TTYDRV woes :/
Heyas, Firstly, (for those of you who really care - or who even have a clue who I am.)... I'm back again, and ready for some wine action :) Anyway I'm having a bit of a problem with *running* wine stuff - more specifically TTYDRV... I'm getting lots of messages like fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_CreateWindow (10045): stub (obviously with different actual functions blah blah...) And I have no idea... And yes, before you ask, I am running this in X :) - I've tried CVS, i've tried compiling from a tar.gz, i've tried RPM's, and all seem to produce the same result. I'm using the latest nVidia drivers (from www.nvidia.com) if that would make any difference. Anyone else experienced this problem? Thanks, Kye Lewis = [EMAIL PROTECTED] or, if that doesn't work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] will!
Win2000 Conformance R3:
=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=BorderWidth, testValue=7, value=
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=BorderWidth, testValue=20, value=
sysparams.c:406:testing SPI_{GET,SET}KEYBOARDSPEED
sysparams.c:139: Test failed: Missed a message: change_counter=2
sysparams.c:440:testing SPI_ICONHORIZONTALSPACING
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconSpacing, testValue=101, value=
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconSpacing, testValue=32, value=
sysparams.c:480:testing SPI_{GET,SET}SCREENSAVETIMEOUT
sysparams.c:515:testing SPI_{GET,SET}SCREENSAVEACTIVE
sysparams.c:555:testing SPI_{GET,SET}KEYBOARDDELAY
sysparams.c:590:testing SPI_ICONVERTICALSPACING
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconVerticalSpacing, testValue=101, value=
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconVerticalSpacing, testValue=32, value=
sysparams.c:635:testing SPI_{GET,SET}ICONTITLEWRAP
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconTitleWrap, testValue=1, value=
sysparams.c:170: Test failed: Wrong value in registry: subKey=Control Panel\Desktop,
valName=IconTitleWrap, testValue=0, value=
sysparams.c:670:testing SPI_{GET,SET}MENUDROPALIGNMENT
sysparams.c:707:testing SPI_SETDOUBLECLKWIDTH
sysparams.c:738:testing SPI_SETDOUBLECLKHEIGHT
sysparams.c:770:testing SPI_SETDOUBLECLICKTIME
sysparams.c:817:testing SPI_SETMOUSEBUTTONSWAP
sysparams.c:880:testing SPI_{GET,SET}DRAGFULLWINDOWS
sysparams.c:915:testing SPI_{GET,SET}WORKAREA
sysparams.c:953:testing SPI_{GET,SET}SHOWSOUNDS
sysparams.c:997:testing SPI_{GET,SET}DESKWALLPAPER
sysparams: 318 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 12 failures.
win.c:132:main window 000202D2 main2 000202C8 desktop 0001000C child 000202C6
win.c:148:created child 000202C4
win.c:161:created child of desktop 000302C4
win.c:171:created child of child 000402C4
win.c:181:created top-level 000502C4
win.c:191:created owned top-level 000602C4
win.c:201:created popup 000702C4
win.c:211:created owned popup 000802C4
win.c:221:created top-level owned by child 000902C4
win.c:227:created popup owned by desktop 000A02C4
win.c:233:created popup owned by child 000B02C4
win.c:239:created WS_CHILD popup 000C02C4
win.c:245:created owned WS_CHILD popup 000D02C4
win.c:250:testing parent changes
win.c:262:created child 000E02C4
win.c:288:created top-level 000F02C4
win.c:305:created popup 001002C4
win.c:322:created child 001102C4
win.c:339:created top-level 001202C4
win.c:348:created owned popup 001302C4
win.c:364:created owner 001402C4 and popup 000202C2
win.c:378:created owner 000302C2 and popup 001502C4
win.c:386:created owner 000402C2 and popup 001602C4
win: 428 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
wsprintf: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
=== wininet_test ===
generated: 252 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
(Lines removed...)
http.c:172: Test failed: InternetQueryDataAvailable failed
(Lines Removed...)
http: 28 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure.
=== winmm_test ===
wave: 149 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
=== ws2_32_test
sock: 286 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
Thanks,
Kye Lewis
LinksOS Project Administrator
LinksOS Web Team Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(New email address! [EMAIL PROTECTED] still work, but please send all emails
now to new email)
640k ought to be enough for anyone!
- Bill Gates
=
LinksOS: Linking you to the world
http://linksos.cjb.net
http://linksos.sourceforge.net/
http://linksos.oxygen-x.net/
Now with Bugzilla and phpBB installed :)
=
XP Conformance Test Results: Round 3...
failed: d is 8.76543e+007, should be cvt. to 8.765432e+07, but return val is 8.765432E+07 vartest.c:2438: Test failed: d is -8.76543e+007, should be cvt. to -8.765432e+07, but return val is -8.765432E+07 vartest.c:2432: Test failed: d is 9.87654e+008, should be cvt. to 9.876543e+08, but return val is 9.876543E+08 vartest.c:2438: Test failed: d is -9.87654e+008, should be cvt. to -9.876543e+08, but return val is -9.876543E+08 vartest.c:2432: Test failed: d is 1.98765e+009, should be cvt. to 1.987654e+09, but return val is 1.987654E+09 vartest.c:2438: Test failed: d is -1.98765e+009, should be cvt. to -1.987654e+09, but return val is -1.987654E+09 vartest.c:2493: Testing Hi-Level Variant API vartest.c:2560: Test failed: should be 5/11/94 7:58:42 AM vartest.c:2578:-- Testing different VARTYPES vartest: 2281 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 55 failures. === rpcrt4_test === rpc: 901 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. === shell32_test === generated: 272 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. shlfileop.c:120: Test failed: Deletion was successful shlfileop.c:122: Test failed: File should be removed shlfileop.c:124: Test failed: Directory exists, but is not removed shlfileop.c:129: Test failed: Directory removed shlfileop.c:130: Test failed: Directory should be removed shlfileop.c:132: Test failed: The requested file does not exist shlfileop.c:286: Test failed: Files are copied to other directory shlfileop.c:287: Test failed: The file is copied shlfileop.c:316: Test failed: Files and directories are moved to directory shlfileop.c:317: Test failed: The file is moved shlfileop.c:318: Test failed: The directory is moved shlfileop.c:319: Test failed: The file in subdirectory is moved shlfileop: 121 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 12 failures. === shlwapi_test === clist.c:367: Test failed: allowed bad element size clist.c:372: Test failed: allowed adding a container clist: 236 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures. generated: 19 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. shreg.c:171: Test failed: (44,43) shreg.c:195: Test failed: (44,43) shreg.c:205: Test failed: () shreg.c:206: Test failed: () shreg.c:207: Test failed: (44,43) shreg.c:218: Test failed: (44,43) shreg.c:240: Test failed: didn't open dest shreg: 39 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 7 failures. === urlmon_test === generated: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. === user32_test === class: 80 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. generated: 1524 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. Sysparams: win: 428 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. wsprintf: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. === wininet_test === generated: 252 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. (Lines removed) http.c:172: Test failed: InternetQueryDataAvailable failed (Lots more lines removed) http: 25 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. === winmm_test === wave: 149 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. === ws2_32_test === sock: 128 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. Thanks, Kye Lewis LinksOS Project Administrator LinksOS Web Team Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] (New email address! [EMAIL PROTECTED]will still work, but please send all emails now to new email) 640k ought to be enough for anyone! - Bill Gates = LinksOS: Linking you to the world http://linksos.cjb.net http://linksos.sourceforge.net/ http://linksos.oxygen-x.net/ Now with Bugzilla and phpBB installed :) =
RE: Win2000 Conformance Test Results...
XP Results Round 2: ** If a test is not listed here, then it has passed ** advapi32_test registry: No Change Note: Test now always has 3 failures, No cases of more failures are apparent. kernel32_test process: No Change netapi32_test access: No Change shell32_test shfileop: No Change user32_test sysparams: No Change Thanks, Kye Lewis LinksOS Project Administrator LinksOS Web Team Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] (New email address! [EMAIL PROTECTED] will still work, but please send all emails now to new email) 640k ought to be enough for anyone! - Bill Gates = LinksOS: Linking you to the world http://linksos.cjb.net http://linksos.sourceforge.net/ http://linksos.oxygen-x.net/ Now with Bugzilla and phpBB installed :) = -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Francois Gouget Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 8:58 AM To: David Fraser Cc: Kye Lewis; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Win2000 Conformance Test Results... Hmmm, I meant to send this two days ago... On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David Fraser wrote: [...] for kernel32_test path, I got this additional error (before all the others) I have made tons of fixes to the kernel/path test and it should now work much better. I just uploaded the new version of the tests compiled from my sources. One can download them from the usual URL: http://fgouget.free.fr/wine/winetests.zip [...] process: 116 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 4 failures. Exactly the same except I have 10 messages interspersed with these, saying: tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. Why these extra messages? Because this executable invokes itself to test CreateProcess. And each time it exits it prints statistics about how many tests passed and failed, although the child processes are not actually performing any test. So these messages can be ignored. h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:218: Test failed: (6) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:219: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:220: Test failed: (3435973836) [...] Same but I get 0 for all your 3435973836 which is 0x. Must be a debug/release build thing - variable not being initialized. Should not be the case. The code does: dwType = -1; dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, Test3, NULL, dwType, NULL, dwSize); ok( dwType == REG_SZ, (%lu) , dwType); So we should either get -1 or something that makes sense, not 0x. This needs to be investigated more. Should we print out some of these results in hex as well to make life easier? We should print them in just one format, decimal or hex, whichever makes more sense. I will now be concentrating on working out what is wrong with these tests :) Yep, I think this is priority number one now. Running the tests on more platforms would only return pretty much the same list of bugs again and again. -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://fgouget.free.fr/ Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. -- from some indian guy
advapi32_test registry 3 errors vs 31 errors
Hi, Just ran the conformance tests on my laptop: The first time I went through I got 3 errors, the second time I got 31 So I get the feeling that one of the tests (maybe even that one) is doing something weird. Im on a quest now to find out which one (if any!) Thanks, Kye Lewis You can reach me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at most times [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alternative email
RE: advapi32_test registry 3 errors vs 31 errors
Looks like it's: shlwapi_test.exe shreg that has a problem. Any easy way of narrowing down even further (ie. Running the individual tests separately?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kye Lewis Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: advapi32_test registry 3 errors vs 31 errors Hi, Just ran the conformance tests on my laptop: The first time I went through I got 3 errors, the second time I got 31 So I get the feeling that one of the tests (maybe even that one) is doing something weird. Im on a quest now to find out which one (if any!) Thanks, Kye Lewis You can reach me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at most times [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alternative email
WinXP Test Oddities (Changed Test Results!!)
Hi, I ran the advapi32_test registry again today, and only received 3 errors: h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' This seems very strange to me. I ran the test at first because I thought it might have been a matter of long file names, but then when I moved it back I found it wasnt, there was just something weird happening instead. Ill try to reproduce the other errors tonight if I can, and if I am successful I will post the results to the wine-devel group. David Miller, you also received 31 errors for this test, yes? Could you test again straight after a computer reboot? Thanks, Kye Lewis You can reach me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at most times [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alternative email
RE: Janitorial Projects -- conformance tests --recruiting volunteers
C:\Downloads\Linuxadvapi32_test.exe registry h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 3 failures. It is here that I notice a large discrepancy between this test and my test on the same Operating System: h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:80: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:81: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:94: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:95: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:108: Test failed: data_count set to24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:109: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:122: Test failed: data_count set to24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:123: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:134: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:135: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:136: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:137: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:138: Test failed: value is 'xx' instead of Test h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:139: Test failed: data is 'xx' instead of foobar h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:155: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:156: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:169: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:170: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:182: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:183: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:184: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:185: Test failed: value is not 'Test' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:195: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:196: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:197: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:198: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:199: Test failed: value is not 'Test' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:200: Test failed: data is not 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 31 failures. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows XP Conformance Test results...
Hi, My Results using the batch file and Windows XP. If you need any more information about msvcrt_test crash, just ask. My desktop also becomes smaller after running user32_test sysparams, the approximate time of this is marked below in the appropriate section. These results are obtained with Windows XP Home advapi32_test h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:80: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:81: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:94: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:95: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:108: Test failed: data_count set to24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:109: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:122: Test failed: data_count set to24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:123: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:134: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:135: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:136: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:137: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:138: Test failed: value is 'xx' instead of Test h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:139: Test failed: data is 'xx' instead of foobar h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:155: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:156: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:169: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:170: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:182: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:183: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:184: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:185: Test failed: value is not 'Test' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:195: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:196: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:197: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:198: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:199: Test failed: value is not 'Test' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:200: Test failed: data is not 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 31 failures. kernel32_test alloc: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. atom: 229398 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. codepage: 2 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. directory: 48 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. drive: 156 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. environ: 39 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:578: Test failed: DeleteFile should fail with an empty path, and last error value should be ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:610:Current offset = 0015 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:635:Current offset = 0015 file: 487238 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. format_msg: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. generated: 609 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. locale: 54 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:927:TMP=C:\WINDOWS\TEMP h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:935:TMP=C:\WINDOWS h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:944:TMP=C:\ h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:954:TMP=C: h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:879: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 12, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:892: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 12, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:898: Test failed: win2000 BUG: should return path without terminating back slash path: 2083 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 3 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:374: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpDesktop expected (null), got WinSta0\Default h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:375: Test
RE: Janitorial Projects -- conformance tests --recruiting volunteers
Well I've got XP Home SP1 here, I'm not going to go through a complete lot of specifications without having some idea of what to look for though :) Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Francois Gouget [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 12:01 PM To: Kye Lewis Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Janitorial Projects -- conformance tests --recruiting volunteers On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Kye Lewis wrote: C:\Downloads\Linuxadvapi32_test.exe registry h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxx' instead of 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 3 failures. It is here that I notice a large discrepancy between this test and my test on the same Operating System: h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:80: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:81: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ [...] I guess that means the test makes assumptions that are not valid. It would be interesting to find out what the differences are between your bo and Alberto's: Home Edition vs. Profesional, internationaliztion issues, etc. Could it be that the test did not cleanup after itself and failed on the subsequent runs? Do we have a volunteer for untangling this? -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://fgouget.free.fr/ tcA thgirypoC muinelliM latigiD eht detaloiv tsuj evah uoY
Win2000 Conformance Test Results...
INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 0012EB30 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 0012EB14 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA -- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:140:Option 0x17 - 1 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:144:Option 0x22 - 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:149:Option 0x16 - 1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 05:01:55 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4. 1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Content-Type: text/html X-Cache: MISS from cache3.net2000.com.au Connection: close h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:154:Option 0x22 - 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:158:Option 0x5 - 0 http://www.winehq.com/about/ (12150) h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:163:Option 0x1 - 1 text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:166:Entery Query loop h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 772 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 466 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 1460 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile - 1 447 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION(50) 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED(51) 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EBFC 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC0C 4 http: 28 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. winmm_test h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:56:found 1 WaveOut devices h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:82: 0: Sound Blaster 16 5.0 (1:100): channels=65535 formats=0fff support=002c h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:133:Testing invalid 2MHz format wave: 53 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. w2_32_test sock: 128 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. I will now be concentrating on working out what is wrong with these tests :) Thanks, Kye Lewis You can reach me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at most times [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alternative email
WinXP advapi32_test
Hi, It would seem to be that all advapi32_test is trying to do is overflow, and see if wine (or in this case windows) responds correctly. As far as I can see, there is currently no way that that test could *ever* work properly. Maybe I have an old version of this file? (Or maybe I'm missing something completely obvious) In the version of dlls/advapi32/tests/registry.c that I have, it puts xx into both value and data, and in *most* cases, expects either Test or foobar (or a truncated version depending on the other values) to be returned. How can Test OR foobar ever be returned from xx? It always seems to fail because of this. It expects a truncated word (because it's been overflowed) which is fair enough, but it expects Te for example, and gets xx instead, and this is why it seems to be failing these tests. Thanks, Kye Lewis You can reach me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at most times [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alternative email
RE: WineHQ FTP (ftp://ftp.winehq.com/pub/wine/)
Hi, It just seems odd, as this FTP site worked fine with internet explorer before. - no errors at all. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Matthews Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:32 PM To: wine devel Subject: Re: WineHQ FTP (ftp://ftp.winehq.com/pub/wine/) On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:29:09 +1100 Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, While trying to connect to the wineHQ ftp site, I am getting the following error with IE6: 200 Type set to A. 500 Illegal PORT command. 500 LPRT not understood Don't know about the last error, but the illegal PORT is typically seen when trying to use active FTP from behind a firewall that does not support it. Command-line MS FTP clients don't support passive mode and I have heard reports that IE does not also. If that is the problem you'll have to switch to a Linux box or find a windows FTP client that supports passive.
RE: WineHQ FTP (ftp://ftp.winehq.com/pub/wine/)
Hi, Has started working again for me - but I am still Puzzled as to what the problem was! Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gustavo Junior Alves Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:49 PM To: Keith Matthews Cc: wine devel Subject: Re: WineHQ FTP (ftp://ftp.winehq.com/pub/wine/) The command LPRT is used for ipv6 over FTP, but I don't know any FTP servers that allow this command, maybe oftpd. Keith Matthews wrote: On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:29:09 +1100 Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, While trying to connect to the wineHQ ftp site, I am getting the following error with IE6: 200 Type set to A. 500 Illegal PORT command. 500 LPRT not understood Don't know about the last error, but the illegal PORT is typically seen when trying to use active FTP from behind a firewall that does not support it. Command-line MS FTP clients don't support passive mode and I have heard reports that IE does not also. If that is the problem you'll have to switch to a Linux box or find a windows FTP client that supports passive.
WineHQ FTP (ftp://ftp.winehq.com/pub/wine/)
Hi, While trying to connect to the wineHQ ftp site, I am getting the following error with IE6: 200 Type set to A. 500 Illegal PORT command. 500 LPRT not understood I have tried several times unsuccessfully. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: games
Surely there is no reason that wine actually has to do these checks anyway - would it not be simply possible to say that the checks passed regardless? And even if we do decide to implement them, (I don't know the legal position on this - I'm not a lawyer or anything), I don't see why implementing copy protection code should be any different than the rest of the wine code - as long as we make it up ourselves, it should be legal (again, I'm not sure about this) Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Earthviewer 3D Setup
Hi, When I run the EarthViewer 3d setup (www.keyhole.com), wine tells me this: ERROR: You need to merge the 'winedefault.reg' file into your Wine registry by running: `regedit winedefault.reg' fixme:ole:_LocalServerThread CoMarshalInterface failed, 80070057! Can someone help me with the ERROR: part (typing that command tells me that winedefault.reg doesn't exist) It's an InstallShield Wizard - not sure what version, but it's a newer one - I would bet InstallShield 6. Wine Version is latest CVS. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing Applications
Hi, I've done a lot of testing different applications that I have (and checking on their progress with new wine versions) and I was wondering: Should I report every application that doesn't work as a separate bug? Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation Fault: A possibility???
Hi, Sorry for posting all of this to the wine-devel group continuously, but I may have found the problem (or I may not have) but either way I need some help. I have run wine --debugmsg +relay acrord32.exe and read the resulting file. The last thing that comes up is: wineoss.drv I had a quick look through the specific function's code (The actual log entry is: Call wineoss.drv.DriverProc(,403e2858,0001,,) ret=40c9d2b5 ) Recently in the KDE Control Panel's Sound options, I ticked the 'Use Full Duplex' option - and ever since that it hasn't worked. Could this have been the reason? I can't look and see if it was now, i'll have to restart linux, and right now i'm the internet server on the network - so no restarts for me :( -- Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation Fault
Oh, and one other thing. If I run the setup for who wants to beat up a millionaire (it's a WISE installer), the blue 'Initializing Wise Installation Wizard' screen comes up BEFORE wine faults. On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 21:14, Kye Lewis wrote: I don't know if this will help my Segmentation Fault at all, but when runing winedbg c:\\windows\\pbrush.exe, the Debugger actually waits for a command from me. If i take a step, it says: Single Stepping until exit from function, which has no line number information Stopped on breakpoint 1 at 0x0040100c (pbrush.exe.Entrypoint in c:\windows\pbrush.exe If i then step again Invalid address for breakpoint 0, disabling it . breakpoint 1 . . breakpoint 2 . Process of pid=0a24dbf0 has terminated a very odd thing happens if i run, and then step: another window pops up (gdb) and I get wine_dbg_cmd: Exception c0005 in the Wine Debugger the gdb window says 0x402e2b41 in nanosleep () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 and stepping in that window steps me through function nanosleep (?!?!?!) it would seem that it starts to debug wine itself! unfortunately, this window doesn't allow copy and paste, so i'll have to type it out for you (it may be a little incorrect): __errno_location () at errno.c:48 48 return wine_errno_location(); (gdb) step thread_errno_location () at ../../include/winnt.h:1717 1717__asm__(.byte 0x64\n\tmov1 (0x18),%0 : =r (teb)); (gdb) step Program recieved signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault thread_errno_location () at ../../include/winnt.h:1717 1717__asm__(.byte 0x64\n\tmov1 (0x18),%0 : =r (teb)); (gdb) step Program recieved signal SIGCONT, Continued 0x40305134 in read () from /lib/i686/lib.so.6 etc... etc... etc... and it goes through a whole heck of code... The only thing that comes up in the console is Can't attach process 8072d90: error 5 Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Segmentation Fault
Hi, Not really sure if this is the right place to post this, but as i'm signed up to it; My version of wine has suddenly started Seg Faulting on startup. The last thing I tried with wine was netmeeting. This is with cvs version from 26th October at about 2:00 Australian Eastern Standard Time ( not sure what that is GMT - it was about 5 hours before posting this message ) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Segmentation Fault
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:41, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Kye == Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kye Hi, Not really sure if this is the right place to post this, but as Kye i'm signed up to it; Kye My version of wine has suddenly started Seg Faulting on startup. The next thing you should try is a littel debugging, like running with relay messages or starting the application in winedbg or using strace on wine Hi, Firstly, I need to make sure it's clear that wine is Seg Faulting with any application I try to run with it I have tried re-compiling it (the version is the latest CVS), and i've tried following some of the recomended steps from the FAQomatic @ winehq - with no success Winedbg quits with: No debug information in xx No debug information in xx Invalid address for breakpoint 1, disabling it Invalid address for breakpoint 2, disabling it Process of pid=08444840 has terminated Any extra command-line options that I should put on winedbg to help find out the problem? Bye -- Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTECTED] Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt - Tel. 06151 162516 Fax. 06151 164321 --
Re: Segmentation Fault
Hi, Firstly, I need to make sure it's clear that wine is Seg Faulting with any application I try to run with it I have tried re-compiling it (the version is the latest CVS), and i've tried following some of the recomended steps from the FAQomatic @ winehq - with no success Winedbg quits with: No debug information in xx No debug information in xx Invalid address for breakpoint 1, disabling it Invalid address for breakpoint 2, disabling it Process of pid=08444840 has terminated Any extra command-line options that I should put on winedbg to help find out the problem? Just a little more info... Wine is working with notepad.exe, calc.exe, winhlp32.exe, and seemingly fine with console apps like ping.exe (eg. It doesn't segfault) Some applications (eg. pbrush.exe, write.exe) don't fault, they just quit silently back to the bash prompt But other apps like Acrobat Reader (acrord32.exe) and media player (mplayer.exe, mplayer2.exe and wmplayer.exe) ARE faulting. Only the first application in the session to fault says so - the rest just freeze after the 'See wine User guide...' text, and cannot be CTRL+C'd out of. As well, the wine processes in the background cannot be killed with a killall wine, however wineserver can.. Thanks, Kye Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
