Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
On 21 May 2011 20:10, Brian McNeil wrote: > Something I stumbled across today: > > http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm > > So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to > ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling > an out-of-touch man in a white, powdered wig and dress to, "eff > orf!". > If you read the actually case: http://www.onebrickcourt.com/files/cases/wiki_21890.pdf the WMF makes it pretty clear that it doesn't actualy answer to the court is mearly chosing to respect the court order on that occasion -- geni ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
I believe the applicable case law is Arkell v. Pressdram. On 21 May 2011 20:10, "Brian McNeil" wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote: >> I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio >> this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has >> been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in >> enwiki. > > Something I stumbled across today: > > http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm > > So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to > ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling > an out-of-touch man in a white, powdered wig and dress to, "eff > orf!". > > > -- > Brian McNeil. > -- > brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. > http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org > "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news". > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote: > I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio > this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has > been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in > enwiki. Something I stumbled across today: http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling an out-of-touch man in a white, powdered wig and dress to, "eff orf!". -- Brian McNeil. -- brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news". ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in enwiki. On 21 May 2011 18:40, "Gordon Joly" wrote: ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 18:40 +0100, Gordon Joly wrote: > On 21/05/2011 09:30, Andrew West wrote: > > Which footballer would that be? Aaah, Wikipedia finally comes to the rescue: > > The affair is outed! The Daily Fail better hope that twitter collapses the Super Injunction nonsense. We're working on multiple media breaches, including one or two by them, that've spend a brief time online before being bunged in the memory hole. Obviously, there's a need for Wikinews to await feedback from the AG on this stuff - not go setting up twitter accounts that might get hit with a Norwich Pharmacal Order. ;-) [You didn't, did you, Iain?] -- Brian McNeil. -- brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news". ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Info: Press interest in Wikipedia articles for 'super-injunction celebrities'
On 21/05/2011 09:30, Andrew West wrote: > Which footballer would that be? Aaah, Wikipedia finally comes to the rescue: The affair is outed! Gordo -- Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com http://www.joly.org.uk/ Don't Leave Space To The Professionals! ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
