> sdk's windbg already work, so why no VC++ debugger ?
Then we'll probably have to implement NtQueryInformationProcess completely
for ProcessDebugPort. Does anyone know what it should return ? The debugger
process handle ?
> btw, your patch will not compile (ret/retv)
Sorry, I sent the wrong file. Here's the correct version.
Laurent Pinchart
--- nt.c 9 Mar 2002 23:39:09 - 1.38
+++ nt.c 2 Apr 2002 21:59:41 -
@@ -116,15 +116,34 @@
IN ULONG ProcessInformationLength,
OUT PULONG ReturnLength)
{
- FIXME("(0x%08x,0x%08x,%p,0x%08lx,%p),stub!\n",
- ProcessHandle,ProcessInformationClass,ProcessInformation,ProcessInformationLength,ReturnLength
- );
- /* "These are not the debuggers you are looking for." */
- if (ProcessInformationClass == ProcessDebugPort)
- /* set it to 0 aka "no debugger" to satisfy copy protections */
- memset(ProcessInformation,0,ProcessInformationLength);
+ NTSTATUS ret = STATUS_SUCCESS;
+ ULONG len = 0;
- return 0;
+ switch (ProcessInformationClass) {
+ case ProcessDebugPort:
+ /* "These are not the debuggers you are looking for." */
+ /* set it to 0 aka "no debugger" to satisfy copy protections */
+ if (ProcessInformationLength == 4)
+ {
+ memset(ProcessInformation,0,ProcessInformationLength);
+ len = 4;
+ }
+ else
+ ret = STATUS_INFO_LENGTH_MISMATCH;
+ break;
+ default:
+ FIXME("(0x%08x,0x%08x,%p,0x%08lx,%p),stub!\n",
+ ProcessHandle,ProcessInformationClass,
+ ProcessInformation,ProcessInformationLength,
+ ReturnLength
+ );
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (ReturnLength)
+ *ReturnLength = len;
+
+ return ret;
}
/**
