[Wien] Eorb =0 in LDA+U case.outputfiles

2015-08-28 Thread Paresh Chandra Rout
Dear all,
I am getting Eorb=0 in  case.outorbup and case.outorndn files. I had
applied U values to 9th and 10th atom of my system. The complex and real
part of potential for spin up and dn are also providing zero for all m
values . Does that make any sense for the LDA+U calculation ? Would anybody
kindly explain a little bit  about the out put files whether it is correct
or I have reproduced  it incorrectly ? Here I have attached the output
files.  Any help would be highly appreciated .



Kind Regards
Paresh Chandra Rout
Research Scholar
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research


BiFeReO6.outputorbdn
Description: Binary data


BiFeReO6.outputorbup
Description: Binary data


BiFeReO6.outputorb
Description: Binary data
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Eorb =0 in LDA+U case.outputfiles

2015-08-28 Thread Gavin Abo

I don't see any lines in your BiFeReO6.outputorb[up/dn] like:

Atom 9   L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry
Atom 10 L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry

So there might still be a problem with your BiFeReO6.inorb file.

Did you adjust BiFeReO6.inorb and do the scf calculation again?

If you only want to apply U values to atoms 9 and 10, then remove atoms 
11 and 12 from the inorb and indm files.


On 8/28/2015 10:00 AM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:

Dear all,
I am getting Eorb=0 in  case.outorbup and case.outorndn files. I had 
applied U values to 9th and 10th atom of my system. The complex and 
real part of potential for spin up and dn are also providing zero for 
all m values . Does that make any sense for the LDA+U calculation ? 
Would anybody kindly explain a little bit  about the out put files 
whether it is correct or I have reproduced  it incorrectly ? Here I 
have attached the output files.  Any help would be highly appreciated .




Kind Regards
Paresh Chandra Rout
Research Scholar
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research
-12.  Emin cutoff energy
 2   number of atoms for which density matrix is calculated
 9  1  2  index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1
 10 1  2  dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times
 0 0   r-index, (l,s)index  1  2  0 nmod, natorb, ipr
PRATT  1.0BROYD/PRATT, mixing
  9 1 2  iatom nlorb, lorb
  10 1 2  iatom nlorb, lorb
  1  nsic 0..AMF, 1..SIC, 2..HFM
   0.30 0.00U J (Ry)   Note: we recommend to use U_eff = U-J and J=0
   0.30 0.00U J___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Eorb =0 in LDA+U case.outputfiles

2015-08-28 Thread Paresh Chandra Rout
Thanks again for the kind reply. Now it is printing like the two atoms you
mentioned in the outputorb[up/dn] file.
Here I am attaching the output files. I have one more query . Can you tell
me how and where can I get occupations of atoms for which I applied U
values ?

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Gavin Abo gs...@crimson.ua.edu wrote:

 I don't see any lines in your BiFeReO6.outputorb[up/dn] like:

 Atom 9   L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry
 Atom 10 L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry

 So there might still be a problem with your BiFeReO6.inorb file.

 Did you adjust BiFeReO6.inorb and do the scf calculation again?

 If you only want to apply U values to atoms 9 and 10, then remove atoms 11
 and 12 from the inorb and indm files.


 On 8/28/2015 10:00 AM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:

 Dear all,
 I am getting Eorb=0 in  case.outorbup and case.outorndn files. I had
 applied U values to 9th and 10th atom of my system. The complex and real
 part of potential for spin up and dn are also providing zero for all m
 values . Does that make any sense for the LDA+U calculation ? Would anybody
 kindly explain a little bit  about the out put files whether it is correct
 or I have reproduced  it incorrectly ? Here I have attached the output
 files.  Any help would be highly appreciated .



 Kind Regards
 Paresh Chandra Rout
 Research Scholar
 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research


 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html




BiFeReO6.outputorb
Description: Binary data


BiFeReO6.outputorbup
Description: Binary data


BiFeReO6.outputorbdn
Description: Binary data
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Eorb =0 in LDA+U case.outputfiles

2015-08-28 Thread Gavin Abo
The occupations can be found in the corresponding :QTLxxx line in the 
scf file [ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg03288.html 
, 
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg12761.html 
].


On 8/28/2015 12:16 PM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:
Thanks again for the kind reply. Now it is printing like the two atoms 
you mentioned in the outputorb[up/dn] file.
Here I am attaching the output files. I have one more query . Can you 
tell me how and where can I get occupations of atoms for which I 
applied U values ?


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Gavin Abo gs...@crimson.ua.edu 
mailto:gs...@crimson.ua.edu wrote:


I don't see any lines in your BiFeReO6.outputorb[up/dn] like:

Atom 9   L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry
Atom 10 L=  2 U=  0.300 J=  0.000 Ry

So there might still be a problem with your BiFeReO6.inorb file.

Did you adjust BiFeReO6.inorb and do the scf calculation again?

If you only want to apply U values to atoms 9 and 10, then remove
atoms 11 and 12 from the inorb and indm files.


On 8/28/2015 10:00 AM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:

Dear all,
I am getting Eorb=0 in  case.outorbup and case.outorndn files.
I had applied U values to 9th and 10th atom of my system. The
complex and real part of potential for spin up and dn are also
providing zero for all m values . Does that make any sense for
the LDA+U calculation ? Would anybody kindly explain a little
bit  about the out put files whether it is correct or I have
reproduced  it incorrectly ? Here I have attached the output
files.  Any help would be highly appreciated .



Kind Regards
Paresh Chandra Rout
Research Scholar
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html