Re: [Wikimedia-l] Introducing Diff – a blog by and for the Wikimedia volunteer community

2020-07-15 Thread effe iets anders
The editorial team has been the status quo for years. I'd like to see it
expanded over time with volunteers, but at this point it would be unfair to
look down at this development for that reason.

To keep things constructive here: are there specific guidelines or
procedures that you would like to see changed? What is the kind of
volunteer/non-WMF person that you would like to see added to the team? (not
expecting you to call names, but you may be able to come up with broad
categories)

If you have such big problems with the privacy policy, could you create a
separate thread about that and be specific about what exactly you find
concerning, and why? I don't think an announcement thread is the best place
to discuss those concerns - if these are really significant problems, it
warrants a separate thread.

Best,
Lodewijk

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:27 PM Yair Rand  wrote:

> I am concerned.
>
> Although it is purported to be "by and for the Wikimedia volunteer
> community", the blog is clearly run by the WMF, the editorial team is made
> up of WMF staff, the WMF handles moderating, the guidelines were written by
> the WMF, the blog was created by the WMF without community consultation or
> input, and the structure and category system are clearly WMF-oriented.
> Also, it's based on WordPress, yet again, and with a very
> problematic privacy policy which probably won't be acceptable to many in
> the community.
>
> This is not a positive development, in my opinion.
>
> -- Yair Rand
>
> ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 15 ביולי 2020 ב-15:31 מאת ‪Andy Mabbett‬‏ <‪
> a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk‬‏>:‬
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 18:50, Chris Koerner 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Diff builds on lessons and  experiences from  the
> > > Wikimedia Blog, the Wikimedia Foundation News, and Wikimedia Space;
> > > previous posts from these channels are archived on Diff.
> >
> > Based on my involvement with the Blog, I've identified some issues...
> >
> > At the request of the WMF, in 2017 I wrote a blog post, which was
> > published - after WMF's editorial approval - at:
> >
> >https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
> >
> > an independently-archived copy may be found at:
> >
> >
> >
> https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
> >
> > This has now been republished at:
> >
> >https://diff.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
> >
> > to which the original URL has now been redirected.
> >
> >
> > The new version of the article has  footer, saying:
> >
> >Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, and
> >as such was written under a different editorial standard than Diff.
> >
> > I am concerned that this unexplained comment may not reflect well on
> > me, as the named author.
> >
> >
> > The new version of my author profile page:
> >
> >https://diff.wikimedia.org/author/cap-andy-mabbet/
> >
> > is missing the thumbnail image for the blog post; compare with the
> > archived version:
> >
> >
> >
> https://web.archive.org/web/20191218122440/https://blog.wikimedia.org/author/andy-mabbet/
> >
> > (the spelling error in the URL has carried over from the original).
> >
> > > The channel
> > > is primarily intended for community-authored posts, in which
> > > volunteers can share their stories, learnings, and ideas with each
> > > other.
> >
> > I didn't write the above post simply to share the story with other
> > volunteers; it was written - I again emphasise, at the WMF's request -
> >  for a global audience, and presented to the press as such, as part of
> > a joint publicity initiative with the European Space Agency.
> >
> > > content on Diff can be written and
> > > translated into languages to reach a wide audience.
> >
> > My original post - as can be seen from the banner in the version at
> > the Internet Archive - was kindly translated into Italian (apt, as the
> > subject was an Italian Astronaut) and French. The banner containing
> > the links to those translations is missing from the "Diff" copy.
> >
> > The original URLs of the italian and French versions:
> >
> >
> >
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra
> >
> >
> >
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre
> >
> > now redirect, respectively, to:
> >
> >
> >
> https://diff.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra
> >
> >
> >
> https://diff.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre
> >
> > each of which are returning a 404 error.
> >
> > Several links to the original Italian URL, from the Italian-language
> > Wikipedia, including those in encyclopedia articles, and two links to
> > the original French URL on the French-language Wikipedia, are now
> > broken. Obviously this also applies to any external sites that link to
> > them, too.
> >
> > > Still curious to learn more?
> >
> > Yes: What consultation was carried out with contributors, and the
> > wider the 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Introducing Diff – a blog by and for the Wikimedia volunteer community

2020-07-15 Thread Yair Rand
I am concerned.

Although it is purported to be "by and for the Wikimedia volunteer
community", the blog is clearly run by the WMF, the editorial team is made
up of WMF staff, the WMF handles moderating, the guidelines were written by
the WMF, the blog was created by the WMF without community consultation or
input, and the structure and category system are clearly WMF-oriented.
Also, it's based on WordPress, yet again, and with a very
problematic privacy policy which probably won't be acceptable to many in
the community.

This is not a positive development, in my opinion.

-- Yair Rand

‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 15 ביולי 2020 ב-15:31 מאת ‪Andy Mabbett‬‏ <‪
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk‬‏>:‬

> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 18:50, Chris Koerner 
> wrote:
>
> > Diff builds on lessons and  experiences from  the
> > Wikimedia Blog, the Wikimedia Foundation News, and Wikimedia Space;
> > previous posts from these channels are archived on Diff.
>
> Based on my involvement with the Blog, I've identified some issues...
>
> At the request of the WMF, in 2017 I wrote a blog post, which was
> published - after WMF's editorial approval - at:
>
>https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
>
> an independently-archived copy may be found at:
>
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
>
> This has now been republished at:
>
>https://diff.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/
>
> to which the original URL has now been redirected.
>
>
> The new version of the article has  footer, saying:
>
>Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, and
>as such was written under a different editorial standard than Diff.
>
> I am concerned that this unexplained comment may not reflect well on
> me, as the named author.
>
>
> The new version of my author profile page:
>
>https://diff.wikimedia.org/author/cap-andy-mabbet/
>
> is missing the thumbnail image for the blog post; compare with the
> archived version:
>
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20191218122440/https://blog.wikimedia.org/author/andy-mabbet/
>
> (the spelling error in the URL has carried over from the original).
>
> > The channel
> > is primarily intended for community-authored posts, in which
> > volunteers can share their stories, learnings, and ideas with each
> > other.
>
> I didn't write the above post simply to share the story with other
> volunteers; it was written - I again emphasise, at the WMF's request -
>  for a global audience, and presented to the press as such, as part of
> a joint publicity initiative with the European Space Agency.
>
> > content on Diff can be written and
> > translated into languages to reach a wide audience.
>
> My original post - as can be seen from the banner in the version at
> the Internet Archive - was kindly translated into Italian (apt, as the
> subject was an Italian Astronaut) and French. The banner containing
> the links to those translations is missing from the "Diff" copy.
>
> The original URLs of the italian and French versions:
>
>
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra
>
>
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre
>
> now redirect, respectively, to:
>
>
> https://diff.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra
>
>
> https://diff.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre
>
> each of which are returning a 404 error.
>
> Several links to the original Italian URL, from the Italian-language
> Wikipedia, including those in encyclopedia articles, and two links to
> the original French URL on the French-language Wikipedia, are now
> broken. Obviously this also applies to any external sites that link to
> them, too.
>
> > Still curious to learn more?
>
> Yes: What consultation was carried out with contributors, and the
> wider the Wikimedia community, to inform this change?
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] Introducing Diff – a blog by and for the Wikimedia volunteer community

2020-07-15 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 18:50, Chris Koerner  wrote:

> Diff builds on lessons and  experiences from  the
> Wikimedia Blog, the Wikimedia Foundation News, and Wikimedia Space;
> previous posts from these channels are archived on Diff.

Based on my involvement with the Blog, I've identified some issues...

At the request of the WMF, in 2017 I wrote a blog post, which was
published - after WMF's editorial approval - at:

   https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/

an independently-archived copy may be found at:

  
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/

This has now been republished at:

   https://diff.wikimedia.org/2017/11/29/astronaut-spoken-voice/

to which the original URL has now been redirected.


The new version of the article has  footer, saying:

   Archive notice: This is an archived post from blog.wikimedia.org, and
   as such was written under a different editorial standard than Diff.

I am concerned that this unexplained comment may not reflect well on
me, as the named author.


The new version of my author profile page:

   https://diff.wikimedia.org/author/cap-andy-mabbet/

is missing the thumbnail image for the blog post; compare with the
archived version:

   
https://web.archive.org/web/20191218122440/https://blog.wikimedia.org/author/andy-mabbet/

(the spelling error in the URL has carried over from the original).

> The channel
> is primarily intended for community-authored posts, in which
> volunteers can share their stories, learnings, and ideas with each
> other.

I didn't write the above post simply to share the story with other
volunteers; it was written - I again emphasise, at the WMF's request -
 for a global audience, and presented to the press as such, as part of
a joint publicity initiative with the European Space Agency.

> content on Diff can be written and
> translated into languages to reach a wide audience.

My original post - as can be seen from the banner in the version at
the Internet Archive - was kindly translated into Italian (apt, as the
subject was an Italian Astronaut) and French. The banner containing
the links to those translations is missing from the "Diff" copy.

The original URLs of the italian and French versions:

   https://blog.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra

   https://blog.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre

now redirect, respectively, to:

   https://diff.wikimedia.org/it/2017/11/29/wikipedia-lascia-il-pianeta-terra

   https://diff.wikimedia.org/fr/2017/12/01/wikipedia-quitte-la-planete-terre

each of which are returning a 404 error.

Several links to the original Italian URL, from the Italian-language
Wikipedia, including those in encyclopedia articles, and two links to
the original French URL on the French-language Wikipedia, are now
broken. Obviously this also applies to any external sites that link to
them, too.

> Still curious to learn more?

Yes: What consultation was carried out with contributors, and the
wider the Wikimedia community, to inform this change?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation statement on new Hong Kong security laws

2020-07-15 Thread Sherwin Siy
Dear all:

As some of you might already be aware, the Chinese government has recently
passed and started implementing a new national security law applicable in
Hong Kong which prohibits a broad range of speech and grants wide-ranging
surveillance powers to authorities. We are concerned that this law may have
serious implications for protection of the privacy of users on Wikipedia
and other projects operated by the Foundation, potentially enabling
authorities to request personal user data.

After consultation and discussion, the Foundation’s Legal Department has
prepared a public statement in response to this law and the potential
threats to Wikipedia user privacy. We encourage you to review and share
this statement with anyone who may be interested or impacted:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/07/15/new-chinese-national-security-law-in-hong-kong/

We take protection of your data very seriously, and we will continue to
defend our values around user privacy with any government, as we have in
the past. Our thoughts are with our community in Hong Kong who are directly
facing these new challenges.  We hope this statement will make clear that
we stand with them and will strive to protect their right to digital
privacy.

Thank you,
Sherwin

-- 
Sherwin Siy (he/him)
Senior Public Policy Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] Introducing Diff – a blog by and for the Wikimedia volunteer community

2020-07-15 Thread Chris Koerner
Hello,

Today the Wikimedia Foundation would like to introduce a new community
blog. It's called "Diff" (diff.wikimedia.org) and is a blog by – and
for – the Wikimedia volunteer community to connect and share
learnings, stories, and ideas from across our movement. We'd like to
encourage you to learn more about Diff and how it can help you in
sharing and learning from your fellow Wikimedians.

Everyone is invited to contribute!

https://diff.wikimedia.org/2020/07/14/welcome-to-diff-a-community-blog-for-the-wikimedia-movement/

The name “Diff” is in reference to the wiki interface that displays
the difference between one version and another of a Wikipedia page. It
also reflects the “difference” our communities and movement make in
the world every day.

For some background, Diff builds on lessons and  experiences from  the
Wikimedia Blog, the Wikimedia Foundation News, and Wikimedia Space;
previous posts from these channels are archived on Diff. The channel
is primarily intended for community-authored posts, in which
volunteers can share their stories, learnings, and ideas with each
other.

Diff offers a simple and accessible editorial process, moderated by
Foundation communications staff and open to volunteers, to encourage
participation from all — especially emerging and under-represented
communities. Additionally, content on Diff can be written and
translated into languages to reach a wide audience. Diff also has a
code of conduct and comments can be flagged and moderated.

Still curious to learn more?

https://diff.wikimedia.org/2020/07/14/welcome-to-diff-a-community-blog-for-the-wikimedia-movement/

Yours,
Chris Koerner (he/him)
Community Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Research Showcase] July 15, 2020: Medical Knowledge on Wikipedia

2020-07-15 Thread Janna Layton
Hi all, this will be starting in about 15 minutes.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:20 PM Janna Layton  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Reminder that this very topical Research Showcase will be happening on
> Wednesday.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:26 PM Janna Layton 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The next Research Showcase will be live-streamed on Wednesday, July 15,
>> at 9:30 AM PDT/16:30 UTC.
>>
>> Wikipedia is one of the most important online resources for health
>> information. This has been especially highlighted during the Covid-19
>> pandemic: since the beginning of the year more than 5000 articles related
>> to Covid-19 have been created receiving more than 400M pageviews.
>> Therefore, for this month’s showcase our two invited speakers will help us
>> get a better understanding of the state of medical knowledge in Wikipedia.
>> In the first talk, Denise Smith will give an overview on how Wikipedia's
>> health content is used by different audiences (public, students, or
>> practitioners). In the second talk, Giovanni Colavizza will present results
>> on how editors on Wikipedia find, select, and integrate scientific
>> information on Covid-19 into Wikipedia articles.
>>
>> YouTube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIV26lWrD9c
>>
>> As usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research.
>> You can also watch our past research showcases here:
>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase
>>
>> This month's presentations:
>>
>> Wikipedia for health information - Situating Wikipedia as a health
>> information resource
>>
>> By Denise Smith (McMaster University, Health Sciences Library & Western
>> University, Faculty of Information & Media Studies)
>>
>> Wikipedia is the most frequently accessed web site for health
>> information, but the various ways users engage with Wikipedia’s health
>> content has not been thoroughly investigated or reported. This talk will
>> summarize the findings of a comprehensive literature review published in
>> February. It explores all the contexts in which Wikipedia’s health content
>> is used that have been reported in academic literature. The talk will focus
>> on the findings reported in this paper, the potential impact of this study
>> in health and medical librarianship, the practice of medicine, and medical
>> or health education.
>>
>>
>>-
>>
>>D.A. Smith (2020). "Situating Wikipedia as a health information
>>resource in various contexts: A scoping review". PLoS ONE.
>>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228786
>>
>>
>>
>> COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
>>
>> By Giovanni Colavizza (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands)
>>
>> Wikipedia is one of the main sources of free knowledge on the Web. During
>> the first few months of the pandemic, over 4,500 new Wikipedia pages on
>> COVID-19 have been created and have accumulated close to 250M pageviews by
>> early April 2020.1 At the same time, an unprecedented amount of scientific
>> articles on COVID-19 and the ongoing pandemic have been published online.
>> Wikipedia’s contents are based on reliable sources, primarily scientific
>> literature. Given its public function, it is crucial for Wikipedia to rely
>> on representative and reliable scientific results, especially so in a time
>> of crisis. We assess the coverage of COVID-19-related research in Wikipedia
>> via citations. We find that Wikipedia editors are integrating new research
>> at an unprecedented fast pace. While doing so, they are able to provide a
>> largely representative coverage of COVID-19-related research. We show that
>> all the main topics discussed in this literature are proportionally
>> represented from Wikipedia, after accounting for article-level effects. We
>> further use regression analyses to model citations from Wikipedia and show
>> that, despite the pressure to keep up with novel results, Wikipedia editors
>> rely on literature which is highly cited, widely shared on social media,
>> and has been peer-reviewed.
>>
>>
>>-
>>
>>G. Colavizza (2020). "COVID-19 research in Wikipedia". bioRxiv.
>>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.10.087643v2
>>
>>
>> --
>> Janna Layton (she/her)
>> Administrative Assistant - Product & Technology
>> Wikimedia Foundation 
>>
>> --
>> Janna Layton (she/her)
>> Administrative Assistant - Product & Technology
>> Wikimedia Foundation 
>>
>
>
> --
> Janna Layton (she/her)
> Administrative Assistant - Product & Technology
> Wikimedia Foundation 
>


-- 
Janna Layton (she/her)
Administrative Assistant - Product & Technology
Wikimedia Foundation 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Clinic en español. jueves, 16 de junio, a las 18 hs UTC

2020-07-15 Thread Asaf Bartov
Estimados y estimadas Wikimedistas,

(Les pedimos que compartan este mensaje a todas las personas que consideren
que podrían beneficiarse de esta invitación. Puede que no sea parte de los
canales más relevantes o grupos).

En estos tiempos tan complejos con la pandemia, y la posterior complejidad
que surgirá durante la post-pandemia, el contacto e interacción humana con
nuestros y nuestras compañeras de Wikimedia, aunque sea a través de una
videollamada, puede sernos útil, relajante y divertido. También nos da la
oportunidad para hacer esas preguntas que siempre quisimos realizar, pero
nunca pudimos hacerlas; o hasta explicar situaciones que pueden ser
complejas de articular por escrito.

Es así que el equipo de Desarrollo Comunitario de la Fundación Wikimedia,
ha estado experimentando con videollamadas abiertas (usando Google Meet)
para que cualquier persona activa en los proyectos Wikimedia pueda
participar, realizar consultas o recomendaciones sobre cualquier iniciativa
o problema relacionado con Wikimedia en el que se encuentren trabajando.

También es un espacio para compartir y recibir retroalimentación, aún si no
tienen ninguna pregunta o duda concreta, o si simplemente quisieran
conectarse y compartir sus experiencias con las demás personas.

Llamamos a esta iniciativa: Clínicas de Wikimedia (nos traen cualquier
“caso” que tengan en mente, y vamos a hacer lo posible por ayudarles), y se
estarán realizando varias veces al mes (alternando entre zonas horarias y
días, para que la mayor cantidad de personas puedan participar)

Cada sesión de la clínica puede durar hasta 90 minutos, y garantizamos que
participen al menos dos personas de la Fundación Wikimedia en la llamada.
Esto no quiere decir que vamos a tener todas las respuestas, pero nos
comprometemos a ayudarles a conseguirlas, aún si no es durante la llamada,
podemos hacer un seguimiento posterior a sus consultas y trataremos de
resolverlas.

Cada llamada tendrá un resumen que será editado para mayor claridad y
estará disponible para los y las voluntarias interesadas. Este resumen
contendrá también enlaces hacia herramientas o recursos que hayan sido
mencionados durante la llamada, y será compartido y archivado en Meta[0].
Aquí un ejemplo reciente [1] (en inglés).

¡Estas llamadas *no* reemplazarán ningún canal existente ni tampoco
llamadas previas que hayan sido agendadas! Todos los canales o reuniones
que utilicen o ya tengan seguirán existiendo. No se realizarán anuncios de
gran magnitud durante estas llamadas, ni tampoco queremos que se sientan
con la obligación o el estrés de participar.

Más bien, estas clínicas serán una nueva forma de comunicación directa y
apoyo, con un enfoque menos restringido o limitado que otros canales
existentes (donde sólo ciertos temas son tratados), y esperamos que sean
más accesibles para las personas que no están tan seguras sobre si su tema
o problema es apropiado para alguno de esos canales.

Ya que estas llamadas (que hasta el momento han sido en inglés) parecen ser
útiles, nos complace ahora también poder ampliarlas al español, y esperamos
que más adelante también podamos realizarlas en otros idiomas, y así dar un
mayor acceso a este recurso más allá de la barrera idiomática con el
inglés. No soy fluido en español, así que esta vez sólo participaré en la
llamada, pero será co-facilitada por Melissa y Selene; y Edna junto a
Cassie tomarán las notas (en español).

¡Les invitamos a unirse si es que este horario les funciona! Nuestra
primera llamada en español está agendada para el jueves, 16 de junio, a las
18 hs (6pm) UTC (15 hs - 3pm Buenos Aires, 20 hs - 8pm Madrid, etc.), en
este link[2] de Google Meet.

Les recordamos que no hay ninguna agenda fija, ni tampoco se requiere
preparación previa para esta llamada. Siéntanse libres de participar y
acompañarnos con cualquier tema relacionado a Wikimedia que tengan en
mente, o simplemente para pasar el rato.

¡Cualquier comentario o duda es bienvenida!

Saludos,

Asaf

Esta vez con el apoyo de Melissa, Selene, Edna y Cassie

[0] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Clinics

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Clinics/004

[2] https://meet.google.com/mjv-dxvk-jjb

Asaf Bartov (he/him/his)

Senior Program Officer, Emerging Wikimedia Communities

Wikimedia Foundation 

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,