[Wien] virtual crystal approximation

2015-01-15 Thread Meng, Qingping
Dear all,
I want to do virtual crystal calculation. I change Fe's Z to 26.2. I also 
change case.inst to:
Fe
Ar 3
3, 2, 2.0 N
3, 2, 2.0 N
3, -3, 2.5 N
3, -3, 0.0 N
4, -1, 1.0 N
4, -1, 0.7 N
I checked the Mail Archive. Someone said I also need change NE in case.in2. I 
do not know how to change it, and why I need change NE. I also do not know NE's 
means. Could you tell me. Thank you.
Best,
Qingping Meng
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] virtual crystal approximation

2015-01-15 Thread Zhu, Jianxin
Hello,

As I recall, it is nonessential to change the value in case.inst. But the 
change of NE in case.in2 is important.
It is straight to do so — when you change Fe 26 to 26.2 in case.struct, add 
0.2*number of Fe (in the considered unit cell)  to the existing NE.
The reason is simple --- With 26 to 26.2, the valence electron count is 
increased.

Cheers,

Jianxin

#
Jian-Xin Zhu, Ph.D
Theoretical Division, MS B262
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Phone: (505) 667 2363 (T-4);
(505) 667 6602 (CINT)
Fax: (505) 665 4063
Email (main): jx...@lanl.gov
Email (backup): physjx...@gmail.com
#

From: Meng, Qingping qm...@bnl.govmailto:qm...@bnl.gov
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users 
wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atmailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:21 PM
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atmailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atmailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: [Wien] virtual crystal approximation

Dear all,
I want to do virtual crystal calculation. I change Fe’s Z to 26.2. I also 
change case.inst to:
Fe
Ar 3
3, 2, 2.0 N
3, 2, 2.0 N
3, -3, 2.5 N
3, -3, 0.0 N
4, -1, 1.0 N
4, -1, 0.7 N
I checked the Mail Archive. Someone said I also need change NE in case.in2. I 
do not know how to change it, and why I need change NE. I also do not know NE’s 
means. Could you tell me. Thank you.
Best,
Qingping Meng
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

2013-12-12 Thread Hena Das
Thank you for your suggestions. Yes I realize I was doing wrong. 



From: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
[wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] on behalf of Peter Blaha 
[pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:48 AM
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: Re: [Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

You are not doing virtual crystal approximation (where one changes the
occupation by a few tenth of an electron), but you are changing the atom.

If you change Z by two, do also the initialization with an atom of 
Z=Z(W)+1,2,3,...

Am 12.12.2013 00:56, schrieb Hena Das:
 Dear All,

 Using Virtual Crystal Approximation I am trying to do total energy 
 calculation by varying occupancy of 5d level of W^+6 ion.
 I did a normal initialization first, and afterwards changed Z in case.struct 
 and case.in2 (not in case.inst) and then submitted a scf calculation.
 Change in occupancy by one worked well. However for higher than one, like 
 two, three or more, I got the following error:

 Error in LAPW1
   'SELECT' - no energy limits found for atom   4  L= 0
   'SELECT' - E-bottom   -3.51089   E-top -200.0

 I have tried all suggestions given in the Trouble shooting, but still 
 getting the same error.

 Please help me to solve this problem.

 Thank you.

 Best regards,
 Hena Das


 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
-
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

2013-12-11 Thread Hena Das
Dear All,

Using Virtual Crystal Approximation I am trying to do total energy calculation 
by varying occupancy of 5d level of W^+6 ion. 
I did a normal initialization first, and afterwards changed Z in case.struct 
and case.in2 (not in case.inst) and then submitted a scf calculation. 
Change in occupancy by one worked well. However for higher than one, like two, 
three or more, I got the following error:

Error in LAPW1
 'SELECT' - no energy limits found for atom   4  L= 0
 'SELECT' - E-bottom   -3.51089   E-top -200.0

I have tried all suggestions given in the Trouble shooting, but still getting 
the same error. 

Please help me to solve this problem.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Hena Das


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

2013-12-11 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
If you change Z  of (the atom you initially named) W by one, that is from 74 to 
75, then you have Re but NOT W !
Wien does not care how you name an atom but only the number of Z matters and 
Z=75 is definitely not longer tungsten.


Ciao
Gerhard

DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is.


Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz

Von: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
[wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Hena Das 
[hd...@cornell.edu]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013 00:56
An: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: [Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

Dear All,

Using Virtual Crystal Approximation I am trying to do total energy calculation 
by varying occupancy of 5d level of W^+6 ion.
I did a normal initialization first, and afterwards changed Z in case.struct 
and case.in2 (not in case.inst) and then submitted a scf calculation.
Change in occupancy by one worked well. However for higher than one, like two, 
three or more, I got the following error:

Error in LAPW1
 'SELECT' - no energy limits found for atom   4  L= 0
 'SELECT' - E-bottom   -3.51089   E-top -200.0

I have tried all suggestions given in the Trouble shooting, but still getting 
the same error.

Please help me to solve this problem.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Hena Das


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation

2013-12-11 Thread Peter Blaha

You are not doing virtual crystal approximation (where one changes the
occupation by a few tenth of an electron), but you are changing the atom.

If you change Z by two, do also the initialization with an atom of 
Z=Z(W)+1,2,3,...

Am 12.12.2013 00:56, schrieb Hena Das:

Dear All,

Using Virtual Crystal Approximation I am trying to do total energy calculation 
by varying occupancy of 5d level of W^+6 ion.
I did a normal initialization first, and afterwards changed Z in case.struct 
and case.in2 (not in case.inst) and then submitted a scf calculation.
Change in occupancy by one worked well. However for higher than one, like two, 
three or more, I got the following error:

Error in LAPW1
  'SELECT' - no energy limits found for atom   4  L= 0
  'SELECT' - E-bottom   -3.51089   E-top -200.0

I have tried all suggestions given in the Trouble shooting, but still getting 
the same error.

Please help me to solve this problem.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Hena Das


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--
-
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] virtual crystal approximation

2013-11-14 Thread kangb...@lycos.co.kr

Hi users.I want to calculate VCA for 10% hole doping.Fist, edit Z of an atom in structure file.Second,  in the step of check case.in1_st, I face the message "error: case.inst not consistent with Z
 edit case.inst and rerun lstart afterwards or change Z in StructGen!". So, I modified the value thatBa Xe 16,-1,1.0 N - 6,-1,0.9 N6,-1,1.0 N - 6,-1,0.9 NAnd then, in case.in2 fileNE 67.8  - 67.7I wonder that this is correct.If not,how do I edit the value in case.in1.Thanks for reading in advance.Myung-Chul.

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] virtual crystal approximation

2013-11-14 Thread Uday
In the present form of case.inst it is looking like a 20% hole doped.
The process is..
1. Initialize the calculation with Ba(Z=56).
2. Change Z to 55.90
3. Change case.inst to:
--
Ba
Xe 1
6,-1,1.0  N
6,-1,0.9  N
---
4. Changed NE in case.in2*
5. Run the SCF.

Regards
Uday
IIT Kanpur

 !--espresso editor content start--div id=espresso_editor_view
 style=font-family:굴림;font-size:10pt;
 Hi users.brbrI want to calculate VCA for 10% hole doping.brbrFist,
 edit Z of an atom in structure file.brSecond,nbsp;  in the step of
 check case.in1_st, I face the message error: case.inst not consistent
 with Z
 gt; editspan style=font-family: 돋움;/span case.inst and rerun
 lstart afterwards or change Z in StructGen!.nbsp; brbrSo, I modified
 the value
 thatbrBanbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 brXe 1br6,-1,1.0nbsp; Nnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 -gt;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 6,-1,0.9 Nbr6,-1,1.0nbsp;
 Nnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; -gt;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 6,-1,0.9
 NbrbrAnd then, in case.in2 filebrNE 67.8
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; -gt;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 67.7brbrbrI wonder that this is correct.brIf not,brhow do I edit
 the value in case.in1.brbrThanks for reading in
 advance.brbrMyung-Chul.brbr

 /div!--espresso editor content end--img
 src=https://mail3.nate.com/app/msg/confirm/?usn=62295email=kangb...@lycos.co.krkey=019ccf7fb4cb9b987a9fb34d66090fef$5c672...@natemail.nate.com;
 height=1 width=1 /___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation (VCA): not neighboring atoms in periodic table

2013-03-11 Thread Qingyun Mao
Dear Xavier,

Thank you for your reply!

Regards,
Qingyun

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 9, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Rocquefelte xavier.rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr 
wrote:

 Many other posts have been sent more recently. Search the word virtual and 
 not VCA. 
 
 The idea is that you replace an atom defined by a nucleus +Z surrounded by Z 
 electrons, by an effective atom defined by a nucleus Zeff = Z+x  surrounded 
 by Z+x electrons. Such an effective   treatment can only be done for 
 neigboring atoms, which have the same number of core electrons for instance 
 and similar radii...
 Indeed, remember the Slater approach (effective nucleus). The screening is 
 defined by the inner electrons Zeff = Z - Sigma, and the way the nucleus is 
 screened defines all the properties of the   atom. In your case the 
 valence electrons of La and Nb feel a completely different effective nucleus 
 (the screening is too much different) and a mixing of these two atoms cannot 
 be simply   treated by an effective nucleus. In a way VCA is a 
 perturbative approach and could give results only if the atoms are not too 
 far in the periodic table. 
 
 In addition, as already explained by Peter in previous posts it should be 
 used only for non-active electrons in the valence band (like Sr2+/La3+), 
 but not for active ones (like O/F) ...
 
 In your case, I will use a supercell approach and to insure that you didn't 
 create an artificial order you must try different models and compare them in 
 terms of total energy, DOS, properties... 
 
 Best Regards
 
 Xavier
 
 
 
 
 
  valence electrons/core charge
 
 
 Le 3/9/2013 1:11 AM, Qingyun Mao a ?crit :
 Dear Prof. Blaha and wien users,
 
 Recently I am trying to do calculations on systems like La(x)Nb(1-x)O(y). I 
 searched in the mailing list and the earliest comments showed up was posted 
 around 2004. I saw comments like: VCA in WINE2k is only possible between 
 neighboring elements, like Na-Mg or Ba-La. But I have not seen any 
 explanation for that yet.
 
 May I ask the reason why we cannot use VCA for atoms which are not neighbors 
 (like La and Nb) in periodic table? Thanks a lot!
 
 Regards,
 Qingyun Mao
 
 School of Applied and Engineering Physics
 Cornell University
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130311/6e21e3d4/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation (VCA): not neighboring atoms in periodic table

2013-03-09 Thread Rocquefelte
Many other posts have been sent more recently. Search the word virtual 
and not VCA.

The idea is that you replace an atom defined by a nucleus +Z surrounded 
by Z electrons, by an effective atom defined by a nucleus Zeff = Z+x  
surrounded by Z+x electrons. Such an effective treatment can only be 
done for neigboring atoms, which have the same number of core electrons 
for instance and similar radii...
Indeed, remember the Slater approach (effective nucleus). The screening 
is defined by the inner electrons Zeff = Z - Sigma, and the way the 
nucleus is screened defines all the properties of the atom. In your case 
the valence electrons of La and Nb feel a completely different effective 
nucleus (the screening is too much different) and a mixing of these two 
atoms cannot be simply treated by an effective nucleus. In a way VCA is 
a perturbative approach and could give results only if the atoms are not 
too far in the periodic table.

In addition, as already explained by Peter in previous posts it should 
be used only for non-active electrons in the valence band (like 
Sr2+/La3+), but not for active ones (like O/F) ...

In your case, I will use a supercell approach and to insure that you 
didn't create an artificial order you must try different models and 
compare them in terms of total energy, DOS, properties...

Best Regards

Xavier





  valence electrons/core charge


Le 3/9/2013 1:11 AM, Qingyun Mao a ?crit :
 Dear Prof. Blaha and wien users,

 Recently I am trying to do calculations on systems like 
 La(x)Nb(1-x)O(y). I searched in the mailing list and the earliest 
 comments showed up was posted around 2004. I saw comments like: VCA 
 in WINE2k is only possible between neighboring elements, like Na-Mg or 
 Ba-La. But I have not seen any explanation for that yet.

 May I ask the reason why we cannot use VCA for atoms which are not 
 neighbors (like La and Nb) in periodic table? Thanks a lot!

 Regards,
 Qingyun Mao

 School of Applied and Engineering Physics
 Cornell University




 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130309/c3f0d16f/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual Crystal Approximation (VCA): not neighboring atoms in periodic table

2013-03-08 Thread Qingyun Mao
Dear Prof. Blaha and wien users,

Recently I am trying to do calculations on systems like La(x)Nb(1-x)O(y). I
searched in the mailing list and the earliest comments showed up was posted
around 2004. I saw comments like: VCA in WINE2k is only possible between
neighboring elements, like Na-Mg or Ba-La. But I have not seen any
explanation for that yet.

May I ask the reason why we cannot use VCA for atoms which are not
neighbors (like La and Nb) in periodic table? Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Qingyun Mao

School of Applied and Engineering Physics
Cornell University
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130308/580e3785/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-24 Thread Jihoon Park
Dear Users,


I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

- run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
- edit nuclear charges in case.struct
- edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
- edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
- run SCF circle But I do not understand a few things.

First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number.
I have looked up the manual, but still confused. Just say that I want to do
x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit?
There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u.,
therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of
electrons as 26?


All my best,
Jihoon Park
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120824/771547c7/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-24 Thread Jihoon Park
Dear Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher and other users,


I am sorry that I send the same question multiple times.
I think my account setting has some problems, therefore, I thought that my
message was not sent.
That's why I tried to send multiple time.
Thank you for your answers.


All my best,
Jihoon Park


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jihoon Park 
maximumenergyproduct at gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Users,


 I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
 I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

 - run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
 - edit nuclear charges in case.struct
 - edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
 - edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
 - run SCF circle But I do not understand a few things.

 First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number.
 I have looked up the manual, but still confused. Just say that I want to
 do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit?
 There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

 Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u.,
 therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
 For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of
 electrons as 26?


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120824/26c62374/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-24 Thread Jihoon Park
Dear Users,


If the MULT=2, should I increase NE in case.in2 by 2x?
For example, if the original NE is 632 and x = 0.1, the new NE is 632.2?

And the transition metals such as Fe, Co, Ni, etc work for VCA?


-- If you change for example the electrons at a transition metal atom,
then you should change the number of d electrons in case.inst
(they are different for each TM atom, and the occupation of d3/2 and d5/2
depends on kind of atom as well as spin polarised or not).

I have case.inst file as below,

Fe
Ar 3
3,  2, 2.0 N
3,  2, 2.0 N
3, -3, 2.5 N
3, -3, 0.0 N
4, -1, 1.0 N
4, -1, 0.5 N

If x = 0.1 [MULT=2, Total # of atoms = 64, # of sublattice = 11,
particularly the Fe atom above include 12 Fe atoms (This atom has 12
different positions)], should I change the d electrons in the line 3, -3,
2.5 N to 3, -3, 2.6 N?
But if so, total increase in electrons = 2.4 (0.1 * 2 f.u. per u.c. * 12 Fe
atoms). Then in this case, what it should be?

-- Did you check what numbers change in the input files when you go
from x=0.0 to x=1.0 (or from one atom to a neighbouring) ?

No, I have not checked yet. Should I check it and see what changes and
difference?

Thank you so much for your help.


All my best,
Jihoon Park

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Jihoon Park maximumenergyproduct at gmail.com
wrote:

 Dear Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher and other users,


 I am sorry that I send the same question multiple times.
 I think my account setting has some problems, therefore, I thought that
my message was not sent.
 That's why I tried to send multiple time.
 Thank you for your answers.


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park


 On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jihoon Park 
maximumenergyproduct at gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Users,


 I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
 I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

 - run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
 - edit nuclear charges in case.struct
 - edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
 - edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
 - run SCF circle But I do not understand a few things.

 First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number.
 I have looked up the manual, but still confused. Just say that I want to
do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit?
 There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

 Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u.,
therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
 For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of
electrons as 26?


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120824/572822e0/attachment.htm


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-23 Thread Jihoon Park
Dear Users,


I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

- run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
- edit nuclear charges in case.struct
- edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
- edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
- run SCF circle


But I do not understand a few things.

First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have looked 
up the manual, but still confused. 
Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? There 
are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
electrons as 26?


All my best,
Jihoon Park


2012-08-21 ?? 11:09, Jihoon Park ? ?:
 Dear Users,


 I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
 I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

 - run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
 - edit nuclear charges in case.struct
 - edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
 - edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
 - run SCF circle


 But I do not understand a few things.

 First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have looked 
 up the manual, but still confused. 
 Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? 
 There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

 Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
 therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
 For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
 electrons as 26?


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park


-- 
Graduate Research Assistant
Magnetic Materials and Device Laboratory
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
101 Houser Hall, Box 870286
The University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Tel (205)348-3759
Fax (205)348-6959



[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-22 Thread Jihoon Park
Dear Users,


I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

- run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
- edit nuclear charges in case.struct
- edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
- edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
- run SCF circle


But I do not understand a few things.

First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have looked 
up the manual, but still confused. 
Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? There 
are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
electrons as 26?


All my best,
Jihoon Park

-- 
Graduate Research Assistant
Magnetic Materials and Device Laboratory
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
101 Houser Hall, Box 870286
The University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Tel (205)348-3759
Fax (205)348-6959



[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-22 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
x=0.5 of whatever maybe too much for VCA

If you change for example the electrons at a transition metal atom, then you 
should change the number of d electrons in case.inst
(they are different for each TM atom, and the occupation of d3/2 and d5/2 
depends on kind of atom as well as spin polarised or not).

Did you check what numbers change in the input files when you go from x=0.0 to 
x=1.0 (or from one atom to a neighbouring) ?

By the way, if you add 1 electron to Manganese (Z=25) then you have iron (Z=26).

To go back to the beginning of the e-mail, VCA does not distinguish the types 
of atoms,
think about whatelse mixtures you model with the same numbers. Is that what you 
wanted to have ?



Ciao
Gerhard

DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is.


Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz

Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Jihoon Park [jpark61 at 
crimson.ua.edu]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 06:09
An: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: [Wien] Virtual-crystal

Dear Users,


I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

- run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
- edit nuclear charges in case.struct
- edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
- edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
- run SCF circle


But I do not understand a few things.

First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have looked 
up the manual, but still confused.
Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? There 
are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
electrons as 26?


All my best,
Jihoon Park

--
Graduate Research Assistant
Magnetic Materials and Device Laboratory
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
101 Houser Hall, Box 870286
The University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Tel (205)348-3759
Fax (205)348-6959

___
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-22 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
Does it realy work for atoms from different rows as in the Sr-La example,
the total energies should be completely different because of the larger number 
of core electrons
I guess the result is not Sr-La but Sr-Y (or Sr - 1/2 Zr, etc. as the kind of 
atom is not distinguished).

Ciao
Gerhard

DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is.


Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz

Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at 
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Peter Blaha [pblaha at 
theochem.tuwien.ac.at]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 07:40
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] Virtual-crystal

When you increase Z of an atom (with MULT=1) by x, increase also
NE in case.in2 by x.

Remember: VCA works only for non-active electrons in the valence band
(like Sr2+/La3+), but not for active ones (like O/F)

Am 22.08.2012 06:09, schrieb Jihoon Park:
 Dear Users,


 I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
 I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

 - run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
 - edit nuclear charges in case.struct
 - edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
 - edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
 - run SCF circle


 But I do not understand a few things.

 First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have looked 
 up the manual, but still confused.
 Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? 
 There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

 Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
 therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
 For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
 electrons as 26?


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park


--
-
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


[Wien] Virtual-crystal

2012-08-22 Thread Peter Blaha
Sure. I did not think too much in my answer. What I meant was :
use VCA for neighboring atoms in the periodic table,

Am 22.08.2012 08:15, schrieb Fecher, Gerhard:
 Does it realy work for atoms from different rows as in the Sr-La example,
 the total energies should be completely different because of the larger 
 number of core electrons
 I guess the result is not Sr-La but Sr-Y (or Sr - 1/2 Zr, etc. as the kind of 
 atom is not distinguished).

 Ciao
 Gerhard

 DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
 I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
 is that you have never actually known what the question is.

 
 Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
 Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
 Johannes Gutenberg - University
 55099 Mainz
 
 Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at 
 zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Peter Blaha [pblaha at 
 theochem.tuwien.ac.at]
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 07:40
 An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
 Betreff: Re: [Wien] Virtual-crystal

 When you increase Z of an atom (with MULT=1) by x, increase also
 NE in case.in2 by x.

 Remember: VCA works only for non-active electrons in the valence band
 (like Sr2+/La3+), but not for active ones (like O/F)

 Am 22.08.2012 06:09, schrieb Jihoon Park:
 Dear Users,


 I am trying to perform a calculation using virtual-crystal method.
 I have found the way to do this and it is as below.

 - run through inil_lapw using default atomic numbers
 - edit nuclear charges in case.struct
 - edit corresponding occupancies in case.inst
 - edit the total number of electrons in case.in2
 - run SCF circle


 But I do not understand a few things.

 First, I do not know how I should change the occupation number. I have 
 looked up the manual, but still confused.
 Just say that I want to do x = 0.5 for example, then what should I edit? 
 There are numbers like 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and so on...

 Second, if I want to add one more electron in the unit cell (two f.u., 
 therefore x = 0.5), should I just do the # of electron + one in case.in2?
 For example, if the current # of electrons is 25, should I put the # of 
 electrons as 26?


 All my best,
 Jihoon Park


 --
 -
 Peter Blaha
 Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
 Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
 Tel: +43-1-5880115671
 Fax: +43-1-5880115698
 email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 -
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--