[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r91642]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-07-08 Thread MediaWiki Mail
User Krinkle changed the status of MediaWiki.r91642.

Old Status: fixme
New Status: reverted

User Krinkle also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r91642.

Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/91642#c19348
Commit summary:

Bug #29755: Apply patch from Vitaliy Filippov so that MW's HTTP client
respects no_proxy env setting

Comment:

Reopening bug 29755, patch wasn't reviewed yet. (or rather, it wasn't a 
patch/diff at all).

I think it was a good experience to trigger code review by committing it (which 
may have been a coincidence), but I don't think it's something that should be a 
acceptable way of getting code review. It will only stress developers into 
maintaining trunk.

In a time where pre-commit review is being considered (perhaps even github-like 
forks and merges, there even are github projects of which the history solely 
consists of merges! that result from pull-requests that have been reviewed 
first), this doesn't look good.

It's probably easy to turn this into a patch and make it happy with the 
conventions but to keep the patch simple I've reverted it for now.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r91642]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-07-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
User Bryan changed the status of MediaWiki.r91642.

Old Status: new
New Status: fixme

User Bryan also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r91642.

Full URL: 
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/91642#c19309
Commit summary:

Bug #29755: Apply patch from Vitaliy Filippov so that MW's HTTP client
respects no_proxy env setting

Comment:

* Error suppression operator. Should never be used in new code.
* Variable names do not match MediaWiki code conventions. Use $lowerCamelCase.
* The absence of code comments, makes it almost impossible to review this. The 
regexes suggest that you are looking to IPv4 IP addresses. You should use the 
functions in the IP class for this, and also make this working with IPv6.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview