Re: [Wien] YCo5 magnetic anisotropy calculations with GGA+U on Co

2023-11-29 Thread Peter Blaha
Please list all the steps you do for the EBND calculation for the GGA+U 
case.

I'd expect you do something wrong in this case.


Am 28.11.2023 um 20:22 schrieb Samolyuk, German D. via Wien:

Dear colleagues,

I'm calculating magnetic anisotropy in YCo5 within GGA+U approach with 
U-J=0.08 Ry Co d-states, wien2k_19.


To obtain the MAE, K, value the fully self-consistent calculations were 
executed for in plane and along z-axis magnetic moment orientation. the 
self-consistency is important for case of GGA+U.
Three sets of calculations were executed 1) keep 8 symmetry operation  
obtained for [100] moment orientation, 2) keep 8 symmetry operations 
obtained for [110] operations, 3) one E symmetry operation - full BZ 
integration.
The MAE energy is calculated 1) as total energy difference 2) as a 
difference of band structure energy, EBND.


Following results were obtained:
 >1)
100 - 8 SYM OP:
nk=16x16x17-5000: K = 6.53575196338352 meV/fu
nk=18x18x20-7000: K = 6.49467997718602 meV/fu
nk=16x16x17-5000: K = 15.4869591999841 meV/fu - EBND
nk=18x18x20-7000: K = -5.3348728267 meV/fu - EBND
 >2)
[110] - 8 SYM OP:
16x16x17-5000: K = 6.56594401516486 meV/fu
18x18x20-7000: K = 6.47836000134703 meV/fu
16x16x17-5000: K = 23.350166399905 meV/fu - EBND
18x18x20-7000: K = 24.0896663999706 meV/fu - EBND
 >3)
FBZ - 1 SYM OP:
16x16x17-5000: K = 6.48733603011351 meV/fu
18x18x20-7000: K = 6.45932000479661 meV/fu
16x16x17-5000: K = -23.450821642 meV/fu - EBND
18x18x20-7000: K = -14.726882399907 meV/fu - EBND

The total energy results for MAE, K, are well converged and insensitive 
to in-plane magnetization orientation.

While, K value calculated from band structure energy, EBND, behaved strange.
Expectedly, both ways of K calculation gives close result for regular 
GGA (the force theorem).


Do you know what is source of such irregular EBND difference behavior 
for GGA+U calculaions?

Thank you,

German


Dr. German D Samolyuk
Materials Theory Group
Materials Science & Technology Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Post Office Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6138
(865) 241-5394
(865) 241-3650 (FAX)

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] YCo5 magnetic anisotropy calculations with GGA+U on Co

2023-11-29 Thread Samolyuk, German D. via Wien
Dear colleagues,

I'm calculating magnetic anisotropy in YCo5 within GGA+U approach with U-J=0.08 
Ry Co d-states, wien2k_19.

To obtain the MAE, K, value the fully self-consistent calculations were 
executed for in plane and along z-axis magnetic moment orientation. the 
self-consistency is important for case of GGA+U.
Three sets of calculations were executed 1) keep 8 symmetry operation  obtained 
for [100] moment orientation, 2) keep 8 symmetry operations obtained for [110] 
operations, 3) one E symmetry operation - full BZ integration.
The MAE energy is calculated 1) as total energy difference 2) as a difference 
of band structure energy, EBND.

Following results were obtained:
>1)
100 - 8 SYM OP:
nk=16x16x17-5000: K = 6.53575196338352 meV/fu
nk=18x18x20-7000: K = 6.49467997718602 meV/fu
nk=16x16x17-5000: K = 15.4869591999841 meV/fu - EBND
nk=18x18x20-7000: K = -5.3348728267 meV/fu - EBND
>2)
[110] - 8 SYM OP:
16x16x17-5000: K = 6.56594401516486 meV/fu
18x18x20-7000: K = 6.47836000134703 meV/fu
16x16x17-5000: K = 23.350166399905 meV/fu - EBND
18x18x20-7000: K = 24.0896663999706 meV/fu - EBND
>3)
FBZ - 1 SYM OP:
16x16x17-5000: K = 6.48733603011351 meV/fu
18x18x20-7000: K = 6.45932000479661 meV/fu
16x16x17-5000: K = -23.450821642 meV/fu - EBND
18x18x20-7000: K = -14.726882399907 meV/fu - EBND

The total energy results for MAE, K, are well converged and insensitive to 
in-plane magnetization orientation.
While, K value calculated from band structure energy, EBND, behaved strange.
Expectedly, both ways of K calculation gives close result for regular GGA (the 
force theorem).

Do you know what is source of such irregular EBND difference behavior for GGA+U 
calculaions?

Thank you,

German


Dr. German D Samolyuk
Materials Theory Group
Materials Science & Technology Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Post Office Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6138
(865) 241-5394
(865) 241-3650 (FAX)
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html