Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Andy Mabbett]

On 3 October 2014 00:24, James Heilman  wrote:

> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564

Congratulations!

I know your and J. De Wolff's user names, but the other two are harder
to find. Is there a reason they're not made apparent? Can you give
them here, without "outing" anyone?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

[Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[James Heilman]

@ Cristian. I mean by number of "edits". Wikipedians by number of edits is
listed here for the Dengue fever article.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/articleinfo/index.php?article=Dengue_fever&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia

Yes I do know number of edits is not perfect and that someone who has made
a single edit could have contributed substantially.

-- 
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Rachel diCerbo]

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:

> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>

This is wonderful news; happy to hear it :)

-rachel

>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 




-- 

Rachel diCerbo
Director of Community Engagement (Product)
Wikimedia Foundation
Rdicerb (WMF) 
@a_rachel 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Cristian Consonni]

Hi James,

first of all, congrats for proving this to be possible. As it has
already been said it is an achievement nothing short of great.

2014-10-04 15:47 GMT+02:00 James Heilman :
> I agree all Wikipedia articles are sort of peer reviewed. When I speak
> about GA/FA I refer to it as Wikipedia's semi-formal peer review process.
>
> With respect to authorship, the 5th to 10th contributors by number of
> editors were contacted and asked if they wished to be listed as an author.
> All of them declined feeling that they had not contributed sufficiently to
> justify being listed.

You mean by number of edits? (I do not understand what you mean with
"by number of editors").
I think this is a reasonable criteria. (We may discuss on the results,
i.e. everybody declined, so Wikipedian!)

Anyway I would like to suggest other metrics that could be used as a
measure of paternity of the article, e.g. bytes added or removed[1], I
would point you to Dario Taraborelli and the analytics teams for other
ideas.

It also worth pointing out for the readers of this thread that there
is not a single version of the article [[Dengue Fever]] that is
identical to the article published (see [[Talk:Dengue fever]]
here[2]), although I would like to be pointed to one (or a set of)
closest version(s). (Finding automatically close versions would be
super interesting).

Thanks.

Cristian

[1] http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia
[2] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADengue_fever&diff=628032710&oldid=628012705

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Emily Blanchard]

The day has finally come- Amazing and Congratulations!




Emily Blanchard
Talent Acquisition Team
Wikimedia Foundation
eblanchard@wikimedia. org
Follow us on Twitter @wikimediaatwork
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home
Become a Contributor:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse
Join Us: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Work_with_us
Developers Join the Fun: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Communication


*Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share inthe
sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!*

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Lila Tretikov  wrote:

> James -- this is really great, thank you for sharing.
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:
>
> > Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> > http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
> >
> > Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> > http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
> >
> > Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> > the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
> >
> > --
> > James Heilman
> > MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
> >
> > The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> > www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Lila Tretikov]

James -- this is really great, thank you for sharing.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:

> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Pete Forsyth]

On Oct 4, 2014 1:30 PM, "Ziko van Dijk"  wrote:
>
I hope that
> someone will do something with our etherpad notes.
>

Link?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Ziko van Dijk]

Dear friends,

at the WikiCon 2014 in Cologne (the Wikimania for the German speaking
countries) we discussed similar issues, together with some external people.
Can one quote from WP, under what circumstances, and why not. I hope that
someone will do something with our etherpad notes.

A panel discussion yesterday evening. There was one gentleman from a major
German publishing house (C.H. Beck; google about the related plagiarism
scandal) who said that he was astonished that WP authors often talk so
negativly about the quotability and quality of the articles. And one
student in the audience said: "I am new here, I'am just a reader. If I
understand you well, you guys here think that one should not quote from WP?
(People saying: Yes, one should'nt!) Okay, I did not know that, and I
believe that many people don't know that."

Kind regards
Ziko


Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014 schrieb James Heilman :

> I agree all Wikipedia articles are sort of peer reviewed. When I speak
> about GA/FA I refer to it as Wikipedia's semi-formal peer review process.
>
> With respect to authorship, the 5th to 10th contributors by number of
> editors were contacted and asked if they wished to be listed as an author.
> All of them declined feeling that they had not contributed sufficiently to
> justify being listed.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>  ?subject=unsubscribe>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Todd Allen]

This is indeed an accomplishment. Well due congratulations to all involved.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 7:47 AM, James Heilman  wrote:

> I agree all Wikipedia articles are sort of peer reviewed. When I speak
> about GA/FA I refer to it as Wikipedia's semi-formal peer review process.
>
> With respect to authorship, the 5th to 10th contributors by number of
> editors were contacted and asked if they wished to be listed as an author.
> All of them declined feeling that they had not contributed sufficiently to
> justify being listed.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[James Heilman]

I agree all Wikipedia articles are sort of peer reviewed. When I speak
about GA/FA I refer to it as Wikipedia's semi-formal peer review process.

With respect to authorship, the 5th to 10th contributors by number of
editors were contacted and asked if they wished to be listed as an author.
All of them declined feeling that they had not contributed sufficiently to
justify being listed.

-- 
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Erlend Bjørtvedt]

Yeah, this is really  a great thing!
Just remember not to communicate, in a way, that "at last, we have a peer
reviewed Wikipedia article!"..
.
I have myself had twho scientific articles peer reviewed for Scientific
periodicals, and know very well that this is quite a process.

But then we also have the kind of articles that have not been formally peer
reviewed in that sense, but are still Wikipedia-peer reviewed and of
extraordinary standard.

In 2010, PhD / psychiatrist Øystein Eiring wrote a large number of medical
articles to Norwegian Wikipedia.

One example is the entry on Schizofrenia

http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizofreni

It was started by many writers, including doctors "Reodor" and "Sigve",
both physicians. With Dr Eiring the article (and many others) got a serious
Scientific boost and has 217 References. It has had 156 different
contributors, and the Three mentioned doctors have both changed each
others' contributors and had their own wordings changed. As much as 3,5 KB
of doctor "Sigve"'s text, has been removed or changed.

This is the wonderful beauty of Wikipedia peer review!


Best regards
Erlend Bjørtvedt


2014-10-04 8:52 GMT+02:00 Nurunnaby Hasive :

> Great work James! Congratulation.
>
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Peter Southwood <
> peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>
> > Not really
> > P
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt
> > Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer
> > Reviewed and Published
> >
> > But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..
> >
> > Erlend Bjørtvedt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:
> >
> > > Congratulations!
> > >
> > > A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other
> > > disciplines too.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Vishnu
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> > >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
> > >>
> > >> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> > >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
> > >>
> > >> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia
> > >> and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Erlend Bjørtvedt*
> > Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
> > Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
> > Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
> >  http://no.wikimedia.org <http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us>
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > -
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8318 - Release Date: 10/03/14
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive*
> Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia
> <http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive>
> Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People>
> Social Media Interaction Moderator | The Daily Prothom-Alo
> <http://www.prothom-alo.com>
> Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Fou

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Nurunnaby Hasive]

Great work James! Congratulation.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Peter Southwood <
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote:

> Not really
> P
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt
> Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer
> Reviewed and Published
>
> But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..
>
> Erlend Bjørtvedt
>
>
>
>
> Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other
> > disciplines too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Vishnu
> >
> >
> > On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
> >
> >> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
> >>
> >> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
> >>
> >> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia
> >> and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> --
> *Erlend Bjørtvedt*
> Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
> Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
> Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
>  http://no.wikimedia.org <http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8318 - Release Date: 10/03/14
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>



-- 
*Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive*
Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia
<http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive>
Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People>
Social Media Interaction Moderator | The Daily Prothom-Alo
<http://www.prothom-alo.com>
Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network
<http://www.okfn.org>
Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) <http://www.bdosn.org>
Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh <http://www.mozillabd.org>
fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive <http://www.twitter.com/nhasive> | Skype: nhasive
| www.nhasive.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Peter Southwood]

Not really
P

-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt
Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer 
Reviewed and Published

But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..

Erlend Bjørtvedt




Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:

> Congratulations!
>
> A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other 
> disciplines too.
>
> Cheers,
> Vishnu
>
>
> On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
>
>> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
>> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>>
>> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
>> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>>
>> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia 
>> and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ 
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>



-- 
*Erlend Bjørtvedt*
Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
 http://no.wikimedia.org <http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8318 - Release Date: 10/03/14


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Marc A. Pelletier]

On 10/03/2014 06:58 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
> It’s great to see that this article has been formally reviewed, although it 
> is disappointing to see how short the author list for the formal article is 
> here, given how many people have actually contributed to the article over the 
> years.

In the corresponding blog post/editorial, you see them struggle with
that very problem and fail to find a solution that is entirely
satisfactory; they chose to do the "obvious" thing and credit directly
the people who have participated in the review process /itself/, and
link to the Wikipedia history page for the detail.

It's not perfect, but it's a surprisingly difficult problem to solve
given how radically different the editing traditions are (something they
go into details about themselves).

-- Marc


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Michael Peel]

Wikipedia articles are passively peer reviewed every time someone with 
knowledge of the topic reads the article. Ideally, this would be the equal of 
scientific peer review. In reality, most such people don’t bother giving 
feedback, or are unable to figure out how to give feedback. Hopefully we can 
get better at encouraging and supporting such feedback in the future.

I’ve systematically reviewed Wikipedia articles in the past, and I’ve also 
persuaded others to do the same. However, systematic review isn’t the same as a 
formal review through a journal.

It’s great to see that this article has been formally reviewed, although it is 
disappointing to see how short the author list for the formal article is here, 
given how many people have actually contributed to the article over the years.

Thanks,
Mike

On 3 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Risker  wrote:

> Umm, no, they aren't - at least not in the way the term is used in
> scientific subjects.
> 
> Many articles are never reviewed in any systematic manner; in fact, that is
> the overwhelming majority of our articles.  Those that are formally
> reviewed are reviewed in the context of meeting *Wikipedia* standards:
> formatting, manual of style, reliable sources as references (as opposed to,
> say, blogs).   It doesn't contain most of the elements of peer review seen
> for scientific papers.
> 
> Risker/Anne
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3 October 2014 15:56, Erlend Bjørtvedt  wrote:
> 
>> But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..
>> 
>> Erlend Bjørtvedt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:
>> 
>>> Congratulations!
>>> 
>>> A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other
>>> disciplines too.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Vishnu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
>>> 
 Article published by the journal Open Medicine
 http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
 
 Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
 http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
 
 Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
 the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
 
 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Erlend Bjørtvedt*
>> Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
>> Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
>> Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
>> http://no.wikimedia.org 
>> ___
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> 
>> 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> 


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Risker]

Umm, no, they aren't - at least not in the way the term is used in
scientific subjects.

Many articles are never reviewed in any systematic manner; in fact, that is
the overwhelming majority of our articles.  Those that are formally
reviewed are reviewed in the context of meeting *Wikipedia* standards:
formatting, manual of style, reliable sources as references (as opposed to,
say, blogs).   It doesn't contain most of the elements of peer review seen
for scientific papers.

Risker/Anne





On 3 October 2014 15:56, Erlend Bjørtvedt  wrote:

> But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..
>
> Erlend Bjørtvedt
>
>
>
>
> Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other
> > disciplines too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Vishnu
> >
> >
> > On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
> >
> >> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
> >>
> >> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> >> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
> >>
> >> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> >> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
>
>
>
> --
> *Erlend Bjørtvedt*
> Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
> Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
> Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
>  http://no.wikimedia.org 
>  ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Erlend Bjørtvedt]

But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed..

Erlend Bjørtvedt




Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu  følgende:

> Congratulations!
>
> A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other
> disciplines too.
>
> Cheers,
> Vishnu
>
>
> On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
>
>> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
>> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>>
>> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
>> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>>
>> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
>> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 



-- 
*Erlend Bjørtvedt*
Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge
Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway
Mob: +47 - 9225 9227
 http://no.wikimedia.org 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Pete Forsyth]

Big congrats James!

And:

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Marc A. Pelletier  wrote:

> On 10/02/2014 07:24 PM, James Heilman wrote:
> > Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> > the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> Beyond this, and (IMO) even more importantly, it means that we are
> succeeding at our mission where it counts.  That a Wikipedia article in
> medecine is reasonably considered as the basis for a peer reviewed is an
> acheivement it iself; that it /was/ in fact published is nothing short
> of a crowning acheivement.
>

Agreed, and very well said, Marc.
-Pete

[[User:Peteforsyth]]
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[David Gerard]

James - I suggest you (or someone) draft a post for the WIkimedia blog
on the topic: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog

On 3 October 2014 00:24, James Heilman  wrote:
> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> 

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Vishnu]

Congratulations!

A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other 
disciplines too.


Cheers,
Vishnu


On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:

Article published by the journal Open Medicine
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564

Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565

Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
the number of contributors. I guess we will see.




___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Tanweer Morshed]

Wow! It's great a see a Wikipedia article being published in a
peer-reviewed journal! Congratulations to James and others who gave efforts
for it.It will definitely strengthen Wikipedia's reliability as an
encyclopedia.

Tanweer
Wikimedia Bangladesh

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Peter Southwood <
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote:

> Nice work, James
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Heilman
> Sent: 03 October 2014 01:24 AM
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer
> Reviewed and Published
>
> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8313 - Release Date: 10/02/14
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>



-- 
Regards -
Tanweer Morshed
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Peter Southwood]

Nice work, James
Cheers,
Peter

-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Heilman
Sent: 03 October 2014 01:24 AM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed 
and Published

Article published by the journal Open Medicine
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564

Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565

Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the 
number of contributors. I guess we will see.

--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8313 - Release Date: 10/02/14


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Asaf Bartov]

Kudos, doc!  You've done it again. :)

   A.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:

> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 




-- 
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation 

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Anna Stillwell]

Nice work, James.
Rock on,
/a

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Anasuya Sengupta 
wrote:

> Congratulations, James - and everyone else who worked on this. This is a
> significant achievement, not only because of the publishing of the article
> itself, but for what it heralds more broadly, as Coren said.
>
> Warmly,
> Anasuya
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:
>
> > Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> > http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
> >
> > Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> > http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
> >
> > Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> > the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
> >
> > --
> > James Heilman
> > MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
> >
> > The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> > www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> *Anasuya SenguptaSenior Director of GrantmakingWikimedia Foundation*
>
> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
> the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!
> Support Wikimedia 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>



-- 
Anna Stillwell
Senior Learning and Org Dev Lead
Wikimedia Foundation
415.806.1536
*www.wikimediafoundation.org *
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Anasuya Sengupta]

Congratulations, James - and everyone else who worked on this. This is a
significant achievement, not only because of the publishing of the article
itself, but for what it heralds more broadly, as Coren said.

Warmly,
Anasuya

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman  wrote:

> Article published by the journal Open Medicine
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
>
> Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
> http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
>
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 




-- 


*Anasuya SenguptaSenior Director of GrantmakingWikimedia Foundation*

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!
Support Wikimedia 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[Marc A. Pelletier]

On 10/02/2014 07:24 PM, James Heilman wrote:
> Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
> the number of contributors. I guess we will see.

Beyond this, and (IMO) even more importantly, it means that we are
succeeding at our mission where it counts.  That a Wikipedia article in
medecine is reasonably considered as the basis for a peer reviewed is an
acheivement it iself; that it /was/ in fact published is nothing short
of a crowning acheivement.

-- Marc


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

[Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published

[James Heilman]

Article published by the journal Open Medicine
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564

Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here
http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565

Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and
the number of contributors. I guess we will see.

-- 
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,