[WikiEN-l] IRC Group Contacts 3-month review

2009-09-21 Thread Rjd0060
The following was posted to the Group Contact noticeboard on Meta.
You can view it at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC/Group_Contacts/Noticeboard#3_month_review
.  If you have any questions or comments, feel free to leave them on
the talk page (
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:IRC/Group_Contacts/Noticeboard ).
Cross-posting of this email to other project lists is also encouraged.

It has been just over 3 months since the new group contact team was
announced. Since then, we've been busy working on a number of
projects; most of which are “behind the scenes”. It is important to
keep a certain level of transparency to show that we are actually
accomplishing things.

The role of the group contacts is to liaise with freenode's staff to
ensure a good relationship with those that provide out IRC services,
to help with the smooth running of IRC by encouraging good practices
on the part of channel operators, to deal with channels left without
operators, and to assign cloaks. They try to avoid getting involved in
the running of individual channels.

We are available on IRC in the channel #wikimedia-ops and via e-mail:
irc-conta...@lists.wikimedia.org for most issues,
irc-contacts-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org for matters in which you would
prefer channel contacts not to see your posting, as this goes to only
the GCs.

Our nicks are dungodung, kibble, Rjd0060 and seanw.
Our commitments

* Regular setting of cloaks
* Increased level of activity
* Communicate regularly with channel contacts

What we've done

* Created an internal mailing list to facilitate discussion
amongst the group and channel contacts
* Surveyed all channels in our namespaces and recorded basic information
* Personally contacted all owners of primary channels in order to
open a line of communication
* Manually set cloaks (since the end of July) while we wait for a
new cloak request system to be developed
* Established requirements for and began setting mediawiki cloaks
* Held a meeting to gain community feedback (see log / minutes)
* Appointed a channel contact for the central Wikimedia channel
operator channel (#wikimedia-ops)
* Lots of housekeeping with access lists (see log of public actions)

What you can do

* Please tell us if you find users abusing the Wikimedia name by
causing trouble in other channels while wearing our cloaks. We are
willing and able to deal with these users but can't hope to watch
every channel on freenode.
* Come to our IRC meetings and bring up issues so we are aware and
have more minds working on problems.
* Check the noticeboard for happenings.
* If you help manage IRC, join #wikimedia-ops and contribute to
discussions there.
* Do not hesitate to get in touch with us by e-mail or IRC if you
ever have feedback, suggestions or concerns. We will, at the very
least least, point you to the correct person.

Moving forward

* We plan to continue our higher level of activity.
* Cloaks will also continue to be set on a regular basis and in a
timely fashion.
* A new cloak request system is in the process of being developed.
* We plan to hold IRC community meetings on a regular basis, with
the next one scheduled for sometime in November (watch IRC/Group
Contacts/Meetings for further updates).
* We will continue to communicate with and rely on the channel
contacts to inform us if there are any issues within their channels.
* We're here for support if needed at any time.

--
For the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts,
Ryan (User:Rjd0060)

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] News agencies are not RSs

2009-06-30 Thread Rjd0060
"OTRS actions" (for lack of a better term) should always stand on their own
merits.  OTRS volunteers have no special authority to do anything that a
regular administrator doesn't have.  Thus, we do not make actions "per
OTRS".  In the final protection I did note the summary with a link to the
OTRS ticket in case people decided to ask about it.  It was for
informational purposes only.  But there was no "drama" before.  Only a few
edits and a few reverts (as well as the previous protections).

---
Rjd0060
rjd0060.w...@gmail.com


On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michel Vuijlsteke wrote:

> I don't see why they didn't indef-protect the entry with a reference to an
> OTRS ticket. That eventually happened, but only after much drama, and after
> branding a news agency "unreliable".
> Michel
>
> 2009/6/30 Ian Woollard 
>
> > Can I ask what policy this was done under? While I generally approve
> > of the action here, it seems that the admins involved were not
> > entirely following the letter or really entirely the spirit of
> > Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. So how are they not
> > technically rouge admins?
> >
> > So shouldn't there, if practical to do so, a policy for this kind of
> > thing? At the very least that way the boundaries of what is and isn't
> > acceptable can be discussed.
> >
> > I'm also left wondering whether there are any other similar things
> > going on, either temporary activities, or extended ones; or whether
> > there have been in the past. If administrators do things, how is a
> > user supposed to know that they're doing it for a sensible reason,
> > rather than some less savoury purpose?
> >
> > --
> > -Ian Woollard
> >
> > "All the world's a stage... but you'll grow out of it eventually."
> >
> > ___
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> ___
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] News agencies are not RSs

2009-06-29 Thread Rjd0060
I'd just like to clarify one point.  The NYT article does make it seem as if
the entire reason that the actions were done were because Jimmy asked or
requested it.  This is not the case and I know this first-hand, of course
being one of those administrators involved.  I did what I did because I felt
it was appropriate.  I did not do it for any other reason.  Of course I
cannot speak for others but I would only assume that they have similar
thoughts.

---
Rjd0060
rjd0060.w...@gmail.com
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l