Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On 8/13/10 2:57 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: OK. Nevertheless, I would really strongly suggest planning a firm escape route as soon as possible. Why? The Java we use is GPL licensed. As long as we use a JDK/VM that is open, we are good. -- Ryan Lane All, You all may not realize that I have been *very* involved in the long road to open Java. I am also an Apache member and was a mentor for the Apache Harmony project (which is where Android got their Java-compliant, open source class libraries from). The lawsuit is so far very narrowly targeting their use of the Dalvik VM and has so far not mentioned the Class Libraries, the Apache Harmony or OpenJDK. Danese ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] So, Java.
So what's our escape plan from Java? http://blogs.computerworld.com/16736/oracle_vs_google_over_java_in_android_is_only_the_start (I work in a Java shop. I'd already recommended to my boss and boss's boss that we get the hell off Solaris ASAP. Today we had a lot of Java developers rather concerned for their careers.) - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
So what's our escape plan from Java? Where are we with Java so that we need to escape from Java? ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Schwen li...@schwen.de wrote: So what's our escape plan from Java? Where are we with Java so that we need to escape from Java? Lucene. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On 13 August 2010 21:57, Daniel Schwen li...@schwen.de wrote: So what's our escape plan from Java? Where are we with Java so that we need to escape from Java? Search, for one. Java is not free software in practice if Oracle is spewing lawsuits all over the place. (My escape plan at work was to move to OpenJDK 7. This may not allow escape from Oracle's gibbering insanity either.) - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
Search, for one. Java is not free software in practice if Oracle is spewing lawsuits all over the place. Right, lucene slipped my mind. I suppose there are good reasons not to use CLucene? ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: So what's our escape plan from Java? http://blogs.computerworld.com/16736/oracle_vs_google_over_java_in_android_is_only_the_start (I work in a Java shop. I'd already recommended to my boss and boss's boss that we get the hell off Solaris ASAP. Today we had a lot of Java developers rather concerned for their careers.) Oracle is only suing Google because Google is redistributing Java without paying them, and because they're using a modified version (so technically they're not covered by the patent grants), and because Google has deep pockets. It's pretty implausible that they'll sue users and developers directly. If they do, Wikimedia has little enough money to be extremely low on their list. I don't think we need to worry about this one way or the other at this point. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On 13 August 2010 22:05, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote: Oracle is only suing Google because Google is redistributing Java without paying them, and because they're using a modified version (so technically they're not covered by the patent grants), and because Google has deep pockets. It's pretty implausible that they'll sue users and developers directly. If they do, Wikimedia has little enough money to be extremely low on their list. I don't think we need to worry about this one way or the other at this point. I wasn't aware of if we can probably get away with it in the WMF guidelines regarding free software. - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: I wasn't aware of if we can probably get away with it in the WMF guidelines regarding free software. If software is non-free just because someone files patent suits against those who use it, then Linux is non-free also. Microsoft has claimed for years to have patents that make it illegal to redistribute Linux without its permission, and it has sued one company (TomTom) on those grounds. Likewise, Apple recently sued HTC on a theory that boils down to the claim that probably all web browsers infringe its patents, IIRC. How is this different from Oracle suing Google? Almost all software might theoretically be covered by someone's patents, but practically speaking, that doesn't make it non-free. It's still free as long as modified versions can be widely disseminated in practice, and that's still the case for Java up until Oracle starts collecting royalties as a matter of course. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
On 13 August 2010 22:25, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote: Almost all software might theoretically be covered by someone's patents, but practically speaking, that doesn't make it non-free. It's still free as long as modified versions can be widely disseminated in practice, and that's still the case for Java up until Oracle starts collecting royalties as a matter of course. OK. Nevertheless, I would really strongly suggest planning a firm escape route as soon as possible. - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
David Gerard wrote: On 13 August 2010 22:05, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote: Oracle is only suing Google because Google is redistributing Java without paying them, and because they're using a modified version (so technically they're not covered by the patent grants), and because Google has deep pockets. It's pretty implausible that they'll sue users and developers directly. If they do, Wikimedia has little enough money to be extremely low on their list. I don't think we need to worry about this one way or the other at this point. I wasn't aware of if we can probably get away with it in the WMF guidelines regarding free software. But the first half of Aryeh's first sentence (Oracle is only suing... not covered by the patent grants) stands alone. Unless we're afraid that Oracle is going to start going after anyone who uses Java in any way, we shouldn't have to worry. (We're not redistributing JDK's, let alone modifying them.) ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
If software is non-free just because someone files patent suits against those who use it, then Linux is non-free also. Microsoft has claimed for years to have patents that make it illegal to redistribute Linux without its permission, and it has sued one company (TomTom) on those grounds. Likewise, Apple recently sued HTC on a theory that boils down to the claim that probably all web browsers infringe its patents, IIRC. How is this different from Oracle suing Google? Almost all software might theoretically be covered by someone's patents, but practically speaking, that doesn't make it non-free. It's still free as long as modified versions can be widely disseminated in practice, and that's still the case for Java up until Oracle starts collecting royalties as a matter of course. Exactly. We better start planning our route away from PHP, it may have technology patented in Java, and we all know how Oracle loves to sue. -- Ryan Lane ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] So, Java.
OK. Nevertheless, I would really strongly suggest planning a firm escape route as soon as possible. Why? The Java we use is GPL licensed. As long as we use a JDK/VM that is open, we are good. -- Ryan Lane ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
