Re: [3/3] msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface (try 2)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Use a skip if we cannot create the control. Changelog: msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes (not related to patch contents) First time I saw this on a list I thought - god dammit, another parser interface. But looking at methods list it's probably a first candidate to be independent from libxml2 without any loss in functionality or big overhead like XPath or XSL things. We'll see. Is it mentioned as obsolete by any chance? Seems to be a kind of low level parser.
Re: [3/3] msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface (try 2)
On 7/09/2011 9:43 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: (not related to patch contents) First time I saw this on a list I thought - god dammit, another parser interface. But looking at methods list it's probably a first candidate to be independent from libxml2 without any loss in functionality or big overhead like XPath or XSL things. We'll see. Is it mentioned as obsolete by any chance? Seems to be a kind of low level parser. Yes, these are marked as obsolete but are still valid interfaces for embedded windows. They are defined in xmlparser.idl but since there are marked as local, I believe they wont be registered as per normal. Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Re: [3/3] msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface (try 2)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com wrote: On 7/09/2011 9:43 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: (not related to patch contents) First time I saw this on a list I thought - god dammit, another parser interface. But looking at methods list it's probably a first candidate to be independent from libxml2 without any loss in functionality or big overhead like XPath or XSL things. We'll see. Is it mentioned as obsolete by any chance? Seems to be a kind of low level parser. Yes, these are marked as obsolete but are still valid interfaces for embedded windows. They are defined in xmlparser.idl but since there are marked as local, I believe they wont be registered as per normal. Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes There is a bug# 5841 which depends on these functionality. This is a deprecrated functionality provided only by msxml3 Thanks, Vijay
Re: [3/3] msxml3: Support creating IXMLParser Interface (try 2)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com wrote: On 7/09/2011 9:43 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: (not related to patch contents) First time I saw this on a list I thought - god dammit, another parser interface. But looking at methods list it's probably a first candidate to be independent from libxml2 without any loss in functionality or big overhead like XPath or XSL things. We'll see. Is it mentioned as obsolete by any chance? Seems to be a kind of low level parser. Yes, these are marked as obsolete but are still valid interfaces for embedded windows. They are defined in xmlparser.idl but since there are marked as local, I believe they wont be registered as per normal. Embedded windows, what's that? We probably can't use SAX for that parser, after a brief look at next patch some 'node' types seems to be low level token or something. Also IE4-quirk sounds promising. It's interesting to see what parts are really used by applications. Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes
