Re: unix filenames in notepad
Hi,
nice!
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Desktop\Namespace\{CC702EB2-7DC5-11D9-C687-0004238A01CD}]
@=My Unix Filesystem
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ShellExtensions]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ShellExtensions\Approved]
{CC702EB2-7DC5-11D9-C687-0004238A01CD}=My UNIX Filesystem
Now what? Is it UNIX or Unix?
I'd much prefer Unix, BTW, since it's not an acronym AFAIK.
Andreas Mohr
Re: Hierarchical namespace for tests
Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Monday 25 April 2005 16:18, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hopefully not a controversial one [...] The problem with this is that the result is not a valid path, which breaks tools that parse the output to let you jump to the error, like emacs compile mode. OK, I didn't realise people were automatically passing these strings. In principle, one can reconstruct the path from the test-name by sticking dlls and tests in the right places. Presumably emacs (or whatever) can be taught these tricks, so one could display the tests as ole32%moniker.c:123 (just to avoid the / character) and have emacs link to dlls/ole32/tests/moniker.c:123 Alternatively, we can store the full path and have the test name-space coincident with the filesystem, which is the simplest but (slightly wasteful) solution. What would people prefer? I'd prefer you don't break tools/winetest/dissect, which matches on the closing line. :) The change is trivial but essential for the winetest web summaries. -- Thanks, Feri.
Re: unix filenames in notepad
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 10:01, Andreas Mohr wrote: Now what? Is it UNIX or Unix? Oops, as you see I'm undecided ;) (Anyway, this probably should be GNU ;) However, in the final version I would like this to appear not at all in the shell namespace, anyway. I think it would be nice if the '/' appears beside the wine drive letters under 'My Computer'. -- Michael Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDMA PCMCIA cards on WINE?
Hello, Somebody from SuSE mailing list told me to send an e-mail to winehq regarding this: I have a Vodafone GPRS/3G (CDMA) PCMCIA card. I tried running Vodafone's software in WINE emulation but it is impossible (it crashes). Is there anything I can do about this? Here is more info about this hardware: # lspci -vv :02:00.0 USB Controller: OPTi Inc. 82C861 (rev 10) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Subsystem: OPTi Inc. 82C861 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Step ping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort - MAbort- SERR- PERR- Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0 Region 0: Memory at 2f80 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) The card seems to incorporate a USB circuit which somehow is connected to an internal antenna, most probably via some sort of modem. The card had labels Qualcomm CDMA and Manufactured by Opti. After searching on the Internet I found the site of Qualcomm ( http://www.cdmatech.com/ ) but I don't know which chipset the card uses. It can connect to both GPRS and CDMA networks but it doesn't work in USA (only in EU). Its datarates are 384kbits downstream and 64kbits upstream (I think). Vodafone supports this card only on Windows. The card is locked until the software transmits a PIN code that I type. I am afraid that even if I make this hardware work on GNU/Linux, I won't know how to transmit my PIN to unlock it. Thanks, -- NSK http://portal.wikinerds.org
Regressions from 20050310 to 20050419 for PCAD-2000 application
Hi, I've notice a regression using some PCAD applications together. If you open more then two PCAD's apps at same time the last one freezes. For example if I open Schematic and PCB it works flawlessly but opening Library Executive one of the others freezes until you close the last opened. It happens only using 20050419 version of wine. In the other hand this version doesn't have a focus bug that forced starting a PCAD application from a Desktop window. Best Regards Marcos
Anyone working on implementing AccessCheck?
We have an installer program (for the Native Instruments Komplete VST plugin package) that fails to run because NtAccessCheck is stubbed out --- that's our best guess at this point, anyway, from watching the WINEDBG trace while the program ran. I noticed that in the last few months someone implemented GetFileSecurity that the installer uses as well --- it looks like Troy Rollo? from scanning the cvs archives. Thanks for that. But NtAccessCheck is still stubbed out. Is that call at all related? any work underway? any suggestions on direction for implementing it? And, how seriously should I take the FIXME(returns fake SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR) in GetFileSecurity. Thanks... mo === Michael Ost, Software Architect Muse Research, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone working on implementing AccessCheck?
Michael Ost wrote: We have an installer program (for the Native Instruments Komplete VST plugin package) that fails to run because NtAccessCheck is stubbed out --- that's our best guess at this point, anyway, from watching the WINEDBG trace while the program ran. I noticed that in the last few months someone implemented GetFileSecurity that the installer uses as well --- it looks like Troy Rollo? from scanning the cvs archives. Thanks for that. But NtAccessCheck is still stubbed out. Is that call at all related? any work underway? any suggestions on direction for implementing it? Yes. I have an implementation at the moment, but it depends on token objects storing more information than they do at the moment and it is completely untested. However, I can send a patch to you to test if you want. Rob
Re: Anyone working on implementing AccessCheck?
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 10:30, Robert Shearman wrote: Michael Ost wrote: We have an installer program (for the Native Instruments Komplete VST plugin package) that fails to run because NtAccessCheck is stubbed out --- that's our best guess at this point, anyway, from watching the WINEDBG trace while the program ran. I noticed that in the last few months someone implemented GetFileSecurity that the installer uses as well --- it looks like Troy Rollo? from scanning the cvs archives. Thanks for that. But NtAccessCheck is still stubbed out. Is that call at all related? any work underway? any suggestions on direction for implementing it? Yes. I have an implementation at the moment, but it depends on token objects storing more information than they do at the moment and it is completely untested. However, I can send a patch to you to test if you want. Yes. We'd be happy to try it out and tweak if necessary. Thanks... mo
Re: advapi32: Add more RegLoadKey tests
James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static void load_keys( struct key *key,
if ((read_next_line( info ) != 1) ||
strcmp( info.buffer, WINE REGISTRY Version 2 ))
{
-set_error( STATUS_NOT_REGISTRY_FILE );
+set_error( STATUS_SUCCESS );
goto done;
}
I don't think you want to fail silently here.
@@ -1382,6 +1382,19 @@ static void load_registry( struct key *k
{
struct file *file;
int fd;
+
+static const WCHAR machineW[] = { 'M','A','C','H','I','N','E',0 };
+static const WCHAR userW[] = { 'U','S','E','R',0 };
+
+if (key key-parent)
+{
+if (strcmpiW( key-parent-name, machineW )
+strcmpiW( key-parent-name, userW ))
+{
+set_error( STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED );
+return;
+}
+}
We discussed this already, we don't want to do it that way (not to
mention that keys can be named Machine or User inside the tree too, so
your test is wrong anyway).
Note that a lot of your new tests fail on XP too, so I'm not sure
there's much point in changing the Wine code to make them succeed.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: advapi32: Add more RegLoadKey tests
On 27 Apr 2005 20:12:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We discussed this already, we don't want to do it that way (not to mention that keys can be named Machine or User inside the tree too, so your test is wrong anyway). Note that a lot of your new tests fail on XP too, so I'm not sure there's much point in changing the Wine code to make them succeed. I understand the first point. I write the tests in XP and test them to make sure they pass, and I don't send in any tests that don't pass under XP (except for needing the permission set for save/load key but that's for a different reason). I don't know why they would be failing for other XP's besides mine. -- James Hawkins
