Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia is not a dictionary (was: Re: Old Wikipedia backups discovered)

2010-12-31 Thread Fred Bauder
> So does that mean we can restore the article on "the"?
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The

Good example of a poor decision. If nothing else, a discussion of how
Russian does without the, or a, or an but English seeming needs them
would be very interesting.

The question is how we could somehow modify this rigid approach. What
does it take to modify something that ingrained into policy?

Fred Bauder



___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia is not a dictionary (was: Re: Old Wikipedia backups discovered)

2010-12-31 Thread Ken Arromdee
So does that mean we can restore the article on "the"?
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia is not a dictionary (was: Re: Old Wikipedia backups discovered)

2010-12-31 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:04 AM, quiddity  wrote:
> 1. Given that the majority of Wikipedians are not subscribed to this
> mailing list (or at least don't post to it), having decisive
> discussions here is not very practical.

I would think that fewer participants would make decisive discussions easier.

> The mailing lists are good for
> brainstorming, alerting, and sharing, (etc), amongst the small number
> of participants; they are not good for establishing a consensus on the
> "nature of Wikipedia".

Sorry, I couldn't resist plagiarizing Jimmy Wales and his widely
ignored principles from his user page.

> 2. Given that you infrequently participate on-wiki,* and your historic
> reticence to even communicate on-wiki,** I'm not surprised by this
> suggestion.

Yes, I find wiki talk pages to be a terrible form of communication.
There's no push notification, no decent threading, post-hoc
censorship, a requirement to release everything you write under
CC-BY-SA, etc.  And the silly memes regarding Wikipedia talk pages
don't even allow people to utilize the benefits of a wiki - non-signed
content, modification of content, multi-person collaboration on a
single paragraph.

Wikis make sense for collaboration, but not for communication.  ~~~
and  never made any sense.

> However, I would suggest that the mountain is unlikely to
> come to you; instead, you must go to the mountain.

In this particular case, the mountain had already come to me.  I was
just objecting to your suggestion that it go back.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia is not a dictionary (was: Re: Old Wikipedia backups discovered)

2010-12-31 Thread MuZemike
This has always been the place for such (IMO, healthy) meta-discussion 
to occur, which what I think this is.

-MuZemike

On 12/31/2010 12:04 AM, quiddity wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Anthony  wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:48 PM, quiddity  wrote:
>>> Also, it might be helpful to move this discussion on-wiki, so that
>>> other interested parties can participate.
>>
>> It would be more helpful to move the on-wiki discussion here.  Very
>> limited meta-discussion of the nature of Wikipedia should be placed on
>> the site itself.
>
> 1. Given that the majority of Wikipedians are not subscribed to this
> mailing list (or at least don't post to it), having decisive
> discussions here is not very practical. The mailing lists are good for
> brainstorming, alerting, and sharing, (etc), amongst the small number
> of participants; they are not good for establishing a consensus on the
> "nature of Wikipedia".
>
> 2. Given that you infrequently participate on-wiki,* and your historic
> reticence to even communicate on-wiki,** I'm not surprised by this
> suggestion. However, I would suggest that the mountain is unlikely to
> come to you; instead, you must go to the mountain.
>
> Quiddity
>
> * http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=Anthony
>
> ** 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony&direction=prev&oldid=140147011
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony&oldid=140153625
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony&oldid=195403930
>
> ___
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l