Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: Here's the italian translation for winedbg Hi, Davide. This patch is malformed too. When you need to create new file in repo, first create it in your file system, then do 'git add programs/winedbg/rsrc_It.rc' . This will add it to your repo. Don't forget to edit rsrc.rc file too to add your new created resource file. Bye.
Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: i think i made a little mess with the files for winedbg. how do i restore the situation to the previous state? Il giorno dom, 28/06/2009 alle 16.14 +0400, Nikolay Sivov ha scritto: Davide Pizzetti wrote: Here's the italian translation for winedbg Hi, Davide. This patch is malformed too. When you need to create new file in repo, first create it in your file system, then do 'git add programs/winedbg/rsrc_It.rc' . This will add it to your repo. Don't forget to edit rsrc.rc file too to add your new created resource file. Bye. Save your edited files somewhere outside tree to keep your work. After that do 'git reset --hard origin' this will reset your tree head to point of last 'git fetch' update. After that proceed as described (add new file, put translation in it, etc).
Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: Another question: when i create a new language translation file, i have to copy the english file into a new file and translate it? Il giorno dom, 28/06/2009 alle 16.14 +0400, Nikolay Sivov ha scritto: Davide Pizzetti wrote: Here's the italian translation for winedbg Hi, Davide. This patch is malformed too. When you need to create new file in repo, first create it in your file system, then do 'git add programs/winedbg/rsrc_It.rc' . This will add it to your repo. Don't forget to edit rsrc.rc file too to add your new created resource file. Bye. Yes, cause only english resources are complete - that's the only reason why you should sync with it.
Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: Il giorno dom, 28/06/2009 alle 16.39 +0400, Nikolay Sivov ha scritto: Davide Pizzetti wrote: i think i made a little mess with the files for winedbg. how do i restore the situation to the previous state? Il giorno dom, 28/06/2009 alle 16.14 +0400, Nikolay Sivov ha scritto: Davide Pizzetti wrote: Here's the italian translation for winedbg Hi, Davide. This patch is malformed too. When you need to create new file in repo, first create it in your file system, then do 'git add programs/winedbg/rsrc_It.rc' . This will add it to your repo. Don't forget to edit rsrc.rc file too to add your new created resource file. Bye. Save your edited files somewhere outside tree to keep your work. After that do 'git reset --hard origin' this will reset your tree head to point of last 'git fetch' update. After that proceed as described (add new file, put translation in it, etc). Ok, thank you. For restoring the completed works i just overwrite the files, right? Yeah, just paste it into new created file.
Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: I've got another question: i've created some new files and translated them into italian. How can i submit them as a patch? I made a git diff but these files i created don't appear there As I told you. Do 'git add new file path relative to tree'. This will add it to your local repo.
Re: winedbg italian translation
Davide Pizzetti wrote: Il giorno dom, 28/06/2009 alle 17.43 +0400, Nikolay Sivov ha scritto: Davide Pizzetti wrote: I've got another question: i've created some new files and translated them into italian. How can i submit them as a patch? I made a git diff but these files i created don't appear there As I told you. Do 'git add new file path relative to tree'. This will add it to your local repo. i used 'git add' but i can't understand how i can submit the new files as a patch, since i get only a diff for the list of the current languages Do 'git commit -a' and 'git format-patch' will do what you want after that.
Re: [1/1] Handle hwnd and tbi when passing NULL
Kovács András wrote: Hi, This patch is for GetTitleBarInfo, when it gets NULL hwnd and/or pti parameter. GTA IV tries to use this function with NULL, NULL parameters. This doesn't hurt Windows, but crashes in wine. Tested against Windows 7. Best Regards, Andras Kovacs I think IsWindow() will be enough here. Also add tests for that please.
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
Kai Blin wrote: On Saturday 27 June 2009 02:16:42 Dan Kegel wrote: If anyone's at LinuxTag, maybe it would be worth wandering over to Halle 7.2a, Stand 111 and chat the projects up to see if any of them have any interest in Wine... Ah, damn, that was like a day late. I won't make it in time today. However, the way I read the article, (most of) the money is planned to be spent on improving software already in use at some agencies. No idea if this already includes Wine or not. :) Cheers, Kai Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? We don't have any real infrastructure for handling those kind of donations (nor seeking them, for that matter). Perhaps it's time for me to dust off that Wine Foundation idea. Thanks, Scott Ritchie
Re: Minor fix for include/bits1_5.idl
Strike that, I must have misread the documentation. Only thing I am wondering is do we really need the (unsigned long) here? If anyone has a pointer to clear documentation that would be nice; what I found so far leaves some questions open... Gerald On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: The generated file include/bits1_5.h is the same before and after this patch, yet somehow the original form strikes me as a bit odd at best... Gerald ChangeLog: Fix prototype for GetReplyData(). diff --git a/include/bits1_5.idl b/include/bits1_5.idl index 274a7de..29520e2 100644 --- a/include/bits1_5.idl +++ b/include/bits1_5.idl @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ interface IBackgroundCopyJob2 : IBackgroundCopyJob } BG_JOB_REPLY_PROGRESS; HRESULT GetReplyProgress([in, out] BG_JOB_REPLY_PROGRESS *progress); -HRESULT GetReplyData([out, size_is( , (unsigned long) *pLength)] byte **pBuffer, +HRESULT GetReplyData([out, size_is((unsigned long) *pLength)] byte **pBuffer, [in, out, unique] UINT64 *pLength); HRESULT SetReplyFileName([unique] LPCWSTR filename); HRESULT GetReplyFileName([out] LPWSTR *pFilename);
Re: [1/2] Handle hwnd and tbi when passing NULL
2009/6/28 Kovács András and...@csevego.net: Hi, This patch is for GetTitleBarInfo, when it gets NULL hwnd and/or pti parameter. GTA IV tries to use this function with NULL, NULL parameters. This doesn't hurt Windows, but crashes in wine. Tested against Windows 7. Best Regards, Andras Kovacs Not a big deal, but in the future, please add the component at the beginning of your e-mail's subject, e.g.: user32: Handle hwnd and tbi when passing NULL in GetTitleBarInfo it's much easier to know what the purpose of the patch is without reading it that way (for those people that only read certain sections of the code). -- -Austin
Re: [1/2] Handle hwnd and tbi when passing NULL
Kovács András wrote: Hi, This patch is for GetTitleBarInfo, when it gets NULL hwnd and/or pti parameter. GTA IV tries to use this function with NULL, NULL parameters. This doesn't hurt Windows, but crashes in wine. Tested against Windows 7. Best Regards, Andras Kovacs --- TRACE((%p %p)\n, hwnd, tbi); +TRACE(tbi is NULL.\n); --- That's a duplication you don't really need. This one isn't very useful too: --- +TRACE(Invalid hwnd.\n); ---
Re: [2/2] GetTitleBarInfo tests for NULL values
Kovács András wrote: Hi, GetTitleBarInfo tests for NULL values. Best Regards, Kovács András What about this one: --- ret = GetTitleBarInfo(NULL, NULL); --- What error code will come first?
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
2009/6/29 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? Codeweavers?
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/29 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? Codeweavers? Is a private for-profit company. Is there something wrong with putting it in the Wine development fund, under custody of the Software Freedom Conservancy? -- -Austin
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
Austin English wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/29 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? Codeweavers? Is a private for-profit company. Is there something wrong with putting it in the Wine development fund, under custody of the Software Freedom Conservancy? For starters, we don't have any clear indicator of what we'd do with a large windfall. We don't even communicate well what we do with very small donations. Thanks, Scott Ritchie
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
On Monday 29 June 2009 01:22:00 Austin English wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/29 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? Codeweavers? Is a private for-profit company. Is there something wrong with putting it in the Wine development fund, under custody of the Software Freedom Conservancy? Yes. Realistically, there will be a contract involved regulating what needs to be done to get the money. I very much doubt the government just go and drop money on random paypal buttons and hope for the best. The way I've seen stuff like this work before is that there's a call for bids from companies to implement certain features in a piece of software, maybe with the requirement at a reasonable effort to get the produced changes upstream. My two cents, Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developerhttp://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Anyone at LinuxTag?
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Kai Blinkai.b...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 29 June 2009 01:22:00 Austin English wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/29 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: Who would they give the money to, even if they wanted to give it to us? Codeweavers? Is a private for-profit company. Is there something wrong with putting it in the Wine development fund, under custody of the Software Freedom Conservancy? Yes. Realistically, there will be a contract involved regulating what needs to be done to get the money. I very much doubt the government just go and drop money on random paypal buttons and hope for the best. The way I've seen stuff like this work before is that there's a call for bids from companies to implement certain features in a piece of software, maybe with the requirement at a reasonable effort to get the produced changes upstream. Ah, misunderstood what you meant there. Eventually some sort of foundation would be the best thing to head toward, but that's a legal headache. -- -Austin
