https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21823

           Summary: ReaderFeedback early input from Strategy project
           Product: MediaWiki extensions
           Version: any
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ReaderFeedback
        AssignedTo: jschulz_4...@msn.com
        ReportedBy: ft2.w...@gmail.com


There's been discussion of reader feedback in the strategy project. We should
probably keep it to 3 metrics for simplicity and to encourage use, but also --
critically -- we need to capture the user's own knowledge level and probably
use a click-bar (not a dropdown or popup).


SUGGESTED METRICS:

Metrics tentatively suggested on the strategy wiki, are:

   Balanced (includes neutrality)
   Coverage (of topic, ie completeness)
   Sources (is it well cited)
   Up to date

Up to date is important for academic and scientific pages; and presentation
(currently requested) may be less important as layout tends to be "encyclopedia
standard" for most pages; ie it's not so much of a "page by page" issue.


USER KNOWLEDGE LEVEL:

Capturing the user's own knowledge level is extremely valuable:

   Casual reader
   Knowledgable
   Very knowledgable
   Formally qualified

Two benefits - it allows us to see how users of different levels of topic
knowledge rate articles. So we can distinguish how experts rate the page (or
its usefulness) vs. how newcomers to the topic or casual readers rate it. 

It also lets us understand the reader profile of the page, so editors can
understand what audience level it's getting.


CLICK BAR NOT POPUPS:

Popups ("rate this page!") are probably going to be seen as "spammy" or
ignored. A click bar (eg strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quality_bar_2.png )
may get better feedback.


Some input, having seen this extension on the test wiki.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to