Re: [PATCH] Label verbosity levels.

2011-03-19 Thread max
From: max 

On 03/19/2011 08:42 PM, Joris Huizer wrote:
> On 03/19/2011 11:32 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> On 03/18/2011 09:24 PM, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:
>>> -  if ($opt_verbose>  0)
>>> -  {
>>> -print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n";
>>> -  }
>>> +  print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n"
>>> +if $opt_verbose q>= $VERBOSE_INPUT;
>>
>> Please don't do this reverse notation. It's much more confusing to most 
>> people who are not too familiar with Perl.
>>
>> Also you changing logic, by replacing ">" (greater then) with ">=" (greater 
>> of equal. This is a big no-no to combine any logical changes with cleanup 
>> changes.
>
> This doesn't seem to change logic as $VERBOSE_INPUT equals 1 ( $VERBOSE_QUIET 
> equals 0 )
>
Correct. The clean-up involves two counter-acting logic changes. The change 
from > to >= is
countered by increasing the target number by one. The result is that the number 
itself has the
designated meaning. Before the number was one less than level needed to change 
the affect.
There is no _functional_ change.

The suffix logical form is not that difficult to understand. It shifts the 
emphasis from the
conditional as the thing of primary import to the message being conveyed, where 
it belongs.

On the other hand if anybody can come up with better names for the levels, 
PLEASE comment!

Max





Re: [1/2] msvcrt: Implement _mbsupr_s (try2).

2011-03-19 Thread Konrad Rzepecki
Dnia piątek, 18 marca 2011, Dan Kegel napisał(a):

> But you could do a few tests.  It's ok if some of them are todo_wine.
> - Dan

I've added some simple test and you have completly right to add them. The 
original libraries works different from what documentation says...


Fourth try was send couple minutes ago. I really hope this is last one.

-- 
  Konrad Rzepecki (Hannibal)




Re: [PATCH] Label verbosity levels.

2011-03-19 Thread Joris Huizer

On 03/19/2011 11:32 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:

On 03/18/2011 09:24 PM, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:

-  if ($opt_verbose>  0)
-  {
-print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n";
-  }
+  print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n"
+if $opt_verbose>= $VERBOSE_INPUT;
Please don't do this reverse notation. It's much more confusing to 
most people who are not too familiar with Perl.


Also you changing logic, by replacing ">" (greater then) with ">=" 
(greater of equal. This is a big no-no to combine any logical changes 
with cleanup changes.





This doesn't seem to change logic as $VERBOSE_INPUT equals 1 ( 
$VERBOSE_QUIET equals 0 )






Re: [PATCH] Label verbosity levels.

2011-03-19 Thread Vitaliy Margolen

On 03/18/2011 09:24 PM, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:

-  if ($opt_verbose>  0)
-  {
-print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n";
-  }
+  print "Processing ".$spec_name."\n"
+if $opt_verbose>= $VERBOSE_INPUT;
Please don't do this reverse notation. It's much more confusing to most 
people who are not too familiar with Perl.


Also you changing logic, by replacing ">" (greater then) with ">=" (greater 
of equal. This is a big no-no to combine any logical changes with cleanup 
changes.





GSOC-Introduction

2011-03-19 Thread Sanket Patel
Hi there
I am Sanket Patel
I can code well in C If Anything is say to Implement
I have good skill in coding in C At all And can Use Efficient C help topics.