM with 4 Mn atoms in unit cell.

I want to fix magnetic moments of Mn atoms individually (i.e., different
magnetic moments for different Mn atoms)
any or all guidance will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Arshad


-- 

*M. Arshad Farhan*EMMG, Physics Division,
PINSTECH, Islamabad
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Projection of Wavefunctions on bessel plane

2013-03-21 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان
Dear Wien users/developers,
hi,

i'm trying to figure out bands arising from surface states in the band
structure of a slab geometry.

one method reported in
http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/24/3/035502using VASP code is by
projecting the wave function on top/bottom
plane/layer of the unit cell (slab)

can any body suggest me how can i do it in Wien2k.

Regards,

-- 
*M.Arshad Farhan*
Dept of Chemistry,
Pohang Univ of Sci  Tech
Pohang, Republic of Korea
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130321/18a05a0a/attachment.htm


[Wien] LAPW2 END

2012-10-23 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان
you can try looking in case.dayfile or case error file (some thing like *
case_title.e???* for example in your case, it may be
NiFe2O4.e???where *???* is job submission number to the
cluster)
there should be a total of 4 files case_title.e??? , case_title.pe??? ,
case_title.o??? and case_title.po???

 by the way, case.def just tells you which files this program needs as
input and which files it will produce after execution.

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Mohamed ouaissa m.ouaissa at yahoo.fr wrote:

 Dear WIEN2k users
 That's what i have found in data in files .def and .erros
 i have checked dndstart.def and i have found this:
  6,'NiFe2O4.outputddn','unknown','formatted',0
 13,'NiFe2O4.in0_std','unknown','formatted',0
 14,'NiFe2O4.in0','old','formatted',0
 15,'NiFe2O4.in2',   'old','formatted',0
 17,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'old','formatted',0
 16,'NiFe2O4.test','unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct',  'old','formatted',0
 81,'NiFe2O4.rspdn','old','formatted',0
  51,'NiFe2O4.clmdn','unknown','formatted',0
 and in dndstart.error i have found nothing

 dnlapw1.def i have found this:
  4,'NiFe2O4.klist',  'unknown','formatted',0
  5,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'old','formatted',0
  6,'NiFe2O4.output1dn','unknown','formatted',0
 10,'./NiFe2O4.vectordn', 'unknown','unformatted',9000
 11,'NiFe2O4.energydn', 'unknown','formatted',0
 18,'NiFe2O4.vspdn',   'old','formatted',0
 19,'NiFe2O4.vnsdn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct', 'old','formatted',0
 21,'NiFe2O4.scf1dn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 55,'NiFe2O4.vec','unknown','formatted',0
 71,'NiFe2O4.nshdn','unknown','formatted',0
  7,'NiFe2O4.vorbdn' ,'unknown','formatted',0
 200,'./NiFe2O4.storeHinvdn', 'replace','unformatted',9000
 and dnlapw1:error i have found nothing
 and dnlapw2.def i have found this:
  2,'NiFe2O4.nshdn','unknown','formatted',0
  3,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'unknown','formatted',0
  4,'NiFe2O4.inso',   'unknown','formatted',0
  5,'NiFe2O4.in2',   'old','formatted',0
  6,'NiFe2O4.output2dn','unknown','formatted',0
  7,'NiFe2O4.vorbdn','unknown','formatted',0
  8,'NiFe2O4.clmvaldn','unknown','formatted',0
 10,'./NiFe2O4.vectordn', 'unknown','unformatted',9000
 11,'NiFe2O4.weightdn','unknown','formatted',0
 13,'NiFe2O4.recprlist',  'unknown','unformatted',9000
 14,'NiFe2O4.kgen','unknown','formatted',0
 15,'NiFe2O4.tmpdn',   'unknown','unformatted',0
 16,'NiFe2O4.qtldn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 17,'NiFe2O4.weightaverdn','unknown','formatted',0
 18,'NiFe2O4.vspdn',   'old','formatted',0
 19,'NiFe2O4.vnsdn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct', 'old','formatted',0
 21,'NiFe2O4.scf2dn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 22,'NiFe2O4.rotlm',   'unknown','formatted',0
 23,'NiFe2O4.radwfdn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 24,'NiFe2O4.almblmdn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 26,'NiFe2O4.weighdn',   'unknown','unformatted',0
 27,'NiFe2O4.weighup',   'unknown','unformatted',0
 29,'NiFe2O4.energyup','unknown','formatted',0
 30,'NiFe2O4.energydn', 'unknown','formatted',0
 32,'NiFe2O4.qdmftdn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 34,'NiFe2O4.oubwindn',   'unknown','formatted',0
 231,'NiFe2O4.dmftsym',   'unknown','formatted',0
 and dnlapw2.error  i have found nothing

 dnstart.def i have found this:
  6,'NiFe2O4.outputd','unknown','formatted',0
 13,'NiFe2O4.in0_std','unknown','formatted',0
 14,'NiFe2O4.in0','old','formatted',0
 15,'NiFe2O4.in2',   'old','formatted',0
 17,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'old','formatted',0
 16,'NiFe2O4.test','unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct',  'old','formatted',0
 81,'NiFe2O4.rsp','old','formatted',0
  51,'NiFe2O4.clmsum','unknown','formatted',0
 and dnstart.error i have found nothing

 updstart.def i have found this :
 6,'NiFe2O4.outputdup','unknown','formatted',0
 13,'NiFe2O4.in0_std','unknown','formatted',0
 14,'NiFe2O4.in0','old','formatted',0
 15,'NiFe2O4.in2',   'old','formatted',0
 17,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'old','formatted',0
 16,'NiFe2O4.test','unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct',  'old','formatted',0
 81,'NiFe2O4.rspup','old','formatted',0
  51,'NiFe2O4.clmup','unknown','formatted',0
 and updstart.error i have found nothing

 uplapw1.def i have found this :
 4,'NiFe2O4.klist',  'unknown','formatted',0
  5,'NiFe2O4.in1',   'old','formatted',0
  6,'NiFe2O4.output1up','unknown','formatted',0
 10,'./NiFe2O4.vectorup', 'unknown','unformatted',9000
 11,'NiFe2O4.energyup', 'unknown','formatted',0
 18,'NiFe2O4.vspup',   'old','formatted',0
 19,'NiFe2O4.vnsup',   'unknown','formatted',0
 20,'NiFe2O4.struct', 'old','formatted',0
 21,'NiFe2O4.scf1up',   'unknown','formatted',0
 55,'NiFe2O4.vec','unknown','formatted',0
 71,'NiFe2O4.nshup','unknown','formatted',0
  7,'NiFe2O4.vorbup' 

[Wien] xcrysden large multipler k-points

2012-08-01 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان
actually, i used only 300 k-points and this specific problem arose when i
tried to select k-path for band structure calculations.
my system has monoclinic symmetry so there are a couple of special points
in k-path i wanted to adopt with coordinates like (0.64xxx, 0.32xxx, 0.5).
i selected the total number of divisions (k-points) of this path again 300.
the code insists on having an integer coordinate with a multiplier. for 300
k-points, the multiplier was quite large and the integer coordinates
printed in case.klist_band file were **.

Prof. Tone asked for my structure file and he too got into same error. Let
me copy - paste his reply:


On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 17:37 +0900,   ? wrote:
 here are the .struct file and complete .klist_band file.
 i tried to solve this problem by making separate kpath klist files for
 every two points. the idea was to join them manually  use different
 multipliers for different path.

Yes, you are right. I could reproduce your problems. I believe that the
problem is due to Wien2K. Your case is a nasty case for Wien2K. Why?
Because it insist on representing the real number (rational number)
as the fraction p/q of two integers with a fixed format. As your case is
not a high symmetry case, the p  q numbers are simple too large and the
stars () are displayed.

As a work-around: you could use the coordinates of special k-points as
given by xcrysden, and then you need to construct out of that
semi-manually a klist file suitable for Wien2K (this would involve some
manual editing + some small scripting to interpolate points between
pairs of special k-points).

Regards. Tone

-- 
Anton Kokalj
J. Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
(tel: +386-1-477-3523 // fax:+386-1-477-3822)

so, therefore i thought may be it is due to same problem you guys are
discussing,  just pushed my mail  . . . . ;D

any way, thnx. for ur reply.

M. Arshad Farhan




On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Gavin Abo gsabo at crimson.ua.edu wrote:

  What large values did you use in xcrysden for the multiplier and
 k-points?  Someone else might be able to comment on whether you can use
 smaller values and still get accurate results.

 I see your posts on the xcrysden mailing list:

 http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/xcrysden/2012-July/001215.html
 http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/xcrysden/2012-July/001223.html

 From the posts, it looks like the number of k-points you used is possibly
 greater than 99672.  You currently cannot use

 multipiler*k-points  5-digits (i.e., 99,999)

 If the larger outputted values are really needed, it could probably be
 done by changing all the 4I5 to say 4I8 in F/kPath.f that is in the
 xcrysden source package (xcrysden-1.5.53.tar.gz).  However, you have to
 compile the xcrysden code.  There are some useful instructions on the web
 for compiling the xcrysden source in Debian or Ubuntu (
 https://sites.google.com/site/jamesanalytis/xcrysden-in-ubuntu-10-04),
 but have not seen for other Linux distributions if one wants to attempt it.

 Since your not quite a linux guy, you will probably want to send your
 struct file (while providing also the multiplier and k-points value used)
 to Tone as requested on the xcrysden mailing list so that a linux binary
 package with changes can be provided if needed.

 On 7/29/2012 7:54 PM,   ? wrote:

 Dear Prof. Lawrance  Gavin-Abo,

 i've not tested the latest version of Wien2k but, let me mention one more
 place where real*4 are used that is in the creation of case.klist_band.

 for any complicated coordinate in the k-path (mainly in monoclinic
 systems) by using Xcrysden, the multiplier goes shooting high and
 coordinate value exceeds real*4 consequently printing ** in places of
 k-point coordinates in case.klist_band file.

 the XcrySden developers claim it to be on part of Wien2k where it insists
 on real value but restricts it to 4 digits.

 if possible, please also look into it and of-course suggest me a solution
 as i'm quite not a linux guy.

 regards,



 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien




-- 
*  ?*
Dept of Chemistry,
Pohang Univ of Sci  Tech
Pohang, Republic of Korea
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120801/cba6c98d/attachment.htm


[Wien] WIEN2k 12 fft_modules

2012-07-30 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان
Dear Prof. Lawrance  Gavin-Abo,

i've not tested the latest version of Wien2k but, let me mention one more
place where real*4 are used that is in the creation of case.klist_band.

for any complicated coordinate in the k-path (mainly in monoclinic systems)
by using Xcrysden, the multiplier goes shooting high and coordinate value
exceeds real*4 consequently printing ** in places of k-point
coordinates in case.klist_band file.

the XcrySden developers claim it to be on part of Wien2k where it insists
on real value but restricts it to 4 digits.

if possible, please also look into it and of-course suggest me a solution
as i'm quite not a linux guy.

regards,




On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Laurence Marks L-marks at 
northwestern.eduwrote:

 Almost certainly it is trickier than this. I expect that -O1 is
 truncating relevant variables to real*4 which is leading to problems.
 With -O2 the compiler may well be not bothering to truncate and, at
 the end of the space allocated for the variable, by luck the correct
 values are present. This is luck; the same type of bug can in other
 cases lead to segmentation violations when code gets overwritten.

 N.B., I think there are only two places where real*4 variables are
 used, in parts of aim and for storage of the Hamiltonian in lapw1.
 Everything else should be real*8.

 On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Gavin Abo gsabo at crimson.ua.edu wrote:
  I didn't use -r8.  However, you are right.  The scf cycle works
  correctly if I use -O1 -r8.
 
  So the higher optimizations -O2 and -O3 must be invoking the use of -r8,
  whereas -O0 and -O1 should be using the default -r4.
 
  On 7/29/2012 1:40 PM, Laurence Marks wrote:
  I have not tested, but it looks like you are probably right. There may
  be other cases where variables are not explicitly defined to be 8
  bytes which are normally hidden by the use of -r8. Did you use -r8?
 
  On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Gavin Abo gsabo at crimson.ua.edu
 wrote:
  Dear Prof. Blaha,
 
  Thanks, the scf cycle runs correctly using -O2 or -O3 with the new
  files for the fftpack routines.  However, the scf cycle of the TiC
  example does not converge with -O1 (in the lapw0 makefile) with wrong
  values in TiC.output0 such as the plane wave contribution.  I don't
  know whether the problem is reproducible on another system.
 
  It seems to be due to IMPLICIT REAL*8 (A-H,O-Z) not being in the
  PIMACH function at the end of the fortran file fftpack_helpers.f.
  This line is in the function in the old file zfft3d.F.
 
  Kind Regards,
 
  Gavin
 
  On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Peter Blaha
  pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
  Thank's for the report.
 
  The problem concerns  lapw0, when compiled in sequential mode WITHOUT
  -DFFTW2 or -DFFTW3
  in the Makefile  (i.e. using the old fftpack routines instead of
 the new
  and faster fftw library).
 
  The fix suggested in the mail below does not work. Instead, you have
 to
  replace the 3 attached
  subroutines and recompile. (eramps.f, fft_modules.F fftpack_helpers.f)
 
  A corrected version is on the web.
 
  PB
 
 
  Am 25.07.2012 23:21, schrieb Gavin Abo:
  Dear Prof. Blaha,
 
  When I run the TiC example with WIEN2k 12 without k-point or mpi
  parallelization, the program stops in lapw2 with the error shown
 below.
  Here lapw2 cannot read the TiC.energy
  file, because it is missing data in it as lapw0 gives bad output
 such as a
  Density Integral with the value NaN in TiC.output0.
 
  The problem seems to be related to the new fft module.
 
  If lines 536-538 and 612-614 in SRC_lapw0/fft_modules.F:
 
  N2 = N+N
  DO 117 I=1,N2
   C(I) = CH(I)
 
  are both changed to:
 
  DO 117 I=1,N
   C(I) = CH(I)
 
  Then, the error goes way.  On my system, N was the number 64.  The
 array C
  had a size of 64, such that the loop is indexing outside the array
 (N2 =
  128).
 
  In Wien2k 11, TiC.output0 had:
 
  PLANE WAVE CONTRIBUTION -0.235589
  :DEN  : DENSITY INTEGRAL  =  -754.35311720   (Ry)
 
  In Wien2k 12 with both changes made in fft_modules.F, TiC.output0
 had:
 
  PLANE WAVE CONTRIBUTION -0.049778
  :DEN  : DENSITY INTEGRAL  =  -753.97972930   (Ry)
 
  The density integral value is about the same, but the plane wave
  contribution value may be significantly different.   So I'm not
 completely
  sure if my change is correct.
  Therefore, please let me know if a different change is needed.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Gavin
 
  forrtl: severe (59): list-directed I/O syntax error, unit 30, file
  /home/gavin/wien/wiendata/TiC/TiC.energy
  Image  PCRoutine LineSource
  lapw2  0053676A  Unknown Unknown  Unknown
  lapw2  00535266  Unknown Unknown  Unknown
  lapw2  004DFA30  Unknown Unknown  Unknown
  lapw2  0049BDEF  Unknown Unknown  Unknown
  lapw2  0049B2F7  Unknown Unknown  Unknown
  lapw2  004C10B3  Unknown 

[Wien] QTL-B Error

2012-07-05 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان

 Dear stefaan,i checked my case.in1c file, it does not have any other line for 
L=2.  
. . .. . .  0.304  0  (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER 
CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 10.30  0.000 CONT 1 1   -3.20  0.001 STOP 
1 20.30  0.005 CONT 1 00.30  0.000 CONT 1  0.304  0  
(GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 10.30  0.000 
CONT 1 1   -3.20  0.001 STOP 1 20.30  0.005 CONT 1 00.30  
0.000 CONT 1. . .. . .
also the output file case.scf1up has it:
  ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Mn3:e__0007: OVERALL 
ENERGY PARAMETER IS0.3000  OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS 
LAPW:E1_0007: E( 1)=0.3000 APW+lo:E1_0007: E( 1)=   -3.2885   
E(BOTTOM)=   -3.322   E(TOP)=   -3.255 LOCAL ORBITAL:E2_0007: E( 
2)=0.1875   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.035   E(TOP)=0.410 
APW+lo:E0_0007: E( 0)=0.3000 APW+lo
hope you can guide me further.Regards,M. Arshad Farhan


 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:06:24 +0200
 From: Stefaan.Cottenier at UGent.be
 To: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 Subject: Re: [Wien] QTL-B Error
 
 
 Your E( 2)=0.1875 is a valence state, while the qtl-b error at -3.28 Ry 
 is for a semicore state. There should be another line for atom 7 in your 
 case.in1 with L=2, and with a strongly negative linearization energy. 
 Change it to -3.2, and see whether the problem has gone.
 
 Stefaan
 
 
 
 On 4/07/2012 7:54,   ? wrote:
  Dear Wien Users and Developers,
 
  i am encountered with QTL-B error. Althought UG has that covered in FAQ
  , there is slight confusion i'm facing
  the case.scf2 has
 
  Energy to separate low and high energystates:   -0.38613
 
  :NOE  : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS  = 212.000
 
  :FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)=   0.45195
 
  while the QTL-B error has the line: with *negative value of Energy*
 
QTL-B VALUE .EQ.   30.11787 in *Band of energy  -3.28095* ATOM=7
L=  2
 
  Inspection of case.in1c gives me this line, where the default energy
  parameter is positive as well as Fermi energy. it seems it has found the
  E (Top)  E(bottom).
 
  :E2_0007: E( 2)=0.1875   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.035   E(TOP)=0.410
 
  the case discussed in UG has all the energy values having same sign but
  in this case, i'm confused.
 
  one more thing, the structure has reduced symmetry  this Atom 7 is Mn
  as are Atom # 5, 6  8. but i only get problem for this Mn and not for
  any other. the values in case.in1c are same for all the four Mn ions.
 
  please help me ,
 
  Regards,
  M. Arshad Farhan
 
 
  ___
  Wien mailing list
  Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
  http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 
 
 
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120705/09b8da95/attachment.htm


[Wien] help Required

2012-07-04 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان


Dear Wien Users and Developers,
i am encountered with QTL-B error. Althought UG has that covered in FAQ , there 
is slight confusion i'm facingthe case.scf2 has 
Energy to separate low and high energystates:   -0.38613:NOE  : NUMBER OF 
ELECTRONS  = 212.000:FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)=   0.45195
while the QTL-B error has the line: with negative value of Energy
 QTL-B VALUE .EQ.   30.11787 in Band of energy  -3.28095  ATOM=7  L=  2
Inspection of case.in1c gives me this line, where the default energy parameter 
is positive as well as Fermi energy. it seems it has found the E (Top)  
E(bottom).
:E2_0007: E( 2)=0.1875   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.035   E(TOP)=0.410
the case discussed in UG has all the energy values having same sign but in this 
case, i'm confused.
one more thing, the structure has reduced symmetry  this Atom 7 is Mn as are 
Atom # 5, 6  8. but i only get problem for this Mn and not for any other. the 
values in case.in1c are same for all the four Mn ions. 
please help me ,
Regards,M. Arshad Farhan
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120704/d70a4226/attachment.htm


[Wien] QTL-B Error

2012-07-04 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان


Dear stefaan,
i checked my case.in1c file, it does not have any other line for L=2.  
. . .. . .  0.304  0  (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER 
CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 10.30  0.000 CONT 1 1   -3.20  0.001 STOP 
1 20.30  0.005 CONT 1 00.30  0.000 CONT 1  0.304  0  
(GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 10.30  0.000 
CONT 1 1   -3.20  0.001 STOP 1 20.30  0.005 CONT 1 00.30  
0.000 CONT 1. . .. . .
also the output file case.scf1up has it:
  ATOMIC SPHERE DEPENDENT PARAMETERS FOR ATOM  Mn3:e__0007: OVERALL 
ENERGY PARAMETER IS0.3000  OVERALL BASIS SET ON ATOM IS 
LAPW:E1_0007: E( 1)=0.3000 APW+lo:E1_0007: E( 1)=   -3.2885   
E(BOTTOM)=   -3.322   E(TOP)=   -3.255 LOCAL ORBITAL:E2_0007: E( 
2)=0.1875   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.035   E(TOP)=0.410 
APW+lo:E0_0007: E( 0)=0.3000 APW+lo
hope you can guide me further.Regards,M. Arshad Farhan




 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:06:24 +0200
 From: Stefaan.Cottenier at UGent.be
 To: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 Subject: Re: [Wien] QTL-B Error
 
 
 Your E( 2)=0.1875 is a valence state, while the qtl-b error at -3.28 Ry 
 is for a semicore state. There should be another line for atom 7 in your 
 case.in1 with L=2, and with a strongly negative linearization energy. 
 Change it to -3.2, and see whether the problem has gone.
 
 Stefaan
 
 
 
 On 4/07/2012 7:54,   ? wrote:
  Dear Wien Users and Developers,
 
  i am encountered with QTL-B error. Althought UG has that covered in FAQ
  , there is slight confusion i'm facing
  the case.scf2 has
 
  Energy to separate low and high energystates:   -0.38613
 
  :NOE  : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS  = 212.000
 
  :FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)=   0.45195
 
  while the QTL-B error has the line: with *negative value of Energy*
 
QTL-B VALUE .EQ.   30.11787 in *Band of energy  -3.28095* ATOM=7
L=  2
 
  Inspection of case.in1c gives me this line, where the default energy
  parameter is positive as well as Fermi energy. it seems it has found the
  E (Top)  E(bottom).
 
  :E2_0007: E( 2)=0.1875   E(BOTTOM)=   -0.035   E(TOP)=0.410
 
  the case discussed in UG has all the energy values having same sign but
  in this case, i'm confused.
 
  one more thing, the structure has reduced symmetry  this Atom 7 is Mn
  as are Atom # 5, 6  8. but i only get problem for this Mn and not for
  any other. the values in case.in1c are same for all the four Mn ions.
 
  please help me ,
 
  Regards,
  M. Arshad Farhan
 
 
  ___
  Wien mailing list
  Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
  http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 
 
 
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120704/05d12d1f/attachment.htm


[Wien] help required for crashed parallel LAPW2

2012-06-12 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان




Dear Wien Users,hi,i'm facing problem in running parallel scf cycle. there's no 
actual error msg in the case.dayfile  or case.e??? log ; so i'm confused as to 
what actually the problem is ! the .machines files which is automatically 
generated has this form: granularity:1
extrafine:1
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node13
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
1:node14
the dnlapw2.error file has these few words: **  testerror: Error in Parallel 
LAPW2  the error log shows this :  forrtl: No such file or directory
forrtl: severe (29): file not found, unit 21, file 
/home/mafarhan/WIEN2k/case/case.scf2dn_22 i suppose, it could not keep track of 
the split it had made in the previous step. i should mention that single job 
(without parallelization) works well ! please help me , Regards,M. Arshad 
Farhan 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120612/780d3088/attachment.htm


[Wien] FW: [NDR] Delivery Failure Notice : parallel LAPW2 crash

2012-06-07 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان

respected prof. Blaha,i am facing problems in parallel execution, i sent an 
email to wien mailing list (which i recieve emails all the time) but it gives 
this error.please designate my email address as permitted sender host (SPF) as 
the error says. Also i will be very grateful for guiding me about my parallel 
job crashing . . . . Regards, Arshad Farhan
 From: postmaster at postech.ac.kr
To: arshadfarhan at hotmail.com
Subject: [NDR] Delivery Failure Notice : [Wien] parallel LAPW2 crash
List-Post: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:16:32 +0900

 
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: 
 
Recipient :ysj at gsnu.ac.kr 
Reason:550 Your E-Mail Address does not designate Permitted Sender Hosts(SPF) 
 


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: arshadfar...@hotmail.com
To: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
List-Post: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:25:56 +0900
Subject: [Wien] parallel LAPW2 crash








Dear Wien user, 
i'm trying to minimize the internal positions by:  min -p -sp -j runsp_lapw -I 
-i 80 -fc 1. -p  
 
the parallel settings are:
 
  MPICH_HOME=/opt/mpi/gcc/mpich-1.2.7p1
  MPICH_EXEC=$MPICH_HOME/bin/mpirun


and my parallel job crashes every time with the error:
 
forrtl: No such file or directory
forrtl: severe (29): file not found, unit 21, file 
/home/mafarhan/WIEN2k/case2/case2.scf2up_2
Image  PCRoutineLineSource
sumpara004A4D9D  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara004A38A5  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00453E69  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0041890F  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00418142  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00421BDD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0041203F  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0040CCB5  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara004030BA  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc.so.6  00376C21D994  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00402FD9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
cp: cannot stat `.in.tmp': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove `.in.tmp': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove `.in.tmp1': No such file or directory

however, the scf cycle finishes without any error when executed without 
parallel tag
 
please help me, 
 
Regards,
M. Arshad Farhan
  

___
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien 
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120607/8a9b0d71/attachment.htm
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT1
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120607/8a9b0d71/attachment.bat
-- next part --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[Wien] parallel LAPW2 crash

2012-06-06 Thread محمد ارشد فرحان




Dear Wien user, i'm trying to minimize the internal positions by:  min -p -sp 
-j runsp_lapw -I -i 80 -fc 1. -p   the parallel settings are:   
MPICH_HOME=/opt/mpi/gcc/mpich-1.2.7p1
  MPICH_EXEC=$MPICH_HOME/bin/mpirun

and my parallel job crashes every time with the error: forrtl: No such file or 
directory
forrtl: severe (29): file not found, unit 21, file 
/home/mafarhan/WIEN2k/case2/case2.scf2up_2
Image  PCRoutineLineSource
sumpara004A4D9D  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara004A38A5  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00453E69  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0041890F  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00418142  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00421BDD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0041203F  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara0040CCB5  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara004030BA  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc.so.6  00376C21D994  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
sumpara00402FD9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
cp: cannot stat `.in.tmp': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove `.in.tmp': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove `.in.tmp1': No such file or directory
however, the scf cycle finishes without any error when executed without 
parallel tag please help me,  Regards,M. Arshad Farhan  
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120606/b8941172/attachment.htm