Re: [Wien] Regarding Relaxation Calculation in DFT+U

2019-07-20 Thread tran

Yes, you can use -min with DFT+U.

On Saturday 2019-07-20 12:05, Shamim Sk wrote:


Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 12:05:34
From: Shamim Sk 
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users 
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: [Wien] Regarding Relaxation Calculation in DFT+U

Dear Prof. P. Blaha & WIEN2k Community, 

  Can we implement the force minimization using "run_lapw -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 
-cc 0.001"  in DFT+U calculation  ?



Thank you,
Shamim Sk
IIT Mandi, HP, India.


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Regarding Relaxation Calculation in DFT+U

2019-07-20 Thread Shamim Sk
Dear Prof. P. Blaha & WIEN2k Community,

  Can we implement the force minimization using "run_lapw -min -fc 0.5 -ec
0.0001 -cc 0.001"  in DFT+U calculation  ?



Thank you,
Shamim Sk
IIT Mandi, HP, India.
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Regarding Relaxation calculation

2019-05-29 Thread Xavier Rocquefelte

See the WIEN2k userguide at pages 177, 178 ...

One can constrain individual positions incase.inMor define linear 
constrains for several po-sitions  usingcase.constraint(thanks to  
B.Yanchitsky  (Kiev,  y...@imag.kiev.ua);  for  detailssee comments in 
the SRCtemplates/template.constraint file).  In case of calculations 
with linearconstrains one should use NEW1 (incase.inM). When 
constraining individual positions and us-ing PORT, one should after 
modifications incase.inMrerunx pairhess -copy(which 
copies.minpairto.minrestartand.minhess).






Le 29/05/2019 à 13:12, Shamim Sk a écrit :

Dear Prof. P. Blaha & WIEN2k Community,

  In relaxation calculation using "run_lapw -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 
-cc 0.001" , is it possible to keep the positions of some of the atoms 
in the supercell fixed  ?




Thank you,
Shamim Sk
IIT Mandi, HP, India.

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--

Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes (ISCR)
Univ Rennes - CNRS - UMR6226, France
https://iscr.univ-rennes1.fr/cti/people/permanent-staff/rocquefelte-xavier

ICAMM2019 : VASP Workshop and International Materials Modelling Conf
June 26-July 3 2019, Rennes France
icamm2019.sciencesconf.org  : Registration opening soon, see you there!

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Regarding Relaxation calculation

2019-05-29 Thread umbreenrasheed
Hi all users..I am in need of some papers regarding explanation of charge 
density using wein2k in pdf form. Regards
null___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Regarding Relaxation calculation

2019-05-28 Thread Laurence Marks
You can edit by hand case.inM, setting values to zero.

However, this is often bad science. People think that, for instance for a
surface, fixing some atoms is a better model and faster. Neither is true.

You should have a very, very good reason to fix an atomic position.

_
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu

On Wed, May 29, 2019, 06:44 Shamim Sk  wrote:

> Dear Prof. P. Blaha & WIEN2k Community,
>
>   In relaxation calculation using "run_lapw -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 -cc
> 0.001" , is it possible to keep the positions of some of the atoms in the
> supercell fixed  ?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Shamim Sk
> IIT Mandi, HP, India.
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at_mailman_listinfo_wien=DwICAg=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws=U_T4PL6jwANfAy4rnxTj8IUxm818jnvqKFdqWLwmqg0=8EFPKsNOI58pqHxU9VPrOse7U-82AjEaFVGcLiNg7PA=SHWsuzI5tgqRA69s7IvZO2hJvzGBAkLY2S-oBvJowhQ=
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_wien-40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at_index.html=DwICAg=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws=U_T4PL6jwANfAy4rnxTj8IUxm818jnvqKFdqWLwmqg0=8EFPKsNOI58pqHxU9VPrOse7U-82AjEaFVGcLiNg7PA=OYD2KnhN5GjPEpYKBgHTPP2-sSyM_DLyHVvYysenlbQ=
>
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Regarding Relaxation calculation

2019-05-28 Thread Shamim Sk
Dear Prof. P. Blaha & WIEN2k Community,

  In relaxation calculation using "run_lapw -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 -cc
0.001" , is it possible to keep the positions of some of the atoms in the
supercell fixed  ?



Thank you,
Shamim Sk
IIT Mandi, HP, India.
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html