Re: Request to be unbanned from #winehq (Jan Zerebecki)
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:09:37AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which program do I have to use to get connected in the #winehq > channel? > > I have truly been out of chatting for a long time. http://www.winehq.org/site/irc -- cu pgpXKn8BUAWak.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Request to be unbanned from #winehq (Jan Zerebecki)
Dear all, Which program do I have to use to get connected in the #winehq channel? I have truly been out of chatting for a long time.
Re: PulseAudio as a sound output?
On 10/7/07, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > King InuYasha wrote: > > I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as > > a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, > > which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think > > would be much better. > There are already a couple too many sound drivers in Wine and none of > which are great. Alexandre won't accept yet another sound driver in > Wine. He would like to have one sound driver working perfect (probably > winealsa). Pulseaudio isn't "yet another sound server", it's a full-blown replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for OSS applications using oss2pulse. Some of its interesting features include per-application volume levels, RTP multicasts, the ability to embed it within an application instead of running a separate server, and a Windows port. The reason it would be good for wine is because it (optionally) runs in realtime (SCHED_RR) priority, and is designed for low-latency playback. Even wine's latest alsa driver continuously stutters under high CPU load (play back some music with foobar2000, while searching a large PDF). > bye > michael > -- > Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 > Sr. Network EngineerFax.: +49-711-96437-111 Damjan Jovanovic
Re: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
On 10/8/07, Roland Kaeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app > works on Wine? > There will never be a point where all Windows apps work in Wine. As it stands, we have a bigger compatibility goal than current versions of Windows, as we support apps all the way back to Win 3.1. Unfortunately, it's just not possible to support all known apps. -- James Hawkins
AW: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
Hello Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app works on Wine? Regards Roland - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Wine Developers List Gesendet: Sonntag, den 7. Oktober 2007, 22:36:41 Uhr Betreff: Re: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003 On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks. > and I > did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to > activate my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the > application are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried to > open VBA inside of Office and was prompted with a dialog stating unable to > open macro storage(bug 8795). The only real reason I use Microsoft Office > over Open Office is the need for VBA integration. > > I think we should add these bugs to the 1.0 target http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8795 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9023 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9943 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 I'm not opposed, but perhaps we should be clear. Do we want to add Microsoft Word 2003 to the "must have" apps list for 1.0? It might delay the release. - Dan Yahoo! Clever: Stellen Sie Fragen und finden Sie Antworten. Teilen Sie Ihr Wissen. www.yahoo.de/clever
Re: Bugzilla and spam harvesting
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little? > I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally. > Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from > bugzilla because it doesn't do this. Afaik this is not really possible with bugzilla as account names are the email address, so hiding them would remove quite some usability. In theory one could hide email addresses from users that are not logged in, but such a feature is not currently implemented in bugzilla. Users that don't want to provide a email address can still use the bugmenot.com login to your bugzilla. But users better should have a distinguishable account. Also we could in principle change accounts to non-existent email addresses if someone really does not want to use another way of hiding his real email, but that doesn't scale and someone who wants to actively participate in our project already reveals his email address on the mailinglists and in the git changelog. In the end there are various other ways to not reveal ones real or main email address that are not specific to this case. Jan
Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria
I would like to propose this one: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5351 2007/10/7, Karl Relton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I would like consideration given to > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 > > I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users > (who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full > Photoshop). > > The other bug has a proposed fix - and something of a testcase to prove > it. Its just a matter of getting it squared up and applied. > > Regards > Karl > > > > -- Jaime Rave Torres GNU/Linux User - Ubuntu Feisty http://sobrelibertad.blogspot.com/
Re: PulseAudio as a sound output?
Hello! King InuYasha wrote: > I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as > a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, > which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think > would be much better. There are already a couple too many sound drivers in Wine and none of which are great. Alexandre won't accept yet another sound driver in Wine. He would like to have one sound driver working perfect (probably winealsa). bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 Sr. Network EngineerFax.: +49-711-96437-111 Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Hauptstätter Strasse 58, 70178 Stuttgart Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 153243 Geschäftsführer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Werner Knoblich
Bugzilla and spam harvesting
Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little? I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally. Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from bugzilla because it doesn't do this. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Re: PulseAudio as a sound output?
> I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a > sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which > PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be > much > better. Audio in wine is still a problematic area. The situation is already horrible because we have to go through several layers. Sound servers are an additional layer on top of lets say oss, alsa or other APIs. Alsa on its own is already very complicated to get working. A sound server will add more latency and so on. From a wine point of view what you need to use is Alsa and make that work correctly with pulseaudio. I think that some day in the near future we might even drop esd and some of the other drivers because they are a hell to get working and to maintain them. Roderick -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
Re: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks. > and I > did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to > activate my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the > application are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried to > open VBA inside of Office and was prompted with a dialog stating unable to > open macro storage(bug 8795). The only real reason I use Microsoft Office > over Open Office is the need for VBA integration. > > I think we should add these bugs to the 1.0 target http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8795 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9023 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9943 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 I'm not opposed, but perhaps we should be clear. Do we want to add Microsoft Word 2003 to the "must have" apps list for 1.0? It might delay the release. - Dan
Re: What happened to the Wine Newsletters?
King InuYasha schrieb: > What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the > website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing > interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must > have happened since then... > > > > There are just not enough human resources fot that... But the releasenews for each new wine version should cover most interesting things that had happened. The short way. Martin
Re: What happened to the Wine Newsletters?
On Sunday 07 October 2007 22:15:48 King InuYasha wrote: > What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the > website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing > interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have > happened since then... The same question was asked a week ago on this list. No one is maintaing the newsletter, feel free to do it. Alexander N. Sørnes
What happened to the Wine Newsletters?
What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have happened since then...
PulseAudio as a sound output?
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be much better.
1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb and I did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to activate my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the application are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried to open VBA inside of Office and was prompted with a dialog stating unable to open macro storage(bug 8795). The only real reason I use Microsoft Office over Open Office is the need for VBA integration. I think we should add these bugs to the 1.0 target 9943 9944 8795 _ Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
Re: Request to be unbanned from #winehq
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:02:18AM -0500, Clarence Risher wrote: > PS: I too have been the victim of heavy handed channel administration > in #winehq. If anyone is interested in making #winehq a place that is more pleasant, I would urge them to try to accomplish what I suggest in the last paragraph (read the rest for more explanation). I'll copy&paste from a previous discussion about #winehq problems: Though formulating proper communication guidelines is some work (one can borrow text and wisdom from projects that may have something like this; freenode, fedora, ubuntu, gentoo, debian come to mind), the real work is discussing it, asking everyone whose comments matter and getting everyone to agree. > > On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:27:04 Jonathan Challinger wrote: > > > but then what? How would they be enforced? Obviously then the people with the authority will support the needed enforcement. But IMHO the best atmosphere is when nobody needs to wield their powers. We have #winehq-social where anything can be discussed and nobody gets banned (unless they do advertisement or/and malware). Another problem is that we don't have a rule for when/how to unban. So if we could agree on rules for when and how to ban and unban, it would be a good start and our community should become a bit more pleasant. Jan
Re: [PATCH] comctl32: add greek resources (resend)
There has been 1 1/2 month since Lei sent this patch for Greek resource file for common control and I don't see it in cvs. Why is that??? 2007/8/23, Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Apostolos Alexiadis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent several copies of this > patch, but none of them were in the right format. I sent him the > proper patch (attached) and asked him to send it to wine-patches, but > he never did. So here it is. > > > >
Re: WineConf - Slides online
Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 16:44:27 schrieb Joerg Mayer: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report > > to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007 > > > > (direct link: > > +http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineco >nf-20 +07-julliard.pdf > > > ) > > > > Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to > > me and I will ;) > > It looks like another presentation can be found at: > http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0526822/wineconf_presentation.pdf.bz2 Right, but it is an early version I showed to Roderick to ask him if he thinks that anything is missing signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: WineConf - Slides online
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report > to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007 > > (direct link: > +http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineconf-20 +07-julliard.pdf > ) > > Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to > me and I will ;) It looks like another presentation can be found at: http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0526822/wineconf_presentation.pdf.bz2 ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
RE: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria
I would like consideration given to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users (who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full Photoshop). The other bug has a proposed fix - and something of a testcase to prove it. Its just a matter of getting it squared up and applied. Regards Karl
Re: WineConf - Slides online
Can everyone else who gave a presentation put them up on the wiki? Stefan, Detlev, Kai, Martin On 10/7/07, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report > to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007 > > (direct link: > http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineconf-2007-julliard.pdf > ) > > Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to > me and I will ;) > > Ciao, Marcus > > >
Re: problem compiling dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
-- Original message --
From: Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ben Taylor wrote:
> > haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
> >
> > actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
> > gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
> > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll'
> > gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2
> > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls'
> > gmake: *** [dlls] Error 2
> >
> >
>
> Does the attached patch help?
Yes. That works.
Ben
>
> Jacek
>
--- Begin Message ---
>From 35659e558b470e36fef16ec09a4c459ed1500640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:17:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] actctx: Rename version to assembly_version.
To: wine-patches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
dlls/ntdll/actctx.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c b/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
index 4f0901b..2021cb8 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct file_info
WCHAR *info;
};
-struct version
+struct assembly_version
{
USHORT major;
USHORT minor;
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct assembly_identity
WCHAR*public_key;
WCHAR*language;
WCHAR*type;
-struct versionversion;
+struct assembly_version version;
BOOL optional;
};
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static inline const char* debugstr_xmlstr(const xmlstr_t*
str)
return debugstr_wn(str->ptr, str->len);
}
-static inline const char* debugstr_version(const struct version *ver)
+static inline const char* debugstr_version(const struct assembly_version *ver)
{
return wine_dbg_sprintf("%u.%u.%u.%u", ver->major, ver->minor, ver->build,
ver->revision);
}
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static BOOL parse_text_content(xmlbuf_t* xmlbuf, xmlstr_t*
content)
return TRUE;
}
-static BOOL parse_version(const xmlstr_t *str, struct version *version)
+static BOOL parse_version(const xmlstr_t *str, struct assembly_version
*version)
{
unsigned int ver[4];
unsigned int pos;
--
1.5.3.2
--- End Message ---
WineConf - Slides online
Hi, I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007 (direct link: http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineconf-2007-julliard.pdf ) Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to me and I will ;) Ciao, Marcus
Re: No joy with XComposite extension on Gutsy on Thinkbook X60
I filed a bug for this, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/149260 and Bryce sent me a beta package which works. Solved, I think!
Re: problem compiling dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
Hi Ben,
Ben Taylor wrote:
> haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
>
> actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
> gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll'
> gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls'
> gmake: *** [dlls] Error 2
>
>
Does the attached patch help?
Jacek
>From 35659e558b470e36fef16ec09a4c459ed1500640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:17:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] actctx: Rename version to assembly_version.
To: wine-patches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
dlls/ntdll/actctx.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c b/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
index 4f0901b..2021cb8 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct file_info
WCHAR *info;
};
-struct version
+struct assembly_version
{
USHORT major;
USHORT minor;
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct assembly_identity
WCHAR*public_key;
WCHAR*language;
WCHAR*type;
-struct versionversion;
+struct assembly_version version;
BOOL optional;
};
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static inline const char* debugstr_xmlstr(const xmlstr_t*
str)
return debugstr_wn(str->ptr, str->len);
}
-static inline const char* debugstr_version(const struct version *ver)
+static inline const char* debugstr_version(const struct assembly_version *ver)
{
return wine_dbg_sprintf("%u.%u.%u.%u", ver->major, ver->minor, ver->build,
ver->revision);
}
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static BOOL parse_text_content(xmlbuf_t* xmlbuf, xmlstr_t*
content)
return TRUE;
}
-static BOOL parse_version(const xmlstr_t *str, struct version *version)
+static BOOL parse_version(const xmlstr_t *str, struct assembly_version
*version)
{
unsigned int ver[4];
unsigned int pos;
--
1.5.3.2
List of 2007 SoC projects
For reference, the projects from this past year are listed at http://code.google.com/soc/2007/wine/about.html -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Re: [PATCH] handle gecko not installed
Marcus Meissner wrote: > This handles failures on "wine" testplatform > with Gecko not installed. > > The testplatform checks might be more generic. > > Ciao, Marcus > This patch should fix it: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/044833.html Thanks, Jacek
Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes: > > Louis wrote: > > Ok, here one on my wish-list: > > All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality. > > Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in > http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw > briefly, and marked a few of them that looked important as 1.0. See > http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw&target_milestone=1.0.0 > How's that for a start? > > That's very much ok, thanks.
Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria
Louis wrote: > Ok, here one on my wish-list: > All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality. Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw briefly, and marked a few of them that looked important as 1.0. See http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw&target_milestone=1.0.0 How's that for a start?
Re: Request to be unbanned from #winehq
On Sunday October 7 2007 01:10, Tsukasa wrote: > Vitamin banned me today - you can see the full log here. Also I was about > to say at the end there, if redhat automounts usb sticks. > http://pastebin.com/mb489dc I'm sorry but I agree with Vitaliy decision. I don't know you so I'm judging just by log you have posted and few sentences on the list. I will not repeat what Vitaliy already have said on the list but just want to add that such phrases like: ... * tsukasa thinks dipdude shouldve gone ubuntu ... i dont get it tsukasa * vitamin warns tsukasa to NOT do such remarks ... im just saying redhat is more advanced of a distribution then ubuntu is find the file of my flash drive and take out the file for wine dipdude, You have to: dipdude, just do a sudo find / -name *wine* ... ...very unhelpful for everyone who are using Ubuntu. You may say that you recommend or suggest other distribution because you like it but you never can tell that it is better than others because it isn't by definition: *each* distribution in the world have something in it why someone uses it and not others. Besides, to me it seems like you "inserting" in the dialog between vitamin and dipdude unhelpful comments (at the end of the log I have posted above) instead of helpful advises or recommendations. Please note also that you has been warned in the log before you has been banned. If you get the warning you should think why before blindly ignoring it as you did (if you unsure why you get it you may ask privately the admin or moderator). In case if you will be unbanned you should try to be more helpful when you are trying to help someone otherwise don't even try - this is good rule of thumb for everyone. Of course everything above is just my opinion.
