Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Trouble in Ireland

2008-11-26 Thread Michael Everson
On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:13, Zoney wrote:

 My vote is for Ireland to be a disambiguation page.

Did you go and vote?

 As someone from Ireland I am not happy to have the page Ireland  
 concern only the State, as the state is only part of both the island  
 and nation.

Yes, that's why we propose

[[Ireland]] - disambiguation page, primary title
[[Ireland (island)]] - geographical entity
[[Ireland (state)]] - political entity

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Make your students edit Wikipedia for extra credit

2008-11-26 Thread David Gerard
2008/11/26 Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 If our response to coordinated student editing is dismissive or punitive,
 and it often is, then we should not be encouraging educators to assign it to
 their students.


It depends on the quality of the assignment they give. I liked this
one because it was You have to make an actual good addition, no
foolin'. We've had other student editing projects that have resulted
in fantastically good new material. YMMV, but I certainly wouldn't
regard it as an intrinsically bad idea.


- d.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-26 Thread geni
2008/11/26 David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 http://www.bluehatseo.com/how-to-overthrow-a-wikipedia-result/

 What an odious person.


 - d.

Standard SEO.

The attack line has been talked about for at least a year but so far
no dirrect evidence that it works. In theory it should as long as you
assume that google treats wikis like other websites. Due to their
unusually high levels of inline linking in wikis this is questionable.


-- 
geni

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Trouble in Ireland

2008-11-26 Thread phoebe ayers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Sam Blacketer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/26/08, Steve Summit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 A reader typing in Ireland (or an editor linking [[Ireland]])
 is almost certainly thinking about the country, not the geological
 structure.


 Most probably, most users who type in Ireland are looking for the article
 about the Republic of Ireland. However, we can't escape the fact that the
 term Ireland is ambiguous. Some users would be unaware that six of the 32
 Irish counties are not currently part of the Republic.

I would actually argue that a reader who doesn't know anything about
Ireland (picture a schoolchild in the US doing a project for St.
Patrick's day) would be expecting to get exactly the article that is
currently located at Ireland. Both the current Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland articles are heavily focussed on the historical
and political situation, and not the kind of comprehensive overview
that is currently at Ireland. What if I don't even know there are
two countries on the island, let alone which one is which? It's pretty
confusing to be sent to a disambiguation page when I'm just trying to
look up something that is a pretty basic geographical topic.

Would just moving Republic of Ireland to [[Ireland (state)]] and
leaving the rest alone be acceptable? The latter title would avoid any
unfortunate political connotations as it's a straight disambiguation
title, but would still leave the background article at the main title.

-- phoebe

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Make your students edit Wikipedia for extra credit

2008-11-26 Thread phoebe ayers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When professors and lecturers assign editing Wikipedia to a group of
 students, our reaction is often not favorable. I've recently had a long
 series of e-mails with lecturers at the University of Scotland and Macquarie
 University in Australia about an assignment that was repeated at Macquarie
 in three terms.

 When the link between the student accounts was discovered recently, it
 turned into a long thread at AN/I where a number of unfriendly things were
 said about both the students and the lecturers - and the students' editing,
 which wasn't (I think) below what we would expect from new editors, was
 treated as a serious problem to be dealt with by blocks and rangeblocks if
 necessary.

 If our response to coordinated student editing is dismissive or punitive,
 and it often is, then we should not be encouraging educators to assign it to
 their students.

 Nathan

Yuck. It's hard enough to help professors do the right thing (I just
got back from giving a couple of classroom lectures about wikipedia)
when they are so often clueless about how wikipedia works anyway,
without extra complications from overzealous admins.

There's a group of people listed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects
who are ready and willing to help with monitoring and cleaning up
after such assignments, and helping craft them as well.

-- phoebe

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-26 Thread Charlotte Webb
On 11/26/08, Gregory Maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If WP is #1 or #2 and your spamvertisment is #4 you can increase your
 income greatly by getting WP delisted even if you can do nothing to
 improve the position of your site.

Yes, especially if WP has an article which describes your goods or
services as fraudulent.

 There are far more effective techniques that these SEO scummbags have
 not figured out yet.

Might be better not to list them here and now but I imagine there are
some software changes which could be made in the near future to be
more able to counter these attacks whenever they do occur (rather than
a couple of programmer-months later).

For example I know edits which add [[wiki-links]] pointing to a
specific page can be seen in (but not filtered from) the inverted
related changes page. But for the technique described in this thread
it would be helpful to have some way to track removal of incoming
links.

Something less tedious than comparing the current whatlinkshere to a
saved whatlinkshere list from last week (which would require
anticipating the attack).

On a side note something like this for mysteriously emptied categories
would be helpful too.

Surely at least some of the edit/behavior patterns of the other
tactics you allude to would be more easily recognized by a bot
watching recentchanges than by a human stumbling upon a user with a
couple strange and not obviously related edits.

If you know the game already you are an a good position to prevent
successful play of it. Match and exceed, as their mantra says.

—C.W.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Trouble in Ireland

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Saintonge
Steve Summit wrote:
 David Gerard wrote:
   
 What's a one-sentence statement of the compelling reason from each
 side, stated from a neutral point of view?
 
 A reader typing in Ireland (or an editor linking [[Ireland]])
 is almost certainly thinking about the country, not the geological
 structure.
It's not just about those two extremes.  If I state that certain of my 
ancestors came from Ireland around the time of the famine it is talking 
about Ireland as who whole before the disunification of 1922.  This is 
about more than mere geology.  So Ireland as the Republic or the State 
or whatever term you choose to use is clearly about what happened in the 
part that successfully cast off the shackles of occupation since 1922.  
For certain partisans of the Republic to assume a monopoly on the 
name, Ireland, seems an improper usurpation of the name for personal ends.


Ec

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l