[Wikidata] TechConf19 nominations - deadline extended until Thursday
The deadline extended until end of day Thursday June 20. Final chance! Greg On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:00:26PM -0700, Greg Grossmeier wrote: > Hello all, > > Two things: > > 1) On Thursday June 13th at 18:00 UTC (11am Pacific) there will be an > open office hours for those of you who would like to share your thoughts > on the event; topics you'd like to see discussed there, decisions you'd > like made, etc. > > It will occur using Google Meet, at this url: > https://meet.google.com/exz-zxfy-nuj > > If you can't make it to this office hours, don't fret! You can always > (continue to) share your thoughts on the Phabricator task: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220212 > > > 2) REMINDER: The deadline for participant/attendee nominations is Monday > June 17th, this coming Monday. Remember, you can nominate others or > yourself. And you can fill out the form as many times as you have > nominations. > > Form: https://forms.gle/CLeGFSMiEasJgEU27 > FAQ: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019/FAQ > > This survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may make it > subject to additional terms. For more information on privacy and > data-handling, see this survey privacy statement: > https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference_Survey_Privacy_Statement > > > On behalf of the Technical Conference Program Committee, > > Greg > > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:39:37PM -0700, Greg Grossmeier wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > As you may have seen, the next Wikimedia Technical Conference[0] is > > coming up in November 2019. > > > > It will take place November 12-15th in Atlanta, GA (USA). As announced > > at the Hackathon and documented on-wiki[1] this year's event will > > focus on the topic of "Developer Productivity". > > > > Like last year, we are looking for diverse stakeholders, perspectives, > > and experiences that will help us to make informed decisions. We need > > people who can create and architect solutions, as well as those who > > will make funding and prioritization decisions for the projects. > > > > See the FAQ for (hopefully) any questions you have: > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019/FAQ> > > > > Please fill out the survey using this link to nominate yourself or someone > > else to attend: <https://forms.gle/CLeGFSMiEasJgEU27> > > > > This survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may make it > > subject to additional terms. For more information on privacy and > > data-handling, see this survey privacy statement: > > <https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference_Survey_Privacy_Statement> > > > > This nomination form will remain open between May 29 and June 17, 2018. > > > > If you have any questions, please post them on the event's talk page > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019>. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Greg and the Technical Conference 2019 Program Committee > > > > [0] <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019> > > [1] > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019#Vision_Statement> > > > > -- > > Greg Grossmeier > > Release Team Manager > > -- > | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | Release Team ManagerA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | Release Team ManagerA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
[Wikidata] TechConf19: Nominations deadline (6/17) and office hours Thursday (6/13)
Hello all, Two things: 1) On Thursday June 13th at 18:00 UTC (11am Pacific) there will be an open office hours for those of you who would like to share your thoughts on the event; topics you'd like to see discussed there, decisions you'd like made, etc. It will occur using Google Meet, at this url: https://meet.google.com/exz-zxfy-nuj If you can't make it to this office hours, don't fret! You can always (continue to) share your thoughts on the Phabricator task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220212 2) REMINDER: The deadline for participant/attendee nominations is Monday June 17th, this coming Monday. Remember, you can nominate others or yourself. And you can fill out the form as many times as you have nominations. Form: https://forms.gle/CLeGFSMiEasJgEU27 FAQ: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019/FAQ This survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may make it subject to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling, see this survey privacy statement: https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference_Survey_Privacy_Statement On behalf of the Technical Conference Program Committee, Greg On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:39:37PM -0700, Greg Grossmeier wrote: > Hello all, > > As you may have seen, the next Wikimedia Technical Conference[0] is > coming up in November 2019. > > It will take place November 12-15th in Atlanta, GA (USA). As announced > at the Hackathon and documented on-wiki[1] this year's event will > focus on the topic of "Developer Productivity". > > Like last year, we are looking for diverse stakeholders, perspectives, > and experiences that will help us to make informed decisions. We need > people who can create and architect solutions, as well as those who > will make funding and prioritization decisions for the projects. > > See the FAQ for (hopefully) any questions you have: > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019/FAQ> > > Please fill out the survey using this link to nominate yourself or someone > else to attend: <https://forms.gle/CLeGFSMiEasJgEU27> > > This survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may make it > subject to additional terms. For more information on privacy and > data-handling, see this survey privacy statement: > <https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference_Survey_Privacy_Statement> > > This nomination form will remain open between May 29 and June 17, 2018. > > If you have any questions, please post them on the event's talk page > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019>. > > Thanks! > > Greg and the Technical Conference 2019 Program Committee > > [0] <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019> > [1] > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Conference/2019#Vision_Statement> > > -- > Greg Grossmeier > Release Team Manager -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | Release Team ManagerA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata] JADE needs your feedback
Jah-Dee? :P > Before anyone comes up with something weird, JADE is pronounced like the > ornamental rock. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade :) > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Keegan Peterzell <kpeterz...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > > > (cross-posting to Wikitech and Wikidata; Wikidata is getting this due to > > the general interest in data sets and databases) > > > > Greetings, > > > > The Platform Scoring Team at the Wikimedia Foundation are developing an > > auditing tool for ORES, the Judgement and Dialogue Engine (JADE) [0]. It's > > largely inspired by the false positive reporting work that currently occurs > > by hand on wiki pages. JADE's purpose is to provide human oversight to > > ORES's AI work. > > > > The team is seeking input in two areas as development begins in two > > technical areas: the database schema [1], and the implementation strategy > > [2]. If you have thoughts or experience to share in how to best set these > > up, please have a look over the pages. Questions, comments, concerns are > > welcome on the talk pages [3][4]. > > > > Feedback and stories on using ORES in production is also welcome, to help > > give the team general ideas about areas of concern and/or improvement that > > JADE should keep in mind [5]. > > > > Thank you for your time, see you on the wikis. > > > > 0. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/JADE > > > > 1. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/JADE/Schema > > > > 2. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/JADE/Implementations > > > > 3. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:JADE/Schema > > > > 4. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:JADE/Implementations > > > > 5. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:JADE > > > > -- > > Keegan Peterzell > > Technical Collaboration Specialist > > Wikimedia Foundation > > > > ___ > > Wikidata mailing list > > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > > ___ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | Release Team ManagerA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | ___ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Re: [Wikidata-l] [Mediawiki-api] Freebase like API with an OUTPUT feature ?
quote name=Thad Guidry date=2015-01-06 time=19:59:18 -0600 And so after some digging, and lack of responses on this thread, Hi Thad! I'm worried that the relevant people from the Wikidata/Wikibase project just aren't seeing your messages on this mailing list. I'm cc'ing here the wikidata list. For those on the Wikidata list, see the full thread here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-api/2015-January/003454.html Best, Greg -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | identi.ca: @gregA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata for organizing 1000s of extensions in mediawiki.org?
quote name=Denny Vrandečić date=2014-03-20 time=16:06:46 + I would very strongly recommend to use Semantic MediaWiki for this use case. It is more powerful, we use SMW in other WMF contexts already, Only on wikitech.wikimedia.org, and only until Ryan Lane figures out how to use Wikidata to manage the labs provisioning/etc :) and supporting the data inside Meta (instead of inside Wikidata and then transcluding it) allows us also to generate workflows in Meta involving local User-accounts, etc., and reduces complexity since the data is saved in one place, and you don't have to switch between Meta and Wikidata to update the data for an extension. It also frees Wikidata for having have to extend their policies to support this specific use case (would MediaWiki extension developers all get their own item per Notability, etc.). Also, SMW already right now supports the uses cases you are asking for right now. I understand that SMW was already suggested in Bugzilla. I understand Wikidata looks more sexy right now, but I think it is not the most appropriate tool for this use case. Very useful points though. I have no horse in this race, but I do want the best tool for the job to win. Greg -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | identi.ca: @gregA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
