[Wikimedia-l] Re: UCoC Phase 2 Ratification Results Announcement

[Željko Blaće]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:34 AM effe iets anders 
wrote:

> Thank you Stella,
>

Thank you Lodewijk for voicing a critical perspective. Hope you do not mind
me adding a few points inline.


> Thank you for sharing, I'm looking forward to an evaluation of how this
> vote was executed, so that we can use these methods for more
> topics/decisions in a constructive way. I'm pleased to see how the process
> has seen various types of community engagement, and this seems a good step
> in the right direction. I guess it's hard to expect more turnout than this.
>

I think turnout could have been much better at least in smaller language
communities. From the experience in the projects I am active in there was a
lack of targeted outreach and proactive work, which rendered the whole
process super Meta. Doing text translations and putting notices is neither
enough nor a good way to communicate complexity and urgency to those most
in need of UCoC. New users who joined sub-ideal wikis (not just very toxic)
could not meet voting criteria as easily, though the document was mostly to
address their most basic needs.

(sidenote: the fact that this announcement is being made by a WMF staff
> member probably means that this process is less community driven than I
> thought. )
>
> For a fundamental document like this, I'm surprised to see that there is
> 40+% opposition. Is there a good understanding of what in the UCoC is
> causing so much opposition?
>

Not surprised as vocal critics were constantly present in the
process...their critique was only partly addressed and of course there is
prevailance with older Wikipedians not to change (much) and let alone fast
+ top down.


> I'm asking, because this is supposed to be a universal code, and even if
> this opposition was randomly distributed in our communities, it would be
> quite likely that there is a meaningful number of communities where there
> would be a majority against, if we would split up the vote by community. In
> such a case, I imagine that understanding the reasons why people are
> against, and whether something can be done to mitigate this (or that any
> universal document could likely meet similar opposition) is the least we
> could be expected to attempt.
>

The construction of vote procedure did not allow for partial support (one I
would also prefer myself) but only binary + comment.
This is suboptimal for lengthy documents and elaborate (but suboptimal)
processes.

Warm regards,
Z. Blace


> Warmly,
> Lodewijk
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:32 PM Stella Ng  wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> We would like to thank the over 2300 Wikimedians who participated in the
>> recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the
>> Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC)
>> .
>> At this time, the volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review
>> of the accuracy of the vote and the final results are available on
>> Meta-wiki. A quick summary can be found below:
>>
>>
>>-
>>
>>58.6% Yes, 41.4% No
>>
>>
>>-
>>
>>Contributors from 128 home wikis participated in the vote
>>-
>>
>>Over thirty languages were supported in the ballot
>>
>>
>> What this outcome means is that there is enough support for the Board to
>> review the document. It does not mean that the Enforcement Guidelines are
>> automatically complete.
>>
>> From here, the project team will collate and summarize the comments
>> provided in the voting process, and publish them on Meta-wiki. The
>> Enforcement Guidelines will be submitted to the Board of Trustees for their
>> consideration. The Board will review input given during the vote, and
>> examine whether there are aspects of the Guidelines that need further
>> refinement. If so, these comments, and the input provided through Meta-wiki
>> and other community conversations, will provide a good starting point for
>> revising the Guidelines to meet the needs expressed by communities in the
>> voter’s responses.
>>
>> In the event the Board moves forward with ratification, the UCoC project
>> team will begin supporting specific proposals in the Guidelines. Some of
>> these proposals include working with community members to form the U4C
>> Building Committee, starting consultations on training, and supporting
>> conversations on improving our reporting systems. There is still a lot to
>> be done, but we will be able to move into the next phase of this work.
>>
>> Many people took part in making sure the policy and the enforcement
>> guidelines work for our communities. We will continue to collaboratively
>> work on the details of the strong proposals outlined in the Guidelines as
>> presented by the Wikimedians who engaged with the project in different ways
>> over the last year.
>>
>> Once again, we thank everyone who participated in the ratification of
>> the Enforcement Guidelines.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stella Ng on behalf of 

[Wikimedia-l] Re: UCoC Phase 2 Ratification Results Announcement

[effe iets anders]

Thank you Stella,

Thank you for sharing, I'm looking forward to an evaluation of how this
vote was executed, so that we can use these methods for more
topics/decisions in a constructive way. I'm pleased to see how the process
has seen various types of community engagement, and this seems a good step
in the right direction. I guess it's hard to expect more turnout than this.
(sidenote: the fact that this announcement is being made by a WMF staff
member probably means that this process is less community driven than I
thought. )

For a fundamental document like this, I'm surprised to see that there is
40+% opposition. Is there a good understanding of what in the UCoC is
causing so much opposition?

I'm asking, because this is supposed to be a universal code, and even if
this opposition was randomly distributed in our communities, it would be
quite likely that there is a meaningful number of communities where there
would be a majority against, if we would split up the vote by community. In
such a case, I imagine that understanding the reasons why people are
against, and whether something can be done to mitigate this (or that any
universal document could likely meet similar opposition) is the least we
could be expected to attempt.

Warmly,
Lodewijk

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:32 PM Stella Ng  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> We would like to thank the over 2300 Wikimedians who participated in the
> recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the
> Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC)
> .
> At this time, the volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review
> of the accuracy of the vote and the final results are available on
> Meta-wiki. A quick summary can be found below:
>
>
>-
>
>58.6% Yes, 41.4% No
>
>
>-
>
>Contributors from 128 home wikis participated in the vote
>-
>
>Over thirty languages were supported in the ballot
>
>
> What this outcome means is that there is enough support for the Board to
> review the document. It does not mean that the Enforcement Guidelines are
> automatically complete.
>
> From here, the project team will collate and summarize the comments
> provided in the voting process, and publish them on Meta-wiki. The
> Enforcement Guidelines will be submitted to the Board of Trustees for their
> consideration. The Board will review input given during the vote, and
> examine whether there are aspects of the Guidelines that need further
> refinement. If so, these comments, and the input provided through Meta-wiki
> and other community conversations, will provide a good starting point for
> revising the Guidelines to meet the needs expressed by communities in the
> voter’s responses.
>
> In the event the Board moves forward with ratification, the UCoC project
> team will begin supporting specific proposals in the Guidelines. Some of
> these proposals include working with community members to form the U4C
> Building Committee, starting consultations on training, and supporting
> conversations on improving our reporting systems. There is still a lot to
> be done, but we will be able to move into the next phase of this work.
>
> Many people took part in making sure the policy and the enforcement
> guidelines work for our communities. We will continue to collaboratively
> work on the details of the strong proposals outlined in the Guidelines as
> presented by the Wikimedians who engaged with the project in different ways
> over the last year.
>
> Once again, we thank everyone who participated in the ratification of the
> Enforcement Guidelines.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stella Ng on behalf of the UCoC Project Team
>
> Senior Manager, Trust and Safety Policy
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/B42TE3IZNGKTEPBMORULKNDVJIXM6AC7/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/OINZZ7TJO4Q5H4NUVE2GY5U7NJISXSOY/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Annual activity report for Wikimedia Community User Group Turkey

[Basak Tosun]

Dear Wikimedians,

Please find the 2021 report  of Wikimedia Community User Group Turkey on
meta [1] and enjoy reading it!

Kind regards,
Başak

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Turkey/Reports/2021


--



___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/D6OFVKSEPBDB4D3UMMLUS5524ZEEPIP6/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] UCoC Phase 2 Ratification Results Announcement

[Stella Ng]

Hello All,

We would like to thank the over 2300 Wikimedians who participated in the
recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the
Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC)
.
At this time, the volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review of
the accuracy of the vote and the final results are available on Meta-wiki.
A quick summary can be found below:


   -

   58.6% Yes, 41.4% No


   -

   Contributors from 128 home wikis participated in the vote
   -

   Over thirty languages were supported in the ballot


What this outcome means is that there is enough support for the Board to
review the document. It does not mean that the Enforcement Guidelines are
automatically complete.

>From here, the project team will collate and summarize the comments
provided in the voting process, and publish them on Meta-wiki. The
Enforcement Guidelines will be submitted to the Board of Trustees for their
consideration. The Board will review input given during the vote, and
examine whether there are aspects of the Guidelines that need further
refinement. If so, these comments, and the input provided through Meta-wiki
and other community conversations, will provide a good starting point for
revising the Guidelines to meet the needs expressed by communities in the
voter’s responses.

In the event the Board moves forward with ratification, the UCoC project
team will begin supporting specific proposals in the Guidelines. Some of
these proposals include working with community members to form the U4C
Building Committee, starting consultations on training, and supporting
conversations on improving our reporting systems. There is still a lot to
be done, but we will be able to move into the next phase of this work.

Many people took part in making sure the policy and the enforcement
guidelines work for our communities. We will continue to collaboratively
work on the details of the strong proposals outlined in the Guidelines as
presented by the Wikimedians who engaged with the project in different ways
over the last year.

Once again, we thank everyone who participated in the ratification of the
Enforcement Guidelines.

Regards,

Stella Ng on behalf of the UCoC Project Team

Senior Manager, Trust and Safety Policy
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/B42TE3IZNGKTEPBMORULKNDVJIXM6AC7/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Annual activity report of Wikimedians of Turkic Languages User Group for 2021

[Mehman Ibragimov]

Hello,

I'm happy to share with you the report [1] of our group for 2021. We hope
to do more this year as a team.

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Turkic_Languages_User_Group/Reports/2021


*Kindly,Mehman.*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/H46A2VRVLL7VJ62V7FR7UOUU5HHAEABF/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikimedia Summit: Hybrid event on September 9-11, 2022

[Nicola Zeuner]

Hi Evelin, please fill out the application form regardless of whether you
want to participate on site or remotely.
Thanks,
Nikki

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 19:05 Evelin Heidel  wrote:

> Hi Nicole!
>
> Will there be an application for people that wants to participate
> remotely?
>
> cheers,
> scann
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/2JQKNHOR3RXGYNVLNSH5YPUK6BOTYI26/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XTO43W3QDGVVCKRI6VBO2DAXE227OGV6/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikimedia Summit: Hybrid event on September 9-11, 2022

[Evelin Heidel]

Hi Nicole! 

Will there be an application for people that wants to participate remotely? 

cheers,
scann
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/2JQKNHOR3RXGYNVLNSH5YPUK6BOTYI26/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Learn how to organize events and campaigns around gender gap!

[Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska]

Dear Wikimedians,
Volunteer Supporters Network would like to invite you to a meeting around
organizing great events and campaigns adressing the gender gap. The event
will happen at *April 7th at 3 PM UTC on Zoom.* It will be a series of
short talks from event and campaign organizers from different parts of the
globe, each doing amazing work in the gender gap context. We will be
talking about different aspects of the process: from creating an good
article lists to organizing a great edit-a-thon. We will share experience
from Art+Feminism, WikiDonne, Wikimedia Austria, Wikimedia Poland,
Wikimedia Argentina and Wikimedia UK. So - a lot of great and diverse
learning that can help you in your work!

You can learn more about the event and register here (registration is
required to get the link do meeting)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_Supporters_Network/VSN_Training:_Events_and_campaigns_around_gender_gap

The event is a part of a series of open skill-share events organized by the
Volunteer Supporters Network - you can check other upcoming events here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_Supporters_Network/Meetings

We are really (really!) looking forward to seeing you!

Best
-- 
Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/2ZB4TFLP6NIZ4KWT6GY7BKKMB2G2VEEW/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Invitation to Join the #WikiForHumanRights:Right to a Healthy Environment Launch Webinar

[Ruby Damenshie-Brown]

Dear Wikimedians,

You are cordially invited to the third launch event of the
#WikiForHumanRights 
[1] campaign, to be held on the 14th April 2022 at 14:00 UTC via Zoom
.

The Wikimedia Foundation, in collaboration with the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Human Rights Office
(UNHCR), will host a special live discussion on how Wikipedia and other
public knowledge can help people understand the human rights implications
of the triple planetary crisis, which includes biodiversity loss, climate
change, and pollution.

To be part of the event, register  [2]  your
participation and save the date by adding to your calendar
 [3].

 For more information about the event or how you can participate in the
campaign see our Diff post here  [4].  We
especially encourage experienced Wikipedia editors to join our writing
challenge
 [5]
or community events

[6].

   -

   Venue: Zoom
   -

   Register: https://bit.ly/36FIJIJ
   -

   Who can participate: Anyone interested


All Wikimedians from  Affiliates groups/organizations or individuals are
encouraged to invite other members of their community to participate.

It promises to be worth the time!

Best,

Ruby D-Brown

[1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiForHumanRights

[2]https://bit.ly/36FIJIJ

[3]https://bit.ly/3LQwl7Z

[4]https://bit.ly/3NCTv3b

[5]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiForHumanRights/Join_the_Challenge

[6]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiForHumanRights/Join_Community_Events
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/YVTIYLFIVPMRGS6VXG463QZAP2ONI6P3/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Wikimedia-l] Re: UNLOCK free knowledge projects | Call for application

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
Wikimedia Germany produced a tool that allows people to find pictures based
on the Wikidata item they are associated with (depicts)... As Wikidata uses
labels in all the Wikimedia languages, it follows that when labels exist,
children who seek pictures at school can find these pictures.

When this tool exclusively supports a language, it follows that the current
goobledegook you get when you search Commons will be prevented. When
children can find pictures at Commons, we can campaign for pictures that
are relevant in a geographical setting... ie occupations in Nigeria, Benin,
Serbia.Children can illustrate their work using Commons media, when they
know Commons for what it has, it will enthuse people to work in their own
language Wikipedia.
Thanks,
  GerardM

On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 12:53, Kannika Thaimai 
wrote:

> Dear fellow Wikimedians,
>
> We are happy to announce that applications for the innovation program
> UNLOCK open from today – April 5th! We are calling for ideas and projects
> that break down social and technical barriers preventing people from both
> accessing and contributing to free knowledge.
>
> In alignment with recommendation 9 “Innovate in free knowledge” [1] of the
> Movement Strategy, we look for early stage projects that address knowledge
> equity, including technical ones that make the access and contribution to
> knowledge easier, more inclusive and equitable. We also look for
> non-technical projects, concepts or standards that create more
> opportunities for everyone to participate in free knowledge projects –
> leading to a more inclusive representation of the diverse knowledge of our
> world.
>
> Participating teams will benefit from a structured online program with
> tailored coaching, access to an international network of experts,
> peer-to-peer exchange and a scholarship.
>
> == Who is the program for? ==
>
> We are looking for Wikimedians as well as free knowledge enthusiasts,
> developers, designers and activists from outside the Wikimedia movement.
> For this year’s edition, Wikimedia Deutschland teamed up with Wikimedia
> Serbia to co-design and co-host the program which will have a regional
> focus on the Western Balkan and German-speaking area. This means that
> applications are open to project teams (of a minimum of two and no more
> than five members) from the following countries: Albania, Austria,
> Bosnia-Herzegovina, Germany, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia as well as
> Serbia and Switzerland. The program language is English in order to enable
> exchange and create synergies among the cross-regional project teams.
> UNLOCK is designed to work completely virtually.
>
> Applications are open from April 5th until May 29th!
>
> == You want to apply? ==
>
> Great – we look forward to your ideas! Please head over to the UNLOCK
> program page [2] for details (incl. eligibility criteria, program timeline,
> application form and more) If you require further assistance with your
> application or if you have an idea but are not sure whether or not to
> apply, feel free to reach out to the organizing team behind the program via
> Email: unl...@wikimedia.de
>
> == You know people who would be interested in this program? ==
>
> Feel free to share this call in your network and community beyond the
> mailing list.
>
> Warm regards,
> Kannika (WMDE) and Ivana (WMRS)
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Innovate_in_Free_Knowledge
>
> [2] https://www.wikimedia.de/unlock/program/
> --
>
> Kannika Thaimai (she/her)*Innovation Engine - Strategy Lead*>> WMDE 
> innovation engine strategy 
> 
> >> UNLOCK Accelerator 
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
> Phone: +49 30 219 158 26-0
> https://wikimedia.de
>
> Keep up to date! Current news and exciting stories about Wikimedia,
> Wikipedia and Free Knowledge in our newsletter (in German):
> https://www.wikimedia.de/newsletter/
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland – Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.
> V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts
> Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig
> anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin,
> Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/I5EORZHDKAA4N6RLXTFYFWBNNR4DUPCP/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 

[Wikimedia-l] UNLOCK free knowledge projects | Call for application

[Kannika Thaimai]

Dear fellow Wikimedians,

We are happy to announce that applications for the innovation program
UNLOCK open from today – April 5th! We are calling for ideas and projects
that break down social and technical barriers preventing people from both
accessing and contributing to free knowledge.

In alignment with recommendation 9 “Innovate in free knowledge” [1] of the
Movement Strategy, we look for early stage projects that address knowledge
equity, including technical ones that make the access and contribution to
knowledge easier, more inclusive and equitable. We also look for
non-technical projects, concepts or standards that create more
opportunities for everyone to participate in free knowledge projects –
leading to a more inclusive representation of the diverse knowledge of our
world.

Participating teams will benefit from a structured online program with
tailored coaching, access to an international network of experts,
peer-to-peer exchange and a scholarship.

== Who is the program for? ==

We are looking for Wikimedians as well as free knowledge enthusiasts,
developers, designers and activists from outside the Wikimedia movement.
For this year’s edition, Wikimedia Deutschland teamed up with Wikimedia
Serbia to co-design and co-host the program which will have a regional
focus on the Western Balkan and German-speaking area. This means that
applications are open to project teams (of a minimum of two and no more
than five members) from the following countries: Albania, Austria,
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Germany, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia as well as
Serbia and Switzerland. The program language is English in order to enable
exchange and create synergies among the cross-regional project teams.
UNLOCK is designed to work completely virtually.

Applications are open from April 5th until May 29th!

== You want to apply? ==

Great – we look forward to your ideas! Please head over to the UNLOCK
program page [2] for details (incl. eligibility criteria, program timeline,
application form and more) If you require further assistance with your
application or if you have an idea but are not sure whether or not to
apply, feel free to reach out to the organizing team behind the program via
Email: unl...@wikimedia.de

== You know people who would be interested in this program? ==

Feel free to share this call in your network and community beyond the
mailing list.

Warm regards,
Kannika (WMDE) and Ivana (WMRS)

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Innovate_in_Free_Knowledge

[2] https://www.wikimedia.de/unlock/program/
-- 

Kannika Thaimai (she/her)*Innovation Engine - Strategy Lead*>> WMDE
innovation engine strategy

>> UNLOCK Accelerator 

Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Phone: +49 30 219 158 26-0
https://wikimedia.de

Keep up to date! Current news and exciting stories about Wikimedia,
Wikipedia and Free Knowledge in our newsletter (in German):
https://www.wikimedia.de/newsletter/

Wikimedia Deutschland – Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.
V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts
Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig
anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin,
Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/I5EORZHDKAA4N6RLXTFYFWBNNR4DUPCP/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org