greg added a comment.
>>! In T571#9338, @mmodell wrote:
> I think the phabot (T571) might be a better way to go since it's already got
> the right information in much more machine-friendly format, all we have to do
> is deal with the channel rules (and yet another irc bot in each relevant
> channel)
>
I think you mean T324, right? But yes, I agree that phabot is the right
approach; use the built in tools and all that. The added features of phabot see
nice as well.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T571
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign
.
To: greg
Cc: wikibugs-l, Aklapper, chasemp, mmodell, Qgil, Dzahn, greg, Legoktm, Elitre,
valhallasw, Eloquence, Liuxinyu970226, Ladsgroup, Jdforrester-WMF, scfc, jeremyb
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l