Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bence Damokos wrote: An other issue on the Hungarian Wikipedia is that if the old namespace name is used than the system doesn't recognise it as an imagelink and puts the image in the category of unused images (apparently the links are recognised correctly if the new, Fájl, namespace name is used). Sounds like it might have been the same problem, probably in a page which was cached while it was broken. I don't see anything wrong at the moment; please show us a specific page where you see a problem and point out the particular bit that's showing incorrectly and we can take a look. - -- brion -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklJSwYACgkQwRnhpk1wk46T7wCbB/+DbknWVjfxvaHikmNQadLk Id0AoKUtVRJhfrD7CJphohRgCq+tucKk =AkFo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bence Damokos wrote: An other issue on the Hungarian Wikipedia is that if the old namespace name is used than the system doesn't recognise it as an imagelink and puts the image in the category of unused images (apparently the links are recognised correctly if the new, Fájl, namespace name is used). Sounds like it might have been the same problem, probably in a page which was cached while it was broken. I don't see anything wrong at the moment; please show us a specific page where you see a problem and point out the particular bit that's showing incorrectly and we can take a look. - -- brion I intended to include a good example in my first letter, but it took a while to find *one, *as there are two related problems. So the main problem is with the unused pages special page: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Nem_haszn%C3%A1lt_k%C3%A9pek; last updated ths morning at 06:10 (Central European Time I guess); The image http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Dalarna_tartomany.png is marked as an unused image although it is indeed used, as is recognised by the image description page (it has surely been used even before this morning). The image: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:J%C3%A4mtland_tartomany.png also appears on this list, and the image description page shows no usage but the image is in fact used in the following article : http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%A4mtland_tartom%C3%A1ny Best regards, Bence Damokos . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklJSwYACgkQwRnhpk1wk46T7wCbB/+DbknWVjfxvaHikmNQadLk Id0AoKUtVRJhfrD7CJphohRgCq+tucKk =AkFo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bence Damokos wrote: So the main problem is with the unused pages special page: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Nem_haszn%C3%A1lt_k%C3%A9pek; last updated ths morning at 06:10 (Central European Time I guess); The image http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Dalarna_tartomany.png is marked as an unused image although it is indeed used, as is recognised by the image description page (it has surely been used even before this morning). The image: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:J%C3%A4mtland_tartomany.png also appears on this list, and the image description page shows no usage but the image is in fact used in the following article : http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%A4mtland_tartom%C3%A1ny The second one's easier to test, so I made a null edit to the page, and the page is now listed as using the image on the image page. Sounds to me like this is either a totally unrelated issue with imagelinks sometimes not being recorded (something we've gotten intermittent reports of on various wikis since long before this change), or some links were specifically not saved properly earlier this week during the hours when the namespaces weren't configured properly. - -- brion -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklJUNcACgkQwRnhpk1wk454LgCdGUrDCgKIFCBzCAMR3xJufu86 EkAAn0G2sBlPEPMHpCnZBxgDLZNP7N1x =SKWT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Remember the dot wrote: The code on Wikimedia sites hasn't been updated in about 3 weeks...any idea on when the next update will be? Now updated on test.wikipedia.org. List of items changed since last update from our release notes: http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_changes After a couple more hours of testing, I'll push it live to all sites. Note the 'File:' namespace is ready to deploy but won't be live there yet since test currently still uses the older message files. It should go live after full deployment. - -- brion -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklBbykACgkQwRnhpk1wk45WBACgo2RD4rBBgZWqDnJXL5SbpZ/Y 9oQAnRonJEDWdTNHOR+cNNYhJB5VfDOV =fTsw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brion Vibber wrote: Remember the dot wrote: The code on Wikimedia sites hasn't been updated in about 3 weeks...any idea on when the next update will be? Now updated on test.wikipedia.org. List of items changed since last update from our release notes: http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_changes After a couple more hours of testing, I'll push it live to all sites. Note the 'File:' namespace is ready to deploy but won't be live there yet since test currently still uses the older message files. It should go live after full deployment. Whee, fixed that bug... now File: is live on test. - -- brion -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklBktsACgkQwRnhpk1wk47ysQCeNBVOgah88EPtkitd14OyJeE9 Xl4An3zf2ceRn4Wz1ctP6yHvXvWauHyd =VOY9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
On Thursday 11 December 2008 05:21:24 pm Remember the dot wrote: Looks like it's live on Wikimedia too, thanks! Whats the deal with the non-alphabetical sorting of images, like here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Southerly_Clubs_Image_Archives bug or feature? -- [[en:User:Dschwen]] [[de:Benutzer:Dschwen]] [[commons:User:Dschwen]] ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Schwen wrote: On Thursday 11 December 2008 05:21:24 pm Remember the dot wrote: Looks like it's live on Wikimedia too, thanks! Whats the deal with the non-alphabetical sorting of images, like here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Southerly_Clubs_Image_Archives bug or feature? Probably just mixed category sort entries with the old namespace names. It should be sorted out pretty soon, after a link index rebuild. - -- brion -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklBq+4ACgkQwRnhpk1wk47GbACgzcL6qe3Hr2yVh2Nd6yYj3UqD Kp0AoJC9P850CxxxYguFvv1GfGXwM5n1 =1sYB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Simon Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's goodnice to see such flippant responses when a simple It could be a while yet would do. It really helps the idea of bringing people on board to help out and feel welcome... What's the difference between When it's ready and It could be a while yet? The former seems more descriptive to me (indicates that there's no fixed date, instead of suggesting that perhaps there is and you're just not being told). Indeed. When it's ready may not be very precise, but it _is_ accurate. There have been some pretty major changes to the code since the Wikimedia servers were last updated, not the least of them being the rename of the Image namespace to File. Presumably the next update will happen when things have settled down enough that brion and others feel it's safe to do it without a bazillion things breaking. Which reminds me that v1.14 is also overdue for release. Perhaps what we'd need would be a temporary feature freeze, with commits to trunk restricted to fixing breaking bugs until everything is stable enough for a release. -- Ilmari Karonen ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aryeh Gregor Sent: 09 December 2008 14:25 To: Wikimedia developers Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Simon Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's goodnice to see such flippant responses when a simple It could be a while yet would do. It really helps the idea of bringing people on board to help out and feel welcome... What's the difference between When it's ready and It could be a while yet? The former seems more descriptive to me (indicates that there's no fixed date, instead of suggesting that perhaps there is and you're just not being told). Sorry, wasn't near email for a while. The only real difference is that one seems to be a lot less confrontational. Even better would've been the asnswer from Ilmari Karonen which explains the situation a bit more clearly... If nobody else sees it that way, then just ignore this. The information contained in this communication is privileged and confidential. The content is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or e-mail, and delete this message from your systems. Teleperformance is a trading style of MM Teleperformance Ltd: Reg No. 02060289 England: Registered Office: St James House, Moon Street, Bristol, BS2 8QY. VAT No.763 0980 18. P Please think of the environment before you print this email ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
Remember the dot wrote: Hey, The code on Wikimedia sites hasn't been updated in about 3 weeks...any idea on when the next update will be? When it's ready. It's goodnice to see such flippant responses when a simple It could be a while yet would do. It really helps the idea of bringing people on board to help out and feel welcome... The information contained in this communication is privileged and confidential. The content is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or e-mail, and delete this message from your systems. Teleperformance is a trading style of MM Teleperformance Ltd: Reg No. 02060289 England: Registered Office: St James House, Moon Street, Bristol, BS2 8QY. VAT No.763 0980 18. P Please think of the environment before you print this email ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Code update status?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Simon Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's goodnice to see such flippant responses when a simple It could be a while yet would do. It really helps the idea of bringing people on board to help out and feel welcome... What's the difference between When it's ready and It could be a while yet? The former seems more descriptive to me (indicates that there's no fixed date, instead of suggesting that perhaps there is and you're just not being told). ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
