[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |---

--- Comment #6 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
Then let me show you I'm still waiting and it's important.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #7 from Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzber...@mathjax.org ---
That's an easy macro to add to texvc.js but there are some technical problems.
Mainly, the right(tm) way of doing this in MathML would be using the frown
entity but only the STIX fonts have the necessary stretchy characters AFAIK. 

However, both MathJax and Firefox can stretch overparens, so something like
\overset{\mmlToken{mo}{#x23DC;}}{XYZ} would do the trick.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #8 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
MathML...? You're talking about the native support from browsers?  Well, this
bug is talking about math inside Wikimedia/Wikipedia.  And in the case when
end-user browser cannot accept MathML, Wikimedia should generate an image. So,
please limit this bug on the server side.

On the other hand, I have just found this article:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/ctan/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
overarc is inside it, so it looks pretty standard.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #9 from physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de ---
MathML is part of HTML5, so it should be quite standard. And I think it's a
good idea to the HTML standard and not to invent custom notation or allow the
use of the turing complete programming language \TeX.
And in the case when end-user browser cannot accept MathML, Wikimedia should
generate an image
That's what's being done.
So back to the question: Do you think
\overset{\mmlToken{mo}{#x23DC;}}{XYZ}
would solve the problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #10 from Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzber...@mathjax.org ---
@石庭豐 the new version of the math extension is moving towards MathML, both
internally and externally. I.e., TeX input is converted into MathML and
rendered into image formats (or just left as is in Firefox). In particular, the
mathoid component uses MathJax-node, hence my example of a MathJax-compatible
macro.

You can try the macro mentioned above on e.g.,
http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/test/sample-dynamic-2.html to see a
sample rendering. It's not ideal but it seems much better than nothing. 

Note that this is not easy in TeX/LaTeX either, see e.g.,
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/86044/represent-an-arc-over-letters for
a solution which is why the old (LaTeX+dvi2png based solution) never added it.
IMHO, another plus of physikerwelt's awesome work of moving the extension
towards MathML.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #11 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Peter Krautzberger from comment #10)
 @石庭豐 the new version of the math extension is moving towards MathML, both
 internally and externally. I.e., TeX input is converted into MathML and
 rendered into image formats (or just left as is in Firefox).[deleted]

Thanks!  That's the missing part of information I needed to understand.

Converting TeX -- MathML -- PNG  well, that's quite an indirect way of
rendering math expressions.  But if you are sure it's working at 100%, why not?
:)

 You can try the macro mentioned above on e.g.,
 http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/test/sample-dynamic-2.html to see a
 sample rendering. It's not ideal but it seems much better than nothing.

I have tried it but nothing is rendered - I could provide a screenshot if you
like.  I had also put it inside math.../math tags but still nothing.  I had
also tried it in Wikipedia's sandbox but nothing came out (which was expected,
I suppose)

(In reply to physikerwelt from comment #9)
 [deleted]
 So back to the question: Do you think
 \overset{\mmlToken{mo}{#x23DC;}}{XYZ}
 would solve the problem?

There are two aspects to this question: 1) rendered result and 2) facility.
For 1: as I cannot see any result, I cannot answer.
For 2: are you saying that
a) Wiki editors have to type your expression instead of \overarc{XYZ} in order
to have the arc symbol?   or
b) \orverarc{XYZ} will be translated into your expression internally?

If you're implying a), then the answer is no, it would not solve the problem
because
i) the TeX syntax is overarc (for those who know TeX, of course) but you force
users to use undocumented tweak without telling them what to do exactly;
ii) in the case \overarc is not supported, I would the TeX syntax I provided
(\overset{\frown}{AB}) which is a LOT shorter and cleaner. So the answer is
still No

If you're implying b), of course, that would solve the problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #12 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
Typo error - I wanted to write:
... in the case \overarc is not supported, I would *prefer* the TeX syntax I
provided ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #13 from physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de ---
Created attachment 16813
  -- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=16813action=edit
peters preview

石庭豐, thank you very much for providing feedback here.
Of course users are supposed to type \overarc{XYZ} which would then be
internally translated to something else similar to the newcommand LaTeX
command.
See a screenshot of Peters demo page attached.
Screenshots aver very helpful for this kind of bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #14 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to physikerwelt from comment #13)
 Created attachment 16813 [details]
 peters preview

Oh, the dollar sign! :D

OK, visually it's acceptable -- point 1 is OK

 Of course users are supposed to type \overarc{XYZ} which would then be
 internally translated to something else similar to the newcommand LaTeX 
 command.

-- point 2 is OK too.

So in all, YES!, the proposal would solve the problem :)

Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2014-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||upstream
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||phy...@ckurs.de
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #5 from physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de ---
I'm closing all feature requests that are older than one year... It seems
unlikely that someone waits more than a year for a new feature. If the bug is
reopened, we see that the feature is still important.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2013-09-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Wang fred.w...@free.fr ---
Is \overarc supposed to be used in math mode?

\overarc should be easy to implement in the MathJax TeX parser (there is no
upstream report so far, though). If the goal is to make the symbol stretch to
cover the base, then stretchy variants will need to be supported by the MathJax
font (I haven't checked if that's the case).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2013-09-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #4 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 Is \overarc supposed to be used in math mode?

I don't understand the question. If math is used, we are in math mode, right?
I want to be able to write math\overarc{AB}/math to show the arc notation.

 \overarc should be easy to implement in the MathJax TeX parser (there is no
 upstream report so far, though). If the goal is to make the symbol stretch to
 cover the base, then stretchy variants will need to be supported by the
 MathJax
 font (I haven't checked if that's the case).

Please take a look at http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php and put
\overarc{AB} inside the text box to see what's supposed to be rendered.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2013-09-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

Frédéric Wang fred.w...@free.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://github.com/mathjax/
   ||MathJax/issues/567

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2013-05-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

Derk-Jan Hartman hartman.w...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hartman.w...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Derk-Jan Hartman hartman.w...@gmail.com ---
\overarc is not a standard symbol as far as I can tell, it seems to be part of
\usepackage{arcs}. It's also not part of MathJax.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2013-05-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

--- Comment #2 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
Not a standard symbol of what?

Nevertheless, can Wikimedia/AMS-LaTeX/whatever evolve to include this?  The arc
notation is not something invented in the last 100 years.  It's very weird it's
not a part of whatever-standard!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 30215] Not possible to use \overarc

2011-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215

Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|Unprioritized   |Normal
 CC||m...@everybody.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l