This is an area I am interested in also. I run two groups of Mexican students 
who work with Wiki project for their "servicio social," a community service 
requirement for all Mexican undergrads. There was some question this semester 
as to whether the program should continue as they were looking for evidence of 
"social impact"... which they were defining as students having direct contact 
with beneficiares (think reading to children or serving food at a soup 
kitchen). We did convince the powers-that-be that while there may not be 
face-to-face, we can provide numbers as to how many people access the materials 
that students create/improve (but cannot break it down as to how many of those 
are from Mexico).

________________________________
From: Wiki-research-l <wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf 
of Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:23:17 PM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Request: Studies of external impacts of Wikipedia

I have a few thoughts.

Thinking financially here: while I'm not aware of studies, the rise of 
Wikipedia coincided with the demise of Encarta. Also, I think that you'd want 
to take into consideration the impacts that Wikipedia has had via its 
appearance in Google search results and in Google's information summary panels; 
I'm sure that Google has reaped substantial financial benefits from Wikipedia. 
(This is a mixed blessing.) You might consider making an estimate of how many 
millions of dollars university and school libraries have saved by not 
purchasing proprietary encyclopedias.

You might consult with WikiProject Medicine and WPMF to learn about the public 
health impacts of their efforts in content development and translation efforts, 
which they seem to think have been substantial in the developing world.

I believe that the education folks in WMF and WEF have done some analyses of 
how Wikipedia assignments have may have yielded improved student engagement 
with material than traditional course assignments.

There are probably also financial benefits that others have reaped from using 
open source MediaWiki software. Perhaps the folks in WMF Tech would be able to 
provide some analysis of the benefits of MediaWiki to external organizations.

HTH,

Pine


On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Aaron Halfaker 
<ahalfa...@wikimedia.org<mailto:ahalfa...@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Wikipedia has probably had some substantial external impacts.  Are there any 
studies quantifying them?  Maybe increased scientific literacy?  Or maybe GDP 
rises with access to Wikipedia?

Are there any studies that have explored how Wikipedia has affected economic or 
social issues?

I'm looking for any references you've got.

-Aaron

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to