Re: [Wikitech-l] Flagged revs and Lua modules
Sounds like a site config issue. All wikis that have NS_TEMPLATE in $wgFlaggedRevsNamespaces should also have NS_MODULE in there. -- View this message in context: http://wikimedia.7.n6.nabble.com/Flagged-revs-and-Lua-modules-tp4999685p497.html Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Flagged revs and Lua modules
Please can anyone help to solve this issue? It causes a lot of extra work, thousands of unchecked pages. 2013/3/18 Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com Hi, I don't know if there is a bugreport on this, forgive me if I duplicate. Hungarian Wikipedia began to use Scribunto in the first batch, and we also use Flagged Revisions. This is a page: http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3action=history where the editors were all trusted and/or bots, but the page had to be explicitliy checked. The behaviour is just like when a template is modified by untrusted user, and we have to check the articles where it is included. But in this case it is not the template but a module. All these pages http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Mi_hivatkozik_erre/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul have the same problem. On the other side, the history of the involved module: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul shows that it was only edited by an admin and should be autochecked (or reviewed or patrollod or anything because I always mix these words in English but uselang=en shows checked). -- Bináris -- Bináris ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Flagged revs and Lua modules
Hi Bináris, Could you file a bug report for this? I think I might be able to tease out what the bug is from your email, but it would be a lot better if you could document what the expected behavior is, and what the actual behavior is. Here's my attempt to describe the problem, but I don't want to file it because I'm not sure I've got it right: Subject: Lua modules don't get autochecked by FlaggedRevs when they should be On Hungarian Wikipedia, we use FlaggedRevs and Scribunto. Lua modules seem to require manual checking on this wiki, even in cases that where the user (such as an admin) should have had their edit autochecked Example page where this happened: http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3action=history Repro steps: 1. Edit a Lua module as a user with autocheck rights 2. View the FlaggedRevs status of that page Expected behavior: the revised Lua module becomes the new checked version of the page Actual behavior: the unrevised Lua module remains the checked version until someone checks the latest revision Is that an accurate description of the problem? Is that the only problem, or are there multiple problems? If this is correct, could you file this as a bug? Rob On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com wrote: Please can anyone help to solve this issue? It causes a lot of extra work, thousands of unchecked pages. 2013/3/18 Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com Hi, I don't know if there is a bugreport on this, forgive me if I duplicate. Hungarian Wikipedia began to use Scribunto in the first batch, and we also use Flagged Revisions. This is a page: http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3action=history where the editors were all trusted and/or bots, but the page had to be explicitliy checked. The behaviour is just like when a template is modified by untrusted user, and we have to check the articles where it is included. But in this case it is not the template but a module. All these pages http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Mi_hivatkozik_erre/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul have the same problem. On the other side, the history of the involved module: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul shows that it was only edited by an admin and should be autochecked (or reviewed or patrollod or anything because I always mix these words in English but uselang=en shows checked). -- Bináris -- Bináris ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Flagged revs and Lua modules
Hi, I don't know if there is a bugreport on this, forgive me if I duplicate. Hungarian Wikipedia began to use Scribunto in the first batch, and we also use Flagged Revisions. This is a page: http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3action=history where the editors were all trusted and/or bots, but the page had to be explicitliy checked. The behaviour is just like when a template is modified by untrusted user, and we have to check the articles where it is included. But in this case it is not the template but a module. All these pages http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Mi_hivatkozik_erre/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul have the same problem. On the other side, the history of the involved module: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul shows that it was only edited by an admin and should be autochecked (or reviewed or patrollod or anything because I always mix these words in English but uselang=en shows checked). -- Bináris ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
