Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Autoconfirmed article creation trial

2011-09-14 Thread MuZemike
Does anyone think we can really get an actual consensus for anything 
big anymore on en.wiki?

To take from Beeblebrox on the Signpost not too long ago 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-29/The_pending_changes_fiasco):

There seems inevitably to come a point in any such attempt where there 
are simply too many voices, too many nonsensical objections, too much 
petty bickering to get anything done. This is a growing, systemic 
problem at Wikipedia, and eventually we are going to have to deal with it.

The near-converse applies when developers boldly turn relatively minor 
features on without community consensus, as seen at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29/Archive_90#Watchlist_emails
 
. That is, people complain up and down about it. It is impossible to 
have everyone happy about everything.

-MuZemike

On 9/13/2011 11:38 AM, David Gerard wrote:
 On 13 September 2011 17:35, Gwern Branwengwe...@gmail.com  wrote:

 And in turn, I look forward to the study of the effects of this
 change, which will never happen despite all promises before.


 Apparently just over 50% in favour is broad consensus. Who knew?

 (Almost as good as the person who told me we achieved consensus
 against that change and it was, literally, a straw poll with two no
 and one yes.)


 - d.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Autoconfirmed article creation trial

2011-09-14 Thread Carcharoth
Possibly a really professional approach with full-time resources
devoted to explaining things and producing a detailed FAQ and managing
expectations to slowly build a consensus. But that jibes uncomfortably
with the approach where groups of volunteers try and produce the same
results. It also feels like campaigning to try and grow a consensus
rather than working with what is there already. But that may be needed
in cases where opinions are all over the place and people may not be
fully informed about something or may polarise into different camps.
All gets rather political, really.

Carcharoth

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, MuZemike muzem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does anyone think we can really get an actual consensus for anything
 big anymore on en.wiki?

 To take from Beeblebrox on the Signpost not too long ago
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-29/The_pending_changes_fiasco):

 There seems inevitably to come a point in any such attempt where there
 are simply too many voices, too many nonsensical objections, too much
 petty bickering to get anything done. This is a growing, systemic
 problem at Wikipedia, and eventually we are going to have to deal with it.

 The near-converse applies when developers boldly turn relatively minor
 features on without community consensus, as seen at
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29/Archive_90#Watchlist_emails
 . That is, people complain up and down about it. It is impossible to
 have everyone happy about everything.

 -MuZemike

 On 9/13/2011 11:38 AM, David Gerard wrote:
 On 13 September 2011 17:35, Gwern Branwengwe...@gmail.com  wrote:

 And in turn, I look forward to the study of the effects of this
 change, which will never happen despite all promises before.


 Apparently just over 50% in favour is broad consensus. Who knew?

 (Almost as good as the person who told me we achieved consensus
 against that change and it was, literally, a straw poll with two no
 and one yes.)


 - d.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Autoconfirmed article creation trial

2011-09-13 Thread Gwern Branwen
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 It may seem a big goal, but perhaps en:wp can emulate the success of
 en:wn. Will we achieve the best-practice level of seven layers of
 review? We can but hope.

And in turn, I look forward to the study of the effects of this
change, which will never happen despite all promises before.

-- 
gwern
http://www.gwern.net

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l