[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T195302: Language, Lexical Category, and Grammatical features of a lexeme do not show up in Special:WhatLinksHere

2018-10-21 Thread Lea_Lacroix_WMDE 
Lea_Lacroix_WMDE added a comment.
It seems to happen again, exampleTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195302EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDECc: Nikki, Stashbot, Addshore, gerritbot, Tarrow, Lydia_Pintscher, Jakob_WMDE, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, VIGNERON, KaMan, Esc3300, JAnD, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, CucyNoiD, Nandana, NebulousIris, Mringgaard, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Retitled] T186006: References aren't readable to unprivileged users on Wikidata when an item is protected

2018-10-21 Thread matej_suchanek 
matej_suchanek renamed this task from "References aren't readable to logged-out users on Wikidata when an item is protected" to "References aren't readable to unprivileged users on Wikidata when an item is protected".
TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T186006EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: matej_suchanekCc: Liuxinyu970226, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Nikki, Pablo-WMDE, matej_suchanek, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, Mike_Peel, Nandana, tabish.shaikh91, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Soteriaspace, Jayprakash12345, Jrbranaa, JakeTheDeveloper, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, Wong128hk, Wikidata-bugs, aude, TheDJ, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T206636: Provide a way to have test servers on real hardware, isolated from production for Wikidata Query Service

2018-10-21 Thread Andrew 
Andrew added a comment.
Thanks, Stas.  There are two ways I think we can go forward with this:


Run a second set of tests on a similar VM that shares a host with other active cloud instances (to see if we can meet your needs as a standard user), or



Start talking about buying you a private virt host so you can do tests like this that are uncontested by anything except for other tests of yours


Number 1 seems like a good option to eliminate but of course it means you'll need to repeat your tests.  Unfortunately to get a good test in the new future I'd need to build you a new VM in the old region (where there's actually some busy traffic happening).  If you're interested in giving that a shot, let me know; otherwise we'll need to pass this issue on to some budget-focused people to discuss #2.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206636EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: AndrewCc: Addshore, Andrew, Aklapper, Smalyshev, Gehel, Nandana, thifranc, AndyTan, sietec, Davinaclare77, Qtn1293, Lahi, aborrero, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, Chicocvenancio, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, Zppix, Jonas, Xmlizer, Wong128hk, Luke081515, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, faidon, Mbch331, Jay8g, bd808, fgiunchedi, chasemp___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T206636: Provide a way to have test servers on real hardware, isolated from production for Wikidata Query Service

2018-10-21 Thread Smalyshev 
Smalyshev added a comment.
Run a second set of tests on a similar VM that shares a host with other active cloud instances (to see if we can meet your needs as a standard user), or

Sure. This would take a bit more time though - we'll need to load a new dump (probably several days) and run updater for a few days and queries on top of it. So overall I estimate it will take 1.5-2 weeks clock time (though mostly it'd be waiting for stuff to complete). I am interested in such test, so let's try it.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206636EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: SmalyshevCc: Addshore, Andrew, Aklapper, Smalyshev, Gehel, Nandana, thifranc, AndyTan, sietec, Davinaclare77, Qtn1293, Lahi, aborrero, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, Chicocvenancio, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, Zppix, Jonas, Xmlizer, Wong128hk, Luke081515, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, faidon, Mbch331, Jay8g, bd808, fgiunchedi, chasemp___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T207550: Sense not always saved with the right language code

2018-10-21 Thread Greta_Doci_WMDE 
Greta_Doci_WMDE added a comment.
I cannot reproduce this. I tried on test and wikidata too. Can you please send it here the test you did?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T207550EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Greta_Doci_WMDECc: Greta_Doci_WMDE, Nikki, Nandana, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Retitled] T206840: [Bug] Suggestion to create Lexeme when not found in search points to the wrong link

2018-10-21 Thread Greta_Doci_WMDE 
Greta_Doci_WMDE renamed this task from "Suggestion to create Lexeme when not found in search" to "[Bug] Suggestion to create Lexeme when not found in search points to the wrong link".Greta_Doci_WMDE triaged this task as "Normal" priority.
TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206840EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Greta_Doci_WMDECc: Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Nandana, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T206840: [Bug] Suggestion to create Lexeme when not found in search points to the wrong link

2018-10-21 Thread Greta_Doci_WMDE 
Greta_Doci_WMDE added a comment.
This might be very confusing, people also might create the wrong items thinking they are creating lexemes.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206840EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Greta_Doci_WMDECc: Greta_Doci_WMDE, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Nandana, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T207550: Sense not always saved with the right language code

2018-10-21 Thread Nikki 
Nikki added a comment.
Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking me to do.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T207550EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: NikkiCc: Greta_Doci_WMDE, Nikki, Nandana, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T206214: Basic data on Wikidata use: Edit counts, frequency

2018-10-21 Thread GoranSMilovanovic 
GoranSMilovanovic added a comment.
@Jan_Dittrich Here we go:

– 1.1. "Q1.1 Checking for power-law behavior" has two log scaled axis, if I read it correctly. I do not get what the numerical labels on the y axis mean – is this number of users, but after log transformation, so 1 users becomes 9.21… on the log scale? The log is a natural logarithm, correct? (2.718281828459…)

Correct. Both the number of revisions (x-axis) and the number of users who made the respective number of revisions (y-axis) where log-transformed (it's a natural log indeed, base = e), and the plotted against each other.

– 1.2. Q1.2 and Q1.3 show the same data as Q1.1, but in natural numbers without transformations,

Yes. Except that Q1.3 is misnomed: it should be titled Q1.3 Histogram: Distribution of the the number of users across revisions. But yes, both Q1.2 and Q1.3 sections deal with the same data as Q1.1, except that they operate on the natural (count) scale, not on log-transforms.

– 1.3. The diagrams tell "We have many accounts that edited a few times and a small amount of accounts which edit(ed) a lot"

Exactly.

– 1.4. To clarify, this is how many revisions a specific account has created until the data was acquired? (I call "revisions" "edits", it seems then)

That is true. Q1.3 is the distribution of the number of users who have made a particular number of revisions (edits, if you prefer), up to the moment of data acquisition for this analysis.

– 2.1 Q2.x are like 1.x, but only for september 2018.

Yes. Initially, you asked for an overview of the last 30 days or so. However, the wmf.mediawiki_history Hadoop table, where the data for this analysis is found, is partitioned per snapshots, where a snapshot represents all the data up to the particular month (e.g. everything since the beginning of history up to August 2018, September 2018, October 2018, etc). At the time when I've run the analysis, the September snapshot was the freshest one available. So you don't see any of the October 2018 data here, for example. We will not be able to do October 2018 before November 2018; it takes some time for that table to update.

– 2.2 The diagrams tell "recent edit counts by user follow the same pattern (log) as the general edit count distribution"

Q2.2 does not use any log scaling (as well as the corresponding Q1.2), but yes, it tells us that in qualitative terms the distribution of the number of users who have made a particular number of edits is no different from what we've seen when we've analyzed all of the data in Q1 sections. One could also compare Q2.3 to Q1.3 and bring about the same judgment by eye-balling only. I am not very enthusiastic about going into strict statistical, model-based comparisons between the two distributions here, but if you really want to make sure whether the case is true as stated here... let me know.

– 3. Q3 The diagrams are indeed tricky to read. I would read the crosstabular one like a scatterplot, however, in this case, it would need jitter, would it? Maybe a "heatmap" like approach might also be OK: A 2-D-bin would be darker if more edit/discussion counts fall into it.

As you have already observed it did cause a bit of a headache to me too. Please allow me some time to figure out the most informative approach to this visualization and as soon as I have it you will have it too. Thank you.

– 4. Q4.2 is again a diagram I am unable to read well. Could it be that the labels are off? X seems to show dates, but y seems to show dates (year-month), too, but log scaled? So I could not make sense of it.

Oh, oh, oh: sorry. The axes are off: x represents Month-Year, y represents log(number of Revisions). I will correct this as soon as I am done with the tricky Q3 diagrams.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you for you feedback!TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206214EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: GoranSMilovanovicCc: Lydia_Pintscher, GoranSMilovanovic, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, Jan_Dittrich, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, QZanden, LawExplorer, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T54971: [Goal] Sitelinks and arbitrary accesses to Incubator, OldWikisource and BetaWikiversity

2018-10-21 Thread Rachitrali 
Rachitrali added a comment.
I am test admin in Khowar Wikipedia incubator project, I am facing errors in Module, Template and wikidata, can anybody fix these errors?

mostly of the Templates, Modules has been fixed by Liuxinyu970226, thanks for that, except for those which includes "attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value)" (which we are still waiting for Wikidata supports). can anybody fix the wikidata supports for Khowar Language. thanksTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T54971EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: RachitraliCc: Rachitrali, Awangba_Mangang, jhsoby, Tagishsimon, Hsarrazin, Kostas20142, Mahagaja, Sannita, Superchilum, ChristianKl, daniel, Bugreporter, PokestarFan, Koavf, StevenJ81, Samwilson, Esc3300, srishakatux, C933103, Stashbot, hoo, aude, JanZerebecki, TTO, Liuxinyu970226, Accurimbono, Aklapper, Ricordisamoa, Purodha, liangent, Wikidata-bugs, Vogone, Candalua, SPQRobin, mxn, Filceolaire, jayvdb, Micru, revi, Billinghurst, Lydia_Pintscher, MF-Warburg, zhuyifei1999, Tpt, Nandana, Kotchchanipa, Adrian1985, Abo00tamr, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Jayprakash12345, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wong128hk, Mbch331, Jay8g___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs