[Bug 43342] Register wiki:// URI schema
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43342 MZMcBride changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@mzmcbride.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 43342] Register wiki:// URI schema
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43342 --- Comment #3 from Ori Livneh --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think your comparisons are very good. BitCoin and SecondLife have > their own custom protocols. Hence they have a custom scheme to point to the > location of the resource. Without the scheme there is no other way to > address anything via URI. RFC 3495 specifically allows for schemes that do not act as locators; cf section 2.3: "Schemes that are not intended to be used as locators SHOULD describe how the resource identified can be determined or accessed by software that obtains a URI of that scheme." (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395) The description in this case would take the form of a mapping of wiki:// URIs to the set of URLs currently usable for retrieving or editing the article. The expectation is not that wiki:// URIs would replace URLs in browsers, but that the scheme would specify a stable, permanent, protocol-independent way of addressing wiki content, irrespective of the means of its retrieval. > The use of interwiki prefixes as hosts is also not a sound idea. Interwiki > prefixes are non-global. An absolute url is not supposed to be relative to > where you use it. Right; for that reason, the current set of interwiki link short forms would serve as the starting point for the top-level naming authority for wikis, as described in section 2.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 43342] Register wiki:// URI schema
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43342 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Friesen --- Tbh what you want sounds more like a request for urn support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 43342] Register wiki:// URI schema
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43342 Daniel Friesen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mediawiki-bugs@nadir-seen-f ||ire.com --- Comment #1 from Daniel Friesen --- I don't think your comparisons are very good. BitCoin and SecondLife have their own custom protocols. Hence they have a custom scheme to point to the location of the resource. Without the scheme there is no other way to address anything via URI. And as for git. git:// is only used when git's custom protocol is being used. When GIT uses ssh it uses ssh:// urls, and when it uses HTTP or HTTPS http:// and https:// are used. The use of interwiki prefixes as hosts is also not a sound idea. Interwiki prefixes are non-global. An absolute url is not supposed to be relative to where you use it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 43342] Register wiki:// URI schema
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43342 Legoktm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
