Re: [Wikidata-l] Commons is coming \o/
Hey :) On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Luca Martinelli martinellil...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/8 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de: No it'd only link to one of the Commons ones but we're not restricting if this is category or page. (There is likely an item for the page and one for the category about Albert Einstein on Wikipedia) IMHO, it should be like Yaroslav pointed out (page to page, category to category, but *absolutely not* page to category or viceversa). Anyway, let's discuss it on Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikimedia_Commons (should we archive this page and make a new one?) In the end this is a decision of the Commons community what they want to link their pages and categories to and should probably be discussed there. As I said it'll be possible one way or another. See also http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-l/2013-August/002626.html and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Interwiki_links_via_Wikidata_coming_soon Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Community Communications for Technical Projects Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. Obentrautstr. 72 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
[Wikidata-l] Wiktionary first phase : interwiki links?
Hi all, About Wiktionary and Wikidata, Hartz proposed at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wiktionary#First_and_second_phases to be pragmatic and just import the interwiki links. I agree. I suggested in the same page that we could have items for Wiktionary where sitelinks would use the label of the item for the sitelink-titles. Is this feasible? I'm not highly knowledgeable about Wikidata, but I suppose this kind of modification shouldn't be too difficult. What do you think? Please come discuss this matter in the link above. Have a good day, Darkdadaah @ fr.wiktionary ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
[Wikidata-l] Properties in Wikidata for Numbers Datatypes
Hello All , i'm working on adding some properties mappings between DBpedia and Wikidata properties [1] when i started to add mappings for DBpedia properties whose datatypes are numbers in the xsd format and some other DBpedia properties that their values are in numbers also but their datatypes in are standard units like : - xsd:Integer - xsd:Float - xsd:Boolean - http://dbpedia.org/datatype/kilogram - http://dbpedia.org/datatype/squareMetre - http://dbpedia.org/datatype/metre i noticed that Wikidata doesn't contain equivalent properties for such DBpedia properties. this includes all properties like : Height , area , weight , mass and population number my Question is, are those properties missing just because no one considered adding them or they don't exist intentionally because Wikidata doesn't have Datatypes for numbers yet ? so for example we are going to see claims in the future on this form ? m:[ value, 222, Integer, 165 ], thanks Regards 1- https://github.com/hadyelsahar/extraction-framework/wiki/Mapping-WikData-to-DBpedia-properties - Hady El-Sahar Research Assistant Center of Informatics Sciences | Nile Universityhttp://nileuniversity.edu.eg/ ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] Properties in Wikidata for Numbers Datatypes
2013/9/9 Hady elsahar hadyelsa...@gmail.com: i noticed that Wikidata doesn't contain equivalent properties for such DBpedia properties. this includes all properties like : Height , area , weight , mass and population number my Question is, are those properties missing just because no one considered adding them or they don't exist intentionally because Wikidata doesn't have Datatypes for numbers yet ? so for example we are going to see claims in the future on this form ? There aren't yet the datatypes for numbers and numbers for units. They're planned, though. No clue about the date. -- Luca Sannita Martinelli http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Sannita ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] Wiktionary first phase : interwiki links?
2013/9/9 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com: This is your own opinion. Though I'm sure it wasn't your intention to sound so rude, I invite you to take a look at the current proposal.[1] If you need an Italian explanation (with some of my thoughts), you're welcome.[2] [1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary [2] http://sannita.wordpress.com/2013/09/09/integrazione-wikizionario-wikidata/ -- Luca Sannita Martinelli http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Sannita ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Re: [Wikidata-l] Commons is coming \o/
Hi, Op 9-9-2013 12:10, Lydia Pintscher schreef: In the end this is a decision of the Commons community what they want to link their pages and categories to and should probably be discussed there. As I said it'll be possible one way or another. See also http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-l/2013-August/002626.html and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Interwiki_links_via_Wikidata_coming_soon Thank you for mentioning my previous email. I've been waiting for this announcement and proposed a new property at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Generic#Topic_main_category Maarten ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
