Re: [Wikidata-tech] IRI-value or string-value for URLs?
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de wrote: OK, based on the discussion so far, we will add the data type to the snak in the external export, and keep the string data value for the URL data type. That should satisfy all use cases that have been brought up. Just so I know what's coming: Is this doable for the deployment in a week? Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Community Communications for Technical Projects Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. Obentrautstr. 72 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. ___ Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
Re: [Wikidata-tech] IRI-value or string-value for URLs?
Am 03.09.2013 11:50, schrieb Lydia Pintscher: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de wrote: OK, based on the discussion so far, we will add the data type to the snak in the external export, and keep the string data value for the URL data type. That should satisfy all use cases that have been brought up. Just so I know what's coming: Is this doable for the deployment in a week? If we push back something else, yes. But I think this is mainly useful in JSON dumps - which we don't have yet. Not hard to do, but won't happen in a week. -- daniel ___ Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
[Wikidata-tech] IRI, URL, sameAs and the identifier mess
A couple of months ago there was a conversation about what to do with the identifiers that should be owl:sameAs [1] Then there is another discussion about using a formatter URL property to use any catalogue/db as an id instead of creating a property [2] Now there is another property proposal to implement sameAs as a property taking a url. [3] And this is all related to the recent thread in this mailing list about IRI-value or string-value for URLs. So, in the end, what is the preferred approach? Micru [1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2013/07#Identifier_mess.E2.80.A6 [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Unsorted#Formatter_URL_.2F_.2F_.2F_URL_di_formattazione [3] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Generic#Same_as_.28en.29 ___ Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
