[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #32 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2010-07-09 15:45:46 UTC --- fixed in r69212 (see http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikisource-l/2010-July/000784.html ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #30 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-20 12:18:16 UTC --- I agree with Vandenberg's proposal. His point that there is no need for an alternative Access Control System is very important. We schould have one and exactly one user access control system. Therefore from my point of view. - There should be the possibility for IP's to contribute as before. - At least Admins should have the right to set the proofread level according to the needs, for converting older already proofreaded projects to the proofread extension. No curious / buggy workarounds by bots. - Only one User access-system. Exactly speaking the access control system which is implemented in the mediawikisw (userCan) @Snottygobble, we don't have to fix aproblem we have. We want the unheralded change of the last update deactivated or changed to a community selectable access system. What I find funny, the we, who were the cutting edge in proofreading - as ThomasV statet - in Wikisource should be the bad guys which don't understand what happens (Is there a possibility that we have more experience, because we doing this job longer than most of the other projects?). The allegation that we are complaining because the other are luckily stepping up to us is ridiculous. The french and english wikisource have overhauled us a long time ago in some numbers. Nobody of us is complaining about that. Far from it, we are happy that all wikisources are coming up to a high level of quality. greetings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #31 from Snottygobble snottygob...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 14:01:25 UTC --- We want the unheralded change of the last update deactivated. You've been told, repeatedly, that you don't need a patch applied in order to achieve this. Simply revert your javascript back to a version that uses your old page quality template, instead of the pagequality tag. This will give you precisely what you want. It will also effect the removal of de.wikisource from the global statistics pages; but this is not unreasonable, given you will have rendered your statistics incommensurable by opting for a different approach to validation. Please bear in mind that this is a bug tracking system, and what is considered fair comment here is very different to what might be acceptable on Wikimedia discussion pages or the mailing lists. Comments here should be directed towards explaining or resolving the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay...@gmail.com --- Comment #28 from John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com 2009-11-19 15:31:21 UTC --- Please provide unified diffs using diff -ur old/ new/ More fundamentally, I think it is necessary for the Proofread Page extension to not include access control. It should probably use the userCan hook, and let another extension implement access control. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Hooks/userCan I would prefer to see a matrix that defines what user groups are able to perform tasks at various stages. The following would prevent IPs from proofreading pages. $wgGroupPermissions['autoconfirmed']['proofread'] = true; $wgProofreadPageStageProtection['*'] = array( 'proofread' ); The following would prevent IPs from validating pages. $wgGroupPermissions['autoconfirmed']['validate'] = true; $wgProofreadPageStageProtection[3] = array( 'validate' ); It should be possible to add a sysop-only fourth stage with: $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['finalise'] = true; $wgProofreadPageStageProtection[4] = array( 'finalise' ); Another approach would be: $wgProofreadPageMaxStage['anon'] = 1; $wgProofreadPageMaxStage['autoconfirmed'] = 3; $wgProofreadPageMaxStage['sysop'] = 4; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 Snottygobble snottygob...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||snottygob...@gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Snottygobble snottygob...@gmail.com 2009-11-19 23:53:40 UTC --- As I understand it, Thomas objects to this proposal and patch because the new pagequality tag integrates the various language domain implementations, allowing the automatic maintenance of pages like http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:ProofreadPage_Statistics. This page compares the progress of different domains, and therefore must use the same metric for each domain. Otherwise it is useless. The proposed patch changes how progress is measured for a single domain, and thus would invalidate the entire integration. This is why Thomas opposes it. The choices, then, are: 1. Thomas could patch all of the domains... but this would require consensus across all of them, not just de.wikisource; 2. de.wikisource can withdraw from the integrated page quality system and fix their problem. No patch is needed for this; they need only revert their local Javascript to a version that does not use the pagequality tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #27 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-17 15:01:32 UTC --- I find it very interesting how ThomasV is arguing about 9 lines of code, which would improve the extension. And his arguments, that if someone else would do it will be ok - we have misunderstood him we are only allowed by him to do it the second best way. He is arguing that a user Xarax can do this for us whith a lot more of java script code. I'm sorry Xarax isn't active as an user anymore (we are quite unhappy about that, only Bot-activities can be seen within in the last 6 month). A experienced programmer - a person who we are laking at the moment - should write a lot of code to circumvent the obstacles, it must be tested in the real environment including removing the bugs, we haf bad experiences about that. And his argument other subdomains don't want it (which one? french community should be clear - or?). If you look at the communications,in total more people are arguing for enhancing the extension then against. Here you have a list of the communities working with proofread http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:ProofreadPage_Statistics The biggest curiousity is ThomasV introduced a big change in the extension without talking to a lot of communities. We must learn it the hard way, by notifying that things which had run good for quite a long time, won't run anymore suddenly. I think most of the communites didn't know up to now, what had happened and therefore don't take part in the communication. (I don't think that a lot of communites are converting multithousand page projects to Proofread 2). I think you should also read this comment here http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikisource-l/2009-November/000636.html Greetings p.s. we want to use the the page quality system but without beeing overruled. We believe in the wiki system and assume good faith (AGF) by the people which are contributing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #13 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:37:26 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=6788) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6788) Allows IPs in Proofread.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #14 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:37:57 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=6789) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6789) Allow IPs in prrofread.js -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #15 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:41:52 UTC --- After testing my older patches on a ProofreadPage-Mediawiki Installation I must admit, that this first patches don't work. Now I uploaded two new patches for Proofread.php and proofread.js and in my installtion they work. There must still be set $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs=true in Localsettings.php to use these patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #16 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:08:55 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=6790) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6790) Allow Q4 and IPs in proofread.js -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #17 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:09:19 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=6791) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6791) Allow Q4 and IPs in ProofreadPage.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #18 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:12:12 UTC --- The Patches 6790 and 6791 allow in addition to 6788 and 6789 the setting to quality level 4 to sysops, so that moving from older projects to PR2 is possible. There must be set $wgProofreadPageAllowQ4=true in LocalSettings.php additional to $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs=true I tested this patches in my local installation and there it work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #19 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-11-16 10:26:10 UTC --- Sorry but I will not add those patches. Please check the discussions from last month in the mailing list about that decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #20 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-16 17:44:36 UTC --- Can anyone verify that the solutions of Buxul T. will work and find an developer to add this to the code. As ThomasV clearly states here, he isn't willing - in my opinion for very personal reasons - to add these more than usefull extension to this script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #23 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 18:41:46 UTC --- and there ThomasV said: Even if I am not willing to program an extra solution for de.ws, I know that some de.ws admins are perfectly able to program the solution they want. They do not need me for that. They know it. And now I have wrote the patch and he is not willing to implement it. Very bad behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #26 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-11-17 06:22:58 UTC --- Buxul : you misunderstood what I said. When I wrote in the ML that de.ws admins can program the solution they need, I was referring to local javascript, and to the solution implemented by user xarax 2 years ago. If something can be achieved through local configuration, I do not see why I should add it to the core of the extension, especially when other subdomains do not want it. Also, it will be much easier for you to develop and maintain code locally. Just check how the quality buttons worked at de.ws before I introduced the pagequality system: categories were added to the pages by local javascript. This should still work. Using local javascript, you can add the categories you want to the pages you want. Please note that this solution does not require a robot; My suggestion to use a robot was intended to facilitate migration of already proofed texts, and is interesting only if de.ws wants to stay in the common pagequality system. However, if de.ws wants IPs to be able to mark pages as proofread, then they do not want to use the common pagequality system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #12 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-14 23:36:00 UTC --- This seems to be the solution, we have been begging for in the german wikisource. Could anyone be so polite to help Buxul T. to test it and if it's ok activate in wikisource. I think it would be usefull to set the default for $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs to false. This wouldn't change anything for the existing projects. And the projects, which wants to deviate can set this to true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
Buxul T. bu...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bu...@web.de
--- Comment #10 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-13 10:17:23 UTC ---
This patch for ProofreadPage.php Revision 58865 should solve the problem:
954,959c954,957
if (!$wgProofreadPageAllowIPs) {
if( ($old_q != $q) $wgUser-isAnon() ) {
$wgOut-showErrorPage( 'proofreadpage_nologin',
'proofreadpage_nologintext' );
return false;
}
}
---
if( ($old_q != $q) $wgUser-isAnon() ) {
$wgOut-showErrorPage( 'proofreadpage_nologin',
'proofreadpage_nologintext' );
return false;
}
and then you must set $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs=true in LocalSettings.php
I can't test it, because I don't have an running installation of ProofreadPage.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #11 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-13 10:23:15 UTC ---
correction:
909c909
global $wgOut, $wgUser, $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs;
---
global $wgOut, $wgUser;
954,959c954,957
if (!$wgProofreadPageAllowIPs) {
if( ($old_q != $q) $wgUser-isAnon() ) {
$wgOut-showErrorPage( 'proofreadpage_nologin',
'proofreadpage_nologintext' );
return false;
}
}
---
if( ($old_q != $q) $wgUser-isAnon() ) {
$wgOut-showErrorPage( 'proofreadpage_nologin',
'proofreadpage_nologintext' );
return false;
}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 Thomas Bleher thomasble...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomasble...@gmx.de --- Comment #9 from Thomas Bleher thomasble...@gmx.de 2009-10-22 06:18:12 UTC --- For anyone looking into this, the code in question was added in r52508. It should be very easy to make this configurable, assuming of course that different communities want to handle this differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #7 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-09-27 07:20:32 UTC --- I understand your point: you want IPs to be able to indicate that they proofread the text. I will not implement the solution you propose, because it implies to remove the double proofreading system, and because this would affect all other wikisources; such a radical change should at least be discussed with them beforehand. The double proofreading system of the extension is not meant to be secure or sockpuppet-proof. It is just meant to be unambiguous. If we remove the current restriction on double proofreading, then users could make their own interpretation of the meaning of the buttons, and this would break the system. If there is local consensus at de.ws, I suggest you configure your wiki so that IPs can indicate they proofread a page. The germans used to do this with a template before I introduced this buttons system. This should still work. Using local javascript, you guys can even create buttons linked to this template, so that IPs will not notice any difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #8 from Cecil cecila...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 18:01:44 UTC --- What do you mean with radical change? This existes until a few days ago when you just implemented something else without a consensus. You don't need to implement the solution. It already exists since several years and you changed it without any consensus. Can you show us one case of miss-use on German Wikisource? Just one to show us that your dictatorship has at least a root? There never was any problem with IPs when it came to proofreading. They are a part of our community while you treat them like dirt, like cheaters, like people who are not to be trusted at all. That is disgusting. It is called discrimination what you are doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wikisource: IPs unable to |Wikisource: IPs unable to |proofread |flag articles as proofread --- Comment #4 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-09-26 10:00:38 UTC --- IPs are allowed to participate : they can proofread and correct articles. What you request is to let them flag an article as proofread. This would dramatically change the current 'double proofreading' system, because it relies on proofreading by two different users (unless the IP is using a fixed adress, and is whiteisted somewhere). I would like to see a community consensus on this, outside of de.ws. A similar proposal was made 3 months ago at ws.org and received no support http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource_talk:ProofreadPage#IP_not_allowed_to_proofread -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 20812] Wikisource: IPs unable to flag articles as proofread
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 --- Comment #5 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-09-26 13:02:58 UTC --- To give a direct replay to this comment of ThomasV, the only person I know which wants to exclude IP'S from the proofreading process ist the developer of this extension ThomasV. He didn't get any positive feedback for his position in the article mentioned by him. You schould also see the discussions in the german wikisource. I'm sorry, but these comments are in german. http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Skriptorium#Code_Update for the last update, when there is interesst in the older problems we had, I can serch for the discussions in the german language ws scriptorim. The same type of discussion we hav every time when there is an code change by ThomasV in his extension Proofread. Everytime the only way we get information about code changes is when feateures dosn't work any longer, because of buggy, mostly untestet code or by ThomasV intention. That is the reason I can't call his code changes updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
