[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r81583]: New comment added
User "^demon" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r81583. Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/81583#c20488 Commit summary: Switch to and start hiding these editsection tags from Tidy so it doesn't break them. Comment: * Definitely needs some unit tests * If we're going to have a class for Tidy-related stuff, it might make sense to move more of Parser's tidy code into it ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r81583]: New comment added
User "Dantman" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r81583. Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/81583#c19683 Commit summary: Switch to and start hiding these editsection tags from Tidy so it doesn't break them. Comment: Whoops, the replace code used to be part of the Tidy class until I decided it would be better to split it out. Feel free to cut that out. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r81583]: New comment added
User "Aaron Schulz" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r81583. Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/81583#c19570 Commit summary: Switch to and start hiding these editsection tags from Tidy so it doesn't break them. Comment: What is the empty replaceEditSectionLinksCallback() there for? ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview