subject:"\[Wikitech\-l\] Page view stats"

Re: [Wikitech-l] Page view stats

2014-06-02 Thread Andre Klapper

Hi,

On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:36 +0900, ikuyamada wrote:
 It seems that the page view stats have not been uploaded for several days.
 http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2014/
 
 Are there any plans to fix this?

See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65978

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Page view stats

2014-06-01 Thread ikuyamada

Hello,

It seems that the page view stats have not been uploaded for several days.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2014/

Are there any plans to fix this?

Thanks.

Ikuya

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Page view stats failure

2013-07-23 Thread Ikuya Yamada

Hello,

It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
actual data for the last few hours.

http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/

Are there any failures on the server-side?

Thanks,
Ikuya

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Page view stats failure

2013-07-23 Thread Jeremy Baron

On Jul 24, 2013 12:43 AM, Ikuya Yamada ik...@sfc.keio.ac.jp wrote:
 It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
 actual data for the last few hours.

 http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/

 Are there any failures on the server-side?

Just looking at file sizes I can see 15, 16, and 20-05(the current hour)
UTC all look smaller than normal. (yes, something's broken)

-Jeremy
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Page view stats we can believe in

2013-02-13 Thread Lars Aronsson


I stumbled on the Danish Wiktionary, of all projects.
Danish is the 68th biggest language of Wiktionary, and
has a little more than 8,000 articles in total.
Most of these articles are very short and provide no
value to a reader. There is no reason to link to them,
and so very unlikely that the next user should stumble
upon them unless they are me.

Yet, wikistats tries to make be believe that this tiny
project has 400,000 or 500,000 page views each month,
and has had so for a long time,
http://stats.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm

(I'm not talking about January 2012, which seems to have
been an error, and reports 2-3 times that many views.)

My guess is that da.wiktionary has 4,000 page views per
month, not 400,000. It's more likely that 400,000 is
some background noise, an offset number that should be
subtracted from the number of page views for any project.

If you look at the log files for just one day, you should
see my IP address (85.228.something) and 3-4 other users
who have been editing lately, and not many more people,
but perhaps a bunch of interwiki bots.

We need an explanation to these vastly inflated page view
statistics.


--
  Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
  Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Page view stats we can believe in

2013-02-13 Thread rupert THURNER

acording to http://stats.grok.se/da.d/latest90/mandag has been viewed
127 times in the last 3 months, and ranks on 927. the raw pagecount
files are here:
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/

i then took an arbitrary file and looked into it, at midnight, i guess
UTC, feb 1st. as all projects are in this file, lets grep for danish
wiktionary, da.d  at the beginning of the line:

grep '^da\.d\s' pagecounts-20130201-00  | wc
5692276   19572

this means 569 pages accessed in this hour, at least once. so lets
sort by third column, which is the page accesses. largest access are
at the bottom, so lets take the last 20 lines:

grep '^da\.d\s' pagecounts-20130201-00  | sort -k3n,3 | tail -20
da.d pony 2 30008
da.d skak 2 44151
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/engelsk 2 7818
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/hyle 2 4630
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/krog 2 4632
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/skaml%C3%A6ber 2 4632
da.d Forside 3 96050
da.d horse 3 54974
da.d interessant 3 9339
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/arrang%C3%B8rer 3 6948
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/b%C3%B8ger 3 6948
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/forg%C3%A6ves 3 6946
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/hensigtsm%C3%A6ssig 3 6946
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/hvad 3 9900
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/indvendig 3 6948
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/k%C3%A6le 3 6948
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/monogame 3 6944
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/revet 3 6946
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/topstykke 3 6944
da.d springer 3 45292

this means that e.g. springer was supposedly accessed 3 times in
that hour. the article does not exist, but there is a red link out of
http://da.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Top_1_(Dansk).

rupert.

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
 I stumbled on the Danish Wiktionary, of all projects.
 Danish is the 68th biggest language of Wiktionary, and
 has a little more than 8,000 articles in total.
 Most of these articles are very short and provide no
 value to a reader. There is no reason to link to them,
 and so very unlikely that the next user should stumble
 upon them unless they are me.

 Yet, wikistats tries to make be believe that this tiny
 project has 400,000 or 500,000 page views each month,
 and has had so for a long time,
 http://stats.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm

 (I'm not talking about January 2012, which seems to have
 been an error, and reports 2-3 times that many views.)

 My guess is that da.wiktionary has 4,000 page views per
 month, not 400,000. It's more likely that 400,000 is
 some background noise, an offset number that should be
 subtracted from the number of page views for any project.

 If you look at the log files for just one day, you should
 see my IP address (85.228.something) and 3-4 other users
 who have been editing lately, and not many more people,
 but perhaps a bunch of interwiki bots.

 We need an explanation to these vastly inflated page view
 statistics.


 --
   Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
   Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se



 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Page view stats we can believe in

2013-02-13 Thread Lars Aronsson


On 02/14/2013 12:03 AM, rupert THURNER wrote:

this means 569 pages accessed in this hour, at least once.


Thanks for taking the time to do this check! This
number already is unreasonable for an obscure project
with 8000 articles.


da.d Speciel:Eksporter/engelsk 2 7818


Should Special:Export ever count as page views?
Anyway, there are no humans using Special:Export
on da.wiktionary in the middle of the night.


this means that e.g. springer was supposedly accessed 3 times in
that hour. the article does not exist, but there is a red link out of
http://da.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Top_1_(Dansk).


So are there some stupid bots that follow red links?
There could be a large number of such accesses
on Wiktionary (in any language) because there
are so many red links. But bots should never be
counted among the page views.


--
  Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
  Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Page view stats we can believe in

2013-02-13 Thread Diederik van Liere

Hi all,

Lars, Rupert thanks for flagging this and you are quite right: the numbers
are too high because webstatscollector, the software that does the counts,
just counts every request as a hit including bots, error pages etc.

I am planning on running a sprint at the Amsterdam Hackathon to built an
easy queryable datastore with clean pageview counts. Please let me know if
you are interested in this so I can pitch this.

Best,
Diederik

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:

On 02/14/2013 12:03 AM, rupert THURNER wrote:

this means 569 pages accessed in this hour, at least once.

Thanks for taking the time to do this check! This
number already is unreasonable for an obscure project
with 8000 articles.

da.d Speciel:Eksporter/engelsk 2 7818

Should Special:Export ever count as page views?
Anyway, there are no humans using Special:Export
on da.wiktionary in the middle of the night.

this means that e.g. springer was supposedly accessed 3 times in
that hour. the article does not exist, but there is a red link out of
http://da.wiktionary.org/wiki/**Wiktionary:Top_1_(Dansk)http://da.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Top_1_(Dansk)
.

So are there some stupid bots that follow red links?
There could be a large number of such accesses
on Wiktionary (in any language) because there
are so many red links. But bots should never be
counted among the page views.

--
Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se

__**_
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] 'Page View' Stats for the Timed Media Handler

2013-02-13 Thread Matthew Walker

Greetings all,

Victor is releasing a video tomorrow for valentines day and whilst I was
discussing it with him, the topic of how many users actually watch our
videos came up. Do we currently have a way of collecting play/click stats
for content played by the TimedMediaHandler off of commons?

If not, does anyone have any ideas on how to go about getting this
information?

~Matt Walker
Wikimedia Foundation
Fundraising Technology Team
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

27 matches

Mail list logo