[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-24 Thread Peter Blaha

   I was running force minimization of a 56 atomic cell ( an oxide 
 material) by constraining the coordinates of elements other than oxygen as 
 that is the only variable
 parameter (other coordinates are fixed obeying space group symmetry) in 
 wien2k 11.1

 I was using NEW1 minimization method following user guide -- In case of 
 constraint calculations one should use NEW1

You did not read the UG correctly:
a) When positions are fixed by symmetry, this is NOT a constrain at all for the 
minimizers.
b) The UG says: when using linear constrains, use NEW1. Linear constrains 
are specified in case.constrain
and restrict something like x+y=0.5   or similar.

About your error: you have not found anything, so how should we find anything ?


 Two structure files having different atomic coordinates were already created.

 while when running SCF calculation using the 3rd struct file, SCF was aborted 
 by mentioning the line at the 4th iteration:

  lapw2 -c -up (15:01:51) Abort
 3.348u 0.320s 0:01.61 227.3%0+0k 0+20376io 0pf+0w
 error: command   /home/shamik81/WIEN2k/lapw2c uplapw2.def   failed

 stop error

 Another unusual thing is that the energy and charge convergence in different 
 iterations of this SCF cycle went on as below:

 EC: .41   CC:  .0007728
 EC:  .00600493   CC. .0028021
 EC:  .002993535 CC. .0028017

 There was no error file created and I haven't found any error indicated in 
 case.output2 (up/dn) file and case.scf2up file was empty as lapw2 got aborted 
 when it was just started.

 Charge distance in the above SCF cycle went on as following:

 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0007728 for atom   48 spin 2)  
 0.0002381
 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028021 for atom   29 spin 2)  
 0.0019903
 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028017 for atom   29 spin 2)  
 0.0019911

 We are not able to figure out what the problem is. Any response in this 
 regard will be very helpful for us.

 with regards,

 --
 Shamik Chakrabarti
 Senior Research Fellow
 Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
 Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
 IIT Kharagpur
 Kharagpur 721302
 INDIA


 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


-- 

   P.Blaha
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--


[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-24 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha,

Thank you very much for your reply and clarification. I will rerun
the calculation again without using any constraints. Thanks once again.

with best regards,

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atwrote:


I was running force minimization of a 56 atomic cell ( an oxide
 material) by constraining the coordinates of elements other than oxygen as
 that is the only variable
 parameter (other coordinates are fixed obeying space group symmetry) in
 wien2k 11.1

 I was using NEW1 minimization method following user guide -- In case of
 constraint calculations one should use NEW1


 You did not read the UG correctly:
 a) When positions are fixed by symmetry, this is NOT a constrain at all
 for the minimizers.
 b) The UG says: when using linear constrains, use NEW1. Linear
 constrains are specified in case.constrain
and restrict something like x+y=0.5   or similar.

 About your error: you have not found anything, so how should we find
 anything ?


 Two structure files having different atomic coordinates were already
 created.

 while when running SCF calculation using the 3rd struct file, SCF was
 aborted by mentioning the line at the 4th iteration:

  lapw2 -c -up (15:01:51) Abort
 3.348u 0.320s 0:01.61 227.3%0+0k 0+20376io 0pf+0w

 error: command   /home/shamik81/WIEN2k/lapw2c uplapw2.def   failed

 stop error

 Another unusual thing is that the energy and charge convergence in
 different iterations of this SCF cycle went on as below:

 EC: .41   CC:  .0007728
 EC:  .00600493   CC. .0028021
 EC:  .002993535 CC. .0028017

 There was no error file created and I haven't found any error indicated
 in case.output2 (up/dn) file and case.scf2up file was empty as lapw2 got
 aborted when it was just started.

 Charge distance in the above SCF cycle went on as following:

 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0007728 for atom   48 spin 2)
  0.0002381
 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028021 for atom   29 spin 2)
  0.0019903
 :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028017 for atom   29 spin 2)
  0.0019911

 We are not able to figure out what the problem is. Any response in this
 regard will be very helpful for us.

 with regards,

 --
 Shamik Chakrabarti
 Senior Research Fellow
 Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
 Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
 IIT Kharagpur
 Kharagpur 721302
 INDIA


 __**_
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.**at Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.**ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wienhttp://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien


 --

   P.Blaha
 --**--**
 --
 Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
 Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
 Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/**
 theochem/ http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
 --**--**
 --

 __**_
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.**at Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.**ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wienhttp://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien




-- 
Shamik Chakrabarti
Senior Research Fellow
Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
IIT Kharagpur
Kharagpur 721302
INDIA
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120824/a99db4ab/attachment.htm


[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-23 Thread Shamik Chakrabarti
Dear Prof. Laurence Marks,

   I have constrained some fixed positions for keeping them intact due
to the following reason:

(i) I am doing a calculation which is a primitive supercell generated from
the original unit cell having a particular space group.
(ii) Similar type of calculation on a different material (by generating
primitive space group) showed earlier that if the original structure has a
coordinate say (0.5, 0, 0) after force minimization with the primitive
space group the optimized coordinates eventually turned  out to be (0.4995,
0.9998, 0.9997) and hence we have again came back to our original position
(0.5, 0, 0). Hence, optimizing these fixed coordinates seems to be an
wastage of computational time while only varying the variable coordinates
(of the primitive space group) may give the equilibrium structure in a
relatively small time.

As you have mentioned, that I have not give enough information for finding
out the reason behind the crash, Sir, can you please suggest me which
information should I give?as already I have given the following
information:

(i) There is no error file
(ii) case.scf2up is empty (as lapw2 -c -up crashed)
(iii) I am not able to figure out any error messages from case.output2

Also, the initial positions for the structure has been entered carefully.
The coordinates are determined from Rietveld analysis of experimental XRD
which is also confronted with earlier findings.

Looking forward to your response.

with best regards,

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Laurence Marks L-marks at 
northwestern.eduwrote:

 You have misunderstood the UG. Wien2k knows about fixed positions due
 to symmetry and so long as you have entered your positions with
 precision, e.g. 0. not 0. you should not impose
 additional constraints yourself. In addition there is no reason to use
 NEW1 if you do have constraints as both PORT and MSR1a obey them.
 However, unless you have a very good reason I do not recommend using
 constraints.

 As to why your calculation crashed, no idea as you have not provided
 enough information for anyone to guess. I suspect that you have chosen
 inappropriate parameters and/or have a mistake in your input. Most
 oxides are centrosymmetric and a common mistake is to get a lower
 symmetry by not entering the initial positions with enough accuracy.

 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:39 AM, shamik chakrabarti shamikphy at gmail.com
 wrote:
  Dear wien2k users,
 
   I was running force minimization of a 56 atomic cell ( an oxide
  material) by constraining the coordinates of elements other than oxygen
 as
  that is the only variable parameter (other coordinates are fixed obeying
  space group symmetry) in wien2k 11.1
 
  I was using NEW1 minimization method following user guide -- In case of
  constraint calculations one should use NEW1
 
  Two structure files having different atomic coordinates were already
  created.
 
  while when running SCF calculation using the 3rd struct file, SCF was
  aborted by mentioning the line at the 4th iteration:
 
  lapw2 -c -up (15:01:51) Abort
  3.348u 0.320s 0:01.61 227.3% 0+0k 0+20376io 0pf+0w
  error: command   /home/shamik81/WIEN2k/lapw2c uplapw2.def   failed
 
stop error
 
  Another unusual thing is that the energy and charge convergence in
 different
  iterations of this SCF cycle went on as below:
 
  EC: .41   CC:  .0007728
  EC:  .00600493   CC. .0028021
  EC:  .002993535 CC. .0028017
 
  There was no error file created and I haven't found any error indicated
 in
  case.output2 (up/dn) file and case.scf2up file was empty as lapw2 got
  aborted when it was just started.
 
  Charge distance in the above SCF cycle went on as following:
 
  :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0007728 for atom   48 spin 2)
  0.0002381
  :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028021 for atom   29 spin 2)
  0.0019903
  :DIS  :  CHARGE DISTANCE   ( 0.0028017 for atom   29 spin 2)
  0.0019911
 
  We are not able to figure out what the problem is. Any response in this
  regard will be very helpful for us.
 
  with regards,
 
  --
  Shamik Chakrabarti
  Senior Research Fellow
  Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
  Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
  IIT Kharagpur
  Kharagpur 721302
  INDIA



 --
 Professor Laurence Marks
 Department of Materials Science and Engineering
 Northwestern University
 www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
 Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
 nobody else has thought
 Albert Szent-Gyorgi
 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien




-- 
Shamik Chakrabarti
Senior Research Fellow
Dept. of Physics  Meteorology
Material Processing  Solid State Ionics Lab
IIT Kharagpur
Kharagpur 721302
INDIA
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: