Re: [Wikitech-l] Text-to-speech extension?

2014-04-29 Thread Benjamin Lees
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Ilias Koumoundouros ilias.k...@freemail.gr
 wrote:

 So I was wondering whether there is a text-to-speech extension for
 Mediawiki


What advantages would this offer over a screen reader?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Text-to-speech extension?

2014-04-29 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi,
Are screen readers supported ? But do they understand what is the cruft
that is on a page, the kind of cruft that you do not want to get read out
to you?
Thanks,
 GerardM


On 29 April 2014 08:03, Benjamin Lees emufarm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Ilias Koumoundouros 
 ilias.k...@freemail.gr
  wrote:

  So I was wondering whether there is a text-to-speech extension for
  Mediawiki
 
 
 What advantages would this offer over a screen reader?
 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Text-to-speech extension?

2014-04-29 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 08:17 +0200, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
 Hoi,
 Are screen readers supported ? But do they understand what is the cruft
 that is on a page, the kind of cruft that you do not want to get read out
 to you?

Depends on how you define supported. :)
For things that don't work, there is https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org and
the keyword accessibility.
Open tickets:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=accessibilityresolution=---

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugday on General MediaWiki bugs on Tue, April 29 2014, 14:30UTC

2014-04-29 Thread Andre Klapper
Reminder: This will start in about 25 minutes.


On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 00:21 +0530, Andre Klapper wrote:
 you are invited to join us on the next Bugday:
 
  Tuesday, April 29, 2014, 14:30 to 16:30UTC [1]
 in #wikimedia-office on Freenode IRC [2]
 
 We will be triaging Bugzilla tickets under the product MediaWiki and
 the component General/Unknown [3].
 
 Everyone is welcome to join, and no technical knowledge needed! It's an
 easy way to get involved or to give something back.
 We encourage everybody to record your activity on the etherpad [4].
 
 This information and more can be found here:
   https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage/20140429
 
 For more information on triaging in general, check out
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage
 
 See you there!
 
 andre
 
 
 [1] Timezone converter: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html
 [2] See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC for more info on IRC chat
 [3] 
 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?component=General%2FUnknownresolution=---product=MediaWiki
 [4] http://etherpad.wmflabs.org/pad/p/BugTriage
 

-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tech Talk: Unit testing for MediaWiki projects

2014-04-29 Thread Chris McMahon
Very timely, the good people at Atomic Object have posted two articles
about what makes code untestable, I think they're good:

This Code Is Untestable! (Part 1, for Managers)
http://spin.atomicobject.com/2014/04/28/untestable-code-unit-tests/

This Code Is Untestable! (Part 2, for Developers)
http://spin.atomicobject.com/2014/04/29/code-untestable-part-2-developers/


On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 As a reminder, this is happening tomorrow at 12 PM PDT / 19:00 UTC
 tomorrow (Tuesday):

 https://plus.google.com/events/cae6ng1m9o4mhdbpo10u5v05bvg

 We're going to talk about various strategies for automated testing and
 improvements to our continuous integration infrastructure. Antoine
 'hashar' Musso has offered to give an overview, roughly along these
 lines:

 - quick overview of the infrastructure (Zuul/Jenkins, the slaves, the
 myriad of jobs and how they are maintained).

 - MediaWiki testing frameworks and tools (phpunit, qunit, browser
 tests, beta cluster)

 - current concerns in what we test, which should provide enough
 materials for the open discussion part:

  - lack of cross repositories tests and how to handle dependencies
  - repositories that are barely tested yet critical
  - mw/core tests mixing unit and integration tests
  - lack of mocking
  - very thin code coverage

 This will be followed by an open conversation about improvement
 strategies. The session is scheduled to take about an hour total.

 Hope to see you there :)

 Erik

 --
 Erik Möller
 VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Feedback on 1.23 RC 0

2014-04-29 Thread Mark A. Hershberger

We've gotten some feedback already -- 
https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/issues/212 -- about the 
RC for MediaWiki 1.23 that Markus made last week.  Hopefully we can get this 
issue addressed in time for SMW users.

Are there any other issues that people have run into that we should know about 
before we do attempt to make a final release of 1.23?

If you've tried the RC and not run into any problems, that would be good to 
know, as well.

Thanks,

Mark.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Feedback on 1.23 RC 0

2014-04-29 Thread Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.comwrote:


 We've gotten some feedback already --
 https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/issues/212 --
 about the RC for MediaWiki 1.23 that Markus made last week.  Hopefully we
 can get this issue addressed in time for SMW users.


Someone reported that at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62856 but never followed up
when questions were asked.

Without further information, it seems to be an extension trying to grab
wikitext being parsed from some parser hook and making assumptions that are
no longer valid. Chances are that whatever they're trying to do they'll
need to do in a different way.


-- 
Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
Software Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Feedback on 1.23 RC 0

2014-04-29 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 10:50 -0400, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
 Are there any other issues that people have run into that we should
 know about before we do attempt to make a final release of 1.23?

There are 13 tickets with a 1.23 target milestone in Bugzilla, and some
have patches (are in PATCH_TO_REVIEW status):
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?target_milestone=1.23.0%20releaseresolution=---product=MediaWiki

And there are numerous FIXED tickets where backporting the fix to stable
releases has been requested:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Backport_Stable%3F

Cheers,
andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Shifting from PHP mailer to Swift Mailer

2014-04-29 Thread Tony Thomas
Hi,
  Looks like there isn't any more reply about this proposal on
shifting from UserMailer to Swift-Mailer. Since, we have already started
with implementing VERP, it's high time this enhancement needs to be
applied, if it needs to be. If Swift-Mailer is to be done, VERP needs to be
implemented as a plugin to it, or else as an additional script in the
UserMailer code.

Bugzilla ticket:- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63483

Thanks,
Tony Thomas http://tttwrites.in
FOSS@Amrita http://foss.amrita.ac.in

*where there is a wifi,there is a way*


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Tony Thomas 01tonytho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
   While working on implementing VERP for Mediawiki[1], Nemo
 pointed to me, Tyler' recommendation[2] on shifting from PHP mailer to
 Swift Mailer[3]. Quoting Tyler's words :
 PHPMailer has everything packed into a few classes, whereas Swift_Mailer
 actually has a separation of concerns, with classes for attachments,
 transport types, etc. A result of this is that PHPMailer has two different
 functions for embedding multimedia: addEmbeddedImage() for files and
 addStringEmbeddedImage() for strings. Another example is that PHPMailer
 supports only two bodies for multipart messages, whereas Swift_Mailer will
 add in as many bodies as you tell it to since a body is wrapped in its own
 object. In addition, PHPMailer only really supports SMTP, whereas
 Swift_Mailer has an extensible transport architecture, and multiple
 transport providers. (And there's also plugins, and monolog integration,
 etc.

   My mentors too think about it to be a nice idea, and Nemo
 recommended adding it to my GSoC project deliverable here (
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VERP#Deliverables ). But, we need more
 community-consensus on the same as this needs to be done first, and VERP as
 a plugin to it, if Swift mailer needs to be done. I have opened a BZ ticket
 for the same ( https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63483 ).
 Please comment to this thread or in the BZ regarding the shift as it needs
 to be done for a start. The discussions we had on this till date is here:
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:VERP#Swift_Mailer_and_VERP__40928.

 [1]: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VERP
 [2]:
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Third-party_components
 [3]: http://swiftmailer.org/


 Thanks,
 Tony Thomas http://tttwrites.in
 FOSS@Amrita http://foss.amrita.ac.in

 *where there is a wifi,there is a way*

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] jquery.accessKeyLabel broke mobile

2014-04-29 Thread Jon Robson
Krinkle fixed the immediate problem
I opened https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64564 to
further optimise the mediawiki.util library


On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
 The module was split out of mediawiki.util, nothing new, no need for any 
 special treatment here.

 It should've been given the same target definition as mediawiki.util.

 — Krinkle

 On 27 Apr 2014, at 19:37, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:

 Looks like  jquery.accessKeyLabel now seems to be a required ResourceLoader
 module.

 The patch that introduced it is
 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/125426/and this has exploded the
 mobile site with 49 or 50 tests failing since the
 merge.

 I'm not quite sure whether this module is useful on mobile. I'm not judging
 that here - I just want to report this is a consideration.

 Seems we have 2 options
 1) Enable the module on mobile if it is applicable. If it's a small library
 maybe decide on whether it is important later.
 2) Revert this core change and rethink this

 We need to do _one_ of the above before the next deployment train.

 The damage can be viewed at
 http://en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Forty-seven_Ronin - basically
 JavaScript exception.

 Bug at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64512


 On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jenkins-no-re...@cloudbees.com wrote:

  * FAILURE: MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome
 Build #409
 https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/
 (Sun, 27 Apr 2014 04:52:29 +)*
 *Test 
 Result*https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/
 50 failed, 20 skipped
  Failed Tests  *Test Name**Duration**Age*  Check UI components.Check
 existence of important UI components on other 
 pages.https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Check%20UI%20components/Check_existence_of_important_UI_components_on_other_pages_22
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Encourage
 new users to Keep Going.I see a KeepGoing message after completing my
 VisualEditor 
 edithttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Encourage%20new%20users%20to%20Keep%20Going/I_see_a_KeepGoing_message_after_completing_my_VisualEditor_edit48
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Encourage
 new users to Keep Going.I see a KeepGoing message after completing my 
 edithttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Encourage%20new%20users%20to%20Keep%20Going/I_see_a_KeepGoing_message_after_completing_my_edit52
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Generic
 special page features.Search from 
 Loginhttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Generic%20special%20page%20features/Search_from_Login39
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Generic
 special page features.Search from 
 Nearbyhttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Generic%20special%20page%20features/Search_from_Nearby10
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Generic
 special page features.Search from 
 Uploadshttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Generic%20special%20page%20features/Search_from_Uploads2.2
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Generic
 special page features.Search from 
 Watchlisthttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Generic%20special%20page%20features/Search_from_Watchlist38
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Issues.Clicking
 page issues opens 
 overlayhttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Issues/Clicking_page_issues_opens_overlay12
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   Issues.Closing
 page 
 issueshttps://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/409/testReport/junit/(root)/Issues/Closing_page_issues12
 sec2https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/job/MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome/407/
   

[Wikitech-l] Skipping IRC RfC session for May 7th

2014-04-29 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
I think it would be fine to skip the IRC discussion (for Requests for
Comment review) that would happen on Wednesday, May 7th, because so many
potential participants will be in transit to Zurich. You are, of course,
free to schedule your own meetings to discuss things, if you disagree. :-)

So, I'm seeking out proposals to discuss ~May 14, 21, and 28. Feel free
to ping me personally or set something up linked from
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings . Some suggestions:
Content API, Knockout, Storage service, Clean up URLs, URL shortener,
Json Config pages in wiki, API roadmap.
-- 
Sumana Harihareswara
Senior Technical Writer
Wikimedia Foundation

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tech Talk: Unit testing for MediaWiki projects

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 29/04/2014 06:47, Erik Moeller a écrit :
 As a reminder, this is happening tomorrow at 12 PM PDT / 19:00 UTC
 tomorrow (Tuesday):
 
 https://plus.google.com/events/cae6ng1m9o4mhdbpo10u5v05bvg

I have uploaded the slides as PDF on commons:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tech_Talk_-_20140429_-_Unit_testing_in_MediaWiki_projects.pdf


Thank you everyone!

-- 
Antoine hashar Musso


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Feedback on 1.23 RC 0

2014-04-29 Thread Daniel Friesen
I discovered this regression yesterday:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64595

~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/]

On 2014-04-29, 7:50 AM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
 We've gotten some feedback already -- 
 https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/issues/212 -- about 
 the RC for MediaWiki 1.23 that Markus made last week.  Hopefully we can get 
 this issue addressed in time for SMW users.

 Are there any other issues that people have run into that we should know 
 about before we do attempt to make a final release of 1.23?

 If you've tried the RC and not run into any problems, that would be good to 
 know, as well.

 Thanks,

 Mark.

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Config class and 1.23

2014-04-29 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
On 04/18/2014 05:35 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
 Hey,
 
 Is there some kind of description of the responsibility of the context
 source stuff anywhere? And the design vision behind it? I find the whole
 thing extremely dubious, as it appears to try make you bind to a whole
 group of rather scary classes. Perhaps I am missing something?
 
 Cheers
 
 --
 Jeroen De Dauw - http://www.bn2vs.com
 Software craftsmanship advocate
 Evil software architect at Wikimedia Germany
 ~=[,,_,,]:3
 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Jeroen, thanks for your message.

Looks like we are still working on merging the Make abstract Config
class truly implementation-agnostic changeset.[0]

We came out of the Architecture Summit with a lot of momentum[1] for
replacing our direct use of global variables throughout the system. We
agreed on Basic hygiene of taking what's already being used (JSON
configuration like EventLogging, Zero, and UploadWizard campaigns) and
separating into separate extension or integrating into Core. But we
don't really have a clear design document/discussion of the current path
forward, as far as I know.

We've also talked about the Graphical configuration interface RfC
(formerly Configuration database 2) a little bit[2][3] but could use a
lot more speccing out of requirements.

[0] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/109850/
[1]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Architecture_Summit_2014/Configuration
[2]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2013-11-20
[3]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-03-12

-- 
Sumana Harihareswara
Senior Technical Writer
Wikimedia Foundation

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tuesday Apr 29 - MediaWiki libraries components

2014-04-29 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
This is in about 10 minutes.
-Sumana

On 04/25/2014 01:27 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
 This is on a Tuesday at 2200 UTC - note the change!
 
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-29
 
 We'll discuss Ryan Lane's proposal (better handling and versioning
 libraries that are MW extensions) and Tyler Romeo's proposal (replacing
 some MW components with more widely used libraries, especially Symfony
 libraries). Please comment, and look at Jeroen De Dauw's proposal for
 extension management with Composer, in advance.
 
 * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/MediaWiki_libraries
 *
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Third-party_components
 *
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Extension_management_with_Composer
 
 
 When: Tuesday 22:00 UTC-23:00 UTC -
 http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=22min=00sec=0day=29month=04year=2014
   London 11pm
   Toronto 6pm
   Seattle 3pm
   Sydney 8am Wednesday
   Beijing 6am Wednesday
 
 Where: Freenode IRC: #wikimedia-office


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Tuesday Apr 29 - MediaWiki libraries components

2014-04-29 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
Cross-posting to mediawiki-l and mediawiki-enterprise, as I should have
done initially.

On 04/25/2014 01:36 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
 On 04/25/2014 01:27 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
 
 We'll discuss Ryan Lane's proposal (better handling and versioning
 libraries that are MW extensions) and Tyler Romeo's proposal (replacing
 some MW components with more widely used libraries, especially Symfony
 libraries). Please comment, and look at Jeroen De Dauw's proposal for
 extension management with Composer, in advance.

I'm sorry for misattributing! Extension management with Composer is by
Markus Glaser, not Jeroen De Dauw.

 * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/MediaWiki_libraries
 *
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Third-party_components
 *
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Extension_management_with_Composer
 
 Relatedly - take a look at Bryan Davis's
 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/119939/ Add Composer managed
 libraries changeset (part of the structured logging work).

Summary  logs of our meeting are up at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-29#Summary_and_logs
.

We have some open questions for Markus regarding Composer, and for
administrators of MediaWiki installations. Would Composer work in your
environment?

And it sounds like we only want to replace an artisanal, homegrown
MediaWiki component with an externally maintained library if the feature
is complicated, upstream is friendly and responsive and aligned with us,
and so on, on a case-by-case basis.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/119939/ still needs review.

-- 
Sumana Harihareswara
Senior Technical Writer
Wikimedia Foundation

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] dnschain

2014-04-29 Thread James Salsman
Would someone please review this DNS proposal for secure HTTPS?

https://github.com/okTurtles/dnschain
http://okturtles.com/other/dnschain_okturtles_overview.pdf
http://okturtles.com/

It is new but it appears to be the most correct secure DNS solution for
HTTPS security at present. Thank you.

Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l