Re: [Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-21 Thread Patrick Reilly
I can remove it.

— Patrick

On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
 ScientiaMobile basically took an open data repository and closed it, the
 complete opposite of what the WMF is trying to do. I'd strongly suggest
 looking for real Open solutions like OpenDDR/DeviceMap
 
 And apparently they've been trying to take down legitimate copies, too:
 http://openddr.org/takedown.html
 
 Yikes, that's evil. To the extent we're relying on it today, we should
 move off it ASAP.
 
 -- 
 Erik Möller
 VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
 
 Support Free Knowledge: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
 
 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-21 Thread Diederik van Liere
I am in touch with the core developers of the Apache Devicemap project
and we are exploring the possibility of collaborating. If something
comes out of this exploration then I will announce it here.
Best,
Diederik


On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Patrick Reilly prei...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 I can remove it.

 — Patrick

 On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
 ScientiaMobile basically took an open data repository and closed it, the
 complete opposite of what the WMF is trying to do. I'd strongly suggest
 looking for real Open solutions like OpenDDR/DeviceMap

 And apparently they've been trying to take down legitimate copies, too:
 http://openddr.org/takedown.html

 Yikes, that's evil. To the extent we're relying on it today, we should
 move off it ASAP.

 --
 Erik Möller
 VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation

 Support Free Knowledge: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-20 Thread Kevin Israel
Our MobileFrontend extension, which is currently deployed on Wikimedia
sites, uses WURFL to detect the mobile devices it targets. However, I
recently became aware the version of the WURFL data files we use has a
rather restrictive license.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wmlprogramming/message/34311

The license seems to suggest we are not even supposed to redistribute
verbatim copies or install the data files on multiple servers rather
than only making [...] one copy [...], if not merely fail to grant
such permission. Currently, the files are in our Subversion repository
and are going to end up in Git soon.

I am not a lawyer, and I realize this is probably a matter for the
Wikimedia Foundation to handle, albeit one of urgent importance to us.
If I am not mistaken, proper removal of infringing material from Git
repositories is somewhat painful in that it causes all child SHA-1
hashes to change, so I feel resolution of the above licensing concern
blocks Git migration of at least the MobileFrontend extension.

-- 
Wikipedia user PleaseStand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PleaseStand

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-20 Thread Diederik van Liere
Yes, ScientiaMobile has made some very important changes to the
license and it does mean (AFAIK) that you cannot store the wurfl.xml
in a repository.

This paragraph is particularly important:

You are not authorized to create a derivative work of or otherwise modify
this WURFL file, and you are further not authorized to use, copy, display,
or distribute, in each case, any derivative work of this WURFL file,
whether created by you or someone else.

I think it's best with waiting to put the file in git and I'll forward
this question to the legal team.

Best,
Diederik


On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Kevin Israel pleasest...@live.com wrote:
 Our MobileFrontend extension, which is currently deployed on Wikimedia
 sites, uses WURFL to detect the mobile devices it targets. However, I
 recently became aware the version of the WURFL data files we use has a
 rather restrictive license.

 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wmlprogramming/message/34311

 The license seems to suggest we are not even supposed to redistribute
 verbatim copies or install the data files on multiple servers rather
 than only making [...] one copy [...], if not merely fail to grant
 such permission. Currently, the files are in our Subversion repository
 and are going to end up in Git soon.

 I am not a lawyer, and I realize this is probably a matter for the
 Wikimedia Foundation to handle, albeit one of urgent importance to us.
 If I am not mistaken, proper removal of infringing material from Git
 repositories is somewhat painful in that it causes all child SHA-1
 hashes to change, so I feel resolution of the above licensing concern
 blocks Git migration of at least the MobileFrontend extension.

 --
 Wikipedia user PleaseStand
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PleaseStand

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-20 Thread Q
On 3/20/2012 11:35 PM, Diederik van Liere wrote:
 Yes, ScientiaMobile has made some very important changes to the
 license and it does mean (AFAIK) that you cannot store the wurfl.xml
 in a repository.

ScientiaMobile basically took an open data repository and closed it, the
complete opposite of what the WMF is trying to do. I'd strongly suggest
looking for real Open solutions like OpenDDR/DeviceMap

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] WURFL licensing concerns and Git migration

2012-03-20 Thread Erik Moeller
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
 ScientiaMobile basically took an open data repository and closed it, the
 complete opposite of what the WMF is trying to do. I'd strongly suggest
 looking for real Open solutions like OpenDDR/DeviceMap

And apparently they've been trying to take down legitimate copies, too:
http://openddr.org/takedown.html

Yikes, that's evil. To the extent we're relying on it today, we should
move off it ASAP.

-- 
Erik Möller
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation

Support Free Knowledge: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l