Re: Doc building update, finally
- Original Message - From: Vincent Béron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dustin Navea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:54 PM Subject: Re: Doc building update, finally Dustin Navea wrote: Vincent, I finally got SGMLtools installed and went to build the doc. Only problem is that instead of it outputting to files it prints the output on screen. Is there a flag that I may be missing or what? I'm using SGMLTools pre-compiled and built.. Downloaded from ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/extra/sgml-tools-1.0 .9-i386.tgz and installed using pkgtool which comes with slackware.. -Dustin P.S. Any outputs you need say from man or --help on docbook2html? I'll download the package and check what's inside. It'll be less things sent by email ;) Don't expect an answer tomorrow though, it may take a few days because of Real Lide(tm). But I'll definetly look into it (could be the same problem as Joerg, which is that the options to specify a dsl file are different). I dont think its that, in fact I checked, -d specifies the dsl file, so Im not sure what it is, as soon as I get around to configuring Lin to use my new DSL I will check more into it.. Right now im on windows getting everything working there.. -Dustin
Re: Doc building update, finally
- Original Message - From: Vincent Béron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dustin Navea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:54 PM Subject: Re: Doc building update, finally Dustin Navea wrote: Vincent, I finally got SGMLtools installed and went to build the doc. Only problem is that instead of it outputting to files it prints the output on screen. Is there a flag that I may be missing or what? I'm using SGMLTools pre-compiled and built.. Downloaded from ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/extra/sgml-tools-1.0 .9-i386.tgz and installed using pkgtool which comes with slackware.. -Dustin P.S. Any outputs you need say from man or --help on docbook2html? I'll download the package and check what's inside. It'll be less things sent by email ;) Don't expect an answer tomorrow though, it may take a few days because of Real Lide(tm). But I'll definetly look into it (could be the same problem as Joerg, which is that the options to specify a dsl file are different). I dont think its that, in fact I checked, -d specifies the dsl file, so Im not sure what it is, as soon as I get around to configuring Lin to use my new DSL I will check more into it.. Right now im on windows getting everything working there.. -Dustin
[PATCH FINALLY FIXED] tools/wineconf
this works perfectly on my system too
added check for ntfs drives (in case it is drive c)
NOTE: if you have read/write on for NTFS (in your
kernel) i would not recommend using that as your c
drive. thats why the wineinstall script says you
should probably check the ~/.wine/config file anyways
added check for cdroms mounted at /cdrom to be
non-supermount (it got broken when i added the check
for supermount cdroms)
added supermount cdrom checking
NOTE: if you have more than 1 cdrom, make sure you
change the Device = line in ~/.wine.config for 1 of
the cdroms as the script says both cdroms are
/dev/cdrom
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
Name: tools_wineconf-dnavea-patch.diff
ModifiedFiles: tools/wineconf
ChangeLog: Add check for ntfs drives (wouldn't recommend writing to them
if you have it enabled tho), fixed check for non-supermount
cdroms mounted at /cdrom (only got broken when I added in
supermount checking), added supermount cdrom checking
===
--- tools/wineconf Sat Mar 9 18:24:22 2002
+++ /tmp/wineconf Tue Apr 23 18:50:41 2002
-93,13 +93,20
my ($device, $mntpoint, $type, rest) = split(' ', $_);
if ($device !~ m^/dev/fd) {
- if ($type eq msdos || $type eq vfat) {
+ if ($type eq ntfs) {
+ push(::FatDrives, [$device, $mntpoint, 'win95']);
+ }
+ elsif ($type eq msdos || $type eq vfat) {
push(::FatDrives, [$device, $mntpoint, $type]);
}
elsif ($type eq iso9660 ||
- $mntpoint eq /cdrom ||
+ ($mntpoint eq /cdrom ! $type eq 'supermount') ||
($device eq '/dev/cdrom' $type eq 'auto') ) {
push(::CdromDrives, [$device, $mntpoint, 'win95']);
+ }
+ elsif ( ($mntpoint eq '/mnt/cdrom' || $mntpoint eq '/cdrom')
+ $type eq 'supermount') {
+ push(::CdromDrives, [ '/dev/cdrom', $mntpoint, 'win95']);
}
}
}
Re: [PATCH UPDATE] tools/wineshelllink *METHOD 4*
--- Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Speeddymon wrote: + if [ -d /usr/lib/menu -a $mode = menu -a ! `whoami` = root ] + then [...] + elif [ `whoami` = root ] + then +mdk_entry /usr/lib/menu/wine + fi Sorry, I haven't been following this but isn't the elif condition redundant? not really, because what it says is: if /usr/lib/menu is a directory and $mode is menu and i am NOT root then su to root and run this command else if i AM root then just run this command if that elif were an else then the command would be run for example if /usr/lib/menu isn't a directory or if the mode isnt menu Also, AFAIK although its unusual, there's no reason an account name cannot have a space in it, so `whoami` should be `whoami` only reason it is `whoami` instead of `whoami` is because i copied it from the wineinstall script, so just for the sake of argument and not having to have someone change it in all of the scripts, i left it like that... [spent too much time debugging strings in scripts ;^] same here, thats why im contributing... __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: [PATCH] ./tools/wineinstall *correct (.diff) format*
What actually happened is that $libdir was already in ld.so.conf, so the script did NOT add it, and therefore, it did NOT run ldconfig. This strategy works when one upgrades modules with identical names, but not when modules are renamed, as was the case with libntdll.dll.so replacing libntdll.so. The line in wineinstall which controls this behavior is: if [ -f /etc/ld.so.conf ] ! grep -qs $libdir /etc/ld.so.conf -- Chuck Crayne Ok, so now I'm wondering who set it up to not run ldconfig if $libdir is in there... I will fix that in a minute and submit the patch later today... __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: [PATCH] ./tools/wineinstall *correct (.diff) format*
--- Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :I'm thinking maybe it added $libdir to ld.so.conf but :didnt run ldconfig... ? What about simply setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Martin I would except that I was installing in the default dirs...(i.e. --prefix=/usr/local) etc, so there was no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
--- Rizsanyi Zsolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2002 19:51, Speeddymon wrote: what i was saying before though was that the windows link files (.lnk extension) weren't being put into the kde menu, i believe it is a bug/problem in 20020411 wine mainly due to that fact that that wine wouldn't install the icons but crossover office wine would...who knows, all is well now on my computer though. thanks for the help guys. The wineshelllink (the script responsible for installing the lnk files in the desktop menu) in the cvs wine assumes, that if you have a .kde directory in your home, then you have kde 1.x installed. And install kde 2.x files only if you have a .kde2 directory in your home folder. But on some systems (eg. RedHat), the kde config files are in .kde in home directory. That is the reason why the .desktop files are not installed on some systems. I have fixed wineshelllink in my cvs copy of wine, but never submitted it, because, I'm not really sure how to fix it to work on all the systems (I dont know how the other packagers do it). But if somebody needs, it I'm attaching the patch... Best regards Zsolt Rizsanyi hmm that has me wondering... i will take a look at that tonight as i will have more time then (just gonna run home to get my zip disk right now) and see what I can come up with in terms of having wineshelllink finding the correct version. we may need to remove the direcory checking stuff altogether... i have a couple ideas... 1) explicitly ask them for their kde version the first time wineshelllink is run (but then they would have to manually change the version number if they upgrade it) 2) always ask what the version # is... 3) read a file created by kde that has the version # in it (if one exists) 4) run some kde command with the --version arg and use it's output to get the kde version if possible 1 and 2 could be implemented directly in bash but then you have the problem of what if it doesn't get run in a terminal, so you could also have someone make a gtk/tk program that asks and is called from wineshelllink or you could do both and have 1 run if $display is set and the other one run if it isn't... just some thoughts... -Dustin __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
> I dont think you should go by asking the user. You > cant be sure, if he knows > it right. The question is not only about its kde > version, but also the > directory of his config files... which config files would you be referring to? > > Besides, this script is not intended to ask for user > input. > > You will be better of, if you just fix my patch, to > not copy to .kde by > default, but check if there exists a .kde2 and in > that case to copy there. > Actually I decided not to ask for the user input after all, instead it runs kded -v (if kded exists since i wasn't sure if kde 1.x had it or not) and greps the output for KDE: and sed's that to remove the KDE: (so that just the version number is there) and then writes that to /tmp/kdever if /tmp/kdever doesn't exist then it proceeds like it would have before my patch if it does, it sed's the number in there for the first part of that number (1 or 2) and uses that to determine if you are running kde1 or kde2 if you are running kde1 then it proceeds with the kde1 install, if you are running kde2 with the .kde dir it proceeds with kde2 install and if you are running kde2 with .kde2 dir it also proceeds with kde2 install i also figured out why things weren't being added to the k menu in mandrake...if you use the mandrake-style the k menu (as opposed to the default style) it stores the menu config files in /usr/share/menu instead of ~/.menu so i fixed it so that the menu configs are copied to both locations and everything seems to work well now. my only concern is if the 1st part of the fix (the one mentioned in the previous paragraph) will work on redhat or not, seeing as i dont know whether the menu configs are stored in ~/.menu or /usr/share/menu. Anyone that cares to test it out and let me know, feel free.. > You should not make that script to cope with every > possible setup. That would > be an overkill. > You should just make it to work with all the major > distros. > Other distros, and individuals with special setup > should change the > wineshelllink before installing or packaging. > see response above > At most you could make tools/wineinstall ask for the > needed info and generate > wineshellink according to it. I like this idea... that may or may not be needed, depending on the outcome of a redhat tester > > Best regards > Zsolt Rizsanyi thanks, and you too :) the patch is in the next message Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
Well, I did use crossover office last night and everything turned out beautifully. Hell when I used that it also helped me (indirectly) to find the icon for loki's port of unreal tournament, so i now have that in my kde menu. what i was saying before though was that the windows link files (.lnk extension) weren't being put into the kde menu, i believe it is a bug/problem in 20020411 wine mainly due to that fact that that wine wouldn't install the icons but crossover office wine would...who knows, all is well now on my computer though. thanks for the help guys. --- Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 22 April 2002 23:48, Speeddymon wrote: no, in the installer its the .lnk files (windows link files) that aren't being copied from the cd (or being converted to .desktop files) or something at any rate tho, they never showed up in my kde menu or on my desktop... so theres probably a problem in wine somewhere. I will try crossover office tonight to see if it installs the files or not... and post back tomorrow Check it on your .kde directory - they should be there. I'm running crossover office and they're appearing quite well. Thanks, Hetz __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: small patch for ./tools/wineinstall
alright thanks, the reason i thought you needed internet/cvs was because of the way that the winehq patch-making page was worded...it says to use cvs diff (instead of regular diff). I thoguht that there may be a difference in the 2, so I didnt want to make the diffs with diff when they required cvs diff. But now that I know, i will submit in diff format... Maybe the winehq site maintainer (alexandre?) could make that a little more clear (for us patch-contributing newbies/relative newbies) --- Tony Lambregts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speeddymon wrote: as I have said a couple times, i dont have any way to make the proper diff's due to the fact that I have no internet at home, thanks again for making them for me, I will be submitting the 2 diff's tomorrow (can't do it here due to the fact that this computer is at compusa and has downloading disabled) Would there be anyone willing to make diff's for me when I have a patch to post? if so, could you please email me directly so I know who to talk to? Thanks in advance Well I would be glad to make diffs for you but it really is not required that you have CVS or the Internet to make propper diffs. diff -u wineinstall.old wineinstall wineinstall.dif Where wineinstall.old is the original file (that you saved somewhere or got from the tarball) and wineinstall is the file with your changes. man diff will give you more information but thats about all that you need to know. You can edit the wineinstall.dif to get rid of the .old extention but I'm not sure its required. I guess to be on the safe side I would get rid of it. Tony Lambregts PS: dont feel too bad there are tons of stuff that I don't know either. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: [PATCH] ./tools/wineinstall *correct (.diff) format*
well something isn't right with the current wineinstall, because I installed wine to the default directories, and it wasn't finding libntdll.dll.so until after I added $libdir/wine. I'm not sure why that happened, I will do some checking tonight and find out why it wasn't finding the file. I'm thinking maybe it added $libdir to ld.so.conf but didnt run ldconfig... ? I will check that out tonight and a couple other possibilities and let you know the outcome tomorrow... --- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $libdir/wine must not be added to ld.so.conf. Users have to set the WINEDLLPATH variable if Wine is not installed in the directory that was specified with --prefix (which shouldn't happen with wineinstall). -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
I use mandrake 8.2, so the cdrom is mounted with supermount, but i will try that tonight and see what happens -Dustin --- Gustavo Junior Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The install is from a cdrom? You tried mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom -o unhide Gustavo Speeddymon wrote: I just recently installed wine-20020411 (as you may have noticed from my patch) I haven't tried installing Office 2000 on previous versions, but heard that it worked, so I decided to try it. First I tried it in Crossover Office (since i just recently got that also) and the Office 2000 installer complained that it couldnt find a package to install on the installation media. So I tried it in wine and it did the same thing... There were no debug messages or anything (in the console). If anyone knows of a way around this, please let me know... If it has been mentioned before please point me to the right wine-devel archive so I can find it... Thanks, Dustin __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
actually i did manage to get it work work from the cd, you have to explicitly specify the -o unhide command when you run mount or put the unhide command in your /etc/fstab... as for the files not getting written, i had the same problem, it is the .lnk files (that i assume go in the start menu on windows)...i am thinking that they aren't being properly converted to .desktop files or something. I will try installing with crossover office tonight and post the results tomorrow -Dustin --- Rizsanyi Zsolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 17 April 2002 21:42, Speeddymon wrote: I just recently installed wine-20020411 (as you may have noticed from my patch) I haven't tried installing Office 2000 on previous versions, but heard that it worked, so I decided to try it. First I tried it in Crossover Office (since i just recently got that also) and the Office 2000 installer complained that it couldnt find a package to install on the installation media. So I tried it in wine and it did the same thing... There were no debug messages or anything (in the console). If anyone knows of a way around this, please let me know... If it has been mentioned before please point me to the right wine-devel archive so I can find it... I have also dared to try to install office2k, and had the same problem. But I have found a workaround... When the installation fails, the MSI installer is already copied to your windows directory (I think its name is installmsi.exe or something like that - I dont have it at hand). So I have tried to invoke it with the msi file in the root of the CD (the data1.msi or something like that - the other msi is something else). This way the installation started. The configuration of what programs to install worked perfectly, but when copying the files the installer broke, and said that it can't write a file. I dont know what was the problem. I had enough space, the persmissions were ok, and so on. I have tried again, and the installer broke again but now with a different file. So I give up, since I don't really need it to install, just I wanted to see what the people are talking about... But if you find a solution (or submit a patch :), then I will be interested... Best regards, Zsolt Rizsanyi __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
RE: bug?
actually its a typo in wineinstall, find the line that says: if ! su root -c$sucommand and put a space between -c and $sucommand i.e. make it: if ! su root -c $sucommand --- Medland, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Rikard Björklind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 5:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug? Hi, I tried to use ./tools/wineinstall: Performing 'make install' as root to install binaries, enter root password Password: [here I wrote the password] /bin/bash: - : unrecognized option What's wrong? Probably failed to run the ldconfig. Check the /etc/ld.so.conf to see that the location of the wine lib directory is included (probably /usr/local/lib) and su root and run /sbin/ldconfig. Bill __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Re: Installing MS Office gives error in installer
no, in the installer its the .lnk files (windows link files) that aren't being copied from the cd (or being converted to .desktop files) or something at any rate tho, they never showed up in my kde menu or on my desktop... so theres probably a problem in wine somewhere. I will try crossover office tonight to see if it installs the files or not... and post back tomorrow --- Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 22 April 2002 23:01, Speeddymon wrote: actually i did manage to get it work work from the cd, you have to explicitly specify the -o unhide command when you run mount or put the unhide command in your /etc/fstab... as for the files not getting written, i had the same problem, it is the .lnk files (that i assume go in the start menu on windows)...i am thinking that they aren't being properly converted to .desktop files or something. I will try installing with crossover office tonight and post the results tomorrow -Dustin Those .lnk files (you probably mean .kdelnk files) suppose to appear on your K menu if you're using KDE. If you still don't see them after a minute or two then run manually: kbuildsycoca Thanks, Hetz __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
Installing MS Office gives error in installer
I just recently installed wine-20020411 (as you may have noticed from my patch) I haven't tried installing Office 2000 on previous versions, but heard that it worked, so I decided to try it. First I tried it in Crossover Office (since i just recently got that also) and the Office 2000 installer complained that it couldnt find a package to install on the installation media. So I tried it in wine and it did the same thing... There were no debug messages or anything (in the console). If anyone knows of a way around this, please let me know... If it has been mentioned before please point me to the right wine-devel archive so I can find it... Thanks, Dustin __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
*update*: fixed tools/wineconf and tools/wineinstall
ok guys, I know some of you are going to flame me for my post to wine-patches, but I can explain...I did rtfm (the patch submitting archive) for the format of submitting a patch, but I have no internet at home my college's computers are all windows-only, so please, forgive me for sending the whole files and not just 2 patch files... __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
