Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Lennart Guldbrandsson
Just a note about the results we will get, so there are no
misunderstandings:

It will be the one that new users respond best to (which start them
editing), and not necessarily the ones Wikipedians like the best.

And feel free to create better versions yourself.

Best wishes,

Lennart

2011/2/21 Elias Friedman elipo...@gmail.com

 Definitely NOT the bookshelf version!

 Whatever version you go with, DO include the link to those instructional
 videos. I didn't even know we had those!

 Sent from my Droid2
 Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
 אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
 elipo...@gmail.com
 On Feb 20, 2011 5:28 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




-- 
Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
Wikimedia Sverige
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Lennart Guldbrandsson
Of course we want them keep editing, not just starting. :-) And there are
several measures we can have for success, but Sue Gardner and several others
have spoken about the focus this year. One measure that have come up is that
we look at the newcomers' first 100 edits. After that they should be
prepared for what Wikipedia is. And to get them to actually make 100 edits
we may need to handhold them better.

But let's step back a bit. I think we need to think of this in several
steps:

1 let non-Wikipedians know that they actually *can* edit (more people than
you imagine do not actually know that *they* can edit Wikipedia, even if
they know that *you* can edit)
2 encourage them to start editing
3 not scare them away

What this project is focused on is not step 1 or 3, but parts of 2. My
Fellowship is after all only 6 months long and we need to have some limits
to it.

The Account Creation is something fairly simple to improve. We change some
pages and measure what effect that has, and pick whichever change has the
best result. The other things are much more difficult, and may even *gasp*
require some soulsearching among the regular Wikipedians to see what we can
do better. So let's start with something easier and make more versions of
the landing pages.

Best wishes,

Lennart


2011/2/21 Elias Friedman elipo...@gmail.com

 Okay then, let me ask how do you intend to measure start them editing?
 Raw edit counts? Over what period of time? Will what namespace matter?

 Frankly I'm not as interested in getting new people *started* editing as I
 am I in *keeping* them editing. Many new editors get frustrated because they
 don't understand basic rules like proper sourcing and citation. Many are not
 good at reading our written rules - that's why I was excited to see those
 tutorial videos. I really think they can bridge the gap for the majority of
 people who don't do well with just RTFM. That's why I say that at least a
 link to those videos should be on *every* version of that landing page.

 Sent from my Droid2
 Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
 אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
 elipo...@gmail.com
 On Feb 20, 2011 6:33 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson wikihanni...@gmail.com
 wrote:




-- 
Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
Wikimedia Sverige
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Somebody must correct this

2011-02-21 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 21 February 2011 00:52, michael west michaw...@gmail.com wrote:
 No Thomas, there are problems with (a) the East Pakistan/West Pakistan war
 (Bhhutto was a memeber of government and never appeared on TV - it was the
 government leader who told of West Pakistan's capitulation)

I made no comment as to the accuracy of the article, only your claim
that it is un-sourced. There are numerous sources in that article. The
sources may be incorrect or the article may be misinterpreting the
sources, but the sources are there.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Somebody must correct this

2011-02-21 Thread William Beutler
The larger point is that this isn't the ideal forum for finding editorial
assistance. I'm surprised no one has yet responded with
WP:SOFIXIThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOFIXIT.
At a glance, the page looks OK, if not great. Perhaps there are indeed
serious problems with it, but being un-sourced as you first wrote does not
seem to be the key problem. So fix it! You seem to have the interest and
knowledge. That plus a little initiative is (often) all that separates a bad
article from a good one.

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 21 February 2011 00:52, michael west michaw...@gmail.com wrote:
  No Thomas, there are problems with (a) the East Pakistan/West Pakistan
 war
  (Bhhutto was a memeber of government and never appeared on TV - it was
 the
  government leader who told of West Pakistan's capitulation)

 I made no comment as to the accuracy of the article, only your claim
 that it is un-sourced. There are numerous sources in that article. The
 sources may be incorrect or the article may be misinterpreting the
 sources, but the sources are there.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread FT2
I'm not usually one for graphic design, so this could probably do with
improving and relevant links adding.

I've added a version that could be helpful at
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/mod2

What I'm hoping to address are:

   1. Layouts original version and redesign are too close to wall of
   text for many newcomers. Even though they are simple short bullet lists
   with icons, I'm concerned they'll skip it. A better layout and a few brief
   bullets may do better and also be more informative.

   2. The audience is people who want to get involved, so an overview they
   can come back to might be helpful. I have assumed this page is linked from
   the toolkit so they can always find it.

   3. It might be better to have a link for editing, and save the mention
   of policies there. At the start a user needs to know the basics, that some
   stuff will be ok and some won't, and click here to find out which. Then
   they are reading it *by choice* and it'll probably be more sticky as a
   result.

   Words like policies may tend to overwhelm or frighten many of those we
   want to engage.

   4. The section for readers also includes* Reading, or want to make
   improvements and corrections? *The *unstated thought *is that a reader
   will also be someone who might want to make a small correction. Gut feel
   says that a major route is readers who are then tempted to make their first
   correction, or who need to know they *can *think of it. I'd like to see
   the effect of including making a small improvement or correction *as
   part of info for end-users*, not just keeping it separate.

   Not technically accurate but may be effective this way, as editing
   could be felt as overwhelming (initially) where make a small correction
   may be perceived as empowering.  Many people may think someone should fix
   that and despite all our pages, not fully realize the someone is allowed
   to be *them*.

   5. *I have not put links in yet.* I would not make individual words,
   lines, or sentences a link. Link proliferation is a distraction, we found
   that out in the record 2010 fundraiser. Make each section (except the last)
   to be *one* link clickable anywhere. Unfortunately (bug
18640https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460)
   the a href... html tag can't be used yet in markup, otherwise I'd make the
   entirety of each cell a single link to some (short) relevant subpage.

   I'd actually like it done via a popup, that appears when you click a cell
   for information. That's more classy and suited to the richer interface of
   other modern websites, but outside my skills. Anyone else know where I can
   find a basic click this and get a dismissible popup DIV class? :)

   6. Should contain something interesting and engaging too :)


Feedback and any design-related questions welcomed!
Not sure where to link this from/to though.

FT2
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Lennart Guldbrandsson
This is good. I'll make sure we'll test this as well.

Best wishes,

Lennart




2011/2/21 FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com

 I'm not usually one for graphic design, so this could probably do with
 improving and relevant links adding.

 I've added a version that could be helpful at

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/mod2

 What I'm hoping to address are:

   1. Layouts original version and redesign are too close to wall of
   text for many newcomers. Even though they are simple short bullet lists
   with icons, I'm concerned they'll skip it. A better layout and a few
 brief
   bullets may do better and also be more informative.

   2. The audience is people who want to get involved, so an overview they
   can come back to might be helpful. I have assumed this page is linked
 from
   the toolkit so they can always find it.

   3. It might be better to have a link for editing, and save the mention
   of policies there. At the start a user needs to know the basics, that
 some
   stuff will be ok and some won't, and click here to find out which. Then
   they are reading it *by choice* and it'll probably be more sticky as a
   result.

   Words like policies may tend to overwhelm or frighten many of those we
   want to engage.

   4. The section for readers also includes* Reading, or want to make
   improvements and corrections? *The *unstated thought *is that a reader
   will also be someone who might want to make a small correction. Gut feel
   says that a major route is readers who are then tempted to make their
 first
   correction, or who need to know they *can *think of it. I'd like to see
   the effect of including making a small improvement or correction *as
   part of info for end-users*, not just keeping it separate.

   Not technically accurate but may be effective this way, as editing
   could be felt as overwhelming (initially) where make a small correction
   may be perceived as empowering.  Many people may think someone should
 fix
   that and despite all our pages, not fully realize the someone is
 allowed
   to be *them*.

   5. *I have not put links in yet.* I would not make individual words,
   lines, or sentences a link. Link proliferation is a distraction, we found
   that out in the record 2010 fundraiser. Make each section (except the
 last)
   to be *one* link clickable anywhere. Unfortunately (bug
 18640https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460)
   the a href... html tag can't be used yet in markup, otherwise I'd make
 the
   entirety of each cell a single link to some (short) relevant subpage.

   I'd actually like it done via a popup, that appears when you click a cell
   for information. That's more classy and suited to the richer interface of
   other modern websites, but outside my skills. Anyone else know where I
 can
   find a basic click this and get a dismissible popup DIV class? :)

   6. Should contain something interesting and engaging too :)


 Feedback and any design-related questions welcomed!
 Not sure where to link this from/to though.

 FT2
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




-- 
Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
Wikimedia Sverige
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


[WikiEN-l] FW: [Gendergap] Nine Reasons Women Don't Edit Wikipedia

2011-02-21 Thread Marc Riddell

--
From: Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:51:38 -0500
To: Gendergap List gender...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: FW: [Gendergap] Nine Reasons Women Don't Edit Wikipedia


--
From: Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:34:48 -0500
To: Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Nine Reasons Women Don't Edit Wikipedia


 On 20 February 2011 14:24, Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 Sue, as you know, this is the area of my greatest concern regarding the
 future of the Wikipedia Project. The gender gap is a part of the larger
 problem you described above: That of a combative, hostile and defensive
 culture that presents an unchecked arena for Community Member harassment and
 abuse - that prevents the type of healthy, intelligent and productive
 collaboration that can, and will, improve and maintain the quality of the
 Project. Is there, are there, plans to mount a similar initiative to tackle
 this larger problem? To approach it as a gender-neutral problem?
 
on 2/20/11 5:46 PM, Sue Gardner at sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Yes, absolutely. And it's not just plans: people are actively working
 on the issue, today. This is the primary work of the Community
 department at the Wikimedia Foundation -- the staff there are
 currently working with community members on a bunch of projects and
 activities to help make the Wikimedia projects more inclusive. A lot
 of that is happening on the outreach wiki -- for example, the Account
 Creation improvement project, the Bookshelf project, the Ambassador
 program, support for student campus associations, and so forth.
 
 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project
 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bookshelf_Project
 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Ambassador_Program
 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_student_clubs
 
 There's also some outreach-related/outreach-supportive activities that
 have been announced on the Wikimedia blog:
 
 http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2011/01/12/new-wikimedia-fellow/
 http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/11/30/upload-wizard-launches-beta-wikimedi
 a-commons/
 
http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/30/two-new-community-department-fello
ws /
 
 I agree with you Marc that our central challenge is the need for deep
 culture change, to help Wikimedia be more inclusive and open. I think
 the gender challenge is part of that, but it's obviously not the whole
 story: we need more women, and we also need more editors from outside
 North America and Europe, as well as other underrepresented groups.
 And we want current editors to be having better, more positive
 experiences on the projects, as well.
 
 Thanks,
 Sue

Thank you, for this, Sue. And, at the most basic level, we a faced with the
reality that this cultural change can only begin, and grow, at the most
basic level: The individual. Sue, there are key persons in the Project that,
by virtue of their official position or, simply because they are more
frequently vocal on the various Project conversation sites, who must lead by
example. Each one must be actively working toward this healthier culture.
They, and all of us, must set the tone. I truly believe that if the climate
is healthy, the culture will be also.

Marc


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


[WikiEN-l] Points to Ponder

2011-02-21 Thread Marc Riddell
All,

Familiar points to ponder.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/us/politics/21civility.html?nl=todaysheadl
inesemc=tha23

Marc


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


[WikiEN-l] Points to Ponder

2011-02-21 Thread Marc Riddell
All,

Familiar points to ponder.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/us/politics/21civility.html?nl=todaysheadl
inesemc=tha23

Marc 
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Sage Ross
Since it's a WMF holiday and I can do whatever I want with my time, I
made one too.  ;)

http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/Video_walkthrough

Like FT2, I welcome  any edits to make it look better.  And feedback
about the content is of course welcome too.  I can always do more
takes with revised scripts.

-Sage

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
wikihanni...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is good. I'll make sure we'll test this as well.

 Best wishes,

 Lennart




 2011/2/21 FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com

 I'm not usually one for graphic design, so this could probably do with
 improving and relevant links adding.

 I've added a version that could be helpful at

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/mod2

 What I'm hoping to address are:

   1. Layouts original version and redesign are too close to wall of
   text for many newcomers. Even though they are simple short bullet lists
   with icons, I'm concerned they'll skip it. A better layout and a few
 brief
   bullets may do better and also be more informative.

   2. The audience is people who want to get involved, so an overview they
   can come back to might be helpful. I have assumed this page is linked
 from
   the toolkit so they can always find it.

   3. It might be better to have a link for editing, and save the mention
   of policies there. At the start a user needs to know the basics, that
 some
   stuff will be ok and some won't, and click here to find out which. Then
   they are reading it *by choice* and it'll probably be more sticky as a
   result.

   Words like policies may tend to overwhelm or frighten many of those we
   want to engage.

   4. The section for readers also includes* Reading, or want to make
   improvements and corrections? *The *unstated thought *is that a reader
   will also be someone who might want to make a small correction. Gut feel
   says that a major route is readers who are then tempted to make their
 first
   correction, or who need to know they *can *think of it. I'd like to see
   the effect of including making a small improvement or correction *as
   part of info for end-users*, not just keeping it separate.

   Not technically accurate but may be effective this way, as editing
   could be felt as overwhelming (initially) where make a small correction
   may be perceived as empowering.  Many people may think someone should
 fix
   that and despite all our pages, not fully realize the someone is
 allowed
   to be *them*.

   5. *I have not put links in yet.* I would not make individual words,
   lines, or sentences a link. Link proliferation is a distraction, we found
   that out in the record 2010 fundraiser. Make each section (except the
 last)
   to be *one* link clickable anywhere. Unfortunately (bug
 18640https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460)
   the a href... html tag can't be used yet in markup, otherwise I'd make
 the
   entirety of each cell a single link to some (short) relevant subpage.

   I'd actually like it done via a popup, that appears when you click a cell
   for information. That's more classy and suited to the richer interface of
   other modern websites, but outside my skills. Anyone else know where I
 can
   find a basic click this and get a dismissible popup DIV class? :)

   6. Should contain something interesting and engaging too :)


 Feedback and any design-related questions welcomed!
 Not sure where to link this from/to though.

 FT2
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




 --
 Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
 Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
 Wikimedia Sverige
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Missing Wikipedians: An Essay

2011-02-21 Thread FencesWindows
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:40:35 +0100
From: Mike  Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] [Foundation-l] Missing Wikipedians: An Essay

Well this is a similar problem I am having with adding details to, or new 
articles about Kosovo, even my attempts are getting deleted.
 
Mike, certainly this would be a systemic bias issue, but some of your editing 
needs refining to avoid running into problems.
 
Having problems even getting the Turkish, Bosnian or Albanian alternative 
names 
added without being deleted, even if sources
 
Why should all these alternate names by included in the English Wikipedia? I've 
seen you raising these name disputes repeatedly on this list and at various 
noticeboards; you need to stop forum-shopping and instead open an RfC so this 
can be centrally discussed. You're looking a bit like a single-purpose account 
on this issue and such issues have been taken to ArbCom before, see 
[[WP:ARBMAC]]. Tread carefully.
 
let alone a coverage of members of parliament (list of them deleted as not 
notable).
 
That list was 1) formatted in a very unusual way, with each person having a 
heading and with almost no wikilinks 2) almost entirely unsourced. It wasn't 
deleted as non-notable, it was deleted as being a directory. If you want lists 
of living people to stay you need to format them according to the manual of 
style for lists and source them properly. Particularly for such a controversial 
area as Kosovan politics we cannot be cavalier about making claims to do with 
living people. I have restored the history to 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdupont/List_of_politicians_in_Kosovo and
 I have begun cleanup. If you want such a list back in mainspace, it needs 
formatting and sourcing properly.

Also local pop-stars who are not notable by English newspapers are deleted, 
even 
if they are well know and unavoidable.
 
If you can provide reliable sources in non-English languages, such articles can 
certainly be kept. I've done so before. The key is to actually provide the 
sources and not merely assert notability.
 
p.s. The format of my emails tends to come out weird on this list - sorry.


  

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread David Gerard
On 21 February 2011 20:19, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/Video_walkthrough


The person in the video frame that comes up in my browser (Firefox
4.0b11) looks very dismayed :-)

http://oi51.tinypic.com/9zufsy.jpg


- d.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Sage Ross
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:30 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 21 February 2011 20:19, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/Video_walkthrough


 The person in the video frame that comes up in my browser (Firefox
 4.0b11) looks very dismayed :-)

 http://oi51.tinypic.com/9zufsy.jpg


I did a quick fix, setting the thumbtime to a second later when I'm
smiling.  I'll upload a different version that starts with smiling
frames when I get a chance.

-Sage

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread FT2
I like the video, Sage.  Good text, crisp clear delivery, decent video
appearance.

One thing I'd change is, watch again the bit around 1:25 - 1:37 covering
stuff you might want to know about before editing. A new user hearing that
long list could well go oh my god and be discouraged. A link to a long
text page like ABOUT has become, is also not easy for most newcomers
(users here are not typical of newcomers).

Overall it's *crucial* to keep  the list of stuff to learn easy and
light.  I think MediaWiki needs a built-in generic popup-and-dismiss
function, so that information pages can have icons and text where more
information appears only if needed (with a close icon), allowing lower
text density.

This could be a useful resource too:- I wrote [[Wikipedia:Expectations and
norms of the Wikipedia
communityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Expectations_and_norms_of_the_Wikipedia_community]]
as a quick attempt to explain the basis of how we work, and our norms *as a
community* in concise form, in a style specifically to make sense to
newcomers.

It covers almost all usual expectations and the rational foundation of the
community, in a reasonable space. If it could be made even easier (less
text? graphical? popups for detail?) then it could be useful material for
this discussion.

FT2




On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:

 Since it's a WMF holiday and I can do whatever I want with my time, I
 made one too.  ;)


 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/Video_walkthrough

 Like FT2, I welcome  any edits to make it look better.  And feedback
 about the content is of course welcome too.  I can always do more
 takes with revised scripts.

 -Sage

 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
 wikihanni...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is good. I'll make sure we'll test this as well.
 
  Best wishes,
 
  Lennart
 
 
 
 
  2011/2/21 FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com
 
  I'm not usually one for graphic design, so this could probably do with
  improving and relevant links adding.
 
  I've added a version that could be helpful at
 
 
 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/mod2
 
  What I'm hoping to address are:
 
1. Layouts original version and redesign are too close to wall of
text for many newcomers. Even though they are simple short bullet
 lists
with icons, I'm concerned they'll skip it. A better layout and a few
  brief
bullets may do better and also be more informative.
 
2. The audience is people who want to get involved, so an overview
 they
can come back to might be helpful. I have assumed this page is linked
  from
the toolkit so they can always find it.
 
3. It might be better to have a link for editing, and save the
 mention
of policies there. At the start a user needs to know the basics, that
  some
stuff will be ok and some won't, and click here to find out which.
 Then
they are reading it *by choice* and it'll probably be more sticky as
 a
result.
 
Words like policies may tend to overwhelm or frighten many of those
 we
want to engage.
 
4. The section for readers also includes* Reading, or want to make
improvements and corrections? *The *unstated thought *is that a
 reader
will also be someone who might want to make a small correction. Gut
 feel
says that a major route is readers who are then tempted to make their
  first
correction, or who need to know they *can *think of it. I'd like to
 see
the effect of including making a small improvement or correction *as
part of info for end-users*, not just keeping it separate.
 
Not technically accurate but may be effective this way, as editing
could be felt as overwhelming (initially) where make a small
 correction
may be perceived as empowering.  Many people may think someone should
  fix
that and despite all our pages, not fully realize the someone is
  allowed
to be *them*.
 
5. *I have not put links in yet.* I would not make individual words,
lines, or sentences a link. Link proliferation is a distraction, we
 found
that out in the record 2010 fundraiser. Make each section (except the
  last)
to be *one* link clickable anywhere. Unfortunately (bug
  18640https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460)
the a href... html tag can't be used yet in markup, otherwise I'd
 make
  the
entirety of each cell a single link to some (short) relevant subpage.
 
I'd actually like it done via a popup, that appears when you click a
 cell
for information. That's more classy and suited to the richer interface
 of
other modern websites, but outside my skills. Anyone else know where I
  can
find a basic click this and get a dismissible popup DIV class? :)
 
6. Should contain something interesting and engaging too :)
 
 
  Feedback and any design-related 

Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread phoebe ayers
The video intro is awesome, Sage :) I'd love to see more variations on
a theme with various people, too -- and maybe some experimentation
with interspersing screenshots etc. But I like it because it is short
and to the point and friendly, and it gives a human face to a kind of
intimidating wall o'text. And I am not normally a person who likes
videos :)

cheers,
phoebe

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Sage Ross
ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Since it's a WMF holiday and I can do whatever I want with my time, I
 made one too.  ;)

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/Video_walkthrough

 Like FT2, I welcome  any edits to make it look better.  And feedback
 about the content is of course welcome too.  I can always do more
 takes with revised scripts.

 -Sage

 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
 wikihanni...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is good. I'll make sure we'll test this as well.

 Best wishes,

 Lennart




 2011/2/21 FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com

 I'm not usually one for graphic design, so this could probably do with
 improving and relevant links adding.

 I've added a version that could be helpful at

 http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Account_Creation_Improvement_Project/Testing_content/Landing_page/mod2

 What I'm hoping to address are:

   1. Layouts original version and redesign are too close to wall of
   text for many newcomers. Even though they are simple short bullet lists
   with icons, I'm concerned they'll skip it. A better layout and a few
 brief
   bullets may do better and also be more informative.

   2. The audience is people who want to get involved, so an overview they
   can come back to might be helpful. I have assumed this page is linked
 from
   the toolkit so they can always find it.

   3. It might be better to have a link for editing, and save the mention
   of policies there. At the start a user needs to know the basics, that
 some
   stuff will be ok and some won't, and click here to find out which. Then
   they are reading it *by choice* and it'll probably be more sticky as a
   result.

   Words like policies may tend to overwhelm or frighten many of those we
   want to engage.

   4. The section for readers also includes* Reading, or want to make
   improvements and corrections? *The *unstated thought *is that a reader
   will also be someone who might want to make a small correction. Gut feel
   says that a major route is readers who are then tempted to make their
 first
   correction, or who need to know they *can *think of it. I'd like to see
   the effect of including making a small improvement or correction *as
   part of info for end-users*, not just keeping it separate.

   Not technically accurate but may be effective this way, as editing
   could be felt as overwhelming (initially) where make a small correction
   may be perceived as empowering.  Many people may think someone should
 fix
   that and despite all our pages, not fully realize the someone is
 allowed
   to be *them*.

   5. *I have not put links in yet.* I would not make individual words,
   lines, or sentences a link. Link proliferation is a distraction, we found
   that out in the record 2010 fundraiser. Make each section (except the
 last)
   to be *one* link clickable anywhere. Unfortunately (bug
 18640https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460)
   the a href... html tag can't be used yet in markup, otherwise I'd make
 the
   entirety of each cell a single link to some (short) relevant subpage.

   I'd actually like it done via a popup, that appears when you click a cell
   for information. That's more classy and suited to the richer interface of
   other modern websites, but outside my skills. Anyone else know where I
 can
   find a basic click this and get a dismissible popup DIV class? :)

   6. Should contain something interesting and engaging too :)


 Feedback and any design-related questions welcomed!
 Not sure where to link this from/to though.

 FT2
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




 --
 Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
 Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
 Wikimedia Sverige
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




-- 
* I use this address for lists; send personal messages to phoebe.ayers
at gmail.com *

___
WikiEN-l mailing list

Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread David Gerard
On 21 February 2011 20:45, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:30 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:

 The person in the video frame that comes up in my browser (Firefox
 4.0b11) looks very dismayed :-)
 http://oi51.tinypic.com/9zufsy.jpg

 I did a quick fix, setting the thumbtime to a second later when I'm
 smiling.  I'll upload a different version that starts with smiling
 frames when I get a chance.


YOU ARE SO YOUNG. WHY U SO YOUNG.


- d.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread David Gerard
On 21 February 2011 22:31, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:

 YOU ARE SO YOUNG. WHY U SO YOUNG.

 Was that a way of auditioning for the next video, David? :-)


I'm a middle-aged suburban dad. This is my daughter crawling over me
demanding attention. Why not work on the CBeebies articles? You know
Octonauts needs proper documentation. You can sing the theme tune by
now.


- d.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Do you want to write pages that thousands of people see every day?

2011-02-21 Thread Lennart Guldbrandsson
Thanks, Sage for that wonderful video.

There is still room on that page to add more versions if you feel that we
have missed something :-)

/Lennart

2011/2/21 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com

 On 21 February 2011 22:31, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:

  YOU ARE SO YOUNG. WHY U SO YOUNG.

  Was that a way of auditioning for the next video, David? :-)


 I'm a middle-aged suburban dad. This is my daughter crawling over me
 demanding attention. Why not work on the CBeebies articles? You know
 Octonauts needs proper documentation. You can sing the theme tune by
 now.


 - d.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l




-- 
Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation and chair of
Wikimedia Sverige // Wikimedia Foundation-stipendiat och ordförande för
Wikimedia Sverige
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l